I agree with the opinion that the disk is dead, presuming you already gave us
all the relevant info. Can you mount a floppy and boot? If you have windoze,
www.toms.net/rb has a version of linux that builds under dos - a zip file.
Then
#e2fsck - n will tell you about the state of the hd, and
That's in the preferences. Did you check them as the right user?
--
Regards,
Declan Moriarty
Applied Researches - Ireland's Foremost Electronic Hardware Genius
A Slightly Serious(TM) Company
Experience is like a comb,
that Life gives you - AFTER all your hair has
On Monday 17 December 2001 15:47, you wrote:
--- Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have experience with Plugger 4.0 for netscape 6.2?
(I am going to get pluggins working or else...)
Is there a reason why you're insistant on using Netscape 6.2? Mozilla
is basically the same
On Monday 17 December 2001 16:18, you wrote:
[BIG SNIP OF IRRELEVANT TRIVIA(my own utterings)]
Yes, I am at the install stage. And no, it does not get to In second
stage Install.
Hurray!! Got that right! :)
[ANOTHER BIG SNIP OF IRRELEVANT TRIVIA(my own utterings)]
I think I did this
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001 22:52:09 -0500
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously, Anita Lewis chose to write:
that's the general idea. I just finished installing slackware on a
laptop
with 4Mb RAM and using floppies. First there was the boot floppy with
the
So there might be a use for
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 09:43:25 +
Declan Moriarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You must have a lot of time on your hands using Netscape. I decided I
did not, and put on Opera 5, which doesn't need this farting about with
plugins, and loads the same day it's started. I hear everyone going on
Congrats..
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Tina M. Hunley wrote:
% Congrats..
Happy Birthday, Doug, and many more to come!
Kurt
--
If bankers can count, how come they have eight windows and only four
tellers?
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at
Keith Antoine wrote:
% On Tuesday 18 December 2001 12:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] enunciated:
[...]
% Slackware here.
%
% Yeah, noticed that from the way your jocks hang ..snigger.
Skippy 1, Kurt 0.
Kurt
--
Just because your doctor has a name for your condition doesn't mean he
RH 7.1 on a Compaq laptop. Will started building a Linux from Scratch here
in the next few days on my third partition. Have been trying to teach
myself Linux and thought this would be a good route to go.
I have played with all distros but have not figured how to to install
Debain. That will
Anita Lewis wrote:
% On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 02:26:31 + (UTC), Anita Lewis wrote:
% Sorry. Possibly a dumb question, but I saw a lot of Caldera stuff here and
% just wondered if this list is distro specific.
%
% Wow, that sure generated a lot of replies! LOL. Thanks for the answer to
%
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 08:18:58 -0500
Tina M. Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats..
Have a good one Doug!
--
Myles Green Calgary AB Canada
Alberta Linux Step by Step Mirror:
http://www.telusplanet.net/public/mylesg/
--
There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
Hi gang!
I'm sure this must have come up before; please bear with me.
What's the general approach for solving failed dependencies when the
library that rpm cannot find is clearly installed?
Specifically, I'm installing rpm-3.0.6-4.i386.rpm and libdb.so.2 cannot
be found. But I know it is in
On Monday 17 December 2001 09:24 pm,Keith Antoine wrote:
snip
Many newer rpms will not work with that version 3.6 is the least
theey work with.
Thanks. The LlamaDude sent me out to get a 3.0.6 from the SxS. I
looked at rpm.org and it looks the numbering is 3.0.blahblah until it
kicks in
Tina M. Hunley wrote:
Congrats..
Happy Birthday Doug. Hope you enjoy it. Notice any more gray hairs in the
mirror this morning?
Hehehe.
--
Tom Wilson
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at
Tina M. Hunley wrote:
Congrats..
I was about this other user how she knew it was Doug's B-Day...then I
read the last name.
It sure is nice to have family members to point out that we're getting
older!
Happy Day Doug...all things in moderation! Save some beer for the rest
of us.
--
Linux
Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Monday 17 December 2001 09:24 pm,Keith Antoine wrote:
snip
Many newer rpms will not work with that version 3.6 is the least
theey work with.
Thanks. The LlamaDude sent me out to get a 3.0.6 from the SxS. I
looked at rpm.org and it looks the numbering is
Tony Alfrey wrote:
Hi gang!
I'm sure this must have come up before; please bear with me.
What's the general approach for solving failed dependencies when the
library that rpm cannot find is clearly installed?
Specifically, I'm installing rpm-3.0.6-4.i386.rpm and libdb.so.2 cannot
be
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 06:33 am,Ian wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Monday 17 December 2001 09:24 pm,Keith Antoine wrote:
snip
Many newer rpms will not work with that version 3.6 is the least
theey work with.
Thanks. The LlamaDude sent me out to get a 3.0.6 from the SxS. I
Happy birthday to you, Happy birthday to you, Happy birthday to you,
we are all in our places sing ing Happy birthday to you.
Happy birthday to you Doug.
Oh by the way in an earlier life time I was a rock star in compitition
with the beattles. We almost did it too. Did you like my singing g
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 06:56 am,Tim Wunder wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
Hi gang!
I'm sure this must have come up before; please bear with me.
What's the general approach for solving failed dependencies when
the library that rpm cannot find is clearly installed?
Specifically, I'm
Richard R. Sivernell wrote:
% Happy birthday to you, Happy birthday to you, Happy birthday to you,
% we are all in our places sing ing Happy birthday to you.
%
% Happy birthday to you Doug.
%
% Oh by the way in an earlier life time I was a rock star in compitition
% with the beattles. We almost
List
Building the 2.4.16 kernel here, all went well, till I did my
happy birthday song for Doug, this morn g.
I followed all of the SxS recompile-
Automated Kernel Compile script including System.map
moved dl to the below directory
/usr/src/linux-2.4.16
used the config file created from the
Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 06:56 am,Tim Wunder wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
Hi gang!
I'm sure this must have come up before; please bear with me.
What's the general approach for solving failed dependencies when
the library that rpm cannot find is clearly installed?
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 06:56 am,Tim Wunder wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
Hi gang!
I'm sure this must have come up before; please bear with me.
What's the general approach for solving failed dependencies when
the library that rpm cannot find is clearly installed?
Specifically, I'm
Happy Birthday! I missed the start of the thread, but did someone say
how old you are or do we really want to know?
--
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd rather be sailing
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: [COLUG] Beehive Linux [Distro Review]
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 14:23:46 -0500
From: Peter King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home: www.beehive.nu
Version: 0.4.4
The author of Beehive Linux, Kevin Clevenger, issues this warning in the
- Original Message -
From: Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Win95 replacement
Um, ok so its gone on another computer, so its not the disk. However,
EXACTLY
how are you going about the install, not through
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:23:55 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard R. Sivernell wrote:
% Happy birthday to you, Happy birthday to you, Happy birthday to you,
% we are all in our places sing ing Happy birthday to you.
%
% Happy birthday to you Doug.
%
% Oh by the way in an earlier life
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 07:28 am,Tim Wunder wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
snip
Oh, I forgot to mention that on my box, libdb.so.2 is a link to
libdb1-2.1.2.so
Does this confuse rpm??
Who knows? I know I'M confused about RPM. AFAIK, rpm only knows about
what rpm installs. If you've
Acrobat - proper German translation
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Richard R. Sivernell babbled on about:
Happy birthday to you, Happy birthday to you, Happy birthday to you,
we are all in our places sing ing Happy birthday to you.
Happy birthday to you Doug.
Oh by the way in an earlier life time I was a rock star in compitition
with the beattles. We
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 07:28 am,Tim Wunder wrote:
snip
FYI, I've got 3.0.6 installed on my Caldera eW31 system and
/lib/libdb.so.2 - libdb.so.2.7.7
/lib/libdb1.so.2 - libdb1.so.2.7.7
libdb.so.2.7.7 libdb1.so.2.7.7 are part of the db-2.7.7-12 rpm.
'What does rpm -q db' say? Perhaps
stayler babbled on about:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 02:26:31 + (UTC), Anita Lewis wrote:
Sorry. Possibly a dumb question, but I saw a lot of Caldera stuff here
and just wondered if this list is distro specific.
Mostly various flavors of Caldera here but there are lots of other
Distros
Tony Alfrey babbled on about:
Happy Birthday! I missed the start of the thread, but did someone say
how old you are or do we really want to know?
a ripe old 28 years today (dec 18)
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: http://linux.nf Admin:
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
Tony Alfrey babbled on about:
Happy Birthday! I missed the start of the thread, but did someone say
how old you are or do we really want to know?
a ripe old 28 years today (dec 18)
You old fogey...I'm not 28 for another 3 months!
Errr...sorry, I take the fogey
Ian babbled on about:
You old fogey...I'm not 28 for another 3 months!
Errr...sorry, I take the fogey comment back...repsect for elders and
all!
realy? I've gotten so used to being the youngest in any group that I guess
I've just started assuming everybody else is my elder! wow.. I have
Yeah, in my last job I worked with a bunch of former military. The
workplace was close to bases of three services, so they were all over
the place. They would all stand around on the back dock smoking and
talking about what they were doing in 1975. Occasionally I would chime
in with That was a
--- Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Alfrey babbled on about:
Happy Birthday! I missed the start of the thread, but did someone
say
how old you are or do we really want to know?
a ripe old 28 years today (dec 18)
Happy Birthday!
No matter how hard i try, i keep ending
--- Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian babbled on about:
You old fogey...I'm not 28 for another 3 months!
Errr...sorry, I take the fogey comment back...repsect for elders and
all!
realy? I've gotten so used to being the youngest in any group that I
guess
I've just
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 11:36:55 -0500
Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Alfrey babbled on about:
Happy Birthday! I missed the start of the thread, but did someone say
how old you are or do we really want to know?
a ripe old 28 years today (dec 18)
=
Whenever make modules_install complains about anything, its almost
always because you've got an outdated version of modutils. So, what
version of modutils do you have installed? It needs to be at least what
is recommended in /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Changes
--- Richard R. Sivernell [EMAIL
whatever may be age until a person is helping he is ought by everyone.
May god give you blessing and strength to fulfill you every good deed.and
every endeavour.
- Original Message -
From: Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:06 PM
28, ehhh?
That's not so bad.
Done it a couple of time or so.
Happy birthday ;^}
Jer
At 11:52 AM 12/18/01 -0500, Ian wrote:
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
Tony Alfrey babbled on about:
Happy Birthday! I missed the start of the thread, but did someone say
how old you are or do we
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 15:28, you wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 06:56 am,Tim Wunder wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
Hi gang!
I'm sure this must have come up before; please bear with me.
What's the general approach for solving failed dependencies when
the library
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 06:41 pm, you wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:49:53 -0800
Vern W Heesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks again David, with your help I almost there!
Vern,
When you get this all ironed out... why not write up a detailed
step-by-step for the
rest of us to follow?
Doug,
[To the Volga Boatman]
Happy birthday,
Happy birthday,
Sin and sorrow fill the air
People dieing everywhere,
Happy Birthday!
In Harmony's Way, and In A Chord,
Tom :-})
+--+
| Thomas A. Condonemail: [EMAIL
I've putzed with upgrading rpm to v3.0.6 a couple times, and i've never
had to do anything to the 'db' package. If everything works to your
satisfaction, i guess that's all that counts, but i suspect you took a
longer, circuitous route to getting this working than was neccesary.
--- Tony Alfrey
Lonni,
i've been tasked with interviewing people for a position that
my manager
has deemed me not 'mature' enough to take.
=
Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As someone who looks 15 years
Net Llama babbled on about:
Even over me.
who'd a thunk it?
Quite often unfortunately. Alot of managers still think of anyone under
30 as being young inexperienced, regardless of their work history or
knowledge. I find it incredibly frustrating, especially when lately,
exactly. what
Jer Scanlon babbled on about:
28, ehhh?
That's not so bad.
Done it a couple of time or so.
LOL. thanks!
and thanks also to zohar for the kind words (I meant to reply, but hit delete
by mistake)
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: http://linux.nf
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
Jer Scanlon babbled on about:
28, ehhh?
That's not so bad.
Done it a couple of time or so.
LOL. thanks!
and thanks also to zohar for the kind words (I meant to reply, but hit delete
by mistake)
Musta been youthful exuberance...
Well, as long as Skippy's
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 12:47:32 -0500
Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Net Llama babbled on about:
Even over me.
who'd a thunk it?
Quite often unfortunately. Alot of managers still think of anyone under
30 as being young inexperienced, regardless of their work history or
Doug,
Have a wonderful and blessed birthday. Many happy returns.
Best,
Keith B.
Tina M. Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats..
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Net Llama wrote:
...but i suspect you took a
longer, circuitous route to getting this working than was neccesary.
I wouldn't think so. His problem was that rpm didn't know about the db
version he had installed (or, more specifically, the libdb version), and
as a result didn't know the
Richard R. Sivernell babbled on about:
o util-linux 2.10o * 2.10m # fdformat
The * are less than required, do any of these cause a problem?
This is a stock Caldera Server 3.1 system PIII
can't speak about the others, but the one above is just for ext3 issues
Rick,
I believe you need to upgrade the modutils. I use SuSE, but it did have
a new modutils.rpm when I upgraded the default suse kernel to 2.4.16.
Best,
Keith B.
Richard R. Sivernell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lonnie
Thanks for reply.
view /usr/src/linux-2.4.16/Documentation/Changes read
Lonnie
kernel.org has this:
Stable Version: 2.4.11 at their dl site ( ftp )
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/modutils-2.4.11.tar.gz
I can get it today if you think it would help, that is no proble.
any special thing to be aware of in making this tarball?
cheers
--
,--- Forwarded message (begin)
Subject: Newbies Prayers Answered (LONG)
From: mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 05:50:09 -0500
http://www.redmondlinux.org
I have been following the development of Redmond Linux for a while
now,
never
Richard R. Sivernell babbled on about:
Lonnie
kernel.org has this:
Stable Version: 2.4.11 at their dl site ( ftp )
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/modutils-2.4.11.t
ar.gz
I can get it today if you think it would help, that is no proble.
any special thing to
I'm currently running W3.1 with kernel 2.4.16 and ext3. All I had to do was
upgrade e2fsprogs to 1.25 and compile ext3 into the kernel(not a module) and
it worked. I tried to compile util-linux and it didn't work. I can't
remember the error, but I didn't do it. Currently only having a
Happy B-Day. Dang young'uns. :)
Jim
On Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:36, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
Tony Alfrey babbled on about:
Happy Birthday! I missed the start of the thread, but did someone say
how old you are or do we really want to know?
a ripe old 28 years today (dec 18)
--
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
Ian babbled on about:
You old fogey...I'm not 28 for another 3 months!
Errr...sorry, I take the fogey comment back...repsect for elders and
all!
realy? I've gotten so used to being the youngest in any group that I guess
I've just started assuming everybody
On Wednesday 19 December 2001 01:07, Tony Alfrey enunciated:
I thought Skippy went through this not long ago, can you not d/l a
pre compiled binary version to run? Or am I inventing memories?
I think you are absolutely correct; I remember the long thread and I'm
loathe to go dig it up.
I remember this going around earlier this year. Just thought I'd pass along
the info. It's about the filter for WP8 that expired and was never fixed or
updated. It has been and here's the link.
http://noframes.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=5655mode=threadorder=0thold=0
Jim
--
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 23:35, Richard R. Sivernell enunciated:
Skippy
While a CD would be nice, that is so much extra work, and he
does love to surf. Just the url will be enough. I also like these,
as do so many on the list. Your offer says so much about you.
A just and kind person
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 14:47:46 -0500
Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard R. Sivernell babbled on about:
Lonnie
kernel.org has this:
Stable Version: 2.4.11 at their dl site ( ftp )
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/modutils-2.4.11.t
ar.gz
I
--- Richard R. Sivernell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 14:47:46 -0500
Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard R. Sivernell babbled on about:
Lonnie
kernel.org has this:
Stable Version: 2.4.11 at their dl site ( ftp )
@
hunley.homeip.net
Server says... 401 Error - Unauthorized
Access
So?
Remember the last time you saw some cheesy
Hollywood movie where they used computers in a
completely unrealistic way?
Remember how some hacker tried to break
into
some system and kept getting a big
ACCESS DENIED
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 05:18 am, Tina M. Hunley wrote:
Congrats..
Have a good one Doug
David Aikema
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 11:39 am,Douglas J. Hunley wrote:
snip
. Every single app and frontend worked flawlessly. Litterally
less than 20 minutes to a 100% stable 100% functional linux system.
Not even a single additional program is needed to
be totally functional. A great deal of
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 10:15 am,Tim Wunder wrote:
Net Llama wrote:
...but i suspect you took a
longer, circuitous route to getting this working than was
neccesary.
I wouldn't think so. His problem was that rpm didn't know about the
db version he had installed (or, more
Douglas J. Hunley wrote:
,--- Forwarded message (begin)
Subject: Newbies Prayers Answered (LONG)
From: mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 05:50:09 -0500
http://www.redmondlinux.org
I have been following the development of Redmond Linux for a
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 12:47:32 -0500
Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Computer games don't affect kids, I mean if Pac Man affected us as
kids, we'd be sitting around in darkened rooms munching pills and
listening to repetitive music.
Hmmm. As I read this, I'm sitting in a
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:01:48 -0800
Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 08:52 am,Ian wrote:
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
Tony Alfrey babbled on about:
Happy Birthday! I missed the start of the thread, but did
someone say how old you are or do we really want
Tony Alfrey wrote:
%
% Who can argue with this? I'll put it on my wife's machine and see if
% she notices the difference between win 98 ;-)
% She and her machine are the ideal crash-test platforms.
So, are you going to tell your wife you just called her a crash test
dummy? ;-)
Kurt
--
Tony Alfrey wrote:
%
% Didn't we decide a very long while back (on the caldera list) that
% David Bandel was the old fogey?
I don't remember that conversation...
Kurt
--
There are three things I always forget. Names, faces -- the third I
can't remember.
-- Italo Svevo
On Tuesday 18 Dec 2001 19:39, Douglas J. Hunley wrote:
,--- Forwarded message (begin)
Subject: Newbies Prayers Answered (LONG)
From: mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 05:50:09 -0500
http://www.redmondlinux.org
I have been following the development
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 09:35:47 -0800
Vern W Heesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 06:41 pm, you wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:49:53 -0800
Vern W Heesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks again David, with your help I almost there!
Vern,
When you get this all
telnet towel.blinkenlights.nl
--
Ronnie
==
Each days terror almost a form of boredom
madmen at the wheel and stepping on the gas and the brakes no good
and each day one, sometimes two, morning glories
faultless, blue, blue sometimes flecked with magenta
each lit from within with
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 15:47:48 -0800
Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 11:39 am,Douglas J. Hunley wrote:
snip
. Every single app and frontend worked flawlessly. Litterally
less than 20 minutes to a 100% stable 100% functional linux system.
Not even a single
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:01:48 -0800
Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 08:52 am,Ian wrote:
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
Tony Alfrey babbled on about:
Happy Birthday! I missed the start of the thread, but did
someone say how old you are or do we really want
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 20:39:21 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
%
% Didn't we decide a very long while back (on the caldera list) that
% David Bandel was the old fogey?
I don't remember that conversation...
Kurt
=
Guess you're too old...
I am trying to get hagelslag, a console gnutella client, to work.
My machine is behind a firewall (of my own making).
I can search fine and get results but I can't download anything.
I have port 6346 redirected to the masqueraded pc, although I doubt that
could be the problem. I haven't gotten a
Richard R. Sivernell babbled on about:
2.4.12 is at http://huley.homeip.net/linux_sources/ along with
I get either Denied access or no server of that name
that would be cause I cant type... http://hunley.homeip.net/linux_sources/
sorry
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux
Previously, Ronnie Gauthier chose to write:
telnet towel.blinkenlights.nl
Now that's neat. How long does it last? I gave it 5 minutes or so, but then
gave up to do other stuff.
Tim
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at
Richard R. Sivernell babbled on about:
@
hunley.homeip.net
http://hunley.homeip.net/linux_sources/
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: http://linux.nf Admin: http://hunley.homeip.net
Your mom is a monolithic kernel!
Michael Scottaline wrote:
% On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 20:39:21 -0500
% [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% I don't remember that conversation...
%
% Guess you're too old... ducks and runs
% Mike
Pot? Kettle? Black?
Kurt
--
You cannot propel yourself forward by patting yourself on the back.
--- Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Net Llama wrote:
...but i suspect you took a
longer, circuitous route to getting this working than was neccesary.
I wouldn't think so. His problem was that rpm didn't know about the db
version he had installed (or, more specifically, the libdb
I have no idea how long it lasts. But I would like to know how its done. I
have an old ascii draw program laying around with my bbs stuff I'd play with
again. A very low overhead tutorial or something-or-the-other could be
created this way. I bet you could easily color the text too.
On
whatever may be age, a helping person is he/she is ought by everyone.
May god give you blessing and strength to fulfill you every good deed and
every endeavour.
- Original Message -
From: Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:06 PM
--- Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Previously, Ronnie Gauthier chose to write:
telnet towel.blinkenlights.nl
Now that's neat. How long does it last? I gave it 5 minutes or so, but
then
gave up to do other stuff.
Its still running on my box, rigth around where Luke Obiwan meet.
Someone has got way t much time on their hands... but pretty kewl..
starwarsfreak
thats me
/starwarsfreak
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 16:14, you were heard blurting out:
I have no idea how long it lasts. But I would like to know how its done. I
have an old ascii draw program laying around
Well, I may have made some progress.
I changed the public address option in the configuration file to my gateway
machine's ip. And, I spelled the name right of my download directory,
finally.
So, now people are uploading me (or trying to) and I an downloading them
(trying to). But, this seems
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 21:52:21 -0500
Douglas J Hunley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard R. Sivernell babbled on about:
@
hunley.homeip.net
http://hunley.homeip.net/linux_sources/
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: http://linux.nfAdmin:
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 05:39 pm,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
%
% Didn't we decide a very long while back (on the caldera list) that
% David Bandel was the old fogey?
I don't remember that conversation...
Kurt
Well, I looked through my old sent mail logs and I can't
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 05:40 pm,[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
%
% Who can argue with this? I'll put it on my wife's machine and see
if % she notices the difference between win 98 ;-)
% She and her machine are the ideal crash-test platforms.
So, are you going to tell
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 07:17 pm,Net Llama wrote:
--- Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
As it stands now, rpm knows about his db install, and he's running
a newer version than he was when he started, and he's got a current
rpm version that'll read version 4 rpm's. Seems to me
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 17:41:54 +
Declan Moriarty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 15:28, you wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 06:56 am,Tim Wunder wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
Hi gang!
I'm sure this must have come up before; please bear with
- Original Message -
From: Keith Antoine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: Win95 replacement
One point mate, is that it is imperative that you DO know the chipsets
on
board the MB and the video card so as you can tell
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
