[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
Reply via email to
[IFWP] FYI - Common Cause/CDT Letter to ICANN re: At-Large elections (fwd),
!Dr. Joe Baptista
Re: [IFWP] FYI - Common Cause/CDT Letter to ICANN re: At-Large elections (fwd),
Michael Sondow
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:
Hello Joe,
Tuesday, June 06, 2000, 12:52:09 PM, you wrote:
JB FYI: More ccTLD's say no to ICANN FEES
Good for them! As I have said in the past, the ccTLDs are the weak
link for ICANN. They will be the test of ICANN's presumed "authority"
This .union is a bad idea.
1. It completely ignores existing .union domain holders in the name.space
root zone. Even though the name.space root zone is run in an
unprofessional manner - documented from time to time in these groups, one
must still respect the legacy domains operational in
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
At 17:14 31.05.2000 -0400, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
Our current stats:
6,865 Domains registered and validated
1,108 Domain holders
Average squat factor 6.2.
No Harald - we don't have any squat factor
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Andy Gardner wrote:
Our current stats:
6,865 Domains registered and validated
1,108 Domain holders
Average squat factor 6.2.
No Harald - we don't have any squat factor. That is an ICANN definition
which has only served to give
Network Solutions - ATTENTION - what's happening with this?
http://www.thestar.com/thestar/editorial/updates/business/2601NEW01d_CI-DOMAIN1.html
There should also be some consideration here to pursue criminal
action. This is theft.
Registrant:
Billy Tandoko
Kotak Pos 3988 JKP
Jakarta
ICANN DEFENDS INTERNET MANAGEMENT
(Source: InfoWorld.com) ICANN's lack of public exposure has led to
misconception about this private sector body charged with technical
management of the Net, according to Esther Dyson.
http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=269032
poor ol ester polyester
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 15:00:49 -0400
From: Todd Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: "Domain Names Hijacked" news article
Yeah .. just one more example of NSI's unwillingness to get off their butts
and do anything. This has been
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 15:39:22 -0400
From: Rick Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: An Open letter to ICANN
Mr. Mike Roberts
CEO
ICANN
RE: NICANN and the new dot.pod TLD
Dear Mr. Roberts,
I would like to invite you to join the
http://god.pccf.net/admin/stats-2000-06-01/index.htm
regards
Joe Baptista
Our current stats:
6,865 Domains registered and validated
1,108 Domain holders
1,220 Domains in que waiting validation
1 Domain deletion request by owner
105 Domain Duplicates or errors
304 Bogus Domain registrations
Our
On Wed, 31 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Dr." Joe,
First of all, this list is no place for your noise.
It is a discussion of NCTLDs and not a sounding board
for your professional disruptions.
This list Paul is also not a place for publishing misinformation, and I
claim again that
Well - here are some very general stats on the dot.GOD registry.
5935 domain registered and validated
996 domain holder
2471 domains in que waiting validation
1 deletion request by owner
97 Duplicates or errors
340 Bogus registrations
It's interesting to note that
http://god.pccf.net/admin/gtld-zone-2000-05-28.txt
If you detect any errors please feel free to advise - whois is located at:
http://god.pccf.net/cgi-bin/whois.cgi
soon we'll be surfing - actually you can surf it now - but few people know
how - so if you know feel free.
of our batches crashed.
crom is A RR to 204.107.129.8
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Sun, 28 May 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
http://god.pccf.net/admin/gtld-zone-2000-05-28.txt
If you detect any errors please feel free to advise - whois is located
More ICANN FUD. I'm not surprised - this process is so corrupt it stinks
to the hills and back. Shame. However this whole rolly polly show is
being closed - so enjoy while you can.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 20:57:28 +1200
From: Joop Teernstra [EMAIL
The mans right - knows his business.
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Simon Higgs wrote:
http://god.pccf.net/cgi-bin/whois.cgi?whois=ask
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=342106167
With that said I would like to announce our policy concerning domain
speculation - it's not our
The dot.god universe has exploded - I think that is clear. And unlike
ICANN - I know where the cookie is buttered - so to speak. Therefore - it
is with the greatest of pleasure that I announce I have been given
permission to close down PCCF for the summer.
Furthermore - the ICANN production
It is a pleasure to announce that we have reached 8,500 registered dot.GOD
domain names. Our request for beta testers has exceeded our expectations.
We are now moving to the next stages:
1) Clearing our batch backlogs
2) building and testing our first zone file
3)
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 22:07:59 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Mikael Pawlo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ga] Status of ICANN PINs
Did you apply for ICANN membership?
Are you still waiting for the PINs?
So did I, but thanks to Esther Dyson I
Has anybody any idea what this is all about? Looks scary to me and it's s
fine example that people are desparate for names - even to the extent of
working within the existing system resulting in some bizzare examples.
Regards
joe Baptista
- Original Message -
From: Kwon Tayseek
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Fred Hutter wrote:
"!Dr. Joe Baptista" wrote:
How are they going to feel when they realize ICANN is preventing them
from running
safe family values tld's.
Making the big assumption that u r serious for a moment, and further
Oh but I am serious. Very s
http://www.news.com/Perspectives/Column/0,176,432,00.html?st.ne.per.gif.a
Trademark owners may get millions of new names
May 19, 2000
The Internet's policy organization is considering a proposal that would give
trademark holders "first dibs" on millions of planned new domain names.
The
On Sun, 21 May 2000, Mark Jeftovic wrote:
Domain Name: JEFTOVIC.COM
Registrar: ALABANZA, INC.
Whois Server: whois.bulkregister.com
Referral URL: www.bulkregister.com
Name Server: NS1.TO-BUY-THIS-DOMAIN-FAX-305-463-9709.COM
Name Server: NS3.THIS-DOMAIN-IS-FOR-SALE.COM
I'm in the process of moving on of our class c networks. I'm looking to
share the class c to help people setup root secondary servers. If you
have roots running now on your own networks and can swap secondaries with
us - were looking for secondaries in various parts of the world to swap
for
1,200 individuals. In three days.
On Sat, 20 May 2000, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
Yes but, how many registrants?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Joe
Baptista
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2000 9:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Hi Ester, ladies, gentelmen and non specific gender types (You know who
you are ;-)
I am writing you to lodge an official protest concerning Year 1999 DNSO
Secretariat report 1999 milestones located at:
http://www.dnso.org/secretariat/1999.Secretariatreport.html
I would like to draw
that non of it could
of been possible with you and Mr. Gato.
So my advise is - sit back and enjoy the fame.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
At 03:11 19.05.2000 -0400, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
Hi Ester, ladies, gentelmen and non specific gender types (You
I have not read it - wil later - but sounds like fun.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 06:52:04 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IETF-Announce: ;
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-mealling-pin-urn-00.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
, of course there
are no trailing "-'s"... Is that ok with you Louis or Mike?
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
As for Kent, well the bullshit flowith! Joe B. How about a
.GOD special domain for Kent and Songbird. I know you can come
up with
-Songbird.god sound joe? ;) Oh yes, of course there
are no trailing "-'s"... Is that ok with you Louis or Mike?
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
As for Kent, well the bullshit flowith! Joe B. How about a
.GOD special domai
-songbird.god
CrispyCrockett-songbird.god
ect... ect... I think you can follow the direction here joe? ;)
Reserve a few of those for Michael Graham as well would you be
so kind to do so. And bill me on the total amount.
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
Shall I register it in your name Jeff
You want a domain name too Ellen? Just remember, the dot.god tld was
operated by the Church long before you wrote your little ditty. Back in
May 17 1996 the church began operating the tld as a naming convention for
internal networks. Furthermore on the 31 Jul 1996 Jan K. Masek made a
request
Thought this might be of interest to the list. For media contacts or
more information:
Richard Sheehe 202-994-3087
Anna McCollister 202-261-2897
http://www.gwu.edu/~media/pressreleases/05-12-00-DemocracyOnline.html
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
A censored communication of interest to all of us in tld's.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 12:11:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CENSORED
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Give it up, Please!!
Hello:
The article fails to mention the history of this
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/05/18/2346226
You can all consider the slashdot disscussions our contribution to the
Sunrise + 20 crap.
Love and kisses
Joe Baptista
sure you have the right URL?
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/05/18/2346226
You can all consider the slashdot disscussions our contribution to the
Sunrise + 20 crap.
Love and kisses
Joe Baptista
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup
http://www.internetnews.com/wd-news/article/0,2171,10_364761,00.html
Regards
Joe Baptista
oe and all,
This is a nice and truthful piece of journalism at least and at last.
Nice work Joe. May God be with you! ;)
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
http://www.internetnews.com/wd-news/article/0,2171,10_364761,00.html
Regards
Joe Baptista
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
As for Kent, well the bullshit flowith! Joe B. How about a
.GOD special domain for Kent and Songbird. I know you can come
up with something wholesome! ;) Send me the bill on the registration.
songbird.god is taken. any other choices? or
They didn't consult me - and they were warned in Cairo that would be a bad
thing.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
As you may know, ICANN suddenly announced last week that it has formed
Election and Nominating Committees, without any
On Sun, 14 May 2000, Repoman wrote:
( Answer to !Dr Joe: Yes I'm new here and grateful to be able to share my simple
views on topics utilizeing my simple instincts honed by 'hands on brick and
mortar' as I suspect you are as well.
Yup
Btw: What the hell is a 'Fud'?My guess:
eter Playboy decides to start up
a porn magazine at playboy.nom.
- --gregbo
--
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 20:55:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: "!Dr. Joe Baptista" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IFWP] Re: Sunset for sunrise
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Patrick Corliss wro
Ken - your full of shit. Forgive me - but truth in advertising. Your a
names council exec - you should conduct yourself accordingly and not put
ICANN in a position for being sued for libel and slander. Are you not
tired of being sued yourself and pursued by creditors. You can learn from
your
Well at least were moving closer to internationalized domain names, at
least one guide closer.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 06:51:07 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IETF-Announce: ;
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-requirements-02.txt
Hello:
Today I have begun moving the dot.god registry to a new box. We will be
running a one year test of the dot.god top level domain, formerly a
private tld employed and operated by the Church of the Universe in various
internal networks. The naming practice for tld.god began when it was
- Original Message -
From: Jim Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2000 2:47 AM
Subject: FIRST PASS - IPv8 Floating Root Survey
This is the first pass of the IPv8 Floating Root Survey
There are only 198 TLDs widely known enough to pass
the first
I'm convenced the method to deploy in liberating the root is via the
establishment of a tld for that specific purpose in accordance with
the provisions contained in RFC 2606 and RFC 1464. Which see
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/bcp/bcp32.txt and
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1464.txt respectively.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 03:23:22 -0500
From: Jim Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: !Dr. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fw: Not done yet...
IN-ADDR-ONLINE.com available
INC-NIC.com available
IN-ADDR-INC.com available
NET-NIC.com available
Internationalized domain names.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 15:09:57 -0700
From: RFC Editor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IETF-Announce: ;
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFC 2825 on Issues: I18N, Domain Names, and Internet Protocols
A new Request
To date 95,115 nameservers have been surveyed for private roots, 94,807 of
those dns use the USG root (99.7%) the remainder are composed of legacy,
private roots or alternate root server confederations:
Here is the list of root server confederations and the number of
nameserver found using them
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
What is .ppt? Can't you make this graph a gif?
ppt = Power point file.
gif are at
http://dns.pccf.net/reports/dot_com_count/Slide1.GIF
http://dns.pccf.net/reports/dot_com_count/Slide2.GIF
At 06:58 AM 5/10/00 -0400, you wrote:
I've
I've graphed the data from the dot com count - we only have three weeks of
it - but I can already see some trends in the data. It looks like NSI
dumps unpaid domains every wed and thur. I expect that trend will
continue.
Here the power point file
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Michael Graham wrote:
Poring over today's postings and Ellen et al.'s comments that the
"trademark interests" are holding the Internet hostage, and I got to
wondering:
What is it, exactly, about permitting trademark owners priority to
register their trademarks as secondary
Does anyone have an opinion on "Floating Root Technology". I think it's
an excellent idea - give everyone control of the root. I've just received
a message on this from someone who I consider has exceptionally nice brain
cells and it got me all excited - are you excited too?
If anyone has
Most of the japanease computer system for federal government is
offline. Only bits and parts are available. Looks like I love you gave
the world a big kiss yesturday.
regards
Joe Baptista
We've had a discussion concerning floating root technology and would be
interested in public input.
http://www.pccf.net/correspondence/roots/fleming.1/
Regards
Joe Baptista
It is with the greatest of pleasure that I announce the theme of this
years quartly meeting of ICANN - Yokohama. As vetran ICANN watchers will
know, I like to assign themes from time to time with respect to ICANN
meetings. For ICANN Santiago - our theme was "Hats, the fiasco of
Santiago", for
I keep getting solicitation messages from ICANN cronies. Why? Anyway -
this goes into my reply email file and i just felt like shareing. This
will be replied to some time later as a public message. I hate ICANN
solicitaions.
I'm still waiting for my membership @Large - has anyone actually
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Ben Edelman wrote:
For the record, as far as I know, Mark Chen has no affiliation with the
Berkman Center. Harvard is, after all, an awfully big place!
Ben Edelman
Berkman Center for Internet and Society
Harvard Law School
!Dr. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Wawa A. Ngenge wrote:
Would they control content for NON-CHRISTIAN communities too?
Wawa
Why would they want to? The point of using tld's to filter content is to
provide christian groups with control of their own name space. The same
applies for family values groups.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 16:19:53 +0800
From: Franky Tong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Transfers from CORE
Does anybody here notice some extremely long delay for transferring CORE
domains? I successfully transferred two domains from two
Just a brief note to the troops. As always PCCF continues it's fine
tradition of reaching out to our government officials. I have just
received the most recent report from our Yokohama daemons which are as I
type surfing japanese government computer sites collecting, compiling and
indexing
Alexander:
Welcome to ICANN's NCDNHC. For a history of ICANN and info on why it is
against god and everything else good with the world - please reference the
following URL.
http://www.cookreport.com/icannoverall.shtml
I advocate the creation of family value top level domains. If you
I've just noticed something very strange. We manage the earth-net.net
domain on behalf of the estate of John Hunt. We recently paid NSI the
regular yearly fee and check the whois database on a regular bases for the
various domain under our administration.
if you enter the following string
Once again this group should be congratulated for making a
difference. The self proclaimed eu-registry at
http://www.eu-registry.com/ have revised their policy;
"We are currently revising our site in order to allow everyone to
pre-register .EU WITHOUT any fee at the moment of the initial
Is this real or is this bullshit? bogus telephone number, but netsolbiz
look real enough. The EU has not sanctioned this. This looks alot like
fraud and misinformation. Consumers should be warned.
Once again - the eu has not sanctioned this. No mechinisim is in place by
the eu to proceed to
Recently Alejandro Pisanty, an ICANN puppet who is fluent in Spanish -
posts some information to a south american network operators list I
subscribe too - very low traffic - everyone's more or less polite. But
Elejandro does not even bother to translate it - which he can do quickly -
or even
Yesturday I published a test on root server response times and failure
rates which seems to have caused a bit of an uproar with root server
operators and much discussion. As is my usual habit - I published the
results without much explanation and I appologize for all the concern it
has caused.
I just found a new root server confederation
http://ww.rmi.net/ Rocket mountain networks NASDAQ listing RMII.
I love finding new stuff. Looks like this is an internal root network or
an experiment. I must remind myself to find out more.
Heres the root:
; DiG 8.1 @ROOT1.RMI.NET. . any
;
Some interesting data I just found.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 05:07:16 -0400
From: root [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here are the results of the first test. Please note - IDNS root server
b.i-dns.net. (203.37.255.102) is down due to a subway
All of your questions are good. The server where the tests were conducted
did not use icmp. The time in millisec was obtained from dig which
calculates the response time to a question on it's own.
Also the data is biased - the program is being run on an IP string which
is next door to ORSC
Here is the latest root server report for Tuesday April 25th at 1:13PM.
Earlier percentages remain the same - 99.7% of the world is using the
current United States Government Roots - 0.3% of the world uses their own
or one of the confederations.
# DNS Root Server SOA
===
)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IRSC root servers - problems with
Hello Adam:
I'm writing to you concerning the IRSC root servers. I seem to be having
some problems with understanding the infrastructure.
You seem to have 3 different root files.
ftp
our friend at icann continue the horseshit. Harald Tveit Alvestrand and
roberto gato from the GA orchestrated a fradulent vote some time ago - and
now are engineering another round of entertainment.
These are the same people who were blasted at the icann cairo meeting for
bastardizing
wrong url - try
http://stlr.stanford.edu/STLR/Working_Papers/00_rotenberg_1/index.htm
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Greg Skinner wrote:
http://stlr.stanford.edu/STLR/Working_Papers/00_Rotenberg_1
This is a working paper, so please do not cite it without the author's
permission.
I gave the paper
I just went through my little list here and found something interesting -
one service http://www.mobiledns.com/ offers alternate roots to .web tld's
and private tld's to their customers.
Very inovative of them
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Joe Baptista wrote:
A few people have contacted me with
Any dns server can operate as a root server. If a dns server runs the
"." zone - then it's s root server.
Example - if I wanted to operate a root server using the ORSC roots, as i
do on mine - I secondary the file from the ORSC primary root server.
Example:
I would change my named.conf file
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Ron Bennett wrote:
Before people get all excited about alternative
roots, think about liability...
For example what happens if an alternative
root has incorrect information??
That's not possible
Ie. Let's say an alternative root has Buy.com
pointing to some
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:11:27 -0400
From: James Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list RANDOM-BITS
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
ecommerce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Random-bits] Stefan Friedman: no 3-letter .com names left
As ICANN
There's a few problems with the namespace roots which I'll spell out here.
1. Non of the namespace root servers provide for zone transfers of the
root. Therefore it is impossible to determine what tld space is in them.
2. Lack of co-operation - when John Hunt enumerated the namespace he
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 15:44:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: James Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: YJ Park [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: i-dns.net
I think it's time for a history lesson on i-dns. i-dns
I don't know if this has been posted yet - but it's a good little write up
concerning tucows response to Comments on IPC Sunrise Proposal.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 17:51:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ross Wm. Rader [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
Fanello - this civil society crap the EU and US are plying on us is more
appropriately termed bullshit. Mind control has reached a new level of
absurdity.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Jay Fenello wrote:
Anyone watching the President of the
World Bank on C-Span may be
Greg:
Richard has made it very clear to you that he will not participate in this
farce called the DNSO. The DNSO voice is in desparate need of voices to
rationalize thier farce - and Richard has no intention of lending his name
or support to the DNSO farce
Now - why am I denied participation
http://www.elian.cu/
Looks like the horseshit in the GA keeps getting thicker. I have asked
Mr. Cohen personally if he is one of the pedophiles involved in the Fort
Lauderdale scandal which has been supressed here in Canada.
Mr Cohen has choosen to not respond.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Harald
full of vile it's scary stuff. And once again he's
played the fool for all of us to watch. On opensrs some guy came close to
calling him a little hitler. He's a poor twisted soal - I shall pray for
him tonight.
Regards
Joe Baptista
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
Well - those censored messages
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Ken Freed wrote:
whether Internet commercialization will be accompanied
by a social/cultural awakening to our global interactivity,
an awakening that will amplify desires for democracy.
By democracy I take it your not attempting to refer to the old way of
doing things
here is a recent private email exchange I had concerning the big picture.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:32:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: censored
Cc: censored
Subject: Re: ICANN/DNSO
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, censored wrote
An interesting interview with Register.com
http://www.fool.com/foolaudio/transcripts/2000/stocktalk000406_rcom.htm
Fool.com TMF Interview With Register.com (StockTalk) April 6, 2000.url
smime.p7s
Well - those censored messages are now in the public domain. So here's a
copy of the full message. Poor WXW is seeing ghosts again.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:17:01 -0700
From: Jeff Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mo McKinlay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Andy Gardner wrote:
One only needs to review the archives of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list to read
some of the sexually explicit things you said about Elisabeth
Portenouve (sp?), to fully realise just _who_ needs to learn some
"serious" manners.
There's the pity. I'll
http://news.excite.com/news/zd/000405/20/is-icann-the
By Lisa M. Bowman, ZDNet News
TORONTO -- Critics of the International Corporation for Assigning Names
and Numbers (ICANN) on
Wednesday called on the board to develop a charter with a bill of rights
that would spell out specifically
: !Dr. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Press Releases
Greg Shapiro has already corrected your false assertion that Paul
maintains Sendmail, so I will not waste time on that. (Paul did, with
Frank Avolio, write a book titled "Sendmail: Theory and Practice.&qu
my reply to vixie.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:23:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul A Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Mike Bilow [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Press Releases
Wonderful. This is a first. Paul
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:52:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul A Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Mike Bilow [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Press Releases
Paul:
I've just spoken to some of my collegues and we
The law of equity in Canada gives control of domain names to resellers if
admin defaults.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 23:01:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Coolfred Internet Services [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Transfers: A
That's an interesting twist. I don't think the Canadian courts would much
care about a lower US courts decision. But the location of control is a
valid point. I'll pass it on.
Regards
Joe
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Andy Gardner wrote:
The law of equity in Canada gives control of domain names to
. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: realtime root server updates someday?
!Dr. Joe Baptista [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I don't think it's technically possible to update the file in real
time. The dot.com file is in excess of 900 megs
101 - 200 of 376 matches
Mail list logo
