VS: SV: [Ltsp-discuss] tftp access violation error on redhat 7.1

2001-11-21 Thread Asbjørn Morell
Well... xinet is running. Have I installed the tftp server the right way? This is what I did: Rpm -i tftp-server-0.17-9.i386.rpm vi /etc/xinetd.d/tftp (here I changed "disabled = yes to disabled = no) Installed the Core, and by the guide from here. Asbjørn Morell > Ragnar, > > Why do you thin

[Ltsp-discuss] Keyboard layout

2001-11-21 Thread Prolinux
I have spanish keyboards in my computers (terminals and server) but terminal keyboards are not properly configured (server keyb is OK) so I copy and paste keyboard related lines fron XF86Conf file to lts.conf but it doesn't work. Here is my new lts.conf: [Default] SERVER = 192

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] turning off the workstation

2001-11-21 Thread Martin Herweg
Karol Krenski wrote: > Hi there, > I am swapping to a hard drive. When I turn off workstation I can hear > khrr sound from hard drive. Is that the normal way? I'd say this is normal. the head moves to a parking position when the power goes away. some harddrives are louder than others. _

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] Warning: unable to open an Initial console ??? Wrap UP

2001-11-21 Thread Scott Kinnear
I found it !!! - FYI don't for get to check the File Systems | Automatically mount at boot - option. Thanks Jim, doing the diff allowed me to find the problem. Thanks to everyone else that had suggestions. Scott OH, and for anyone that is still thinking about my "can't write to /tmp" pr

[Ltsp-discuss] Re: LTSP Translation

2001-11-21 Thread giorgio rossi
Hi David, the v2.4 version I have read many time. Probabily, the new version are different and I wait for this. May be also for the old ltsp 2.08 is needed a translation, if yes, please inform me. In any case, witch format (html, txt, sgml... ) and witch apply is necessary to make it? I have loo

Re: SV: [Ltsp-discuss] tftp access violation error on redhat 7.1

2001-11-21 Thread Ragnar Wisløff
onsdag 21. november 2001, 21:25 skrev Jim McQuillan: > > Ragnar, > > Why do you think it looks like the tftp server is running standalone ? I stand corrected, I overlooked the single "a" in netstat. Please disregard my advice, Asbjørn. Your xinetd is most likely running and doing its job. net

Re: SV: [Ltsp-discuss] tftp access violation error on redhat 7.1

2001-11-21 Thread Jim McQuillan
Ragnar Wisløff wrote: >onsdag 21. november 2001, 19:49 skrev Asbjørn Morell: > >>Hello >> >>Well inetd is not running >>If I type netstat -a|grep tftp then I get this result: >>udp0 0 *:tftp *:* >>h, is this not strange? I mean should it not be listening

[Ltsp-discuss] OT: List recommendations

2001-11-21 Thread Janyne Kizer
Could someone please recommend a good general Linux list? Thanks! -- Janyne Kizer _ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For addit

Re: SV: [Ltsp-discuss] tftp access violation error on redhat 7.1

2001-11-21 Thread Ragnar Wisløff
onsdag 21. november 2001, 19:49 skrev Asbjørn Morell: > Hello > > Well inetd is not running > If I type netstat -a|grep tftp then I get this result: > udp0 0 *:tftp *:* > h, is this not strange? I mean should it not be listening? I have > done a port-scan o

Re: SV: [Ltsp-discuss] tftp access violation error on redhat 7.1

2001-11-21 Thread Jim McQuillan
Asbjorn, The output of netstat looks fine. It shows that there is a process listening on port 69 (tftp). you could try running the tftp client program on your server. type this: tftp localhost Then, you will get a prompt like this: tftp> Type this: get /lts/vmlinuz.3c90x It shoul

RE: SV: [Ltsp-discuss] tftp access violation error on redhat 7.1

2001-11-21 Thread Asbjørn Morell
Hello Well inetd is not running If I type netstat -a|grep tftp then I get this result: udp0 0 *:tftp *:* h, is this not strange? I mean should it not be listening? I have done a port-scan of my server and nothing is listen on port 69 (I think tftp is

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] trouble with network device

2001-11-21 Thread Jim McQuillan
Sagar, LTSP 2.09pre4 is very stable. The only reason we haven't made it a production release yet is because I am still working on the documentation, and I don't want to release it until that is done. if you go by the Instructions sheet on the ltsp site for 2.09pre4, you shouldn't have any pro

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] trouble with network device

2001-11-21 Thread Sagar Sule
hi, thanks for the advice but is LTSP 2.09pre4 stable enough? will it crash often. coz the setup is at an engineering college and it will be problematic for me if the server crashes often while the students are practicing their normal unix commands. thanks in advance regards sagar --- Jim McQ

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] kernel problems with 2.09pre4

2001-11-21 Thread Dave Mattson
Andy, I had the same problem. There are two solutions: 1. Rebuild the kernel image 2. Use PXE to boot In the past I have gone the route of building kernels for special devices to to boot ltsp (micro channel laptops) it's alot of work and unless your really looking to learn that amount of

RE: [Ltsp-discuss] NCD Win-terminals

2001-11-21 Thread Hans Petrie
The NCD ThinSTARs require that they have the ThinPATH X windows module loaded in order to connect to a Linux or Unix server using the X protocol. Since they are Windows Based Terminals they contain Windows CE on flash as an Operating System rather than Linux. This is because at the time they were

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] kernel problems with 2.09pre4

2001-11-21 Thread Conrad Lawes
mknbi v1.1 or higher will trigger this error. See the documentation at http://www.ltsp.org/documentation/LTSP-MBA.htm - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:53 AM Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] kernel problems with 2.09pr

[Ltsp-discuss] Newbie boot methods question

2001-11-21 Thread Simon Cruickshank
Hi all, I have managed to setup a basic LTSP system at home using floppies to boot and am looking at some alternative boot methods. The clients I am using are old-ish IBM 340 desktop pc's P100 16mb Ram etc. I am thinking of moving to either PXE enabled NIC or Bootromed NICs. If I go for bootrom

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] (no subject)

2001-11-21 Thread Jim McQuillan
Yogesh, With 2.09pre4, you don't need to specify the agpgart.o module. It should be loaded automatically. You can verify this by setting the runlevel to 3, and then running lsmod at the shell prompt, to see if the module is indeed loaded. What do you have your XSERVER entry set to in the lts

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] trouble with network device

2001-11-21 Thread Jim McQuillan
Sagar, The 2.2.18 kernel doesn't support the DFE538tx. You can either grab the latest rtl8139 driver from Donald Becker's web site at http://www.scyld.com, or you could upgrade to LTSP 2.09pre4, which uses the 2.4.9 kernel which does support that card. If you don't already know how to compile

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] NCD Win-terminals

2001-11-21 Thread Jim McQuillan
Looking at the NCD web page on the ThinStar terminal, it appears that it can be configured as an X terminal. In that case, you should be able to tell it to get an XDMCP login from the LTSP server. Probably fairly easy to do, if you can figure out how to get into the setup screen of the termina

Re: SV: [Ltsp-discuss] tftp access violation error on redhat 7.1

2001-11-21 Thread Jim McQuillan
Asbjorn, It looks like you have both inetd and xinetd configured on your system. Which one is running ? Maybe both! It's entirely possible that you have both of them running, but only one of them can be configured for tftp at any given time. Do a ps -ef | grep inetd and see if they are both r

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] X-client

2001-11-21 Thread rapodaca
If its a remote adminstration tool that you are looking for, check out: http://www.webmin.com/webmin/ There is even an ltsp module available: http://termserv.berlios.de/ltsp-module/ Cheers >> Original Message << On 11/20/01, 7:51:10 PM, Marcus Smith <[EMAIL PRO

[Ltsp-discuss] kernel problems with 2.09pre4

2001-11-21 Thread andy
Hello! I have tried the lts_kernel-2.09pre4-4 ready kernels and I have tried compiling my own but I always get the same error when trying to boot the Diskless Client. I use 3Com905 NIC's and use the imggen script to add MBR support. I had lts 2.08 working fine with the same equipment... This

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] (no subject)

2001-11-21 Thread yogesh hasabnis
Hi Mr Jim, After installing the ltsp version 2.09pre4, the below-mentioned DFE538TX card issue has been sorted out. The workstation works fine in Runlevel 4. But when I set runlevel = 5 in lts.conf, an Xserver problem is observed. The workstation is i810-based, so when I add the line MODULE_01

Re: [Ltsp-discuss] dhcp-ltsp

2001-11-21 Thread Johann GORLIER
As for you I had some kind of problem setting up the new 2.09pre4. First, if I use dhcp to get client IP, then I had to add /tftpboot/lts to the /etc/exports and then to make my etherboot floppy with NFS proto enable instead of tftp... I'm using Suse7.3 and my tftp seems to be enable. Well now i

[Ltsp-discuss] trouble with network device

2001-11-21 Thread Sagar Sule
hello all, my client has dlink 538tx+ nw card. i am using the vmlinuz.rtl8139 kernel. here are the error messages that i see on my client : RAM disk driver initialised : 16 RAM disks of 1024k size IP-Config : No Network devices available Root-NFS : No NFS server available, giving up. VFS : Una

Re: SV: [Ltsp-discuss] tftp access violation error on redhat 7.1

2001-11-21 Thread Ragnar Wisløff
onsdag 21. november 2001, 08:41 skrev Asbjørn Morell: > I still get that "tftp access violation error"! > > This is my /etc/dhcpd.conf: > default-lease-time21600; > max-lease-time21600; > > option subnet-mask255.255.255.0; > option broadcast-address 192

[Ltsp-discuss] NCD Win-terminals

2001-11-21 Thread Ragnar Wisløff
A school with a number of NCD Win-terminals (probably ThinSTAR - I haven't seen them yet, but the description fits) has asked if these can be used with an LTSP solution. The description on the web page of NCD looks promising, ref. http://www.ncd.com/about/overview/ where they talk about X.11 an