We have just finished a distribution of pr on behalf of ICANN. As a
member of ICANN we felt the membership base is unrepresentative of the
internet community.
We have identified the following groups of interested parties:
Small Business
Anarchists
Pornographers
Again, I ask you publically to stop posting in MIME-encapsulated HTML.
Thank you.
--
Mark C. LangstonLATEST: ICANN refuses Let your voice be heard:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to consider application for http://www.idno.org
Systems AdminConstituency status from organized
Again, I ask you publically to stop posting in MIME-encapsulated HTML.
Thank you.
Well - mark - here's my public reply to you, which is the same as my
private reply. If it's that bothersome - please filter me.
If more members feel the same - fine i'll consider it. But I'd rather
Brandon and all,
A circular justification. Excellent! You should be an ICANN (Initial?)
Board member! ;)
BrandonButterworth wrote:
Well - mark - here's my public reply to you, which is the same as my
private reply. If it's that bothersome - please filter me.
If more members feel
I will also demand that you refrain from posting private e-mail without
the prior written consent of the author.
However, since you chose to ignore that particular convention as well,
I'll go ahead and point out that where I said MTA I of course meant to
say MUA.
--
Mark C. Langston
Hello Mark:
On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Mark C. Langston wrote:
I will also demand that you refrain from posting private e-mail without
the prior written consent of the author.
However, since you chose to ignore that particular convention as well,
I'll go ahead and point out that where I said
basic netiquette jeff mason, if I send you a message to you alone it
generally is because I don't want to take a disagreement into the
public domain.to take the contents of a private message and make
them public without the permission of the sender is just not
done.defining private
I understand now. Mark complained to me and i told him to go ahead and
filter me out. It's all in my email. But Mark felt compeled to begin his
complaining in public - even though I feel I have adequately dismissed his
complaint.
I posted the private email - simply because I have no need to
to jeff mason plonk
The COOK Report on InternetIndex to seven years of the COOK Report
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA http://cookreport.com
(609) 882-2572 (phone fax) The only Good ICANN is a Dead
an example of true censorship. Oley.
On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Gordon Cook wrote:
to jeff mason plonk
The COOK Report on InternetIndex to seven years of the COOK Report
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA
JEffM and all,
I feel the same way here Jeff, and have stated so on more than
one occasion. However I do not censor anyone as a matter of
practice. I try to respect everyone's input, whether I like their input
or not, is not really relevant.
Planet Communications Computing Facility wrote:
exactly - thanks for your support
On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Jeff Williams wrote:
JEffM and all,
I feel the same way here Jeff, and have stated so on more than
one occasion. However I do not censor anyone as a matter of
practice. I try to respect everyone's input, whether I like their input
Monday, August 23, 1999, 5:13:24 PM, Planet Communications Computing Facility
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exactly - thanks for your support
On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Jeff Williams wrote:
JEffM and all,
I feel the same way here Jeff, and have stated so on more than
one occasion. However I do
William and all,
Your point? Unfortunately for your comment here, neither JeffM nor
I, am anonymous
William X. Walsh wrote:
Monday, August 23, 1999, 5:13:24 PM, Planet Communications Computing Facility
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exactly - thanks for your support
On Mon, 23 Aug
14 matches
Mail list logo
