Fajar and others have given you some answers that all work.
I've done what you are wanting to do using multiple methods.
- x2go works great and is easy to install.
server side (lxc container for you):
- sudo add-apt-repository ppa:x2go/stable
- sudo apt-get update
- sudo apt-g
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 20:54 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Michael H. Warfield
> wrote:
> One gotcha. I haven't tried this in the last year or so but,
> at one
>
> point, NX was broken on Ubuntu due to dependency failures in
>
Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
>
> > One gotcha. I haven't tried this in the last year or so but, at one
> > point, NX was broken on Ubuntu due to dependency failures in some
> > multimedia packages and libraries that I was
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> One gotcha. I haven't tried this in the last year or so but, at one
> point, NX was broken on Ubuntu due to dependency failures in some
> multimedia packages and libraries that I was never able to resolve at
> the time.
>
>
... which i
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 23:40 -0400, TuxRaiderPen wrote:
> I am in a situation where I am looking to possibly use LXC as a way to run
> ONE
> specific program that needs an X desktop.
> What I am comparing is LXC v. my normal method a VM.
What I would use is NX on the server (container) and Remm
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:16 PM, TuxRaiderPen wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 04:49:06 Dirk Geschke wrote:
>
> Any views, opinions, comments in re that LXC might be better, worse, even
> v. a
> VM??? Just curious, as I probably am going the LXC route, as it gives me
> another test use case. I
On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 04:49:06 Dirk Geschke wrote:
>
> + ssh -X {container}
>
> And all these work even with unprivileged containers.
Thanks... that is pretty much the plan as per other message for LXC. (See
other other reply too.. Thanks though.. I do this for a ton of other stuff,
jus
On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 04:04:33 Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>
> The easiest way would be to treat the container like any other remote host.
>
> I'm not familiar with kmail, so I assume it can be started standalone
> without having to start the full kde desktop? If yes, then the easiest
> way is to e
Hi All,
> wrote:
> > I am in a situation where I am looking to possibly use LXC as a way to run
> > ONE
> > specific program that needs an X desktop.
[...]
> The easiest way would be to treat the container like any other remote host.
>
> I'm not familiar with kmail, so I assume it can be star
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:40 AM, TuxRaiderPen
wrote:
> I am in a situation where I am looking to possibly use LXC as a way to run ONE
> specific program that needs an X desktop.
>
> What I am comparing is LXC v. my normal method a VM.
>
> Why do I need to run one program... email. I only use KMai
I am in a situation where I am looking to possibly use LXC as a way to run ONE
specific program that needs an X desktop.
What I am comparing is LXC v. my normal method a VM.
Why do I need to run one program... email. I only use KMail, but since
changes to that program are not to my liking (ou
11 matches
Mail list logo
