I decided to use google to find a simpler solution.
http://www.reaumur.u-bordeaux.fr/Public/Securite/sircam.html
just use the x-mailer and not the content-type parts.
On Monday 27 August 2001 23:29, Andrew Mathews wrote:
> Joel Hammer wrote:
> > > Which poses a totally different question. Can Sen
had to look thru my bookmark mess, use ruleset, look at the check_x_mailer
rule
http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/chk89-opt.html
On Monday 27 August 2001 22:13, Andrew Mathews wrote:
> Alan Jackson wrote:
>
>
> > Yeah, I just got a 6 Mbyte file in my e-mail from some idiot with an
> > infected
If the sending source is using ESMTP then sendmail can set MaxMessageSize in
sendmail.cf to reject the attachments based on total message size. Not
foolproof but is a start.
On Monday 27 August 2001 22:13, Andrew Mathews wrote:
> Alan Jackson wrote:
>
>
> > Yeah, I just got a 6 Mbyte file in
Joel Hammer wrote:
>
> > Which poses a totally different question. Can Sendmail be configured to
> > reject mail based upon the mailer type? There's a few that a canned
> > reply of "This domain no longer accepts mail messages from Outlook or
> > Outlook Express due to unacceptable security. Plea
> Which poses a totally different question. Can Sendmail be configured to
> reject mail based upon the mailer type? There's a few that a canned
> reply of "This domain no longer accepts mail messages from Outlook or
> Outlook Express due to unacceptable security. Please use a secure mailer
> progr
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:13:27PM -0600, Andrew Mathews wrote:
> Alan Jackson wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I just got a 6 Mbyte file in my e-mail from some idiot with an
> > infected machine. I'm getting really testy about this - by this time
> > people need to get their friggin' machines cleaned up.
> >
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:13:53 +0700
Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 18:37:21 -0600 Myles Green
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the pointer... looks like it might be interesting. Do you
> > happen to know if there is an FTP install?
>
> You can ftp a
Alan Jackson wrote:
> Yeah, I just got a 6 Mbyte file in my e-mail from some idiot with an
> infected machine. I'm getting really testy about this - by this time
> people need to get their friggin' machines cleaned up.
> --
Which poses a totally different question. Can Sendmail be configured to
Well, I stand corrected. Jbl did include sr_mod, but they built it
into the kernel. So, are you ready for this, you need to 'append
hda=ide-scsi' to make it work! We had that long discussion about this
no longer being necessary on 2.4.x kernels, and I certainly don't need
it on my gentoo system
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 13:10:12 -0500 Ronnie Gauthier wrote:
> after I got pissed and hammered back heavily. FREAKING MORONS!!! It is only
> going to get worse, all new machines are now running unpatched w2000, so the
> vendors are also at fault and many(almost all) users have no clue and plop
Y
Since I didn't feel like an install from sources, I downloaded KDE2.2
from the Caldera 3.1 site, converted them to jbl packages, and
installed. The reason I picked Caldera was that I knew the packages
have a compatible glibc and they would install to /opt and leave my
KDE 2.1.1 stuff in /usr unto
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 18:38:35 -0500 Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Collins
>
> Glad to hear that jbl is working out fine. I do believe you are
> using xfce
> for destop, is that correct. If so What type of development system
> are you
> using if of course you are a developer. I a
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 18:37:21 -0600 Myles Green
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer... looks like it might be interesting. Do you
> happen to know if there is an FTP install?
You can ftp all the packages to a directory and install from that
directory, but there is no fetch the pa
Thanks for the pointer... looks like it might be interesting. Do you
happen to know if there is an FTP install?
Thanks!
Myles
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:23:27 +0700
Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI
>
> I think this is the greatest distro ever!!!
>
> Except for a very few things om
FYI
I think this is the greatest distro ever!!!
Except for a very few things omitted from the Desktop+Development
install option, the system has everything I could possibly want and
more (both GNOME and KDE are onboard).
Here are some of the good and bad (nothing disastrous).
1) For those of u
FYI
The gentoo distro is basically a site that is "under construction - check
back later." They are working on rc6 and rebuilding the portage
(packaging) system continually, so now would not be a good time for anyone
to jump in.
Since I found jblinux, I'm letting my gentoo-rc5 system languish i
If this helps
It has been my experience on Windoze 95/98 machines that the network
control panel doesn't necessarily reflect the true state of the IP protocol
stack. Most of the time, there is a resource conflict in the device
mangler. Make sure that the Driver instance matches what is
Hello again!
I have been reading Postfix and Sendmail to see if I can set up UCE rules based on a
user name and password.
I currently run a windoze program that allow's the user to log in to the SMTP server
before sending an email.
I am not an ISP, but I do host email for some companies. Peop
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 01:05:18PM -0600, Andrew Mathews wrote:
>David Aikema wrote:
>>
>> On August 25, 2001 07:41 pm, Andrew Mathews wrote:
>>
>> > You could consider using a hub that has a BNC connector to connect your
>> > existing coax network and 10BaseT for the laptop. That would allow yo
Trying to compile sendmail 8.11.6 from source, I get:
In file included from smdb.c:20:
../../include/libsmdb/smdb.h:23: parse error before `NDBM'
../../include/libsmdb/smdb.h:69: parse error before `*'
../../include/libsmdb/smdb.h:86: parse error before `*'
../../include/libsmdb/smdb.h:102: parse
David Aikema wrote:
>
> On August 25, 2001 07:41 pm, Andrew Mathews wrote:
>
> > You could consider using a hub that has a BNC connector to connect your
> > existing coax network and 10BaseT for the laptop. That would allow you
> > to migrate from thinnet to 10BaseT without having to recable
> >
Joel,
I have control of 54 web sites, i'm getting hammered terribly. Each site is
logging between 20 and 100 separate IP hits/hour on heavy days. 7/18,7/31
thru present.
Both NNN and XXX varients. I dont even bother to tell the morons anymore. All
are from win2000(a few NT,but their admins dont
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001 23:38:09 -0400
Hello burns from Lourens:
The output of dmesg might assist you.
First, the drives are listed in the normal fashion and then some useful
info about each drive and the partitions on each drive.
Would you be able to figure the disks out from this ??
hda: WDC WD64
Hello All,
I picked up a used CNet, CN8800TX (?) mini-hub this weekend at a used
computer store - so no info, drivers, etc. The CNet, Inc site only
gives specs, no user manual etc. It has one BNC and 9 UDP ports, one
is used for uplink, I assume set by a DIP switch. I am new to this and
have su
Are you talking about the partitions, or the physical drives? If the
drive recognition in Linux isn't matching reality, then you've got a
BIOS issue. If its a partition issue, then its a Linux and/or BIOS
problem. Either way, first stop should be in the BIOS to see how the
drives are recognized
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:37:40 -0700 Aaron Grewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I often had this issue with Win9x, the fix for me was to remove everything
> from the network control panel, reboot, then add it all back.
>
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for the tip, but that was one of the first remedies I tri
That worked for you? Man, I had to reinstall the OS completely, when that
didn't work! POI- Can any of the other computers ping it? Probably not.
This is not as uncommon as most win people would wish.
I just installed linux on a COMPAQ PRESARIO 7360...
Linux installs, all the onboard stuff (vid,par,ide,serial,usb,sound) works, but
it's not a
good box to use for your linux projects.
The BIOS is totally braindead, does not setup with discreet irqs. For instance,
it
insists on video and sound t
I often had this issue with Win9x, the fix for me was to remove everything
from the network control panel, reboot, then add it all back.
On Monday 27 August 2001 05:27 am, you wrote:
> On Monday 27 August 2001 01:29 am, Jerry McBride wrote:
> > I hate to ask this here... but I don't know of a be
David,
I picked one of these babies up for $30 bucks at a used store this
weekend. Now if I just knew how to set it up. 8^(
Regards,
Keith B.
David Aikema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On August 25, 2001 07:41 pm, Andrew Mathews wrote:
>
>> You could consider using a hub that has a BNC connec
Computerworld created quite a news-day for me:
Fellow Linux-Geeks: Note the 1st article
Fellow Novell-Freaks: Note the 2nd one
Fellow Java-Nerds: Note the 5th article
- Forwarded by Matt Carpenter/IS/Corp/Amway on 08/27/01 09:37 AM -
__
On Sunday 26 August 2001 11:42 am, Net Llama spoke thus unto Caesar's
assembled legions:
> Anyone else planning to attend LinuxWorld this week in San Francisco?
>
> I'll be there all day on wednesday.
I'm there but I don't know which day yet. Wednesday is probably it.
--
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL P
I would recommend either the Hub with BNC connector or wireless. You can
do direct PC-PC networking using a crossover cable (1236 go to 3612) but
that limits you and doesn't really solve the problem. The problem is not
that your son's laptop doesn't have BNC, it's that your equipment is
outlivi
On Monday 27 August 2001 01:29 am, Jerry McBride wrote:
> I hate to ask this here... but I don't know of a better source of
> information
>
> I've got a clients win98 box that she wishes to place on a lan and share
> internet
> connections, with other users...
>
> Everyone else on the lan is s
I read up the blackbox catalog and saw some
BNC to UTP converter. I never saw those things in shops.
Another solution is to buy a HUB with both one BNC and multiple
UTP ports (Practical?). It's not a bad idea to convert
everything to UTP though if budge is not restrained.
> I have a thin coaxial
I still got notime to read the kernel source,
if not to understsnad it at all... :)
> It was 10 years ago today that Linus Torvalds first mentioned his new OS
> on comp.os.minux. However it wasn't until Sept 17 that
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get y
36 matches
Mail list logo
