Jacky,
Take a look at the following wiki article:
http://wiki.ltsp.org/twiki/bin/view/Ltsp/NFS#NFS_Server_not_responding
That should explain what the problem is, and how to fix it.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jacky Li wrote:
Hi,
In a 100 Mbit network environment, I have no problem
seekuel _lycos.com wrote:
Greetings!!!
sir I was setting up LTSP 4.1.0 using Mandrake 10.0 our workstaions are all
identical, evrything wroks fine exept for 1 workstation which was the bios was
updated to newer version. This are the last few lines the workstation displays:
Running dhcpd on po
Am Dienstag, den 14.06.2005, 13:53 +0800 schrieb seekuel _lycos.com:
> Greetings!!!
>
> sir I was setting up LTSP 4.1.0 using Mandrake 10.0 our workstaions are all
> identical, evrything wroks fine exept for 1 workstation which was the bios
> was updated to newer version. This are the last few l
On 6/14/05, Harry Sufehmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 13:53 14/06/2005 +0800, seekuel _lycos.com wrote:
> >sir I was setting up LTSP 4.1.0 using Mandrake 10.0 our workstaions are
> >all identical, evrything wroks fine exept for 1 workstation which was the
> >bios was updated to newer version. T
At 13:53 14/06/2005 +0800, seekuel _lycos.com wrote:
sir I was setting up LTSP 4.1.0 using Mandrake 10.0 our workstaions are
all identical, evrything wroks fine exept for 1 workstation which was the
bios was updated to newer version. This are the last few lines the
workstation displays:
Runni
Dirk-Lüder wrote:
>the client boots off BIOS PXE, starts normal until the following output:
>
>Running dhclient
>e100: eth0 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full duplex
>Mounting root filesystem: /opt/ltsp/i386 from: 192.168.1.71
>
>Then it just sits there, generating lots of traffic and the LTSP-Server sy
PROTECTED]
Linux Registred User # 280238
Visite: http://www.lc3.com.br/
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Marcio Pessoa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 4:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] NFS problem
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 14:00, Marcio Pessoa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a small network with a LTSP server and 6 terminals.
>
> The LTSP can't mount /home directory on terminals, syslog reports
> the follow message:
>
> rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request from 192.168.1.2:784 for /
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Marcio Pessoa wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a small network with a LTSP server and 6 terminals.
>
> The LTSP can't mount /home directory on terminals, syslog reports
> the follow message:
>
> rpc.mountd: authenticated mount request from 192.168.1.2:784 for /home
>
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 10:46:29AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Maurice,
>
> Do this on your server:
>
>showmount -e
>
>
> Make sure it lists your /home directory as exported,
> and check the address that it is exporting it to.
yes they are... (/home clients are comlx*.com.univ-mrs
Maurice,
Do this on your server:
showmount -e
Make sure it lists your /home directory as exported,
and check the address that it is exporting it to.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Maurice Libes wrote:
> hi to all i'am new to the list...
>
> i use ltsp since s
Wouter,
I Fixed that error already, the error is in the /etc/exports like you said
thanks
Mike
> Michael,
>
> It just happens that I had a comparable problem this morning. Did you
> check the /etc/exports file? The lines for LTSP should also point to
> 192.168.1.22
>
> Wouter
>
>
> On 15-
Michael,
It just happens that I had a comparable problem this morning. Did you
check the /etc/exports file? The lines for LTSP should also point to
192.168.1.22
Wouter
On 15-Oct-02 Michael Hadianto wrote:
> sorry for the misstype
> the full error message :
>
> (null)mount : nfsmount failed :
sorry for the misstype
the full error message :
(null)mount : nfsmount failed : Bad file number
NFS: mount program didn't pass remote address!
mount : Mounting 192.168.1.22:/opt/ltsp/i386 on /mnt failed : invalid
argument
ERROR! Failed to mount the root directory via NFS!
-
-
-
-
Kernel Panic
Michael,
can you double check that error message ?
you showed:
mount 192.168.1.22/opt/ltsp/i386
there should be a ':' between the IP address and the
directory. If you don't have it in your /etc/dhcpd.conf
file, then that could cause a problem.
or, maybe you just typed it wrong when you sen
Hi Luciano,
have a look on autofs, the linux automounter. For example I have mounted my
/home with the following line in auto.master
/home /etc/auto.home --timeout 60
and in /etc/auto.home
* -fstype=nfs,soft,intr,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,nosuid intraserv:/home/&
which does nothing else then mount
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 01:49:46PM +0200, Hans Ekbrand wrote:
> The computers are connected through a hub. The firewall at the server
> is told to accept every packet from the clients mac-adress.
For the archives: I tried a cross-over cable instead of a hub and,
viola, it worked perfectly.
> The
Il giorno Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Andres Betancourt E. così ha scritto:
|From: Andres Betancourt E. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: David Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 08:17:44 -0500
|Subject: RE: [Ltsp-discuss] NFS problem
|
| I run
|
|# netstat -l | grep nfs
|
|an
I run
# netstat -l | grep nfs
and had answer, but not this line
udp0 0 *:nfs *:*
I modify ipchains, but I have the same problem with NFS.
Andres Beta
_
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To
"Andres Betancourt E." wrote:
>
> David,
>
> I am run 'netstat > -l | grep nfs and,
> udp0 0 *:nfs *:*
>
> this line does not appear
> I that I can make to add it?
>
> I modify ipchains, but I have the same problem with NFS.
>
> Andre Beta
I think I may have m
David,
I am run 'netstat > -l | grep nfs and,
udp0 0 *:nfs *:*
this line does not appear
I that I can make to add it?
I modify ipchains, but I have the same problem with NFS.
Andre Beta
_
"Andres Betancourt E." wrote:
>
> Sandro.
> The NFS is Runing. The probe is this :
> [root@linux /home]# rpcinfo -p
>program vers proto port
> 132 udp 2049 nfs
> 132 tcp 2049 nfs
>
> [root@linux /home]# grep portmap /etc/hosts.allow
> portmap: 192.168.1.
"Andres Betancourt E." wrote:
> The answer to ipchains-save is:
> :input ACCEPT
> :forward DENY
> :output ACCEPT
> Saving `forward'.
> -A forward -s 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 -d 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -j MASQ
> -A forward -s 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 -d 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 -j MASQ
>
> this is correct?
Yes,
Il giorno Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Andres Betancourt E. così ha scritto:
|From: Andres Betancourt E. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: David Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:05:57 -0500
|Subject: RE: [Ltsp-discuss] NFS problem
|
|David,
|The answer to ipchains-save
Sandro.
The NFS is Runing. The probe is this :
[root@linux /home]# rpcinfo -p
program vers proto port
102 tcp111 portmapper
102 udp111 portmapper
3000191 tcp805 amd
3000191 udp806 amd
115 udp913 rstatd
Il giorno Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Andres Betancourt E. così ha scritto:
|From: Andres Betancourt E. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: David Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 08:26:03 -0500
|Subject: RE: [Ltsp-discuss] NFS problem
|
|David, thanks for your answer.
|
|I made t
ginal Message -
From: David Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andres Betancourt E. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] NFS problem
> "Andres Betancourt E." wrote:
> > I made the test with ipchains-save, and t
o now?
Andres Betancourt
- Original Message -
From: David Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andres Betancourt E. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] NFS problem
> "Andres Betancourt E.&q
"Andres Betancourt E." wrote:
>
> I have problems with the NFS,
> The message that shows is:
> Mountin root filesystem: /opt/ltsp/i386 from: 192.168.1.4
> Doing the pivot_root
> nfs: server 192.168.1.4 not responding, still trrying
>
> 192.168.1.4 is my server.
> My Linux is: OpenCaldera 2.4 e
Actually I would like to compile my very own kernel...Was trying to get
2.2.18 and 2.4.9 to work but to no avail. But 2.2.14 works great. Still not
sure what is the problem or some config that I missed. From the config kernel
that was provided by LTSP, it seems that the option for IP autocon
Which distro of LTSP are you using? If your using 2.0.8 and want to move up
to a 2.4.x kernel I'd suggest moving to 2.0.9 it's stable and runs well on
Mandrake 8.1 (from my experience).
> Hi everyone
>
> Have this little problem with my set-up.
>
> I have Mandrake 8.1 running as server. The
31 matches
Mail list logo
