Re: Past Technical papers / talks / slides required.

2001-06-22 Thread Richard Clamp
. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PUB: Dogget's Coat and Arms

2001-06-22 Thread Richard Clamp
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:03:02PM +0100, Roger Burton West wrote: On or about Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:55:07AM +0100, Richard Clamp typed: Hmmm, Hoegaarden Currently a quid per litre bottle in Calais. Last weekend was a good one... Okay, so the month after next we go even further south

Re: TT new website

2001-06-26 Thread Richard Clamp
see and feel the benefits of doing things test first, without doing the other stuff, but you're not doing XP at that point. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: This is how Dave Made Us Do It

2001-07-01 Thread Richard Clamp
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 06:39:10PM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote: http://www.fpc-ucc.org/fpcDave.html Get her! That was your whole plan, Get her! -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ANNOUNCE]Tech Meeting - Sept 20th

2001-09-11 Thread Richard Clamp
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 07:08:48AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: As promised, we will be having a technical meeting on Thursday 20th September. Start time? -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Talk slides

2001-09-21 Thread Richard Clamp
-- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: No mail since 18:50 Thursday

2001-09-25 Thread Richard Clamp
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 12:39:20PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: And the top secret talk we can't mention Yeah, and if I catch anyone using Pod::Coverage you'll all be for the high jump. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RE: Re: Film Recommendatio : A Knight's Tale

2001-09-25 Thread Richard Clamp
90 minutes of vaguely attractive young women doing kung fu in order to enjoy a film :) Yes, I agree, 90 minutes was far too short. You could always watch it twice. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Pager verification

2001-09-27 Thread Richard Clamp
- send a test page at regular intervals/times of the day. If you don't get one, then worry. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: happy birthday #london.pm!

2001-10-19 Thread Richard Clamp
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 11:57:53AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: Channel #london.pm was created at Thu Oct 19 14:48:32 2000 Which by my reckoning means that #london.pm's first birthday is today in a few hours :) Nope, it ain't, we did this before though. *rummage* -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL

Re: happy birthday #london.pm!

2001-10-19 Thread Richard Clamp
suppose. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: happy birthday #london.pm!

2001-10-19 Thread Richard Clamp
-up _geek_ events, and then gave 1e9 as a further example. I don't hold much joy for Christmas though, but Halloween and Bonfire Night rock my world. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Heretical Non-Heretics

2001-10-21 Thread Richard Clamp
the entrance... -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

one for dave (new module)

2001-10-23 Thread Richard Clamp
I figure we're pretty safe releasing it to CPAN (the kiddies will never think to look there), but does anyone have any comments before I do? -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] USIG.pm

Re: one for dave (new module)

2001-10-23 Thread Richard Clamp
, it's getting a bit chunky, track the development of the code on that there interweb: http://unixbeard.net/~richardc/lab/Acme-USIG/ And later on the CPAN, when I've wrestled a Makefile.PL together. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: one for dave (new module)

2001-10-23 Thread Richard Clamp
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 02:52:45PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote: On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 02:44:41PM +0100, Richard Clamp wrote: +sub gay::is { http://www.cookwood.com/cgi-bin/lcastro/perlbbs.pl?form=4700; } I think you want s/form/read/ there. So I do, thanks for the catch. Did I ever

Re: .emacs help

2001-10-30 Thread Richard Clamp
the one you're looking for. But if you can't tell what a test is testing then I'd say you've got a bigger problem than having to find 23 names. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: .emacs help

2001-10-30 Thread Richard Clamp
richardc@jay:~% perl -e 'use Test::More tests = 2; ok(1); ok(1, with message)' 1..2 ok 1 ok 2 - with message -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: contracts

2001-11-10 Thread Richard Clamp
and their refrigerated for a year fruit then you're wrong. The variance in what you see at markets is much less seasonal and more a side-effect of supply and demand. If $supermarket_chain decides to have granny smiths, and there aren't enough to go round, then they don't. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: contracts

2001-11-10 Thread Richard Clamp
got was a Bananman key fob. [1] Though there are more like 4 but I can only think of Geests and Fyffes right now. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Technical meetings are bad for your holidays

2001-11-23 Thread Richard Clamp
'; inc_foo(foo = $foo); print $foo; prints 2 code here: http://unixbeard.net/~richardc/lab/Tie-Hash-ByReference/ Patches and a better name welcome. I'll probably let it escape to CPAN next week, when I'm back from my week off. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: weird regexness

2001-12-06 Thread Richard Clamp
character. it's matched on the 'nip' not the mmnipm. I think anyway. Change $a, think again. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Class::Contract

2001-12-10 Thread Richard Clamp
, and so not an object. At that point the joke was ruined. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

the undead

2001-12-14 Thread Richard Clamp
it can't validate [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a valid sender - it keeps defering on me. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: the undead

2001-12-14 Thread Richard Clamp
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:46:29AM +, Richard Clamp wrote: Place your bets on what this does: For added fun - I just discovered that it behaves differently under perl 5.005_03 compared to 5.6.1. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: braaaaaains

2001-12-14 Thread Richard Clamp
line 13. So on inspection it looks like what you get stops being an object just after the DESTROY finishes, in older perls, but not in 5.6.1. So remember kids, if you really want to bring yourself back from the dead use a newer perl and everything will be fine. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: London.pm List Weekly Summary 2001-12-10

2001-12-17 Thread Richard Clamp
in the first place. I just flogged the pony until it was good and dead. My bad. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ANNOUNCE Pod::Coverage 0.09

2001-12-17 Thread Richard Clamp
to allow documentation in a parent class to be counted in the coverage of the child has started to tingle (aka as making Pod::Coverage grok inheritance), so that'll be the main target of the next bunch of stuff. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Persistent/static vars in perl

2002-01-04 Thread Richard Clamp
think, but possibly in a very after the fact hey this implementation feature exists, but lets not toss it because it's useful way. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Compiling strings into code refs

2002-01-08 Thread Richard Clamp
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:08:05AM -, Ivor Williams wrote: Any thoughts? eval sub { $some_code } ? -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Compiling strings into code refs

2002-01-08 Thread Richard Clamp
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:55:06AM -, Ivor Williams wrote: Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: eval sub { $some_code } This is missing the point, as eval runs it now, I want to run it later. Eval compiles the sub now, but no code runs until you dereference the subroutine reference

Re: black hat hackers

2002-01-10 Thread Richard Clamp
/local/perl5.6.1/bin/perl, men are men and shoes are optional) This was causing all sorts of aggravation, then I remembered env(1). Top Tip for the day: #!/usr/bin/env perl5.6.1 -w Saves constant tweaking when moving between boxes, which was nice. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

brain starting to glow

2002-01-10 Thread Richard Clamp
/msg01105.html but as with most p5p stuff, I'm a little unclear as to which is going to be right. I suspect doing it and calling it Devel::UpVar isn't going to get me shot, right?, right? Suggestions? Comments? -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: OSCON

2002-01-14 Thread Richard Clamp
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 06:42:07PM +, Paul Mison wrote: If anyone knows how to control the orientation of the arrows, I'd be grateful for the hint. Don't upset the Indians? -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ANNOUNCE Acme::Your - your variables, not our variables

2002-01-14 Thread Richard Clamp
and Chave is somewhat ruder, forcing our variable upon you. I again blame Mark - he wasn't drinking when we came up with this. Available here: http://unixbeard.net/~richardc/lab/Acme-Your/Acme-Your-0.01.tar.gz or your local CPAN mirror -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Technical meeting details and reminders

2002-01-20 Thread Richard Clamp
an unacceptable answer :) -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

call level oddness

2002-01-21 Thread Richard Clamp
know of a good way to get the true Cv in this case - or shall I just steal some more code and implement my own calllevel-to-cv implementation? [0] Though I've told people what it is for already I'm hoping to reveal all properly on Thursday with a working implementation. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL

Re: call level oddness

2002-01-21 Thread Richard Clamp
is only really a consensual callstack, so I think it's a little late now... But I now have the rw case working :) -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: call level oddness

2002-01-22 Thread Richard Clamp
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 09:03:44AM +, Piers Cawley wrote: Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 08:12:42PM +, Robin Houston wrote: Do you want to find the coderef of foo from _within_ a pre or post handler? No, within foo (or something foo may happen

ANNOUNCE Sub::Parameters 0.01 release

2002-01-24 Thread Richard Clamp
It's here, it's groovy, it's the subject of a lightning talk. http://unixbeard.net/~richardc/lab/Sub-Parameters/Sub-Parameters-0.01.tar.gz -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] NAME Sub::Parameters - enhanced parmeter handling SYNOPSIS use Sub::Parameters; sub foo : WantParam

Re: Perl Based Email Archiver

2002-01-24 Thread Richard Clamp
thread structure. Is this intentional? -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ANNOUNCE Sub::Parameters 0.01 release

2002-01-24 Thread Richard Clamp
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 03:11:21AM +, Richard Clamp wrote: It's here, it's groovy, it's the subject of a lightning talk. It's a bit buggy for perl blead, but now it doesn't barf over the test scripts. http://unixbeard.net/~richardc/lab/Sub-Parameters/Sub-Parameters-0.02.tar.gz

Re: Perl Based Email Archiver

2002-01-24 Thread Richard Clamp
it. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: vim+hardlinks

2002-01-28 Thread Richard Clamp
while it's at the keyboard. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: vim+hardlinks

2002-01-28 Thread Richard Clamp
but trying to get it to do it for hard links? No, I know I have this behaviour for hardlinks with emacs, I was just striving to produce a really tidy patch by using something less full-auto. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: vim+hardlinks

2002-01-28 Thread Richard Clamp
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 12:55:08PM +, Rob Partington wrote: Well, :set bkc=no seems to do what you want. Groovy, thanks. Now that I see it the docs that issue dire warnings that you may not want to do that seem almost comical. Back to the code I guess. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: vim+hardlinks

2002-01-28 Thread Richard Clamp
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 12:32:41PM +, Andrew Wilson wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 12:12:18PM +, Richard Clamp wrote: You seem to have inodes and dirents linked in your brain incorrectly. Perhaps I do. My understanding is that the inode is the file, it has all the info except

Re: Photo Credit

2002-01-31 Thread Richard Clamp
mind their photo appearing in the magazine. Huh? What? Ears burning? I'm not quite sure how that pic illustrates the ethos of nms, since I'm only involved as much as knowing of the project, but yes, they have my blessing to use it. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: botch to prevent a warning

2002-02-01 Thread Richard Clamp
really notice until you lose them. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: botch to prevent a warning

2002-02-01 Thread Richard Clamp
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 11:05:49AM +, Simon Wistow wrote: { local $^W = 0; $CGI::DISABLE_UPLOADS = 1; $CGI::POST_MAX= 100; } ? I'm assuming the ? is because you haven't tried it, right? Didn't wfm on 5.005_03 anyhow. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL

Re: botch to prevent a warning

2002-02-01 Thread Richard Clamp
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 11:40:39AM +, Simon Wistow wrote: Yeah, I didn't have quick access to an early Perl. Should have included more disclaimers. Is now when I mention it doesn't work on 5.6.1 or blead too? What are you counting as a non-early Perl? -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: botch to prevent a warning

2002-02-01 Thread Richard Clamp
doesn't just use CGI, and see the pain fade. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] richardc@mirth:~% perl -v | head -2 ; for i in foo bar baz ; do echo --- $i ; cat $i ; echo --- ; perl -w $i ; done This is perl, v5.6.1 built for powerpc-linux --- foo { local $^W = 0; $CGI

Re: botch to prevent a warning

2002-02-01 Thread Richard Clamp
was the latter. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: botch to prevent a warning

2002-02-01 Thread Richard Clamp
doubt I was even born back then, but I have albums older than that :) -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ANNOUNCE Devel::Caller

2002-02-02 Thread Richard Clamp
vars qw/@bar/; foo( @bar = qw( some value ) ); is broken as it generates real split ops rather than optimising it into a constant assignment at compile time as in newer perls. SEE ALSO caller in perlfunc, PadWalker, Devel::Peek AUTHOR Richard Clamp

ANNOUNCE Sub::Parameters 0.03

2002-02-02 Thread Richard Clamp
commence on forcing this further and further back in time, next stop 5.005_03. As ever, lurking here before it gets to CPAN: http://unixbeard.net/~richardc/lab/Sub-Parameters/ [0] Taking a less broken Devel::Caller with it, oopsie. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

gcov/xs trickery.

2002-02-08 Thread Richard Clamp
at the generated Foo.xs.gcov results. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: gcov/xs trickery.

2002-02-09 Thread Richard Clamp
is in my brain, are you planning to talk at any conferences this year? I know I'd like to see a Devel::Cover flavoured talk, and I suspect I'm not alone. It's also helped me enough recently retrofitting tests to some code at work that I suspect that I owe you at least a drink or six. -- Richard Clamp

Re: projects

2002-02-09 Thread Richard Clamp
reinstates. Oh well. [4] Lack of confidence being in no way related to lack of skill[5] [5] Though as Dave has recently pointed out, lack of skill and high confidence isn't an impossible combination (though it can result in impossible people :) -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] do you

Re: projects

2002-02-11 Thread Richard Clamp
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 12:16:44PM -, Jonathan McKeown wrote: and on Sunday 10 February 2002 01:31 + Richard Clamp wrote: [and how he does deeply disturbing perlguts-type stuff but doesn't want to discuss it on london.pm in case he scares people] And also that there are scary people

Re: Youth hostel for YAPC::Europe?

2002-02-12 Thread Richard Clamp
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 09:27:07PM +, Jonathan Stowe wrote: Is there an 'Old Gits Hostel' too ;-} I suspect they'll have to make their pension stretch to a hotel. Start eating catfood now. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Emergency Social Meeting Wednesday next

2002-02-13 Thread Richard Clamp
. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Milan (was Re: User Input at speed)

2002-02-18 Thread Richard Clamp
squeezy thing on fruit? No, but I'm saving up for one of these: (potentially offensive/not work safe/you're all a bunch of girls if you complain) http://www.penny-arcade.com/view.php3?date=2002-02-11res=l -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

crack check

2002-02-18 Thread Richard Clamp
'; with %foo { print $bar{key}; # prints 'value' print $foo[1]; # prints 'baz' print $baz; # prints 'outside' }; Oh wait, I've just realised that's pretty much what CAlias does. Tum te tum. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bolloxia

2002-02-18 Thread Richard Clamp
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:34:38PM -, Barbie wrote: Your system clock is way out. Start hiding from Herr Mison now :) -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: crack check

2002-02-18 Thread Richard Clamp
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 02:36:53PM +, Rob Partington wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: From the nice features from Turbo Pascal, brought to Perl department: Okay, strangely inspired by Russells Pixies tribute, and a few bottles of beer, I

Re: crack check

2002-02-18 Thread Richard Clamp
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 03:01:02PM +, Richard Clamp wrote: It also seems it wasn't quite original thinking of my own: http://dev.perl.org/rfc/342.pod But I don't know how the apocalypses have rated that rfc. I realised I was being too lazy, and looked: Apoc4 states: - RFC 342

Re: How to optimise slow perl scripts?

2002-02-19 Thread Richard Clamp
tables that fit the needs of the application. There must be easier ways than this :-) I think I said that too :) -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: rsync and mutt woes

2002-02-25 Thread Richard Clamp
, but identifying new messages is just a case of (ls Maildir/new ; ls Maildir/cur | grep -v ':2,[A-R]?*S[T-Z]?$' ) | wc -l And identifying which folders have new stuff is just when Maildir/{cur,new}/ was modified later than Maildir/ -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: language extensions

2002-03-01 Thread Richard Clamp
enhances the language? -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

module naming

2002-03-04 Thread Richard Clamp
right. Suggestions please. [0] Currently done for 5.005_03 and 5.6.1, as they were handy. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Social Meeting

2002-03-06 Thread Richard Clamp
of the bar. You can recognise me because I have a goatee and will be carrying a black rucksack full of books. Does it have a see-through window? I think even among geeks it's rude to stop and search everyone carrying rucksacks, though I've been wrong about less before. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL

Re: Testing my tests

2002-03-08 Thread Richard Clamp
of not accidentally breaking everything at some point down the line and being unaware of it. Also it lets me nail down api conventions by having real uses of the interface. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: addiction

2002-03-21 Thread Richard Clamp
mostly looks perplexed/confused, but occasionally flips into pensive. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Me too

2002-03-22 Thread Richard Clamp
My slides from last night lurk here: http://unixbeard.net/~richardc/lab/talks/acme-your/acme-your.slides/ -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: object madness?

2002-03-27 Thread Richard Clamp
packages use StudlyCaps::Names since all lowercase names are reserved for pragmas. Otherwise it's fine, assuming you launder $objtype accordingly. People (well I) do this all the time. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Just pondering

2002-03-27 Thread Richard Clamp
issues with moving to 5.8. Maybe you could use some alternate notation. constant $scalar = something; and then do something source filtery.[1] [1] No I don't like that suggestion, but while the crack pipe is out we may as well indulge. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Just pondering

2002-03-27 Thread Richard Clamp
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 01:27:55PM +, Richard Clamp wrote: often useful. And there's also the speed thing pne picked up on already. Doh, I mean Paul Makepeace. Too many names starting with P, or something. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Just pondering

2002-03-27 Thread Richard Clamp
stupid? Yes. Time them as subs. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Just pondering

2002-03-27 Thread Richard Clamp
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 01:36:56PM +, Richard Clamp wrote: On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 05:19:30AM -0800, Dave Cross wrote: From: iwilliams [EMAIL PROTECTED] What's the performance hit? Probably worth a benchmark - being careful about judging the effects of optimisation. Having

Re: Cuse constant speed

2002-03-27 Thread Richard Clamp
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 01:58:59PM +, Simon Wilcox wrote: use constant DEBUG = 1; my $debug = 0; Spot the difference. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Blade 2 ...

2002-03-29 Thread Richard Clamp
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 03:34:54PM -0500, anathema wrote: YMMV, but if you have a brain, you may be disappointed. Excellent. I use my brain too much as it is, an excuse to completely turn it off for an hour or so is often welcomed. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: penderel

2002-04-03 Thread Richard Clamp
. [1] I'll cough to a slight amount of bias since this is typically how I run my machines. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: YAPC::E Auction (was Re: Advert : Apple Base Station)

2002-04-10 Thread Richard Clamp
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:17:02PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's an auction? Auctioning things to drunk people really isn't fair, you know... No it happens during the day, when people could have hangovers. This could be more inhumane. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Website mirroring

2002-04-25 Thread Richard Clamp
\ http://www.gnu.org/ Or, with less typing: wget -m -k -K -E http://www.gnu.org/ -o /home/me/weeklog --- From wget(1) -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ANNOUNCE: Acme::Magpie 0.01 released

2002-04-30 Thread Richard Clamp
We came up with the notion for this last social meeting, but I've only got around to writing the code. Winging it's way to your nearest CPAN mirror, or available here: http://unixbeard.net/~richardc/lab/Acme-Magpie/ -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] NAME Acme::Magpie - steals shiny

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Emergency pub reconnaissance, Tuesday 21 May

2002-05-03 Thread Richard Clamp
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:20:10PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: Founders Arms gets my vote. Sorry, you don't count because you're not voting for the Anchor. Only the old bits or outside though. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [josette@oreilly.co.uk: Newsletter issue 02-9]

2002-05-29 Thread Richard Clamp
the authors, if there isn't room for both. Dumb Question: Authors of the reviews, or the books? Give me the info and I'll look at working up patches. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

meeting today, at the anchor

2002-06-06 Thread Richard Clamp
part, and as such evil, but the old part has no rooms big enough for everyone to fit in. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: more mailman

2002-07-07 Thread Richard Clamp
. If that happens my money is on recycling the existing code in the meantime which'll never get replaced. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Module Tests

2002-07-17 Thread Richard Clamp
/Writing_A_Test_Library -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Books on london.pm.org (was Re: applying patterns)

2002-10-16 Thread Richard Clamp
people just didn't pick up on it. It needs a few things pulling together for its first release, but it's all self hosting and stuff. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: (no subject)

2002-11-08 Thread Richard Clamp
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 05:42:33PM +, Jasper McCrea wrote: Ifin they ain't too big, try @array1 eq @array2 @array1 = qw( foo bar ); @array2 = qw( foob ar ); They're not big, but they are still wrong :) -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: (no subject)

2002-11-08 Thread Richard Clamp
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 05:54:32PM +, Richard Clamp wrote: On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 05:42:33PM +, Jasper McCrea wrote: Ifin they ain't too big, try @array1 eq @array2 @array1 = qw( foo bar ); @array2 = qw( foob ar ); They're not big, but they are still wrong :) Or would

Re: My First CPAN Module... but comments first, please?

2002-11-12 Thread Richard Clamp
tying, and so is much quicker. http://search.cpan.org/author/PINYAN/Lexical-Alias-0.03/Alias.pm -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Announce: Devel::LeakTrace

2002-11-12 Thread Richard Clamp
/~richardc/journal/8901 http://mirth.unixbeard.net/svn/richardc/perl/Devel-LeakTrace-0.01/ -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Announce: Devel::LeakTrace

2002-11-13 Thread Richard Clamp
::LeakTrace $VERSION; +} + +INIT { start_up(); } Though we should probably take this off list about now... -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

the dog ate my manifesto

2002-11-17 Thread Richard Clamp
Dear voter, you may have noticed by now that I've not turned in a manifesto. You may take this to mean any of: * If elected I don't intend to change anything really * This pseudo political stuff is too complicated for me to follow * BRANES Happy Voting -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: The Peon's Guide To Secure System Development

2002-11-21 Thread Richard Clamp
mail p5p directly and see if they mark it as a duplicate/fix it. -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: REVIEW: Extending and Embedding Perl

2002-11-28 Thread Richard Clamp
always try Devel::LeakTrace (if the something is SVs) or valgrind (if the something is regular malloced blocks). -- Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  1   2   >