Paul Wilson a écrit:
REGIONAL REGISTRIES SUBMIT ICANN ASO PROPOSAL
Expressions of Support Requested - see below!
I'm sorry, but I cannot support a closed process like the one you
used to form your constituency.
Michael Sondow
http://www.jonesday.com/html/biosquery.asp?ResultSet=SingleColumn=IDDataValue=987
Name: Joe Sims
Group: Government Regulation
Practice(s): Antitrust Trade Regulation
Location: Washington
Title: Partner
Description: Admitted 1970 Arizona; 1978 District of Columbia.
Arizona
State University
Michael Sondow wrote:
The EC is taking its cue from ICANN, covering up their own
anticompetitive DNS activities by using NSI as a smokescreen.
Probably, this tactic was suggested to Christopher Wilkinson, who is
a member of CORE, and transmitted by him to DG IV.
Maybe DG IV itself is a
Tony Rutkowsi wrote:
At 12:29 PM 7/29/99 , dibu wrote:
Well, I think is not the same.
NSI domain names are international, but country code based
domain names
not.
From anticompetitive and functional standpoints, it is exactly
the same. The market is the performance of
At 05:02 AM 7/30/99 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
therefore "eventually" competition will be allowed in the ccTLDs, but I
share DG IV's POV that economically and politically NSI's monopoly in
"general purpose" (not nationally restricted) TLDs is a higher priority.
Even though the AFNIC monopoly,
I disagree with Roberto here. As a European national and as a European
company, we regard the ability to compete freely and fairly across Europe to
be our right. If that right is restricted by national policies, i.e. by
restrictive local NIC policies, then we regard that as a highest priority.
BTW there is also the fact that the market share for the NIC's are not so
high than for NSI.
It could be ridiculous to open for example the registration for the
Luxembourg domain name (if it exsits, I have to check) .
Jean-Michel Bécar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.etsi.org
E.T.S.I. Project
At 08:43 AM 7/30/99 , Jean-Michel Becar wrote:
BTW there is also the fact that the market
share for the NIC's are not so
high than for NSI.
It could be ridiculous to open for example the registration for the
Luxembourg domain name (if it exsits, I have to check)
.
The market share of
ESTENA -
Hi Roberto,
The European Commission looks, of course, at
the global European figures.
Obviously, if the European ccNICs had the dominant position you show
as
hypothesis, the things would be different. After all, DG IV should be
silly
to bother for 0.01%, don't you agree?
Not necessarily - if the
Tony,
The European Commission looks, of course, at the global European figures.
Obviously, if the European ccNICs had the dominant position you show as
hypothesis, the things would be different. After all, DG IV should be
silly to bother for 0.01%, don't you agree?
Not necessarily -
Jim,
Odd, given your arguments, that, with the good advice Mr B received at the EC,
we do not see him at the helm of some more adventurous venture.
Why would a man so much more in possession of the facts than most choose merely
to learn Spanish at such a high salary when he could have burst
Tony,
The market share of ESTENA - the Ministry of Education
Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg is nearly 100% in Luxembourg.
Please tell us how you calculate this. I suspect you are simply
dividing the total number of .lu registrations by the total
number of .lu registrations
gTLD market
Among the most frequent requests after ICANN's Public Meetings in Berlin in
May was a centralized ("official") real-time chat site for online
participants to use to communicate with each other.
I'm prepared to make such an area available, but as yet no online chat
software has met my the
Friday, July 30, 1999, 12:03:59 PM, Ben Edelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Among the most frequent requests after ICANN's Public Meetings in Berlin in
May was a centralized ("official") real-time chat site for online
participants to use to communicate with each other.
I'm prepared to make
Roberto and all,
Of course, Rome was not built in a day. However we are not living in
Roman times and building regulative and administrative structures
"Using the Internet" instead of Face to Face meetings can be done
better, more accurately, and with wider participation than when Rome
Rome
Friday, July 30, 1999, 12:14:45 PM, William X. Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friday, July 30, 1999, 12:03:59 PM, Ben Edelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Among the most frequent requests after ICANN's Public Meetings in Berlin in
May was a centralized ("official") real-time chat site for online
Look at http://www.activeworlds.com
No matter what you write or find, you won't find
anything more suited to what you want than this.
At 03:03 PM 7/30/99 -0400, you wrote:
Among the most frequent requests after ICANN's Public Meetings in Berlin in
May was a centralized ("official") real-time
Friday, July 30, 1999, 12:40:29 PM, Richard J. Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IRC is probably your best bet, and then use a Java client on the
website to access it.
It you want to stage WW III, IRC is probably the place to do it.
Only if you venture to EFNet :)
I was actually suggesting
Friday, July 30, 1999, 12:37:33 PM, Richard J. Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look at http://www.activeworlds.com
No matter what you write or find, you won't find
anything more suited to what you want than this.
Activeworlds is quite nice, however it has draw backs.
It is quite CPU
At 12:35 PM 7/30/99 -0700, you wrote:
Friday, July 30, 1999, 12:40:29 PM, Richard J. Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IRC is probably your best bet, and then use a Java client on the
website to access it.
It you want to stage WW III, IRC is probably the place to do it.
Only if you venture to
Friday, July 30, 1999, 1:06:05 PM, Richard J. Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a handful of these products - Esther is invested in
one, but for my money the best one is activeworlds.com.
But we need a solution that works now, and for the most people,
without cost, and none of those
At 12:47 PM 7/30/99 -0700, you wrote:
Friday, July 30, 1999, 12:37:33 PM, Richard J. Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look at http://www.activeworlds.com
No matter what you write or find, you won't find
anything more suited to what you want than this.
Activeworlds is quite nice, however it
Friday, July 30, 1999, 1:10:44 PM, Richard J. Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:47 PM 7/30/99 -0700, you wrote:
Friday, July 30, 1999, 12:37:33 PM, Richard J. Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look at http://www.activeworlds.com
No matter what you write or find, you won't find
anything
On 30 July 1999, "Richard J. Sexton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IRC is probably your best bet, and then use a Java client on the
website to access it.
It you want to stage WW III, IRC is probably the place to do it.
So you're in agreement then, Richard? :)
--
Mark C. Langston
At 03:20 PM 7/30/99 -0400, A.M. Rutkowski wrote:
Hi Werner,
Glad to see you're still around
[Irascible comment skimmed.]
But could you clarify *whom* the EC tries to protect by investigating
NSI, in your opinion?
You're asking the same question that I am! Who in
Europe are they protecting
On 30 July 1999, "William X. Walsh" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friday, July 30, 1999, 1:06:05 PM, Richard J. Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wro
te:
There's a handful of these products - Esther is invested in
one, but for my money the best one is activeworlds.com.
But we need a solution that works
El Generalisimo Sola and all,
I am afraid that the "Generalisimo" here has is a bit backwards.
ICANN doesn't even really exist in that it has not membership.
The DNSO does in the GA. Hence Dennis's "Suggestion" is both
valid
and within the bounds of proper protocol in this instance...
In
All,
More evidence that DOJ, DOC, FDA, FTC, ICANN, NTIA, ect, ect,
are
clueless...
FYI: http://www.cnnfn.com/news/technology/newsbytes/134154.html
Headline: Democrats Eat Their Own On Net Pharmacy Issue
Excerpts:
" Oversight and Investigations
Subcommittee Democrats tore into their
All,
Headline: Bliley Targets All Domain Name Players - Update
Does DOJ and NTIA got it stuff together???
FYI: http://www.cnnfn.com/news/technology/newsbytes/134174.html
Excerpts:
" House Commerce Committee
Chairman Thomas Bliley, R-Va., yesterday launched
an expanded investigation into the
Ronda wrote:
4) After a story was printed in a German online journal critical
of ICANN, the writer got an email from an EU official asking who
he was and what he did and complaining about the article, with
the complaint also sent to the editor of the journal.
Do you still have the URL for that
Has anyone else found it difficult (read "impossible") to get onto DNSO
working groups?
--karl--
not sure of the point that kerry is making with this post. But am
sure that computerized vote counting is fool hardy.
Another way to look at it is that the 'illegal' names would never have
been found w/o the ability to electronically collate the village rolls
that revealed multiple
All,
FYI: http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,0-39935,00.html?st.ne.140.head
Very interesting. A change in ICANN strategy with respect to
Liability perhaps
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA
33 matches
Mail list logo
