gt;>>
>>> > From: casper...@caspershouse.com
>>> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>> > CC: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>> > Subject: Re: twitter questions
>>> > Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:46:57 +
>>> >
>&
head?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Michael
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
>> > wrote:
>> >> I've also found the question on SO, I'll give it a sho
can we post this on twitter?
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> Hey All -
> Just an FYI, the board voted unanimously to allow us to graduate. I will
> push forward with the various tasks in the next week.
> Congrats to everyone who has helped us get this far -
> ~Prescott
rting multiple versions of VS
> files has been an annoying missing feature.
>
> [1]
>
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/zainnab/archive/2012/06/05/visual-studio-2012-compatibility-aka-project-round-tripping.aspx
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Michael Herndon <
> mhern...@wick
I think it's usually the project files that are backwards compatible not
the solution files. So you need a solution for each vs version but should
be able to keep the proj files the same.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> Yes
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ___
fork it and git r done? I couldn't resist. +1 for git.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
> Nowadays git works just great for Windows, and it's much easier to work
> with than Hg
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Zachary Gramana >wrote:
>
> > On Aug 1, 2012, at 12:51 P
* cause obviously we can not* exactly hard code paths.
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Michael Herndon <
mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> to explain further, the shadow copy feature basically copies the test
> assemblies to a different location and executes them from t
en to suggestions.
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Michael Herndon <
mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> because of the shadow copy feature in nunit.
>
> simply using
> Path.Combine("Index", "index." + oldNames[i]);
>
> won't work when the test a
because of the shadow copy feature in nunit.
simply using
Path.Combine("Index", "index." + oldNames[i]);
won't work when the test assemblies are located in funky places.
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Simon Svensson wrote:
> I'm looking into running the tests in MonoDevelop (Mono 2.10.9) on
dded to each project page. The larger(?) change
> would the actual packaging for NUnit. Even though it's already it's own
> separate target, I'm sure we want to validate that both .NET35 and .NET4
> builds have been run before packaging the output.
>
>
that is a peculiar behavior.
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Christopher Currens <
currens.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Right now, it outputs both automatically. I didn't put in a switch, it
> just does it be default.
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 2:38 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13419956#comment-13419956
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-446:
---
That is probably fine for
you would need create a build variable for the .net framework version
parameter for msbuild and have it run a second build and switch out the
version.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
>
>
>
> There was a commit for updating the build scripts - is there a command I
> can r
Stefan, I think you've more than proved your value.
http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/download.html on the downloads page
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> 3.0.3 started as a branch while we were releasing 2.9.4. But it was since
> merged into the trunk. Where is the link? we should update it to point to
> the trun
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net.3.0.3//
is broken link on
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/branches/Lucene.Net.3.0.3//
was there meant to be a -pre release so that users/developers can tinker
with the bits?
Howard wrote:
> Michael - How did you manage to get a Unicode dot into your tweet in the
> first place? ;)
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Michael Herndon <
> mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
>
> > Done. For future reference to tweeting things with
ties, and I want to
> > revert any that I find do too much work back into a method.
> >
> > After that, I think most of the API changes left to make are fairly
> > minimal, and it would be nice to get some feedback from the community.
> > Maybe I'll work
Chris, Prescotts, others awesome committers working on trunk,
Do you wish the project to start attempting to gain attention for 3.0.3 and
possibly gain some community testing / wear and tear on it?
Also are there any pressing matters you wish to gain more feedback on from
the community? Our twit
Is it safe to add content to the site through the CMS again? Anything to
be wary of or not explicitly do?
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> Took all day, but Joe was there babysitting and correcting things for us.
> Basically there is a bug in svn 1.6.17 that the CMS is
even though we're not voting on this. +1
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> I've updated the board report: wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
>
> if you guys could take a moment to review.
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>
> From: Stefan
Stefan what did you use to check the eof of files for svn?
I'm setting up RAT on my local. Are there any other tools that you or ASF
recommends in general to validate releases?
- Michael
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2012-01-23, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> >
Do we have a standard of copy or tag of Java's version source that we're
doing a compare against? I only see the 3_1 and above in the tags.
I could attempt to do something similar I did with core and version 4 and
use beyond compare between 2.9.4 and 3.0.3 and make a list of files that
were touc
> Where would my effort best go?
My advice is to play to strengths or work on things that seem interesting
or challenging to you.
Looking through the tickets on jira is a good place to start.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET
Look at recent threads on the mailing lists.
http://mail
Not be a miser, but I'm abstaining till we get a checklist for releases
going.
I know that we need to check
svn-eof
readme
use rat - apache license in files (if there is a tutorial on how to use
that, I can take that over)
docs
tickets
some form release info (whats in the release)
and I'm sure I'
I'm not familiar enough with the licenses or procedures for incorporating
another project outside the ASF to speak on that. Others might have input
on that.
Another thing that must be considered about is who would be the
responsibility party to in order to keep the project up-to-date against its
o
Hi Alexey,
I believe this version of Lucene.Net will be the last version that can be
compiled with the .NET 2.0 runtime which is what .NET 3.5 runs on. There
was a vote on supported runtime versions by the community this past year,
The community widely supported to drop .NET 2.0 runtime after the
Maybe we use should build a mail/chat/social media search with
lucene.netat some point in the future? I'm sure there is a way to log
the chat.
I posted up a tweet tonight on the release. better later than never.
I have two more tweets scheduled using hootsuite, one to thank Simone for
the packag
ed in an ASF private repo.
the a new key probably needs to be generated and stored in the private ASF
repo as well.
The CI build is at builds.apache.org, however its not complete.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Simone Chiaretta wrote:
> Mine below
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:
o).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > I can grant ownership right to other people so someone else can work
> on
> >> it
> >> > if I get hit by a bus.
> >> > Prescott and Michael?
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
&g
if you look inside of trunk/build/scripts/ there are three nuspecs
under their respective folder names.
all, contrib, and core.
all is basically a dependency on contrib & core.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> We also discussed a contrib package - but we never
Did you mean to create 2 new threads? Also have you read Christopher's
response?
Hi Trevor,
What kind of memory increase are we talking about? Also, how big are the
docum
>
>
> In the same vain: sort out the build process in a way that doesn't
> require the tools to be checked into svn.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Road+Map
Posting these under floating goals on wiki. I already have some ideas on
how this can be done, so I've linked the ab
Some of the stuff currently in core were moved to contrib projects in newer
versions of Lucene
An example of this is the standard analyzer for 4x, is no longer in the
core project. So that is a scenario to be wary of.
As previously mentioned by chris, we should probably continue to maintain
what
> 3) Graduate from the incubator
> 4) Document a porting process that the community can reference.
> 5) Port 4.0
>
>
>
> Scott
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 10:28 AM
While much of the content in this thread is valid and is important,
especially concerns, pain points, and implementation details... we've
gotten way off topic.
road map != implementation details. We should keep to a much a higher
level discussion to get this knocked out.
Lets outline the roadmap,
+1 for wiki checklist & ticket for for build scripts to bundle all this
stuff for you.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> Damn It - knew i was missing something
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>
> From: Stefan Bodewig
> Sent: 11/19/2011 10:34
Just in case anyone else following this that are still fuzzy on the details
due to the acronyms.
CRLF is the windows version of a new line. "\r\n" carriage return,line
feed. or in c# Environment.NewLine;
eol = end of line.
eof = end of file.
FOSS projects that will possibly run on multiple pla
I'm guessing we'll need the xml & docs regenerated. do you know if we need
to commit a small segment and then publish to the cms?
or just do small commits and publish all the small commits at once?
I probably won't attempt that till this weekend.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Prescott Nasser
I can rebuild it, but the trick is replacing the version of it in svn so
that it does not cause svnsync and cms to choke. Last time I just pushed it
into branch/site/docs. However, that is not publicly visible for the
incubation website, so Prescott had to do an svn move.
I'm not quite sure how t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13144893#comment-13144893
]
Michael Herndon commented on LUCENENET-454:
---
Jira comments wouldn&#x
Jira comments wouldn't work from my phone
Let me know if you need any help. I've debating on creating custom
build tasks for clean and such since it does not handle folders and its
harder to script preventative measures than it should be. Powershell
would have been easier, build the scripts ne
The Lucene.Net projects were set up so they only generate when you build
the solution or a project in release mode.
There were also copies of those files in the zip file attached to that one
ticket as well just in case.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> How do I generate
g/jira/browse/LUCENENET-452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13140863#comment-13140863]
> >
> > michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-452:
> > ---
The 4e branch is exploring using PLT (portable library tools) for that as
well, which in theory would allow you to compile one assembly that runs
against multiple versions of .NET. including Silverlight 4 and Silverlight
4 for WP7 and hopefully MonoDroid & MonoTouch in the future.
PLT:
http://vis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13140863#comment-13140863
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-452:
---
html docs & chm for 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon updated LUCENENET-452:
--
Attachment: lucene.net.xml.zip
xml & nupkg files.
> Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon updated LUCENENET-452:
--
Description:
Here are the generated chm & website files for the site.
h
Reporter: michael herndon
Assignee: Prescott Nasser
Fix For: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Here are the generated xml files, chm & website files for the site.
These also include the nuget packages since, the .nupkg are zip files. This is
in case the packages were not made when
@Troy,
Now I don't feel as bad for my long e-mails. ;)
-build scripts
Except for building on mono or running NCover, the scripts work as
intended. Also end users would need to install the required tools they
intend to run with the build scripts. The scripts can be included, but it
would be wise
@Prescott,
In name of getting this out the door and keeping momentum I'll put those
together and push that into svn sometime late tonight. **
Other things to do once released official nuget package, some website
love. and start using the twitter: LuceneDotNet account. I can help with
these
A bare bones version for trunk CI builds have been setup.
[Trunk]
https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene.Net-Trunk-Contrib-Poll-Changes/
https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene.Net-Trunk-Contrib-Nightly/
https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene.Net-Trunk-All-Poll-Changes/
https://builds.apache.org/job/Luce
> >
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> > > On Sep 22, 2011, at 11:14 PM, Prescott Nasser
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> > > >
> >
> >
> &g
rs.
>
> I'll see if I can't dig up some info on how to generate static HTML
> with Sandcastle.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Michael Herndon
> wrote:
> >>We have a folder /trunk/docs, shouldn't this be the place for
:
> On 2011-09-23, Michael Herndon wrote:
>
> > Other than talking on the private list, is there any infrastructure to
> > sharing api keys, passwords for committers of a project? I've tried
> > looking at docs on people.apache.org, infra, and other others place
added. though I'll need to figure out if posh actually handles multiline
comments rather than pushing out the license as a string.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Michael,
>
> On 2011-09-23, wrote:
>
> > Added: incubator/lucene.net/trunk/build/scripts/All/Lucene.Net.nus
Other than talking on the private list, is there any infrastructure to
sharing api keys, passwords for committers of a project? I've tried
looking at docs on people.apache.org, infra, and other others place but no
dice so far. The issue with the private list is that if the whole team turns
over,
Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
>
> Sorry, but I feel the same as Neal.
>
> DIGY
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 6:08 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
&
@Digy, that could be done post build with ILMerge or build an additional
uber assembly that stores other assemblies as a resource.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/microsoft_press/archive/2010/02/03/jeffrey-richter-excerpt-2-from-clr-via-c-third-edition.aspx
We can add the above to the build process if tha
e
> 2.9.4 and before are 3.5 compatible
> After 2.9.4 are 4.0 compatible
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Michael Herndon
> wrote:
> > if thats the case, then well need conditional statements for including
> > ThreadLocal
> >
>
mentation in the package,
> vs just hosting it online and calling that good (this is what most
> projects these days do). Good thing about hosting online -- searchable
> via google.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Michael Herndon
> wrote:
>
le generated static HTML should go under
> ~/site/docs/ folders.
>
> I'll see if I can't dig up some info on how to generate static HTML
> with Sandcastle.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Michael Herndon
> wrote:
> >>We have a
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
> While it may be a bit redundant, why couldn't there be an individual
> package for each piece of contrib and a "Lucene.Net Contrib (All)"
> package that drags them all down.
>
> That way users can grab just the bit they need, or if they just
>We have a folder /trunk/docs, shouldn't this be the place for that?
We should have a live site for the documentation that people can browse,
similar to the parent project's site.
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_4_0/api/all/index.html. It makes it the
documentation more accessible.
The rub is tha
We're taking a quick poll over the next few days to see how people would
like use Lucene.Net through Nuget on the developers mailing list**
Currently version 2.9.2 is hosted on nuget.org, but that package was not
create by the project maintainers, thus nuget is not currently set up in
source. Goi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13107632#comment-13107632
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-443:
---
Stuart, trunk was updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon reassigned LUCENENET-443:
-
Assignee: michael herndon
> SpellChecker finaliser calls close regardless
odewig wrote:
> On 2011-09-18, Michael Herndon wrote:
>
> > So would requesting getting an account be requested on
> lucene-net-private@
> > incubator.apache.org ?
>
> Creating the account requires PMC chairman karma, which I happen to
> posess. I've just adde
-17, Michael Herndon wrote:
>
> > Who is our current PMC?
>
> The Incubator PMC.
>
> Stefan
>
Who is our current PMC? I feel stupid for asking, but I can't find it on
the wiki, site, etc. I need to get a build account and get all the fun CI
stuff setup.
- michael
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13105348#comment-13105348
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-443:
---
I should have some over
get it in to 2.9.4?
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko > >wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, great, we will run RavenDB on top of 2.9.4 in the next few days and
> > > will let you know how it went.
> > >
> > >
> > >
Should we put together a quick release checklist ?
* I know that jira 407 mentions putting out a 2.9.2 build that is signed
when releasing 2.9.4
* We should be able to build a chm & doc website using sandcastle.The
downside is the website that gets built now requires asp.net instead of just
I can't tell if the apache git mirror is updated via scheduler or from
commit hooks, but its generally stays close to being on par with svn. I'll
check next time I push something to svn.
But both of those items have made it to the mirror.
- michael
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Digy wrote:
All,
I hope everyone is doing well despite Earthquakes and Hurricanes. Here are
some updates.
[Build Script & CI Changes]
A strong named key and Build scripts were added to the trunk. Doc comments
files only build in release mode since they increase the warnings in visual
studio by about 2000+
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon closed LUCENENET-400.
-
https://cwiki.apache.org/LUCENENET/build-system-scripts.html
the evaluation of tools
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon resolved LUCENENET-400.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
> Evaluate tooling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon closed LUCENENET-440.
-
> Some of the links on the website don
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon resolved LUCENENET-440.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
links were fixed and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon reassigned LUCENENET-440:
-
Assignee: michael herndon
> Some of the links on the website don
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13083267#comment-13083267
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-440:
---
Changes were pushed to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13082664#comment-13082664
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-440:
---
Fixes have been poste
M, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-08-09, Michael Herndon wrote:
>
> > Has this been taken care of?
>
> No, see <http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2011>
>
> > If not. Let me know what is needed and I'll make sure it gets done
> > tonight.
>
>
Hey Stefan,
Has this been taken care of? If not. Let me know what is needed and I'll
make sure it gets done tonight. Its summer and people could be on much
deserved vacation.
- Michael
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lucene.NET's quarterly board report is due t
I've put * my local git branch.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Michael Herndon wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I put an experimental branch up targeted towards lucene 4 called
> Lucene.Net_4e (e for experimental)
>
> This was initially for me to provide an easier way to create
m the Java code it gets harder port Java patches.
> I
> am not sure where the balance is.
>
> Scott
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
> > Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 2:05 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lu
StyleCop by default adheres strictly to ms coding guidelines and then some.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brada/archive/2005/01/26/361363.aspx (even though a
deal of the internals of the framework breaks these rules).
You can turns rules off but if you want rules that differ from the default
ones, rule
Does anyone have any preferred rules that they want ignored or want required
for the project for either Fx Cop or Style Cop?
It might be prudent to wait on putting style cop int the project, it
currently doesn't have a command line client and if installed it would
generate warnings on each time so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon closed LUCENENET-418.
-
this issue should now be closed
> LuceneTestCase should not have a static method co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon resolved LUCENENET-418.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> LuceneTestCase should not have a static method could th
Code Documentation Guide
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Documenting+Lucene.Net
I could not find a decent link or guide on translating JavaDoc notation to
their XML Doc Comment counter parts. Which is why I threw the guide
together with a table that shows JavaDoc and XML Do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon updated LUCENENET-438:
--
Description:
The are a ton of java doc style notations inside the xml code comments
Test
Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.2, Lucene.Net 2.9.4, Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Environment: all
Reporter: michael herndon
There are a few places in the tests and possibly in the code where exceptions
are being rethrown incorrectly and erasing stacktrace.
Please fix these as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon updated LUCENENET-435:
--
Description:
If wish to work on one of these, create a new sub-task from this one
Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Reporter: michael herndon
* We should still be testing deprecated methods, but we need to use #pragma
warning disable/enable 0618 for testing those. otherwise compiler warnings are
too numerous to be anywhere near helpful.
* We should only be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon updated LUCENENET-435:
--
Description:
If wish to work on one of these, create a new sub-task from this one
Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
Environment: all
Reporter: michael herndon
Assignee: michael herndon
* There needs to be a running list of things to do/not to do with testing. I
don't know if this goes in a jira or do we keep a running list on the wiki or
sit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13059635#comment-13059635
]
michael herndon commented on LUCENENET-418:
---
I'll take a look. Wh
ent issues. We could link all
> the sub-issues to a single task / feature / whatever (that is, if JIRA has
> that capability).
>
> -r
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Michael Herndon <
> mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
>
> > I think whatever makes sense to do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
michael herndon resolved LUCENENET-418.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Lucene.Net 2.9.4g
this issue should now
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
