On Sunday 20 July 2003 10:42 pm, David A. Bandel wrote:
> Ensure the Windoze box has the correct IP and matching subnet mask.
> Also that it lists your upstairs box as the gateway. I'd also check the
> DNS addresses.
It has 192.168.1.2 as its IP
255.255.255.0
192.168.1.1 as GW
210.49.48.1 as DNS
On Sunday 20 July 2003 11:21 pm, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
> Hey Keith-
>
> How does your home network get configured? Do you use DHCP or is the
> downstairs PC hard-configured?
I have used both automatic DHCP and also manual config.
> The DNS servers that your system uses probably gets dynamical
On Sunday 20 July 2003 11:26 pm, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
> Some 169.x.x.x number? Microsoft actually registered that range to allow
> for "dynamic" addresses without using a DHCP server, beyond the RFC 1918
> addresses like 192.168 or 10.x.x.x. Self-selecting IP addresses.
Yes I get that when I
On Sunday 20 July 2003 11:03 pm, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
> begin On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:40:43 -0400
> Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > It is set to 1
>
> Please don't take offense at this next question, mate. Is this still set
> to 1 when the failure occurs?
The failure was o
On Sunday 20 July 2003 10:42 pm, Tim Wunder wrote:
> On Monday 21 July 2003 9:13 am, someone claiming to be Keith Antoine wrote:
>
>
> > ... how can XP
> > and linux on my machine lose networking at the same time?
>
> Hardware failure?
No not at all, otherwise I would not be able to ping downstai
On Sunday 20 July 2003 10:37 pm, Alma J Wetzker wrote:
> Keith,
>
> How is your network setup? You have a cable connected to a cable modem.
> From there is it ethernet or usb? does it go to a computer (which
> one?) or a router? (or maybe a hub?)
>
> The answers may have some bearing on how to
On Sunday 20 July 2003 10:03 pm, Collins Richey wrote:
> Anyone using a dvd burner?
>
> I've just installed a Sony +-R IDE DVD burner. I've found lots of
> possible tools - cdrtools-dvdr, dvd+rw-tools, dvdrtools, and perhaps
> there are others that I am not yet aware of.
>
> Which tools would your
On Sunday 20 July 2003 09:05 pm, Joel Hammer wrote:
> You might look at the action upstairs with tcpdump.
Ummm, my machine tells me there is no such command found.
> Is there some firewall on the downstairs machine?
No checked that and also stooped to one on the main machine.
> Perchance, you d
David, you never cease to amaze me with your varied knowledge, since you seem
to have breadth and depth.
begin On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 17:57:06 -0500
"David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 17:53:06 -0700
> "Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 07/19/03 17:43
Some 169.x.x.x number? Microsoft actually registered that range to allow for
"dynamic" addresses without using a DHCP server, beyond the RFC 1918 addresses
like 192.168 or 10.x.x.x. Self-selecting IP addresses.
begin On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 09:16:12 -0400
Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/20/03 23:11, "Shawn Tayler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I absolutely agree. I wouldn't expect them to. But to use a false premise
> to justify a lie about their ability to give service to a customer is
> criminal in my book
>
> Shawn
DSL wont go over fiber it has to copper from en
Hey Keith-
How does your home network get configured? Do you use DHCP or is the
downstairs PC hard-configured?
The DNS servers that your system uses probably gets dynamically configured by
your ISP. You should be able to see that information on your gateway by either
typing "ipconfig /all" in XP
On 7/20/03 17:29, "Kurt Wall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoth Raymond Russell:
>> On 7/20/03 0:03, "Kurt Wall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I don't have DSL any more but when I did my installer used CAT-5 cable and
>> put RJ11 connectors on it, this helped a lot. I was far out from the CO
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 21:20:59 -0500 "David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
professed:
> The distance is "measured" electronically over the circuit. While I
> agree then fiber part is bunk, they do have to have transitional
> equipment to change DSL from copper to fiber and back. DSL wasn't
> desig
begin On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:40:43 -0400
Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is set to 1
Please don't take offense at this next question, mate. Is this still set to 1
when the failure occurs?
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 20 July 2003 6:55 pm, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
> On 07/20/03 14:40, Iraj Medifar wrote:
>
> I'm guessing that your problem is that the users group doesn't have rwx on
> /dev/dsp and/or /dev/mixer
And I'm guessing you can fix it by fixing /etc/security/console.perms
Look
I've had great luck with my Hauppauge card... ATI WinTV VE (Value edition). I
never got a chance to see which driver it uses because SuSE automatically
identified it (yes, LONG AFTER installation... a window popped up on my desktop
identifying it and asking if I wanted to configure it... way cool)
On Monday 21 July 2003 9:13 am, someone claiming to be Keith Antoine wrote:
> ... how can XP
> and linux on my machine lose networking at the same time?
Hardware failure?
--
RedHat 8.0 Kernel 2.4.20-18.8, KDE 3.1.CVS, Xfree86 4.2.1
10:40pm up 27 days, 23:36, 2 users, load average: 0.43, 0.
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:28:59 -0400
Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I seem to have given may an incorrect version of my internet sharing
> problem. The problem is NOT that I cannot share my machine with
> daughters downstairs machine, but that I cannot share theinternet
> connection. Thi
Keith,
How is your network setup? You have a cable connected to a cable modem.
From there is it ethernet or usb? does it go to a computer (which
one?) or a router? (or maybe a hub?)
The answers may have some bearing on how to setup your machines. I use
a SMC router and my clients all get
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 18:54:13 -0700
Shawn Tayler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> When I was looking into wideband service at my present home QTH, I
> check into DSL first. I was told that since I was 17,957ft ( I looked
> up the old reply) from the central office, I was not eligable for DS
Did you make modules and make modules_install?
Check in /lib/modules to see if things went ok.
You can load modules by hand if modprobe isn't working. No big deal.
Joel
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 03:34:58AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I run Caldera e2.4. The kernel does not provide USB support
On 07/20/03 17:50, Ted Ozolins wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
On 07/20/03 14:40, Iraj Medifar wrote:
pre-remove sound-slot-0 /bin/aumix-minimal -f /etc/.aumixrc -S
/dev/null 2>&1 || :
I'm guessing that your problem is that the users group doesn't have
rwx on /dev/dsp and/or /dev/mixer
Does RH9
On 07/20/03 18:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run Caldera e2.4. The kernel does not provide USB support for
my scanner. I downloaded kernel 2.2.18 which does support USB,
compiled it, installed it, then rebooted. Everything appeared to
run normally but I could not connect to the scanner. I checked
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 18:01:38 -0500
"David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 15:53:36 -0600
> Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >[snip]
> >
> > The most likely "feechur" is the £$%! decision in 2.6 to make
> > VGA_CONSOLE, etc., off by default. Your boot wil
Anyone using a dvd burner?
I've just installed a Sony +-R IDE DVD burner. I've found lots of
possible tools - cdrtools-dvdr, dvd+rw-tools, dvdrtools, and perhaps
there are others that I am not yet aware of.
Which tools would your recommend? stable versions or alpha/unstable
versions?
I've done
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 20:34:04 -0400 Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
professed:
> Quoth Shawn Tayler:
> >
> > Hi David,
> >
> > I should've been more exact, the farcical portion I was refering
> > to was the "tariff" imposed wire limit that does not limit itself to
> > the length of the copper por
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 08:28, Keith Antoine wrote:
> I seem to have given may an incorrect version of my internet sharing problem.
> The problem is NOT that I cannot share my machine with daughters downstairs
> machine, but that I cannot share theinternet connection. This does not entail
> any fil
I run Caldera e2.4. The kernel does not provide USB support for
my scanner. I downloaded kernel 2.2.18 which does support USB,
compiled it, installed it, then rebooted. Everything appeared to
run normally but I could not connect to the scanner. I checked
the boot-up errors and found,".../usb-uh
You might look at the action upstairs with tcpdump.
Is there some firewall on the downstairs machine?
Perchance, you don't have two machines with the same IP number on your
network?
Joel
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:28:59AM -0400, Keith Antoine wrote:
> I seem to have given may an incorrect version
Net Llama! wrote:
On 07/20/03 14:40, Iraj Medifar wrote:
pre-remove sound-slot-0 /bin/aumix-minimal -f /etc/.aumixrc -S
/dev/null 2>&1 || :
I'm guessing that your problem is that the users group doesn't have rwx
on /dev/dsp and/or /dev/mixer
Does RH9 use devfs? If it does then a simple addi
Quoth Shawn Tayler:
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 18:05:07 -0500 "David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> professed:
>
> > No, the distance thing isn't a farce. Trust me. Kinda like the 90
> > meters (300 feet) on ethernet. I've installed DSLAMs and DSLs. PITA,
> > but not farce. Besides, you don't want
I seem to have given may an incorrect version of my internet sharing problem.
The problem is NOT that I cannot share my machine with daughters downstairs
machine, but that I cannot share theinternet connection. This does not entail
any file sharing on either machine and is normally done both in X
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 18:05:07 -0500 "David A. Bandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> professed:
> No, the distance thing isn't a farce. Trust me. Kinda like the 90
> meters (300 feet) on ethernet. I've installed DSLAMs and DSLs. PITA,
> but not farce. Besides, you don't want to run servers on _Asymmetric
--- Iraj Medifar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I just installed RH9. Overall, it works fine for me,
> but I have been
> experiencing problems getting my sound card to work.
> My Intel 82801 AC
> '97 - i810 was detected and configured automatically
> during
> installation. And I
Gary Wilson wrote inter alia:
But cutting edge is not always where you want to be on
the desktop anyway. Libranet sets up a very stable
desktop system that is pure Debian. That's a very good
thing.
That says a lot, particularly coming from the author of
Caldera OpenLinux Installation and Con
On 07/20/03 14:40, Iraj Medifar wrote:
Hi everyone.
I just installed RH9. Overall, it works fine for me, but I have been
experiencing problems getting my sound card to work. My Intel 82801 AC
'97 - i810 was detected and configured automatically during
installation. And I do have sound events a
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 15:53:36 -0600
Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[snip]
>
> The most likely "feechur" is the £$%! decision in 2.6 to make
> VGA_CONSOLE, etc., off by default. Your boot will complete, but your
> have no way of knowing it. Auf gut Deutsch heisst das: beschissen!
Lik
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 15:05:03 -0700
Shawn Tayler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> One other point to the DSL Gotcha. This wire length from the CO is
> mythical. Used to really rip off us poor saps in the country. It
> includes any fiber thats inline. ATM on fiber really doesn't matter
> the d
Boy! Sex, money, and contracts. Is there a movie somewhere?
Joel
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 05:09:09PM -0500, Michael Hipp wrote:
> SCO's boy, David Boies, may have some legal trouble of his own:
>
> http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localnews/content/auto/epaper/editions/saturday/local_news_f381cb202242
On Sunday 20 July 2003 08:57 am, James Conner wrote:
> Here's a site that has a Step-by-Step using the gui to configure Mandrake
> 9.0 to WinXP. Dunno if this will help or not.
>
> http://www.tweakhound.com/mdk9/mdk9net.htm
>
> Jim
Many thanks for taking the trouble to reply. However what the art
On Sunday 20 July 2003 02:01 pm, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> XP defaults to dhcp - meaning MS has that button checked - but that assumes
> there is a dhcp server somewhere. On my XP machine I have a fixed address.
> You can change it in the network setup.
Yes that is true and I have tried both wi
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 10:32:46 -0400
Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[snip]
>
> I might add that I'm currently using (at least) a 25 foot phone cord
> for DSL at my wife's house. (now sold) Goes from one bedroom, through
> a closet, into another bedroom and around the wall... etc.
>
On Sunday 20 July 2003 08:48 am, tom marinis wrote:
> Start ==> My Network Places ==> Local Area Connection ==>
>
> { I don't know if you can right click that one or not}
>
> Internet Protocol TCP/IP Properties==>
>
> In the General Dialogue box, you should have at the top
> something that sa
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 17:53:06 -0700
"Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07/19/03 17:43, Kurt Wall wrote:
>
> > Hey, list,
> >
> > I learned something interesting about DSL today. I was having lots
> > or intermittency problems with my DSL connection. A call to tech
> > support later, and
On Sun, 2003-07-20 at 15:40, Iraj Medifar wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I just installed RH9. Overall, it works fine for me, but I have been
> experiencing problems getting my sound card to work. My Intel 82801 AC
> '97 - i810 was detected and configured automatically during
> installation. And I d
On Sunday 20 July 2003 03:09 pm, Michael Hipp wrote:
> SCO's boy, David Boies, may have some legal trouble of his own:
>
> http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localnews/content/auto/epaper/editions/s
>aturday/local_news_f381cb202242317a0031.html
He is scum, but I have a better page:
http://users.erols.c
On 20 Jul 2003 14:40:12 -0700
Iraj Medifar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I just installed RH9. Overall, it works fine for me, but I have been
> experiencing problems getting my sound card to work. My Intel 82801
> AC'97 - i810 was detected and configured automatically during
> i
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003 10:58:14 -0400
Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2003 18:57 pm, Keith Antoine wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 July 2003 01:03 am, Net Llama! wrote:
> > > On 07/19/03 11:22, Keith Antoine wrote:
> > > > On Friday 18 July 2003 07:17 pm, Net Llama! wrote:
>
One other point to the DSL Gotcha. This wire length from the CO is mythical. Used to
really
rip off us poor saps in the country. It includes any fiber thats inline. ATM on
fiber really
doesn't matter the distance. Its the transition to copper thats the killer on DSL.
I'm 17,800ft
from
SCO's boy, David Boies, may have some legal trouble of his own:
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localnews/content/auto/epaper/editions/saturday/local_news_f381cb202242317a0031.html
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> h
Kurt Wall wrote:
ohmygod, a little bit of ego surfing reveals that there's another Kurt
Wall out there. We're all _doomed_...
http://www.oads.ca/people.asp
I founfd him a few months ago at . com, I think. He's selling cars or
something, isn't he?
Bob
_
Hi everyone.
I just installed RH9. Overall, it works fine for me, but I have been
experiencing problems getting my sound card to work. My Intel 82801 AC
'97 - i810 was detected and configured automatically during
installation. And I do have sound events as root. But there it all
ends. As user
Gentoo will be joining the ranks of the "boxed set of cd's" distros on
August 5, 2003. For those of you who don't have DSL/Cable or a CD
burner, this will be your opportunity to avoid the slow downloads and,
if you choose, much of the delays due to compiles that are associated
with a gentoo instal
Quoth Bruce Marshall:
>
> I might add that I'm currently using (at least) a 25 foot phone cord for
> DSL at my wife's house. (now sold) Goes from one bedroom, through a
> closet, into another bedroom and around the wall... etc.
>
> Has worked just fine from day 1 of DSL install. I would g
Quoth Raymond Russell:
> On 7/20/03 0:03, "Kurt Wall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't have DSL any more but when I did my installer used CAT-5 cable and
> put RJ11 connectors on it, this helped a lot. I was far out from the CO so
> I needed every little bit of help.
I'm 12,269 feet from t
Quoth Ben Duncan:
> Ok Kurt . fill me in here.
>
> At "Patch" file is that which is the difference of compared to .
> The output of that is:
> -
> and
> +
Yup. Specifically, a patch file, or, rather, a "diff" represents
the changes you have to make to in order to produce .
>
> With the @
Quoth Ben Duncan:
> Thanks Kurt still pretty foggy, but the Sun IS starting to lift on it.
>
> Anyway, When the output of the DIFF is run in a patch routine,
> Do the "Minuses" get taken away and the "Pluses" added to the
> routine being patched ?
Yes.
--
Conscience is a mother-in-law who
Quoth tom marinis:
>
> Gee, too bad I use Slackware now :)
>
> Besides, the only thing that SCO's lawyer could say Monday that
> could frighten me is to say that Linus Torvalds now
> works for SCO.
>
> E.
I'd switch to *BSD if that happened.
Kurt
--
This life is a test. It is only a
Over the last couple of days I've started using
Libranet and I want to add my 2 cents to the earlier
discussion of it and other distros.
Back when I saw that I had to move away from Caldera
to another Linux distribution, I checked a whole bunch
of them. Slackware was a strong contender. But then I
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, James Conner wrote:
> Here's a site that has a Step-by-Step using the gui to configure Mandrake 9.0
> to WinXP. Dunno if this will help or not.
>
> http://www.tweakhound.com/mdk9/mdk9net.htm
>
> Jim
>
> On Sunday 20 July 2003 10:35 am, Keith Antoine wrote:
> > At 08:22 PM
Here's a site that has a Step-by-Step using the gui to configure Mandrake 9.0
to WinXP. Dunno if this will help or not.
http://www.tweakhound.com/mdk9/mdk9net.htm
Jim
On Sunday 20 July 2003 10:35 am, Keith Antoine wrote:
> At 08:22 PM 19/07/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >--- Keith Antoine <[EMAIL P
XP defaults to dhcp - meaning MS has that button checked - but that assumes
there is a dhcp server somewhere. On my XP machine I have a fixed address.
You can change it in the network setup.
Keith Antoine wrote:
> At 05:53 PM 19/07/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>>On 07/19/03 17:19, Keith Antoine wr
Someone, somewhere asked for some resources on windows and was looking for the
comparisons of windows to linux... The included url below is excellent. It
really digs into the state of windows art... Highly informative, entertaining
and well worth the read. It's long...
http://www.euronet.nl/users
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/31833.html
FYI
Harry G
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Harry Giles wrote:
> A couple of months ago, a lot of talk about how Billy boy acquired dos,
> and built his company were discussed here, but I can't find the thead in
> the archives, as I don't remember the sublect title.
>
> I am trying to get information to a person who wrote a rather uninform
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 10:32:46 -0400 - Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
the following
Re: Re: DSL Gotcha
Going back to my old support days.
Wiring used for telephones, when used for telephones works fine. When the same
wires are used for other purposes, including data transmission, strange
On Sunday 20 July 2003 0:03 am, Kurt Wall wrote:
> Quoth Michael Hipp:
> > Kurt Wall wrote:
> > >Hey, list,
> > >
> > >I learned something interesting about DSL today. I was having lots
> > >or intermittency problems with my DSL connection. A call to tech
> > >support later, and it was fixed. Immed
Greets Keith;
--- Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 07:26 PM 19/07/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >As Lonni pointed out, you need to set up your
> >DNS ip's in XP. If you don't, your XP boxes will
> >never traverse outside your internal home network, and
> >out onto the internet.
> >
> >I
At 08:22 PM 19/07/2003 -0700, you wrote:
--- Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 19 July 2003 07:51 am, Matthew Carpenter wrote:
> > Is DNS working on the Linux box? (if that's where you are
> running it from)
>
> No AFAIK, its just setup by mandarke to share the net.
Whoa, wait
At 07:26 PM 19/07/2003 -0700, you wrote:
As Lonni pointed out, you need to set up your
DNS ip's in XP. If you don't, your XP boxes will
never traverse outside your internal home network, and
out onto the internet.
I think if your user setting has the rights, you can
adjust the settings for the NI
At 05:53 PM 19/07/2003 -0700, you wrote:
On 07/19/03 17:19, Keith Antoine wrote:
Just checked the downstairs machine and that can piong this upstairs machine
under XP on both, but its not seeing the net. It appears not to be able
to resolve
the addresses.
I do not have any DNS settings downstairs
On 7/20/03 0:03, "Kurt Wall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoth Michael Hipp:
>> Hey, list,
>>>
>>> I learned something interesting about DSL today. I was having lots
>>> or intermittency problems with my DSL connection. A call to tech
Kurt Wall wrote:
>>
>> support later, and it was fixed.
73 matches
Mail list logo
