William and all,
If anybody has is getting tired of person's identifying themselves as
William X Walsh's and John D. Goodspeed's continuos fraudulent,
public libelous or slanderous statements, please contact me
privately. All posts will be forwarded to the DOJ, FBI, and
INTERPOL for further
Jeff and Everyone,
Jeff, can do. For your information I have recieved four posts that reference
Mr. Goodspeed and eleven that reference Mr. Walsh today alone. I will
forward them in the mourning. I have also sent them to the proper legal
authorities in my home country as well. I am going
Well if it's not hats - it may as well be shirts.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 09:58:46 -0400
From: Planet Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: Danke [iso-8859-1] für Ihren CAN CAN with ICANN link!
] (fwd)]
Original Message
On 5 August 1999, "Ben Edelman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Berkman Center for Internet and Society will webcast and facilitate
remote participation for the upcoming meetings of the Internet Corporation
for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN, http://www.icann.org), which will
take place in
FYI
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
The
Excerpts from the essay at:
http://www.ibm.com/services/newmark/mature.html
Toward A More Mature Internet
By Esther Dyson
big snip
FRAMING THE BIG PICTURE
After the facts, what you need to cover is the meaning of all this.
Specifically, how
Mr. Fenello and Everyone,
I does appear the Ms. Dyson has a rudimentary understanding of media bias.
The excerpt that you chose was interesting in that it contains some very
inaccurate statements of obvious note.
Jay Fenello wrote:
Excerpts from the essay at:
Hi Jay,
Excerpts from the essay at:
These same things could be said about every
significant communications medium development
that has ever occurred.
Perhaps the essay could be compressed down to a single
crisp nugget: "Esther is the message." :-)
--tony
No, quite the contrary. Read again:
Fundamentally, the Net is a better tool for grassroots organizing or
conspiracy than it is for far-reaching propaganda. It is a medium
wherein people can find each other and then communicate.
At 01:41 pm 08/20/1999 -0400, spotlight special wrote:
Martin and all,
Thank you for the pointer. Interesting article indeed. The most interesting
part was the part that is missing. That being that the house commerce
commission is still investigating ICANN and most specifically with respect
to funding, as in a funding model. ICANN still
Tony and all,
ROFLMAO! You got it just about right! And exercise in self
aggrandizement...
A.M. Rutkowski wrote:
Hi Jay,
Excerpts from the essay at:
These same things could be said about every
significant communications medium development
that has ever occurred.
Perhaps the essay
http://www.dnspolicy.com/article.pl?sid=99/08/20/1120220
Quote
"We are not presently broke and all we have done with the White House
people is the same as we have done with everyone else," said Joe Sims,
an ICANN attorney.
/Quote
--
William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
Email: [EMAIL
At 02:18 PM 8/19/99 , Jay Fenello wrote:
At 01:56 PM 8/19/99 , Kent Crispin wrote:
By all appearances, these two sides have been equally matched,
with approximately the same number of people supporting each
of these positions.
Yet, over time, the technocracy has come to dominate ICANN.
http://www.dnspolicy.com/article.pl?sid=99/08/20/1132206
Orientation.com will act as a distributor for NSI, supplying
multilingual content, etc. Orientation.com operates many regionally
specific and multilingual portals.
Interesting to see NSI positioning itself globally in advance of
facing
Dear Joop and colleagues -
I'm writing to respond personally to your proposal for an Individual Domain
Name Holders' Constituency. As you know, the Initial Board decided not to
consider it in Berlin because it was not among the seven constituencies we
hoped to see form to constitute the full
On 20 August 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Esther Dyson) wrote:
Second, I am more concerned that the voices and interests of individuals be
*represented* in the work of the DNSO, than with precisely how that happens.
Although the process is certainly messy, the concerns of individuals and
http://www.dnspolicy.com/news/99/08/20/1145221.shtml
This is absolutely insane. NSI will now be actively promoting the
services of this web hosting service to its domain registrants. This
is an absolute abuse of their position and trust.
ISPs need to let NSI know how they feel.
It is time
Throughout this debate over Internet Governance,
there has consistently been two very different and
distinct perspectives.
One looked at the transition of authority from IANA
to ICANN as a purely technical matter, one that should
remain under the control of a technocracy.
...
The other
Esther and all,
No Esther, you read again:
"Net was nowhere in the recent elections. (In the United States,
at least, political operatives are using the Net effectively for
organizing; in the East, the Net is for academics and business people;
the political establishment has not yet caught
Esther and all,
Nice try Esther, but no cigar, as they say! ;) Excellent political
posturing,
but lacks sufficient substance, and is therefore your *Reasons* are more in
line with *Excuses*, and I have no doubt that they will be viewed
as such, by in large.
Esther Dyson wrote:
Dear Joop
Might one ask who made this agenda-setting decision, and when?
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Esther Dyson wrote:
Dear Joop and colleagues -
I'm writing to respond personally to your proposal for an Individual Domain
Name Holders' Constituency. As you know, the Initial Board decided not to
William and all,
I would agree that it is long past time for new gTLD's and Registries
to be added ore otherwise incorporated into the existing structure.
But I can't blame NSI for taking the business initiative here in their
own interest and the interests of their customers
William X.
Bret and all,
Bret A. Fausett wrote:
Esther Dyson wrote:
Second, I am more concerned that the voices and interests of individuals be
*represented* in the work of the DNSO, than with precisely how that happens.
Another avenue for individual domain name holders to let their interests
be
Laura and all,
Great idea!
Might I make a few suggestions to get things started out on the
right foot or moving if a positive productive direction.
1.) Clean up the membership of the NCDNHC. Insure that all members
of the NCDNHC are indeed NON-COMMERCIAL or otherwise do
not
Friday, August 20, 1999, 11:56:26 AM, Bret A. Fausett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Esther Dyson wrote:
Second, I am more concerned that the voices and interests of individuals be
*represented* in the work of the DNSO, than with precisely how that happens.
Another avenue for individual domain
Professor Froomkin and all,
Excellent questions here Professor, and ones that deserve a direct
and definitive answers. How about it Esther?
Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
Might one ask who made this agenda-setting decision, and when?
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Esther Dyson
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [spotlight special
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 13:55:17 -0400 (EDT)
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 20
Ken is not the only one opposed to
measuring consensus:
Esther Dyson wrote:
http://www.ibm.com/services/newmark/mature.html
Indeed, I am not so sure we should welcome the opportunity for
electronic voting. That would make it easier for the elite to vote, and
further disenfranchise those
From:
http://www.dnspolicy.com/news/99/08/20/1145221.shtml
NSI and Interliant team up (Score:1)
by Mitch on Friday August 20, @01:11PM
(User Info)
I don't see any indication of money exchanging hands, yet NSI is
going to give Interliant "preferred handling"? They've been raking
in millions
http://www.dnspolicy.com/news/99/08/20/1439239.shtml
$650,000 in loans, as part of a $2M target sum ICANN is seeking to
enable it to start paying the bills.
Perhaps as Interim President, Mike Roberts should waive his salary for
one year, that alone would give ICANN over half of what it is
On 20 August 1999, "William X. Walsh" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dnspolicy.com/news/99/08/20/1439239.shtml
$650,000 in loans, as part of a $2M target sum ICANN is seeking to
enable it to start paying the bills.
Perhaps as Interim President, Mike Roberts should waive his salary for
Bill Lovell wrote:
Any
person can go to any government agency at any time and complain, freak
out, kiss butt, or whatever, at any time he/she/it/they want(s) to.
To emulate your colorful language, you're full of it. Interfering
with investigations, whether it be to influence the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see the threat that can be put over CORE by USG, if CORE was based
in the US (other than political pressure, of course).
CORE is a conspiracy, illegally incorporated, that has broken every
section of the Sherman and the Federal Trade Commission Acts. It is
Esther Dyson wrote:
Dear Joop and colleagues -
I'm writing to respond personally to your proposal for an Individual Domain
Name Holders' Constituency.
Thank you, Oh Great Queen of the Internet.
As you know, the Initial Board decided not to
consider it in Berlin because it was not among
http://www.dnspolicy.com/article.pl?sid=99/08/20/1643201
DNSPolicy.com is leading with this story this evening.
Still awaiting a response from NSI, and Doubleclick has issued a "no
comment" response, but their PR Director did say she would get back
toMonday.
I had enough that I felt
How is this different from, say, regisetr.com having
ads on their whois ?
Isn't every *registrar* able to do what they want
with their whois ? The *registry* has no public interface
and I don't see any ads from say
dig foo.com any @a.root-servers.com
--
This program posts news to
Friday, August 20, 1999, 5:09:08 PM, Richard J. Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How is this different from, say, regisetr.com having
ads on their whois ?
Isn't every *registrar* able to do what they want
with their whois ? The *registry* has no public interface
and I don't see any ads from
once again I ask for accounting details
Who are resposible for the budget details on the ICANN site. Who are the
accountants who have developed these proforma financials.
What is the budgeted amount for the public relations firm and can someone
post accounting details to your budgets, the
my understanding is that estee has a friend at ogilvie who agreed to
lend ogilvies services at a greatly reduced rateseems that
ogilvie thought the prestiege of being the firm that sold the net
down the river was too much for ogilvie to pass up.
once again I ask for accounting
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Gordon Cook wrote:
my understanding is that estee has a friend at ogilvie who agreed to
lend ogilvies services at a greatly reduced rateseems that
ogilvie thought the prestiege of being the firm that sold the net
down the river was too much for ogilvie to pass
40 matches
Mail list logo
