Just installed rh7.2 on my box. The box is a dual hd unit with the hds being
hda , hdc. The CD burner is listed by dmseg as hdb and the standard cd as
hdd. After install with kde got 2 icons cdrom and cdrom1 on the desk top.
When accessed got can't mount no device cdrom or cdrom. When I
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Lee wrote:
Just installed rh7.2 on my box. The box is a dual hd unit with the hds being
hda , hdc. The CD burner is listed by dmseg as hdb and the standard cd as
hdd. After install with kde got 2 icons cdrom and cdrom1 on the desk top.
When accessed got can't mount no
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 22:47:16 -0400 Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 09:26 pm, Jerry McBride wrote:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 22:01:13 -0400 Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:snip
or slower than KDE2x. Running on an AMD Athlon 950 with 384MB RAM
If you run this
is there a maximum connection limit in the networking services of linux?
how could I find out all these limits?
/usr/src/linux/include/limits.h?
a friend of mine running a public news server using dnews on freebsd.
and I constantly hit an error message 800 simultaneous connections
exceeded.
I did use google. and the results didn't help. I had problem understaind
M$ stuffs since graduation. I was not trained to understand tcp stuffs.
:)
Net Llama! wrote:
And typing port 135 in google somehow didn't work for you??
just wanna know. thanks.
--
May the Force and Farce be with
On Wednesday 17 April 2002 2:47 am, Tim Wunder wrote:
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 09:26 pm, Jerry McBride wrote:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 22:01:13 -0400 Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
or slower than KDE2x. Running on an AMD Athlon 950 with 384MB RAM
If you run this stuff on half
AFAIK, there is no system wide hard limit. The limitations are usually
based around the specific server being accessed, and the overall pool of
system resources.
I wouldnt' be at all surprised if dnews allows you to set a limit on the
number of simultaneous connections.
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002,
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Bob Raymond wrote:
Windows is actually faster on my box than KDE, if I consider application load
times. Comparison:
rig is Athlon 1.4ghz, 512mb SDRAM, Radeon 8500 video, 40GB 7200RPM drive for
Windows, 13GB 5400RPM drive for Gentoo (I know it's unfair, but my sound card
I guess so.
if we ignore his problem, is there such a limit in linux herself that
was configurable at compile time?
Net Llama! wrote:
AFAIK, there is no system wide hard limit. The limitations are usually
based around the specific server being accessed, and the overall pool of
system
On Wednesday 17 April 2002 10:07 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Bob Raymond wrote:
Windows is actually faster on my box than KDE, if I consider application
load times. Comparison:
rig is Athlon 1.4ghz, 512mb SDRAM, Radeon 8500 video, 40GB 7200RPM drive
for Windows, 13GB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Witowski spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
Ok, screw it. If I decided I wanted to get rid of ALL KDE installations
and start from scratch with just KDE3, which directories would I need to
delete? When I installed KDE3, I
The problem was in my startkde script.
It was looking for the string FirstLogin=false in
$kdehome/share/config/kpersonalizerrc
kdehome was not defined. I uncommented the line
kdehome=$KDEHOME
and all is well.
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 08:40 pm, Tim Wunder wrote:
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 04:51
I long wanted to do that. I wanted a guaranteed way of removing *_ALL_*
xfree86 4.0 and KDE 2 in my caldera openlinux 3.1
Brian Witowski wrote:
Ok, screw it. If I decided I wanted to get rid of ALL KDE installations and
start from scratch with just KDE3, which directories would I need to
On Wednesday 17 April 2002 05:43 pm, Bob Raymond wrote:
On Wednesday 17 April 2002 2:47 am, Tim Wunder wrote:
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 09:26 pm, Jerry McBride wrote:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 22:01:13 -0400 Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
or slower than KDE2x. Running on an
On Wednesday 17 April 2002 11:49 pm, Tim Wunder wrote:
On Wednesday 17 April 2002 05:43 pm, Bob Raymond wrote:
On Wednesday 17 April 2002 2:47 am, Tim Wunder wrote:
On Tuesday 16 April 2002 09:26 pm, Jerry McBride wrote:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002 22:01:13 -0400 Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Limit in what? You might be able to use IPTables to control the number
of connections, however that has nothing to do with the kernel directly.
toylet.linux[¤pª±·N] wrote:
I guess so.
if we ignore his problem, is there such a limit in linux herself that
was configurable at compile time?
Scribbling feverishly on April 18, toylet.linux[¤pª±·N] managed to emit:
I guess so.
if we ignore his problem, is there such a limit in linux herself that
was configurable at compile time?
Not in the kernel, with the possible exception of things like the
total number of open files or the
Scribbling feverishly on April 18, toylet.linux[¤pª±·N] managed to emit:
is there a maximum connection limit in the networking services of linux?
how could I find out all these limits?
/usr/src/linux/include/limits.h?
Nope, not there.
a friend of mine running a public news server using
Scribbling feverishly on April 18, toylet.linux[¤pª±·N] managed to emit:
I long wanted to do that. I wanted a guaranteed way of removing *_ALL_*
xfree86 4.0 and KDE 2 in my caldera openlinux 3.1
# rm -rf /
;-)
Kurt
--
Life is to you a dashing and bold adventure.
Or, for a bit less destructive method:
rm -rf /etc/X11
rm -rf /usr/bin/X11
rm -rf /opt/kde*
Kurt Wall wrote:
Scribbling feverishly on April 18, toylet.linux[¤pª±·N] managed to emit:
I long wanted to do that. I wanted a guaranteed way of removing *_ALL_*
xfree86 4.0 and KDE 2 in my caldera
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 20:31:07 -0400
Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scribbling feverishly on April 18, Bob Raymond managed to emit:
[kerslash]
My Gentoo build is still recovering from my stupidity, typing:
rm -rf /etc
instead of:
rm -rf etc
Don't try this at home,
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 20:31:07 -0400
begin Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
Scribbling feverishly on April 18, Bob Raymond managed to emit:
[kerslash]
My Gentoo build is still recovering from my stupidity, typing:
rm -rf /etc
Gee, I hope you didn't log out after doing this!
Sorry about the vagueness. Its installed in /opt/kde2. I installed/compiled
it from tarballs. I'm running COL 3.1 with 2.4.18 kernel.
Thanks,
Brian
depends. how did you install it? tarball? rpm? .deb? and where?
/opt? /usr?
- --
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User
On April 17, 2002 04:49 pm, Tim Wunder wrote:
FWIW, Kmail 1.4 (which is the version supplied with KDE 3.0), starts in 3
seconds for me. Maybe Gentoo ain't so great after all ;-)
Tim
Kmail 1.4 starts in just under 4 seconds on Mandrake 8.1 KDE 3.0 AMD 750 192
Meg RAM. I guess I'm not doing
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 19:19:50 -0700 Ted Ozolins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On April 17, 2002 04:49 pm, Tim Wunder wrote:
FWIW, Kmail 1.4 (which is the version supplied with KDE 3.0),
starts in 3 seconds for me. Maybe Gentoo ain't so great after all
;-)
Tim
Kmail 1.4 starts in just
List
I need some help here.
I have created a index.html file and it works. Now I wish to replace the hard coded
return url path in the forms action variable. Ihave done the following:
script
function OnGetHostName()
{
g_szHostName = document.location.hostname;
On Thursday 18 April 2002 1:46 am, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 20:31:07 -0400
begin Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
Scribbling feverishly on April 18, Bob Raymond managed to emit:
[kerslash]
My Gentoo build is still recovering from my stupidity, typing:
On April 17, 2002 07:55 pm, Collins wrote:
Being a dedicated xfce-sylpheed fan, who cares grin. But then I did
the test anyway. Kmail 3.0 starts in about 10 seconds (dragging in
all the KDE framework), then about 3 seconds to start again. But
since xfce starts in about 3 seconds, and
Scribbling feverishly on April 18, Bob Raymond managed to emit:
On Thursday 18 April 2002 12:31 am, Kurt Wall wrote:
Scribbling feverishly on April 18, Bob Raymond managed to emit:
[kerslash]
My Gentoo build is still recovering from my stupidity, typing:
rm -rf /etc
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:47:54 -0700
Ted Ozolins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On April 17, 2002 07:55 pm, Collins wrote:
Being a dedicated xfce-sylpheed fan, who cares grin. But then I did
the test anyway. Kmail 3.0 starts in about 10 seconds (dragging in
all the KDE framework), then about
thank you all.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
31 matches
Mail list logo
