http://www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,14006,00.html
April 11, 2000, 11:20 AM PST
EU Pushes for Greater Net Influence
The European Commission wants ICANN to be more open and for the ".eu" domain name to
be up and
running by year's end.
By Elizabeth De Bony
Throwing Rocks at
Looks like the horseshit in the GA keeps getting thicker. I have asked
Mr. Cohen personally if he is one of the pedophiles involved in the Fort
Lauderdale scandal which has been supressed here in Canada.
Mr Cohen has choosen to not respond.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Harald Tvei
in :(
I know. He's so full of vile it's scary stuff. And once again he's
played the fool for all of us to watch. On opensrs some guy came close to
calling him a little hitler. He's a poor twisted soal - I shall pray for
him tonight.
Regards
Joe Baptista
>
>
Well - those censored messages are now in the public domain. So here's a
copy of the full message. Poor WXW is seeing ghosts again.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:17:01 -0700
From: Jeff Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mo McKinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMA
An interesting interview with Register.com
http://www.fool.com/foolaudio/transcripts/2000/stocktalk000406_rcom.htm
Fool.com TMF Interview With Register.com (StockTalk) April 6, 2000.url
smime.p7s
here is a recent private email exchange I had concerning the big picture.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:32:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: ICANN/DNSO
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, wrote:
> If this were po
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Ken Freed wrote:
> whether Internet commercialization will be accompanied
> by a social/cultural awakening to our global interactivity,
> an awakening that will amplify desires for democracy.
By democracy I take it your not attempting to refer to the old way of
doing things
http://news.excite.com/news/zd/000405/20/is-icann-the
By Lisa M. Bowman, ZDNet News
TORONTO -- Critics of the International Corporation for Assigning Names
and Numbers (ICANN) on
Wednesday called on the board to develop a charter with a bill of rights
that would spell out specifically wha
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Andy Gardner wrote:
> One only needs to review the archives of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list to read
> some of the sexually explicit things you said about Elisabeth
> Portenouve (sp?), to fully realise just _who_ needs to learn some
> "serious" manners.
There's the pity. I'll
There's a big rebellion going on in the tucows and opensrs lists. Alot of
two cows mirrors are cancelling out. It's a real mess.
http://www.opensrs.org/archives/discuss-list/3307.html
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:52:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Paul A Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Mike Bilow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Press Releases
Paul:
I've just spoken
my reply to vixie.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:23:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Paul A Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Mike Bilow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Press Releases
Wonderful
PROTECTED]>
Cc: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Press Releases
> Greg Shapiro has already corrected your false assertion that Paul
> maintains Sendmail, so I will not waste time on that. (Paul did, with
> Frank Avolio, write a book titled &qu
From: "Network Solutions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Customer Feedback Request
--
This is a multi-part message in MIME format...
Dear NSI Customer,
Network Solutions appreciates your business. We also value
your input, whic
o: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: realtime root server updates someday?
!Dr. Joe Baptista [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I don't think it's technically possible to update the file in real
> time. The dot.com f
That's an interesting twist. I don't think the Canadian courts would much
care about a lower US courts decision. But the location of control is a
valid point. I'll pass it on.
Regards
Joe
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Andy Gardner wrote:
> >The law of equity in Canada gives control of domain names to
Your on the ball here. Your lawyer friend was reffering to the equity
laws in Canada which govern the proceedure in small claims courts there.
Just out of curiousity - which in small claims court jurisdiction is
tucows or open SRS located. Does anyone from opensrs know? According to
a domain s
The law of equity in Canada gives control of domain names to resellers if
admin defaults.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 23:01:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Coolfred Internet Services <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Transfers: A
The next BIND Survey - which will start in a few months will specifically
test for dns pointing to alternate roots - and the question should be
settled then.
Your analysis is a bit faulty here. You've made an analysis more
appropriately applied to a standalone nameserver and not a root server.
On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> Paul did not resign because of this.
then why did he resign?
> baptista> Incidentally - Paul Vixie also is the sendmail programmer,
>
> No, he is not. The ISC generously sponsors the sendmail ftp site and
> sendmail-announce mailing list.
I
ews/pccf-statement.html
>
>
> On 02-Apr-2000 !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
> > SPAM? I think not. And obviously it is for this group. This group
> > resulted in 100 hits - so obviously your in the minority opinion.
> >
> > We use the list to manage PR - and I wou
same old - same old - complains galor - any response to this NSI?
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 19:11:43 -0700
From: Morica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Domain Reg Frustrations
After contacting NSI and ICANN, emails to/from the Reseller I us
A slow day at the IETF ;-)
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 16:02:43 -0800
From: RFC Editor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: IETF-Announce: ;
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFC 2795 on The Infinite Monkey Protocol Suite (IMPS)
A new Request for Comments is now available in
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 17:17:54 -0500
From: Bob Pickles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fwd: Re: [NIC-000330.18feb] NSI Rejects Domain Name Transfer
Request
I admit that this one was cutting it real close, but according to my
con
I goit a call today from someone - who's also called a few other admins I
know. Looks like there is an effort to seek legal sanctions against the
RBL and Maps.
Regards
Joe
Christopher - you obviously have not been paying attention - nor have you
addressed the important issues in the GA.
People are being excluded from the GA. I lost my posting rights for
calling these feminazi's horseshitters, and since no one objected - well -
so it goes chris.
Remember - first t
The head GA horseshitter reminds us that if you want to participate in the
GA a 5 posting max applies. Once again my congratulations to ICANN on
this DNSO mess.
Regards
Joe
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 04:41:56 +0930
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[EMAIL PROTE
how silly of me - i forgot the URL.
http://www.pccf.net/media.fax/
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
>
> As you all may know - PCCF maintains the largest database of media fax
> contact numbers - now 9,600 in total.
>
> We used to give them away for free, no
As you all may know - PCCF maintains the largest database of media fax
contact numbers - now 9,600 in total.
We used to give them away for free, now we provide an interface which lets
you look up fax numbers via area code.
Those of you who have an interest in using the media for various PR
camp
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Kent Crispin wrote:
> 1) There are millions of names in .com. Even with 5 names marked out,
> adding 6 new gTLDs is an *enormous* expansion of the domain space.
complete nonsense here. the root file can be as big as dot.com, that's a
fact, if that was not a fact dot
I'd like to make a suggestion here which seems to have evaded the
majority. All the talk about top level domains is missing some FACTS -
and FACTS are important.
1) FACT - as dot.com has shown the world, it is possible to incorporate
the english dictionary into the domain space. This is a tech
This email has been cesored to protect the innocent. I agree with the
writer - if walsh got more sex he'd be better off.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000
From: censored
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cybersquatting and FOURNIER.COM (fwd)
Yes, thank you, I DID
I just got this in my email .. made me laugh .. looks like the cairo fall
out continues.
I KISS YOU.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 04:20:48 -0500
From: The Commissioner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: !dr.baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: International Transmission o
No - no successful registrations reported so far. But lots of complaints
and false hopes.
If anyone manged to register a domain with them, was successful and it's
in the DNS - then please let us know.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Ross Mueller wrote:
> were any registrations proce
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: registerfree.com is overloading OpenSRS (fwd)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pay attention if you must be on this list. This has been asked and answered,
at least twice.
Nameengine.com is accredited, and they operated registerfree.com
On 24-Mar-2
The problem here is with ICANN who openSRS has to live with. ICANN has
effectively distroyed and destabilized the registries - and that's a real
pity.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Ken wrote:
> Ross,
> Thank you for your work, and all that openSRS is trying to do.
> I realize that
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Charles Daminato wrote:
> RegisterFree IS an ICANN accredited registrar. Check the ICANN site for
> proof (Name Engine Inc.).
>
> There are many ICANN accredited registrars that haven't implemented the
> hooks to resell themselves. So they go to other registrars.
> Actual
I think opensrs was slimed tonight - so far it looks like some bogus
company registerfree.com, an icann accredited registrar who does not
support their own RRP - but subcontracts it to OpenSRS - does this media
trip for free domains - the NSI's registry goes offline to openSRS,
everyone else so fa
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:19:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Ross Wm. Rader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bill Gerrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: registerfree.com is overloading OpenSRS
>
> > NSI Registry was formally offline from 7:15 through
You know Ross - ICANN is nothing more then a bunch of money grubbers, if
you want to become a registrar and can afford the money to keep Michael
Roberts wine cellar well stocked, you get a registrars certificate.
Registrarfree is a shining example of how a bunch of money grubbers can
take the net
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> Personal commment:
> My apologies if my manner is somewhat abrasive, but quite frankly this
> entire evening has been less than pleasurable and as far as I'm concerned,
> would not have been an issue had NSI not dropped the ball with the
> registry.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:14:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Ross Wm. Rader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: registerfree.com is overloading OpenSRS
> Register Free is junk.
> I sincerely hope Tucows isn't going t
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 01:10:08 -0500 (EST)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ross Wm. Rader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IFWP] registerfree.com (fwd)
Ross:
Here what people where
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:05:32 -0500 (EST)
From: Ross Wm. Rader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
At 09:36 PM 3/23/00 -0500, Ron Bennett wrote:
>At 09:51 PM 3/23/00 -0500, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
>>well - it's March 23rd, 2000 21:01:16 EST by registerfree.com's clock and
>>the free domain registration page is not yet up. hmmm.
, I bet they didn't inform OpenSRS of this
stunt and they ended up overloading the OpenSRS servers.
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Ron Bennett wrote:
> At 09:51 PM 3/23/00 -0500, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
> >well - it's March 23rd, 2000 21:01:16 EST by registerfree.com's clock and
>
or, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and inform
them of the time the error occurred, and anything you
might have done that may have caused the error.
More information about this error may be available in the server error
log.
Apache/1.3.12 Server at neweb1.registerfreetoday.com Port 80
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, !Dr. Jo
still not up - March 23rd, 2000 21:03:57 EST - 3 minutes past nine pm, in
cyberspace that a lifetime for some people.
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
> well - it's March 23rd, 2000 21:01:16 EST by registerfree.com's clock and
> the free domain registration pa
well - it's March 23rd, 2000 21:01:16 EST by registerfree.com's clock and
the free domain registration page is not yet up. hmmm.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 22:27:23 +0100 (MET)
From: DNSO Listadmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ga] Fwd: IANA Report on Request for .ps Delegation
| From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 18:31 MET 2000
| Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
re entitled to your very own,
> no-cost, permanent .com domain name and .com email, FREE FOREVER,
> from NAMEzero.
> For details go to:http://www.NAMEzero.com/signupiwspecial.jhtml
>
> xx----------xxxx
>
>
> ~k
>
>
> At 06:24 AM 3/22/00 -0500, !D
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:22:25 -0500
From: James Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: NCDNHC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NC-TLDS, a list on new Internet Top Level Domains (TLDs)
Note: announcement for new list: nc-tlds -- list on new
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 11:03:35 -0400
From: "Luis [iso-8859-1] Eliécer Cadenas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Enredo] LACNIC
Estimados miembros y amigos de Enred:
Tenemos el agrad
It's so very true - the icann follies - the lies - this is a very sad
attempt by lawyers to take over - and it will fail. So far the internet
is eating up icann, let them lie - let them show off as the twits they
are. Soon the battle for seattle will seem like a pleasant memory to
these icanners
Harald:
Can you explain to me what this horseshit is all about?
I am still unable to post to the ga list. Sure I can post to the ga-full,
but then anyone can. I have been unable to post to the ga-rules and I'm
holding you responsible for that.
As you can see, your assistant Mr. Walsh is now s
On Sat, 18 Mar 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:
> CC everyone and their brother. The DNSO GA decided to lessen the impact of
> this behavior to eliminate some of the excessive noise.
>
> It appears to have worked. I will note that ICANN also has this policy on
you bet it worked - the list is de
I must admit - the GA for all intents and purposes is dead.
And here is Elisabeth Porteneuve filter list which helped kill it. Very
extensive filter.
taboo /^From:.*\@ix\.netcom\.com/i
taboo /^From:.*jfleming\@anet\.com/i
taboo /^To:.*domai
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, KS LIM wrote:
> I feel that I need to say some thing here. BIND may not be the best
> product that can be but it is acceptable for the time being and
> available free to all of us. If any one is unhappy about it he(she) can
You don't get it - do you. Let me try to clarify
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 17:08:58 +
From: Fay Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ga] Meeting on the creation of .EU TLD, Brussels, 28 March
Dear Names Council of the DNSO,
I write to request you assistance
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, David R. Conrad wrote:
> I do not necessarily feel political processes are the best mechanism to manage
> the DNS, rather I'd say political processes are appropriate for the creation
> of the policies by which the DNS is managed.
Have you ever heard of the english language
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, David R. Conrad wrote:
> P.S. I'm told that Joey Baptista is having another tantrum. I wouldn't know
> as I filter him directly to the trash unread. Given Joey's past actions, I
> would strongly recommend anyone who has interest in maintaining a list with a
> non-zero sign
Ken - I hear you've been hitting the road - playing salesman in florida
for your DNS registry services. Or am I wrong here ;-)
Regards
Joe Baptista
P.S. Hitting the road keeps you fit, enjoy.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Ken Stubbs wrote:
> the transfer must be effected thru the core registrar you
>
> Regards.
>
> Mike Norris
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: !Dr. Joe Baptista [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 4:07 PM
> > To: David R. Conrad
> > Cc: Michael Sondow; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROT
Some interesting information of another list which should be shared
here. Curious if anyone has a rebuttal.
Regards
Joe Baptista
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:12:32 -0800
From: Roeland M. J. Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: '!Dr. Joe Baptis
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, David R. Conrad wrote:
> IPv4 address allocation is based on technical considerations that relate to
> management of a limited (albeit one can argue not currently scarce) resource
> and the implications the allocation of that resource has on the Internet
> routing system.
Well - Michael - this is one of my concerns - the people involved in this.
Conrad along with Vixie took over the BIND maintenance. The result of
that is every BIND since 4.9.4 has been buggy. In fact BIND is to a large
extent the unix joke version of gates windows.
Further to that - I have the
Your barking up the wrong tree David. IP owners already have a degree of
control over the ip infrastructure. The question is - are they
represented?
The whole ICANN mess could result in the RIR's losing their right to
administer the ip space. It's happened in domain names, it's happened in
ICA
I definately will look into it. Certainly the ripe modem sounds
acceptable. If you have any resources you feel I should focus on to
educate myself - please advise.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Yes, that's my concern too. This is watered down repres
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> and representation in at least one region. I'd be the last to try
> to force one region's practices on another region, but we can learn
> from each other, and it may be that something useful in this instance
> may be learned from the RIPE experienc
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Michael Sondow wrote:
> It doesn't serve any useful purpose to repeat nostrums and empty
> formulas, does it? ICANN is supposed to be open to all stakeholders,
> but in fact it hasn't been open to any end-users, either of domain
> names or of IP addresses. The former have b
ings although it's not
> possible to make sure every single IP holder is aware. Our next meeting
> is April 3-4 in Calgary, Canada. Information is available on the ARIN
> website at www.arin.net.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kim Hubbard
> ARIN
>
> At 05:41 AM 3/13/00 -0500, !D
response below ..
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I am increasingly concerned that the ASO has no means of representing
> > indivudual ipv4 holders. The virtual infrastructure is represented, but
> > those people who operate the ipv4 structure (ipv4 holders) have no
> > repr
I am increasingly concerned that the ASO has no means of representing
indivudual ipv4 holders. The virtual infrastructure is represented, but
those people who operate the ipv4 structure (ipv4 holders) have no
representation whatsoever in the "bottoms up" ICANN process.
Am i wrong in making this
http://nigg.er/
regards
Joe Baptista
very perceptive observation Ellen and quite right.
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Ellen Rony wrote:
> I currently serve as chair the Nominating Committee for the Environmental
> Forum of Marin, a 27 year-old organization. In our situation, the
> Nominating Committee wields enormous power because it scree
. However I felt compelled to respond as William X. Whalsh's
> rantings and hysterical postings towards members of this organization
> are entirely or likely entirely based, on no stable foundation. Further
> it is MHO, that William X. Walsh is at least in part not in control of
> all of
Interesting stuff - as part of my campaign to increase membership from
african countries in ICANN, the IDNO and the DNSO, I just noticed netsol
has the domain autozone.ac. registered to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here the dump is anyone is interested.
hertz.netsol.com. jbroadhurst.netsol.com. 1999040101
Does anyone have a list of african cctld's?
e Berkman is handeling the links, right? >;)
> Seems like a familier pattern here, doesn't it? :(
>
> !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
>
> > ICANN Cairo is missing. The meetings started 45 minutes ago, but so far
> > the page has yet to be updated for
ICANN SAYS U.S. WILL LET IT PROSECUTE CYBERSQUATTERS, DOMAIN PROFITEERS
The U.S. government is against empowering ICANN, the organization
responsible for maintaining the Internet-address system, to prosecute
domain-name profiteers, saying instead that it would prefer ICANN, "remain a
private-sec
That really sucks Ben, and I know you understand the term well, so let me
be specific and say it sucks in a bad way - so as not to confuse you with
a pleasure concept.
Didn't anyone video tape the PM of Egypt, or Mike Roberts. You could show
reruns for us die hard icann fans.
Oh well ;-)
On Tu
I guess the opening sessions are not to be televised.
ICANN Cairo is missing. The meetings started 45 minutes ago, but so far
the page has yet to be updated for the remote link. Very sad.
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/cairo/
The ICANN Cairo meeting should have started 14 minutes ago - but so far
nothing from them. No link - no nothing.
Regards
Joe
President Hosny Mubarak of Egypt has cancelled his opening address at the
ICANN Cairo meetings. President Mubarak will instead be replaced by Atef
Ebeid, Prime Minister of Egypt.
Oley
Joe Baptista
I can feel the momentum.
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Richard J. Sexton (At work) wrote:
> Path:
>ns3.vrx.net!news2.best.com!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!remarQ70!supernews.com!rQ66!corp.supernews.com!news.victoria.tc.ca!199.60.222.3
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arthur T. Murray)
> Newsgroups:
>sci.econ,comp.pr
- JPNIC is to study Japanese domain names, trying to start
registration of these domain names within the year 2000.
http://www.nic.ad.jp/en/topics/archive/2225-01.html
This is a good idea.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 06:57:59 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IETF-Announce: ;
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-axfr-clarify-00.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts dire
Ah the usual WXW lies. Shame. Now your back to alter egos and alternate
personalities. Oy vey in a big oy vey way.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 06-Mar-2000 !Dr. Joe Baptista wrot
My reply to my egyptian counterpart. And now I turn my attention to the
egyptian press.
Regards
Joe Baptista
P.S. Israel get's hit tommorrow.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 04:32:29 -0500 (EST)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "E
The Center for Democracy and Technology and Common Cause recently issued
the following press release forwarded by Mr. Fenello, which quoted the
following,
> DOMAIN NAME PUBLIC INTEREST GROUP RELEASES STATEMENT ON 3/3/00 REPORT BY
> CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND TECHNOLOGY AND COMMON CAUSE ON PROPOSED
I think they use bottoms-up alot because of the Berkman boys. Seems to be
a term employed alot by them.
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Michael Sondow wrote:
> > Domain Name Rights Coalition today issued the following
> > statement:
>
> > ICANN has consistently failed to live up to its commitment to make
According to the bind 1999 survey, egypt has 1,700 administrators - and i
will be contacting all of them today - and inviting them to the ICANN
meetings.
Next stop - Japan.
Regards
Joe Baptista
fodder from the egyptian government front lines. Obviously Nasr is
confused, which means another letter to my egyptian government on ICANN.
Regards
Joe
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 18:13:56 +0200
From: "Eng.\\ Ahmed Mohy El-Din Ahmed Nasr"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eart to Harald - Earth to Harald ... I'm waiting Harald. Has old age
hampered your bring forward file?
Joe
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 14:20:30 +0100
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ga] Suspension of posting ri
STUDY FINDS ICANN VOTE PLAN FULL OF PROBLEMS
http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=233903
The BIND2000 survey this year will be testing to see which dns is using
which root server complex. The information will be collected through the
SOA report and a few other methods will be employed when the SOA shows up
as USG - some root servers report USG's as being the SOA - which is wrong.
H
I'm getting a timeout for the superroot root servers at 204.80.125.130
;; res_nsend to server 204.80.125.130: Connection timed out
Both of the EURSC nameservers are not working.
. 518400 IN NS ZHAR.praud.com.
zhar.praud.com. 518400 IN A 212.234.36.20
. 518400 IN NS ZOTHOMMOG.praud.com.
zothommog.praud.com.518400 IN A 212.23
I think the idno is soon to be in an excellent position to do some
work. The bad influence of William X. Walsh is about to be booted as
a very userUNfriendly person.
I have mixed feelings about this, and would welcome some input on this
external to the IDNO.
It's a sad day when Walsh get Xed.
201 - 300 of 419 matches
Mail list logo
