On Mon, 15 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What the hell are you folks talking about? I hate to be annoying, but
Hold on to your Hat!
> That said, the latest *stable* RAID tools as of the release of RH 5.2
> are *in* RH 5.2. No, there are no updates to them as some of the work
> since t
Hi folks
I can share with you my experience on setup a Raid 1 system.
I've done al lot of test with RH 5.2, Kernel 2.0.36 +
raid0145-121519998/01081999/01281999
I've tested my L.B. with 16-18 xterm open...with 12 users compiling 2.0.36
with Gimp working with a 1024*1024 image at 16Ml color (ave
PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, February 15, 1999 11:25
Subject: Re: RAID1 experiences - patches
>
>
>On Mon, 15 Feb 1999, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>> unavoidable. Still waiting for someone w
Sorry if i am going way off topic here, if this is
the case please insult me personally.
On Mon, Feb 15, 1999 at 02:31:13PM +, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> Umm, Ingo Molnar == [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think we can assume that there
> is somebody working for Red Hat who knows a bit about the curren
On Mon, 15 Feb 1999, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> unavoidable. Still waiting for someone with better documentation skills
> than mine to pick the maintainance of RAID-docs up :)
I would be more than willing to do this, but I admittedly know
very little about linux-raid. I would be more than h
hi ya ingo
> just to add one more point, i was waiting for 2.2 to stabilize before
> moving the RAID driver to 2.2.x. But when patches began floating around
i picked up the 2.2.0 stuff...seems to work okay for me with 2.2.1 kernel...
but I did not test thoroughly
think like any new sw, it wil
just to add one more point, i was waiting for 2.2 to stabilize before
moving the RAID driver to 2.2.x. But when patches began floating around
porting the RAID driver to 2.2.x, i rather decided to move the 'official'
patch to 2.2.x too. This resulted in at least two bogus 'RAID-problems' so
far: t
Hi,
On Sat, 13 Feb 1999 18:14:14 -0500, Michael Stone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 09:43:12AM -0600, Chris Price wrote:
>> Instead of pointing fingers at Redhat, I would ask if there is
>> someone with teh Linux-raid community that actively corresponds with
>> redhat to le
What the hell are you folks talking about? I hate to be annoying, but
Ingo Molnar works for Red Hat. Stephen Tweedie works for Red Hat. Both
are on this list and are heavily involved with RAID and RAID issues. I'm
on this list (though I don't read it as much as I'd like to).
That said, the l
On Sat, 13 Feb 1999, Chris Price wrote:
> So Micheal, WHERE IS THIS BLOODY INFO DOCUMENTED?? HUH Do we
> need to wait until you or some other 'sage' member of this group decides
> to bless us with their info, or will you guys start making some half-assed
> docs? (hey, I already have i
Hi Chris,
maybe this is the sort of feedback you are looking for. Quick info on my
profile: quite exp. Windows Sys Admin, converting to Linux. No Linux
experience until recently. Had to set up a Server, RAID1 was a "must". Had
to struggle my way through command lines etc. and am doing this now f
On Sat, Feb 13, 1999 at 11:42:47PM -0600, Chris Price wrote:
> > Is anyone in the "linux-raid community" being paid to do research work
> > for redhat? If so, they should probably keep redhat informed. If not, I
> > think it's fair to expect redhat to do their own work.
>
> Are you daft, or
Date:Sat, 13 Feb 1999 23:47:12 -0600 (CST)
From: Chris Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED
hi ya "raid gurus"
I've collected some docs of lastest/raid docs stuff
think about 2 or three people posted their versions...
( unfortunately I did not keep copies from before )
I made my version too so that I can remember what I did
to get my stuff running...
- yes..am willing to help documen
So Micheal, WHERE IS THIS BLOODY INFO DOCUMENTED?? HUH Do we
need to wait until you or some other 'sage' member of this group decides
to bless us with their info, or will you guys start making some half-assed
docs? (hey, I already have in my own small way, see my RAID1 cookbook of
a
> As for notifying redhatI'd suggest sending the raid announcements
> and stuff to someone's attention and they might redirect it to the
> right people etc... ??? ( so it'd be in their hands - what they do
> is a separate issue )
>
> have fun
> alvin
I agree wholeheartedly. A smal
> Is anyone in the "linux-raid community" being paid to do research work
> for redhat? If so, they should probably keep redhat informed. If not, I
> think it's fair to expect redhat to do their own work.
>
> Mike Stone
>
Are you daft, or were you drunk when you wrote this... Saying th
hi linux-raid folks...
I just finished installing the raid stuff into linux-2.2.1
w/ rh-5.2 with all the 5.2 patch files
I used raid0145-19990128-2.2.0.gz and also the latest
raidtools-19990128-0.90.tar.gz
it works good...
however, I'm sure you folks all know that there is a header problem
fo
On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 08:43:49AM -0500, Erich J. Ritzmann wrote:
> I am inclined not to put the root filesystem on the raid drives; it
> seems more trouble than it's worth. Instead keep root to its minimal
With the latest raid patches, you can autostart the raid on the root
partition, so there
On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 09:43:12AM -0600, Chris Price wrote:
> Instead of pointing fingers at Redhat, I would ask if there is
> someone with teh Linux-raid community that actively corresponds with
> redhat to let them know of current status of linux-raid? Ingo etal. seem
> to be doing a supe
> You are nuts if you think the docs are of ANY help. They are so
> out of date, and full of error/omissions I wonder why you are pointing
> this fellow there.
I disagree. The docs are pretty okay if you run 2.0.x,
raidtools 0.42 and take the time to really understand
what you're doing.
On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 09:43:12AM -0600, Chris Price wrote:
> We should not criticize Redhat for putting obsolete code on their
> distro. A while back, when Redhat followed a more bleeding edge approach,
> they constantly put beta software on their distro, and received much more
> criticism
I'd love to see it integrated, but that time is passed for now... we've
just seen the 2.2 release and we cannot merge such a major functionality
at the moment... I don't believe that Linus would allow it
Roll on 2.3!
I believe that from what I have seen, the existing patches are well good
e
Chris Price wrote:
> Instead of pointing fingers at Redhat, I would ask if there is
> someone with teh Linux-raid community that actively corresponds with
> redhat to let them know of current status of linux-raid? Ingo etal. seem
> to be doing a superb job in adding funtionality and fixing
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Geof Goodrum wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Erich J. Ritzmann wrote:
>
> > I have 'blindly' subscribed to this list as I have an immediate need to
> > deploy a RAID1 system. I say blindly as I do not know where to find the
> > main linux-raid web site or FAQ.
>
> Try ht
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Erich J. Ritzmann wrote:
> I have 'blindly' subscribed to this list as I have an immediate need to
> deploy a RAID1 system. I say blindly as I do not know where to find the
> main linux-raid web site or FAQ.
Try http://linas.org/linux/raid.html. You can find the latest R
I have 'blindly' subscribed to this list as I have an immediate need to
deploy a RAID1 system. I say blindly as I do not know where to find the
main linux-raid web site or FAQ.
Neither, have I found the md tools on my Red Hat 5.2 distribution CD.
This surprised me because the kernel code supp
27 matches
Mail list logo
