Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
Anyone getting e-mails about a MS critical update? I am getting this
over 300 times per day. It has a 156K exe attachment. They all seem to come
from different addresses.
Damn but I must find the time to set up spam filtering...
Yes. over and over. it is, of course, a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Hemus shocked and awed us all by speaking:
I was going to install SpamAssin, but the site said it wasn't for
desktop use. So I Lonnied and came up with this site
SpamAssassin (SA) goes on whatever machine has your incoming sendmail server.
if
Kurt Wall wrote:
Quoth Bob Hemus:
Doug, is the users' mail down or did my fp-linux-ws make you disappear?
What's a fp-linux-ws?
Kurt
I was going to install SpamAssin, but the site said it wasn't for
desktop use. So I Lonnied and came up with this site
www.f-prot.com ] and downloaded
Hi
I am running sendmail on Cobalt raq4r.. i have created one user under
one domain. when i am using webmail , i am not facing any problem to send the
mail. But when i am trying to send the mails through pine, i am getting errors
as follows:
Sep 10 13:21:54 server sendmail[381
Doug, is the users' mail down or did my fp-linux-ws make you disappear?
Bob
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Hi
I am running sendmail on Cobalt raq4r.. i have created one user under
one domain. when i am using webmail , i am not facing any problem to send the
mail. But when i am trying to send the mails through pine, i am getting errors
as follows:
Sep 10 13:21:54 server sendmail[381
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Swapana Ghosh wrote:
Hi
I am running sendmail on Cobalt raq4r.. i have created one user under
one domain. when i am using webmail , i am not facing any problem to send the
mail. But when i am trying to send the mails through pine, i am getting errors
as follows
Quoth Bob Hemus:
Doug, is the users' mail down or did my fp-linux-ws make you disappear?
What's a fp-linux-ws?
Kurt
--
Tax reform means Don't tax you, don't tax me, tax that fellow behind
the tree.
-- Russell Long
___
Linux-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ken Moffat shocked and awed us all by speaking:
Maybe the from header in kmail is showing an unsubscribed email address?
just a thought/guess...
we allow unsubbed emails onto the list...
- --
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux
Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can from
Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work account.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman
Marianne Taylor wrote:
Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can
from Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work account.
Does kmail work with other subscribed mailing lists?
Maybe the from header in kmail is showing an unsubscribed email address
On 09/07/03 10:19, Marianne Taylor wrote:
Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can from
Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work account.
What do you mean by can't? Is it bouncing? If so, what does the bounce
look like
On September 7, 2003 10:38, Net Llama! wrote:
On 09/07/03 10:19, Marianne Taylor wrote:
Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can from
Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work account.
What do you mean by can't? Is it bouncing? If so, what does
On September 7, 2003 12:04, Marianne Taylor wrote:
On September 7, 2003 10:38, Net Llama! wrote:
On 09/07/03 10:19, Marianne Taylor wrote:
Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can
from Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work
account
Net Llama! wrote:
On 09/07/03 10:19, Marianne Taylor wrote:
Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can
from Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work
account.
What do you mean by can't? Is it bouncing? If so, what does the
bounce look like?
I
The original message was received at Sat, 6 Sep 2003 00:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
from adsl-67-121-155-249.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.121.155.249]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 553 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown)
- Transcript
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail.
550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown
Reporting-MTA: Norton AntiVirus Gateway;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status
Failed to deliver to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
LOCAL module(account tesfaye_lemma) reports:
account is full (quota exceeded)
Reporting-MTA: dns; freemail.et
Original-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Final-Recipient: LOCAL;
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Received: from [24.61.222.23] (HELO NETSERVER)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Antoine shocked and awed us all by speaking:
Doug,
I am getting virii sent to me, I have actually lost count of how many times
I have received a copy. All I seem to be doing at the moment is deleting
mail.
you're getting actual copies
at the moment is
deleting mail.
you're getting actual copies of the virus from this list? if so, we need to
look into this asap
BTW, they do seem to have stopped as of today will let you know if they
continue, but yes they came from the list. I am only getting undelivered
mail notices now via
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail.
550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown
Reporting-MTA: Norton AntiVirus Gateway;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status
Failed to deliver to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
LOCAL module(account tesfaye_lemma) reports:
account is full (quota exceeded)
Reporting-MTA: dns; freemail.et
Original-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Final-Recipient: LOCAL;
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Received: from [64.222.177.246] (HELO
]
Free 20MB Web Site Hosting and Personalized E-mail Service!
Get It Now At Doteasy.com http://www.doteasy.com/et/
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message has been rejected because it has
a potentially
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message has been rejected because it has
a potentially
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message has been rejected because it has
a potentially
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail.
550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown
Reporting-MTA: Norton AntiVirus Gateway;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail.
550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown
Reporting-MTA: Norton AntiVirus Gateway;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message has been rejected because it has
a potentially
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message has been rejected because it has
a potentially
]
Free 20MB Web Site Hosting and Personalized E-mail Service!
Get It Now At Doteasy.com http://www.doteasy.com/et/
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org
A
AAA
A
AAA
[message truncated]
Free 20MB Web Site Hosting and Personalized E-mail Service
I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are
doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's
non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now...
On 9/2/2003 11:38 AM, someone claiming to be Harry Giles wrote:
I have recieved about 30 of these from the mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking:
I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are
doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's
non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now...
are you guys
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking:
I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are
doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's
non-trivial, or it
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 11:45, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking:
I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are
doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's
non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now...
are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was
caught?
Both.
Some of the notices have the virus attached as part of the original e-mail.
For instance, the message with the subject: Mail delivery failed:
returning message
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 13:45, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was
caught?
- --
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
http://doug.hunley.homeip.net http://www.linux-sxs.org
I have not received the
Replies and notices --- lots and lots of them: probably 60 in the past
two days.
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
Are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was caught?
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
just the notices -
-Original Message-
From: Douglas J Hunley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 12:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why all this- Undeliverable Mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Wunder shocked and awed us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
| Tim Wunder shocked and awed us all by speaking:
|
|I suspect we're all getting them and I'm hoping the powers that be are
|doing what they can to eliminate the problem. I suspect it's
|non-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Mathews shocked and awed us all by speaking:
FWIW- I have yet to receive any of these attachments. I'm running
MIMEDefang/Clamav/Sendmail same as the list.
and you're not having the occasional .pif file make it past MD (like we've
been
On 9/2/03 11:38, Harry Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have recieved about 30 of these from the mailing list. Anyone else
getting them?
Harry G
Its due to the SoBig worm. It must be using the lists e-mail on some ones
infected machine and the bounces are coming back here.
--
Ray
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
| Andrew Mathews shocked and awed us all by speaking:
|
|FWIW- I have yet to receive any of these attachments. I'm running
|MIMEDefang/Clamav/Sendmail same as the list.
|
|
| and you're not having the occasional .pif file make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Mathews shocked and awed us all by speaking:
Nope. I haven't received any attachments. MIMEDefang has been deleting all
the .pif's, regardless. No upstream filtering is going on either. (yeah,
I've been following the MD thread on this, but I
-trivial, or it woulda been fixed by now...
are you guys actually getting the virus or just notices that a virus was
caught?
Doug,
I am getting virii sent to me, I have actually lost count of how many times I
have received a copy. All I seem to be doing at the moment is deleting mail.
--
Keith
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 08:38 am, Harry Giles wrote:
I have recieved about 30 of these from the mailing list. Anyone else
getting them?
I'm getting megabytes of this stuff and other bounced mail. I think
Doug is gonna work on a really spiffy filter to keep all of this
bounced stuff
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:53, Raymond Russell wrote:
Its due to the SoBig worm. It must be using the lists e-mail on some ones
infected machine and the bounces are coming back here.
It would have to be a Windows box.
--
burns
___
Linux-users
Failed to deliver to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
LOCAL module(account tesfaye_lemma) reports:
account is full (quota exceeded)
Reporting-MTA: dns; freemail.et
Original-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Final-Recipient: LOCAL;
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Received: from [64.222.145.104] (HELO
The original message was received at Mon, 1 Sep 2003 12:19:41 -0500
from pool-64-222-145-104.man.east.verizon.net [64.222.145.104]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... User unknown)
- Transcript of
User mailbox exceeds allowed size: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original message follows.
Received: from NETSERVER [64.222.145.104] by actmail2.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.00) id AB642053010A; Mon, 01 Sep 2003 11:09:40 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Your details
Date: Mon, 1
Failed to deliver to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
LOCAL module(account tesfaye_lemma) reports:
account is full (quota exceeded)
Reporting-MTA: dns; freemail.et
Original-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Final-Recipient: LOCAL;
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Received: from [64.222.145.104] (HELO
]
Free 20MB Web Site Hosting and Personalized E-mail Service!
Get It Now At Doteasy.com http://www.doteasy.com/et/
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message has been rejected because it has
a potentially
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 07:48:45 +1000
James McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Joines wrote:
We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he
is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have
one big combined system for all employees
, it arrived as an
attachment, right through an Exchange mail server with McAfees big
commercial setup. An idiot, in the DA's office, where else, clicked on
it and we are in our 3rd day of cleanup, it shutdown whole depts. Every
unpatched Win2000 box that was turned on and connected to the network
We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is
about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one
big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about
50,000 users.
At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:00:25 -0500
Jason Joines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he
is
about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one
big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about
is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one
big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about
50,000 users.
At the moment the predominant faculty/staff mail system is Lotus
Domino on windows 2k and the predominant system for students is Sun
Internet Mail Server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Joines wrote:
| We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is
| about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one
| big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about
| 50,000 users
David A. Bandel wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:00:25 -0500
Jason Joines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he
is
about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one
big combined system for all employees and students
On 8/27/2003 12:31 PM, someone claiming to be Andrew Mathews wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Joines wrote:
| We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is
| about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one
| big combined
like Ximian Evolution
would be just the product for you:
http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/
cmr
On Wednesday 27 August 2003 09:00 am, you wrote:
We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is
about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems
for you:
http://www.ximian.com/products/evolution/
cmr
On Wednesday 27 August 2003 09:00 am, you wrote:
We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he
is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have
one big combined system for all
/sendmail/MIMEDefang/clamav gives us shared calendars,
global address books, check in/out functions, web, pop3 imap4 mail,
spam filtering, anti virus scanning all in one system that doesn't
even yawn at 15,000 messages a day. (before sobig blaster) Total cost?
$0. Compared to 4 Exchange servers
Jason Joines [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 27 Aug 2003 09:00:25 -0500
We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he is
about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have one
big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be about
50,000 users
well.
phpgroupware/sendmail/MIMEDefang/clamav gives us shared calendars,
global address books, check in/out functions, web, pop3 imap4 mail,
spam filtering, anti virus scanning all in one system that doesn't
even yawn at 15,000 messages a day. (before sobig blaster) Total cost?
$0. Compared
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Gerry Doris wrote:
I'mn surprised you haven't plugged SpamAssassin into the mix. Is there a
reason for that?
Maybe cause its track record lately isn't that great.
--
~~
Lonni J Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerry Doris wrote:
[...]
|phpgroupware/sendmail/MIMEDefang/clamav gives us shared calendars,
[...]
|
| I'mn surprised you haven't plugged SpamAssassin into the mix. Is there a
| reason for that?
|
| Gerry
We don't really need it. We run Symantec AV on
Jason Joines wrote:
We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he
is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have
one big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be
about 50,000 users.
We run a single M$ E2K server for around 1000
Jason Joines wrote:
We just got a new CIO at the university where I work. One thing he
is about to do is get rid of all the different mail systems and have
one big combined system for all employees and students. That'll be
about 50,000 users.
At the moment the predominant faculty/staff
:
|
| - When one user is sending mail from any address
| to one of
| our domain the messages are showing in the
| /var/log/maillog as follows:
| __
|Aug 8 09:21:11 server sendmail[1712]:
| h78GLBP01712: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
| size=752, class
Hi
i am facing one problem recently...My server is
cobalt-raq4r. we have created the users through the
cobalt GUI and *sendmail* is running as MTA . Now in
case of the mails. The problem is as follows:
- When one user is sending mail from any address
to one of
our domain
Hi
Few months back I have insalled
*spamassassin* with spamc/spamd
in one of our server.
As i have failed in subscribing to the
spamassassin list(they are giving message that they
sent email to my address for authentication but i did
not receive any mail from them till yet
Please ignore and delete
James McDonald
Systems Engineer
Singleton NSW Australia
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Hi Andrew
Thanks a lot... Now the mail are coming to my
queue and i am not seeing any rejectiong of smtp
connection in the maillog. So qmail is sending
the mail without holding those defeffed mails in its
queue.
But one problem is there . All the mails are
now gathered
Hi Andrew
Thanks a lot
I waited almost 1 hr just to see if my luck
favours. But i found that after more than an hr mail
started to generate from the queue and finally all
mails have been sent...
Best Regards.
-Swapna
__
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC
with 50,000
records, I guessed that altogether qmail willl take 75
mints to clear its mailq?
But i saw that the processing became very slow in
the middle. I mean sendmail was accepting the mail
very slowlyAnd finally all the mails to come from
qmail server to sendmail server, took almost 4 hrs
How much memory does this box have? What kind of HDs? What's the load
like when its taking an hour to send mail? Which version of sendmail?
Which kernel version? What kind of network connection do you have (type
speed)?
On 06/14/03 18:54, Swapana Ghosh wrote:
Hi
When i am
and then
| it started for clearing the queue.
| But when the same testing i did with 50,000
| records, I guessed that altogether qmail willl take 75
| mints to clear its mailq?
| But i saw that the processing became very slow in
| the middle. I mean sendmail was accepting the mail
| very slowly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Mathews wrote:
snip
| Change the QUEUE to something like 5m to process it once a minute. This
| is extreme, so use it at your own risk.
snip
Typo. 5m is every 5 minutes, not once a minute. Sorry.
#cd /pub
#more beer
- --
Andrew Mathews
-
:75752 kB
What kind of HDs? What's the load
like when its taking an hour to send mail?
Load is varying 15 - 22 ...in this server only i am
running sendmail
NO other processing is going on.
Which version of sendmail?
sendmail-8.12.5-7
Which kernel version?
kernel-2.4.18-14
On 06/14/03 20:55, Swapana Ghosh wrote:
What kind of HDs? What's the load
What kind of HDs?
like when its taking an hour to send mail?
Load is varying 15 - 22 ...in this server only i am
running sendmail
NO other processing is going on.
Something is not right if the load is that high.
What
Folks,
I have mozilla installed as my IMAP client on WinXP and MDK9.0.
I blow away my sessions change profiles and generally gig around with
mozilla regularly I am wondering is it possible to transfer the basic
Mail filter rules so that I don't have to labouriously go in and create
them new
James McDonald wrote:
Folks,
I have mozilla installed as my IMAP client on WinXP and MDK9.0.
I blow away my sessions change profiles and generally gig around with
mozilla regularly I am wondering is it possible to transfer the basic
Mail filter rules so that I don't have to labouriously go
]
Subject: Re: Transferring Mozilla Mail filter rules between
installations
James McDonald wrote:
Folks,
I have mozilla installed as my IMAP client on WinXP and MDK9.0.
I blow away my sessions change profiles and generally gig
around with
mozilla regularly I am wondering
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Core Security Technologies Advisory
http://www.coresecurity.com
Vulnerability in Mutt Mail User Agent
Date Published: 2003-03-20
Last Update: 2003-03-19
Advisory ID: CORE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
luckily, mimedefang covered us during the short time we were vulnerable.
please, keep your anti-sendmail comments to yourself. thanks
- --
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: Linux StepByStep -
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 19:08:58 -0800, Net Llama! wrote:
problem is that the load on the box is over 20.00, with mimedefang.pl
going bezerk.
Thats interesting. Is there a relaying issue?
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:22:08 +0800
Chong Yu Meng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Problem : The mail will be delivered if the recipient has a email
account on XYZ.com (i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]), but if the recipient
belongs to some other domain, the mail will not get delivered.
relay problem
HI!
Yes as your sendmail should simply go directly to the recipients mail
server. Or the simpler alternative is to direct the email through
whatever email server your machine is allowed to relay through already.
That will accomplish the same result without needing sendmail.
Stayler
On Mon
Ok, here's my first question on the list :
Scenario : Company XYZ, which I used to work for, deployed a server in a
certain local ISP. I wrote a Java servlet that tries to mail the results
of a form to the server administrator, along with an acknowledgement
email to the person who filled out
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:31:37PM -0500, Kurt Wall wrote:
Some sort of unexpected (duh) binary character? Did it stop at the
same location each time?
Yes, it seemed to.
It was long, but not dramtically long, perhaps two lines of dots instead
of the usual 1/4th line or so.
Joel
My incoming mail goes to various mail servers on the internet, and I run
fetchmail to get them from various POP servers.
Today, for the first time in memory, when fetchmail tried getting my mail,
a particular piece of mail kept freezing during the download and fetchmail
would finally stop
On 02/05/03 19:56, Joel Hammer wrote:
My incoming mail goes to various mail servers on the internet, and I run
fetchmail to get them from various POP servers.
Today, for the first time in memory, when fetchmail tried getting my mail,
a particular piece of mail kept freezing during the download
Feigning erudition, Joel Hammer wrote:
% My incoming mail goes to various mail servers on the internet, and I run
% fetchmail to get them from various POP servers.
%
% Today, for the first time in memory, when fetchmail tried getting my mail,
% a particular piece of mail kept freezing during
mail acounts...
I have several popmail accounts and would like to pull them all down to my
linux box(which also has its own mail server, that works)...
What all do I need..?
I have running Trustix realease of postfix-0.0.20010228.pl08-2tr.
TIA,
Bill Day
Linux 2.2.20-1tr i586
10:10am up 29
I have several popmail accounts and would like to pull them all down to my
linux box(which also has its own mail server, that works)...
What all do I need..?
I have running Trustix realease of postfix-0.0.20010228.pl08-2tr.
TIA,
Bill Day
Linux 2.2.20-1tr i586
10:10am up 29 days, 15:45, 0
% problem because in lengthy conversations, it becomes much more difficult to
% follow since color coding and font changes may be used. I have tried saving an
% Outlook mail that I've sent as html and then reading it with mozilla, and it
% looks fine. This leads me to believe that the html produced
difficult to
follow since color coding and font changes may be used. I have tried saving an
Outlook mail that I've sent as html and then reading it with mozilla, and it
looks fine. This leads me to believe that the html produced by outlook is
readable by mozilla. When I read email that I've sent
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
