in :(
I know. He's so full of vile it's scary stuff. And once again he's
played the fool for all of us to watch. On opensrs some guy came close to
calling him a little hitler. He's a poor twisted soal - I shall pray for
him tonight.
Regards
Joe Baptista
>
>
Well - those censored messages are now in the public domain. So here's a
copy of the full message. Poor WXW is seeing ghosts again.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 00:17:01 -0700
From: Jeff Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mo McKinlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMA
Here's more censored stuff of this very interesting conversation.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 04:47:51 +0100 (GMT)
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: ICANN/DNSO
# , I agree that restricting the content of a post to the DNSO
# GA list is a very bad thing and a ter
An interesting interview with Register.com
http://www.fool.com/foolaudio/transcripts/2000/stocktalk000406_rcom.htm
Fool.com TMF Interview With Register.com (StockTalk) April 6, 2000.url
smime.p7s
here is a recent private email exchange I had concerning the big picture.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 23:32:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: ICANN/DNSO
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, wrote:
> If this were po
nd direct democracy.
> I repeat, ICANN disenfranchises billions, and if we were
> willing to do the work of educating the masses to make
> informed choices for themselves, ICANN would vanish.
And that is why in the long run ICANN itself will be disenfranchised and
alot of people are going to end up look ridiculous.
Regards
Joe Baptista
http://news.excite.com/news/zd/000405/20/is-icann-the
By Lisa M. Bowman, ZDNet News
TORONTO -- Critics of the International Corporation for Assigning Names
and Numbers (ICANN) on
Wednesday called on the board to develop a charter with a bill of rights
that would spell out specifically wha
Ross understands he took the wrong
path. I'm not sure if he lost any mirrors - a few threatened to go bye
bye today. Fasicinating stuff.
Regards
Joe Baptista
There's a big rebellion going on in the tucows and opensrs lists. Alot of
two cows mirrors are cancelling out. It's a real mess.
http://www.opensrs.org/archives/discuss-list/3307.html
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:52:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Paul A Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Mike Bilow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Press Releases
Paul:
I've just spoken
my reply to vixie.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:23:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Paul A Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Mike Bilow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Press Releases
Wonderful
This is beutiful. Paul Vixie joined the opensrs project mailing lists for
the purpose of defending himself. Wonderful.
Regards
Joe Baptista
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 08:17:24 -0700
From: Paul A Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mike Bilow <[EMAIL
From: "Network Solutions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Customer Feedback Request
--
This is a multi-part message in MIME format...
Dear NSI Customer,
Network Solutions appreciates your business. We also value
your input, whic
David Harris made a suggestion to update the root servers in real time and
I was wondering if NSI found this a practicle solution for implimentation.
Regards
Joe Baptista
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 13:01:29 -0400
From: David Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
That's an interesting twist. I don't think the Canadian courts would much
care about a lower US courts decision. But the location of control is a
valid point. I'll pass it on.
Regards
Joe
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Andy Gardner wrote:
> >The law of equity in Canada gives control of domain names to
Your on the ball here. Your lawyer friend was reffering to the equity
laws in Canada which govern the proceedure in small claims courts there.
Just out of curiousity - which in small claims court jurisdiction is
tucows or open SRS located. Does anyone from opensrs know? According to
a domain s
The law of equity in Canada gives control of domain names to resellers if
admin defaults.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 23:01:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Coolfred Internet Services <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Transfers: A
erver.
A root server only acts as a pointer - once it get's the data it needs -
the resolver holds the information for a specific period of time,
therefore the resolver will no longer query the root server for answers.
So the analysis here is a bit off and misinformed.
Regards
Joe Baptista
7;s no laughing matter and Vixie is one of the main reasons why it is
that way. A real pity. One we should strive to correct.
Regards
Joe Baptista
ews/pccf-statement.html
>
>
> On 02-Apr-2000 !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
> > SPAM? I think not. And obviously it is for this group. This group
> > resulted in 100 hits - so obviously your in the minority opinion.
> >
> > We use the list to manage PR - and I wou
same old - same old - complains galor - any response to this NSI?
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 19:11:43 -0700
From: Morica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Domain Reg Frustrations
After contacting NSI and ICANN, emails to/from the Reseller I us
A slow day at the IETF ;-)
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 16:02:43 -0800
From: RFC Editor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: IETF-Announce: ;
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFC 2795 on The Infinite Monkey Protocol Suite (IMPS)
A new Request for Comments is now available in
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 17:17:54 -0500
From: Bob Pickles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fwd: Re: [NIC-000330.18feb] NSI Rejects Domain Name Transfer
Request
I admit that this one was cutting it real close, but according to my
con
I goit a call today from someone - who's also called a few other admins I
know. Looks like there is an effort to seek legal sanctions against the
RBL and Maps.
Regards
Joe
Christopher - you obviously have not been paying attention - nor have you
addressed the important issues in the GA.
People are being excluded from the GA. I lost my posting rights for
calling these feminazi's horseshitters, and since no one objected - well -
so it goes chris.
Remember - first t
The head GA horseshitter reminds us that if you want to participate in the
GA a 5 posting max applies. Once again my congratulations to ICANN on
this DNSO mess.
Regards
Joe
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 04:41:56 +0930
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[EMAIL PROTE
how silly of me - i forgot the URL.
http://www.pccf.net/media.fax/
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
>
> As you all may know - PCCF maintains the largest database of media fax
> contact numbers - now 9,600 in total.
>
> We used to give them away for free, no
campaigns can now target specific area codes.
regards
Joe Baptista
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000, Kent Crispin wrote:
> 1) There are millions of names in .com. Even with 5 names marked out,
> adding 6 new gTLDs is an *enormous* expansion of the domain space.
complete nonsense here. the root file can be as big as dot.com, that's a
fact, if that was not a fact dot
o setup
the registry operations now and list it with an alternate root server
authorities instead of waiting for the holy blessing of mother ICANN.
Regards
Joe Baptista
This email has been cesored to protect the innocent. I agree with the
writer - if walsh got more sex he'd be better off.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000
From: censored
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cybersquatting and FOURNIER.COM (fwd)
Yes, thank you, I DID
I just got this in my email .. made me laugh .. looks like the cairo fall
out continues.
I KISS YOU.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 04:20:48 -0500
From: The Commissioner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: !dr.baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: International Transmission o
No - no successful registrations reported so far. But lots of complaints
and false hopes.
If anyone manged to register a domain with them, was successful and it's
in the DNS - then please let us know.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Ross Mueller wrote:
> were any regis
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: registerfree.com is overloading OpenSRS (fwd)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pay attention if you must be on this list. This has been asked and answered,
at least twice.
Nameengine.com is accredited, and they operated registerfree.com
On 24-Mar-2
The problem here is with ICANN who openSRS has to live with. ICANN has
effectively distroyed and destabilized the registries - and that's a real
pity.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Ken wrote:
> Ross,
> Thank you for your work, and all that openSRS is trying to do.
pointing and
clicking. This is going to effect opensrs's reputation - I hope you
understand that.
It would be prudent to drop them as a client - real fast, and make policy
against this sort of thing. Icann accredited registrars are here to
compete with each other, not be in bed with e
I think opensrs was slimed tonight - so far it looks like some bogus
company registerfree.com, an icann accredited registrar who does not
support their own RRP - but subcontracts it to OpenSRS - does this media
trip for free domains - the NSI's registry goes offline to openSRS,
everyone else so fa
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:19:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Ross Wm. Rader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bill Gerrard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: registerfree.com is overloading OpenSRS
>
> > NSI Registry was formally offline from 7:15 through
net and turn it into horseshit. It's a real shame - because
systems like opensrs are going to end up holding all the broken cookies,
and i don't think that's very fair.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Accordin
th the
> registry.
Could you provide us with details on what NSI has to say concerning this
whole fiasco. I have alot of pissed off people and users who were looking
forward to this - 84 so far who have complained. So this should be
treated with grave seriousness and NSI should not get away w
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:14:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Ross Wm. Rader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: registerfree.com is overloading OpenSRS
> Register Free is junk.
> I sincerely hope Tucows isn't going t
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 01:10:08 -0500 (EST)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ross Wm. Rader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IFWP] registerfree.com (fwd)
Ross:
Here what people where
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 00:05:32 -0500 (EST)
From: Ross Wm. Rader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
At 09:36 PM 3/23/00 -0500, Ron Bennett wrote:
>At 09:51 PM 3/23/00 -0500, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
>>well - it's March 23rd, 2000 21:01:16 EST by registerfree.com's clock and
>>the free domain registration page is not yet up. hmmm.
, I bet they didn't inform OpenSRS of this
stunt and they ended up overloading the OpenSRS servers.
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Ron Bennett wrote:
> At 09:51 PM 3/23/00 -0500, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
> >well - it's March 23rd, 2000 21:01:16 EST by registerfree.com's clock and
>
or, [EMAIL PROTECTED] and inform
them of the time the error occurred, and anything you
might have done that may have caused the error.
More information about this error may be available in the server error
log.
Apache/1.3.12 Server at neweb1.registerfreetoday.com Port 80
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, !Dr. Jo
still not up - March 23rd, 2000 21:03:57 EST - 3 minutes past nine pm, in
cyberspace that a lifetime for some people.
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
> well - it's March 23rd, 2000 21:01:16 EST by registerfree.com's clock and
> the free domain registration pa
well - it's March 23rd, 2000 21:01:16 EST by registerfree.com's clock and
the free domain registration page is not yet up. hmmm.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 22:27:23 +0100 (MET)
From: DNSO Listadmin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ga] Fwd: IANA Report on Request for .ps Delegation
| From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 22 18:31 MET 2000
| Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
. They have to figure out how to stay
relevant and profitable in a hostile market.
As a metter of policy PCCF has advised it's sponsors they stay with
NSI. The main concern was stability, but we certainly encourage this
domain name free for all - about time.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Wed,
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:22:25 -0500
From: James Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: NCDNHC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NC-TLDS, a list on new Internet Top Level Domains (TLDs)
Note: announcement for new list: nc-tlds -- list on new
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 11:03:35 -0400
From: "Luis [iso-8859-1] Eliécer Cadenas M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Enredo] LACNIC
Estimados miembros y amigos de Enred:
Tenemos el agrad
these icanners.
shame on them.
regards
Joe Baptista
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Michael Sondow wrote:
> Louis Touton-
>
> You wrote and instituted a UDRP, put rules in ICANN's bylaws, and
> wrote and signed Agreements, all to prevent cybersquatting by domain
> name registrants.
>
s now slimming me again in the
ga-rules and being unable to post - i can't defend myself.
When Jeff called you people in control of the GA horseshitter - I think he
was being rather kind.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAG
the list is dead.
except of course for the occasional spam messages .. i.e.
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga-full/Arc00/msg00880.html
regards
Joe Baptista
I must admit - the GA for all intents and purposes is dead.
And here is Elisabeth Porteneuve filter list which helped kill it. Very
extensive filter.
taboo /^From:.*\@ix\.netcom\.com/i
taboo /^From:.*jfleming\@anet\.com/i
taboo /^To:.*domai
x27;s nothing to be proud about.
Someday a hacker is going to realize these vulnerabilities exist and take
advantage of them on a massive scale - and that frightens me.
Your claim that the existing situation is acceptable is a very uninformed
claim.
Regards
Joe Baptista
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 17:08:58 +
From: Fay Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ga] Meeting on the creation of .EU TLD, Brussels, 28 March
Dear Names Council of the DNSO,
I write to request you assistance
27;m not satisfied
with the representation of IP holders. Many companies and individuals
depend on the IPv4 infrastructure, it's their bread and butter.
I don't feel confident you are the correct person to represent me.
Regards
Joe Baptista
e Mr. Conrad - in Canada politicians are protected
from charges of child molestation - I of course can not name the guilty
parties due to court order. Be careful what political roads you
travel. I think it's best you stick to DNS ;-)
Regards
Joe Baptista
>
> In the fall of 1995, t
Ken - I hear you've been hitting the road - playing salesman in florida
for your DNS registry services. Or am I wrong here ;-)
Regards
Joe Baptista
P.S. Hitting the road keeps you fit, enjoy.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Ken Stubbs wrote:
> the transfer must be effected thru the core regis
David Conrad would be hung for his sins. The DNS is a mess, the
systems it operates on are hacker friendly and we owe a great deal of
thanks for this state of affairs to to the quality BIND products
produced by Msrs. Conrad and Vixie.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some interesting information of another list which should be shared
here. Curious if anyone has a rebuttal.
Regards
Joe Baptista
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:12:32 -0800
From: Roeland M. J. Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: '!Dr. Joe Baptis
ions for
> the allocation of IPv4 address space rather than a system that relies on
> politics.
Unacceptable. You can not run from politics when you try to effect
control. It's a well established fact you know.
Regards
Joe Baptista
has never advised me that I
could be a member - it has never solicited my participation, and yet these
are serious issues which clearly affect the IP infrastructure and the
whole internet community, very shameful situation we have here.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Michael Sondow wrote:
7;s happened in
ICANN representation, and the IP infrastructure is no different.
A Vixie control freak approach is not going to work here.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, David R. Conrad wrote:
> Michael,
>
> > As
> > to RIPE having a mechanism for representative dem
I definately will look into it. Certainly the ripe modem sounds
acceptable. If you have any resources you feel I should focus on to
educate myself - please advise.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Yes, that's my concern too. This i
learned from the RIPE experience.
Is there any information on the RIPE experience. I take it deals with
membership and empowering them. Are there any historical references I can
goto.
Regards
Joe Baptista
directly by
majority vote of the IPv4 holders.
This is a major concern to me - that I do not have the ability to make
these choices, nor that a concerted effort has been made toward informing
the IPv4 owners on what is going on with the RIR's, the ASO and ICANN.
Regards
Joe Baptista
You are correct - we did not receive our addresses directly from ARIN. At
the time those addresses were distributed by the CA registry, but that was
later rolled into ARIN, and the CA registry discontinued the service.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Kim Hubbard wrote:
> I do
becoming an unacceptable farce and
has received considerable negative international attention. Including a
boycott of the proceeding by President Mubarak of Egypt.
Also - ipv4 owners have considerably different interests then ICANN's
@large membership.
So - because of these reasons I don&#x
in making this conclusion?
Regards
Joe Baptista
http://nigg.er/
regards
Joe Baptista
very perceptive observation Ellen and quite right.
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Ellen Rony wrote:
> I currently serve as chair the Nominating Committee for the Environmental
> Forum of Marin, a 27 year-old organization. In our situation, the
> Nominating Committee wields enormous power because it scree
e who through neglict become social misfits. But if I do that - you
know - it involves a budget. I have to expend dollars to do that. So
will see.
Today at least Walsh is not worth the effort for me to press the right
buttons to make his peanut crake. But at least we have the option, which
is
Interesting stuff - as part of my campaign to increase membership from
african countries in ICANN, the IDNO and the DNSO, I just noticed netsol
has the domain autozone.ac. registered to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here the dump is anyone is interested.
hertz.netsol.com. jbroadhurst.netsol.com. 1999040101
Does anyone have a list of african cctld's?
They should make it clear on the page Just what they intend to
broadcast. At least President Mubarak at the last minute realized he
should refrain from soiling his hands on ICANN.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
> Joe and all,
>
> Yep! But of cours
ICANN SAYS U.S. WILL LET IT PROSECUTE CYBERSQUATTERS, DOMAIN PROFITEERS
The U.S. government is against empowering ICANN, the organization
responsible for maintaining the Internet-address system, to prosecute
domain-name profiteers, saying instead that it would prefer ICANN, "remain a
private-sec
That really sucks Ben, and I know you understand the term well, so let me
be specific and say it sucks in a bad way - so as not to confuse you with
a pleasure concept.
Didn't anyone video tape the PM of Egypt, or Mike Roberts. You could show
reruns for us die hard icann fans.
Oh well ;-)
On Tu
I guess the opening sessions are not to be televised.
ICANN Cairo is missing. The meetings started 45 minutes ago, but so far
the page has yet to be updated for the remote link. Very sad.
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/cairo/
The ICANN Cairo meeting should have started 14 minutes ago - but so far
nothing from them. No link - no nothing.
Regards
Joe
President Hosny Mubarak of Egypt has cancelled his opening address at the
ICANN Cairo meetings. President Mubarak will instead be replaced by Atef
Ebeid, Prime Minister of Egypt.
Oley
Joe Baptista
I can feel the momentum.
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Richard J. Sexton (At work) wrote:
> Path:
>ns3.vrx.net!news2.best.com!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!remarQ70!supernews.com!rQ66!corp.supernews.com!news.victoria.tc.ca!199.60.222.3
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arthur T. Murray)
> Newsgroups:
>sci.econ,comp.pr
- JPNIC is to study Japanese domain names, trying to start
registration of these domain names within the year 2000.
http://www.nic.ad.jp/en/topics/archive/2225-01.html
This is a good idea.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 06:57:59 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IETF-Announce: ;
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dnsext-axfr-clarify-00.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts dire
Ah the usual WXW lies. Shame. Now your back to alter egos and alternate
personalities. Oy vey in a big oy vey way.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 06-Mar-2000 !Dr. Joe Baptista wrot
My reply to my egyptian counterpart. And now I turn my attention to the
egyptian press.
Regards
Joe Baptista
P.S. Israel get's hit tommorrow.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 04:32:29 -0500 (EST)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "E
un an accountable organization but much harder to run a
circus of fools like ICANN.
regards
Joe Baptista
I think they use bottoms-up alot because of the Berkman boys. Seems to be
a term employed alot by them.
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Michael Sondow wrote:
> > Domain Name Rights Coalition today issued the following
> > statement:
>
> > ICANN has consistently failed to live up to its commitment to make
According to the bind 1999 survey, egypt has 1,700 administrators - and i
will be contacting all of them today - and inviting them to the ICANN
meetings.
Next stop - Japan.
Regards
Joe Baptista
.internetnews.com/ec-news/article/0,1087,4_315131,00.html
Regards
Joe Baptista
of posting rights for William Walsh and Joe
Baptista
There has been a complaint by Joe Baptista that William Walsh refers to
a list member as a "loon".
There has also been a complaint by William Walsh that Joe Baptista refers
to some list members as "evil abusive people
STUDY FINDS ICANN VOTE PLAN FULL OF PROBLEMS
http://www.idg.net/go.cgi?id=233903
- NO SOA REPORT
TINCtinc-org.com. tinc.tinc-org.com. 222800 6H 20M 1W 1D
TLDNS A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. hostmaster.internic.NET. 230300 30M 15M 1W 1D
If anyone else is running valid root servers - please let me know.
Regards
Joe Baptista
I'm getting a timeout for the superroot root servers at 204.80.125.130
;; res_nsend to server 204.80.125.130: Connection timed out
Both of the EURSC nameservers are not working.
. 518400 IN NS ZHAR.praud.com.
zhar.praud.com. 518400 IN A 212.234.36.20
. 518400 IN NS ZOTHOMMOG.praud.com.
zothommog.praud.com.518400 IN A 212.23
t Xed.
Regards
Joe Baptista
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 00:46:29 -0800
From: Roeland M.J. Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: IDNO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [idno] Motion under RRP 4.11.1
Honored audience and fellow members of the IDNO,
Although it is n
get http://www.linuxnic.net/ - been like that for a few days.
Regards
Joe
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2000 21:31:55 -0500 (EST)
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTE
301 - 400 of 518 matches
Mail list logo
