Michael Gerz wrote:
> does this patch solve your problem?
John's problem is different. He _has_ installed dvipost (i.e. dvipost.sty),
but not the pplatex script. Therefore, LyX finds dvipost, but cannot run it
nevertheless. So I think John's patch is the right thing.
Jürgen
Bo Peng wrote:
> But if you ever want to insert the break at non-TOP dock, 4.2.2 is
> required.
What happens if you use an older version? Is LyX still usable (else, we have
to use #ifdef's IMO)?
> > As already announced, I have a different solution in the pipe (only
> > inserting ToolbarBreaks i
Bo Peng wrote:
>> Sounds a bit provoking,
>
> I apologize. Having your installer in a repository would certainly
> help you. My point is that if it is not official, it would better in a
> place other than trunk.
What's the problem with trunk, I don't care about a additional folder
in /development
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Has anybody a good idea for the menu entry?
"Embedding objects"?
Jürgen
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> After saving a new file or "save as.." the filename is not updated in
> the tab.
>> This patch fixes this.
>
> I checked out you patch (what Abdel comitted) and it works. But I
> noticed one minor thing:
>
> When you have opened two files and save one in the first tab under a
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Q:... Can either of the installers be used to upgrade a LyX installation?
In other words, what
happens if there already is a LyX installation?
If LyX's version number is different the existing LyX is kept untouched
and can be used side by side with the
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Bo Peng wrote:
Btw. I was never able to convince somebody with prior LaTeX knowledge to
use LyX. They don't want to
work with a program that is desinged to hide LaTeX for the users, funny
but the truth.
I converted two emacs latex-ers, and a few SWP-ers.
I've never b
Bernhard Roider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uwe Stöhr already denoted this small bug in his mail from 03
> Jan 2007 - but the discussion then was only about the status of
> status.15x
>
> After saving a new file or "save as.." the filename is not
> updated in the tab. This patch fixes this.
Be
> After saving a new file or "save as.." the filename is not updated in the tab.
> This patch fixes this.
I checked out you patch (what Abdel comitted) and it works. But I noticed one
minor thing:
When you have opened two files and save one in the first tab under a new name its tab is set to th
Hi Georg,
(I reverted problematic changes you made in rev 16920) but due to your change in rev 16910 LyX
crasheds all the time: When creating a new document, etc.
Could you please have a look?
When I'm at HEAD and revert only the changes from 16920 and 16910 everything
works fine.
regards Uwe
Sounds a bit provoking,
I apologize. Having your installer in a repository would certainly
help you. My point is that if it is not official, it would better in a
place other than trunk.
- Mine: bundling everything that is needed, so the user can download it one or
I can provide a CD
and then
Georg you lastes change to encodings.C breaks the compilation with MSVC:
d:\lyxsvn\lyx-devel\src\encoding.h(74) : error C2039: 'map': Ist kein Element vo
n 'std'
d:\lyxsvn\lyx-devel\src\encoding.h(74) : error C2143: Syntaxfehler: Es fehlt ';'
vor '<'
d:\lyxsvn\lyx-devel\src\encoding.h(74) : erro
Bo Peng schrieb:
I propose that
1. we keep Joost's minial installer (8M), which installs lyx only and
optionally download all components.
That's what I also proposed but additionally:
>> 3. When a new LyX is released the official "LyX-installer" as well as
>> the "LyX-distribution" (the
>> th
> Q:... Can either of the installers be used to upgrade a LyX installation? In
other words, what
> happens if there already is a LyX installation?
If LyX's version number is different the existing LyX is kept untouched and can be used side by side
with the new installer version.
I will implem
Btw. I was never able to convince somebody with prior LaTeX knowledge to use
LyX. They don't want to
work with a program that is desinged to hide LaTeX for the users, funny but the
truth.
I converted two emacs latex-ers, and a few SWP-ers.
Bo
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Regarding the tab update problem:
Technically it would be better, i think, if we could move
lyx_view_->updateTab()
into the function writeAs(...). Is the LyXView accessible from the
Buffer to manage this?
No and it will never be the case becau
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Uwe Stöhr already denoted this small bug in his mail from 03 Jan 2007
- but the discussion then was only about the status of status.15x ;-)
After saving a new file or "save as.." the filename is not updated in
the tab. Th
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>>> The kind of installer I expect almost everyone would use is a bundle
> installer that installs the
>>> LyX application as well as a bunch of other useful applications.
>>
>> not so sure, i think that many (most?) people who install (try out)
> lyx for the 1st time will be
>> la
Bernhard Roider wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Bernhard Roider wrote:
>>> Uwe Stöhr already denoted this small bug in his mail from 03 Jan 2007
>>> - but the discussion then was only about the status of status.15x ;-)
>>>
>>> After saving a new file or "save as.." the filename is not updated
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Regarding the tab update problem:
Technically it would be better, i think, if we could move
lyx_view_->updateTab()
into the function writeAs(...). Is the LyXView accessible from the
Buffer to manage this?
No and it will never be the case because this would break the MV
Hello!
I tried to add a gzipped file type to the file types in lyx (compressed svg) for using this as an
image. But when i try to insert such a file then with the option -dbg graphics an error message
shows up that the program gunzip could not be found. The thing is that i even would not need th
Am Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2007 10:16 schrieb José Matos:
> On Wednesday 24 January 2007 8:45:01 am Georg Baum wrote:
> >
> > I won't have time to finish this before the weekend unfortunately.
>
> No problem.
>
> > What do you say about the font change of spaces? This can lead to
different
> > ou
- && !lyxaction.funcHasFlag(cmd.action,
LyXAction::NoBuffer)
- && !lyxaction.funcHasFlag(cmd.action,
LyXAction::ReadOnly))
+ && !lyxaction.funcHasFlag(action,
LyXAction::NoBuffer)
+ && !lyx
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Bernhard Roider wrote:
>> Uwe Stöhr already denoted this small bug in his mail from 03 Jan 2007
>> - but the discussion then was only about the status of status.15x ;-)
>>
>> After saving a new file or "save as.." the filename is not updated in
>> the tab. This patch fixe
Bernhard Roider wrote:
> Uwe Stöhr already denoted this small bug in his mail from 03 Jan 2007 -
> but the discussion then was only about the status of status.15x ;-)
>
> After saving a new file or "save as.." the filename is not updated in
> the tab. This patch fixes this.
>
> Bernhard
>
>
> -
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Uwe Stöhr already denoted this small bug in his mail from 03 Jan 2007
- but the discussion then was only about the status of status.15x ;-)
After saving a new file or "save as.." the filename is not updated in
the tab. This patch fixes this.
>> The kind of installer I expect almost everyone would use is a bundle
installer that installs the
>> LyX application as well as a bunch of other useful applications.
>
> not so sure, i think that many (most?) people who install (try out) lyx for
the 1st time will be
> latex users and will have
Am Sonntag, 28. Januar 2007 20:44 schrieb Michael Gerz:
> Thanks. It may take a few days though until I can have a look...
Don't worry, this part of the code will get more complicated soon ;-)
Georg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: baum
Date: Sun Jan 28 20:36:30 2007
New Revision: 16911
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16911
Log:
Add two FIXMEs for Michael
Thanks. It may take a few days though until I can have a look...
Michael
On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:15:43 pm Georg Baum wrote:
> Jean-Pierre Chretien discovered that the beamer CVS contains two more LyX
> files that I forgot to transfer. This patch adds them as templates.
>
> Is this OK for trunk and 1.4?
Yes for trunk. :-)
> Jean-Pierre has also a french transl
> Uwe,
> - Item "Insets|n" "help-open ExtendedInsets"
>
> + Item "Figures, Tables, Floats, Notes, Boxes|g" "help-open ExtendedInsets"
> are you kidding? The German translation of this already-to-large menu entry is
> "Abbildungen, Tabellen, Gleitobjekte, Notizen, Boxen"
> which sp
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Bo Peng wrote:
> Could you please give read access to the files in this directory. I'm
> currently not allowed to download the files from there.
Please try again.
Now works.
(Strange default setting though.)
Indeed. I looked a bit but couldn't figure out why you h
John,
does this patch solve your problem?
Michael
Index: src/paragraph_pimpl.C
===
--- src/paragraph_pimpl.C (Revision 16906)
+++ src/paragraph_pimpl.C (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -516,8 +516,7 @@
// and with dvi/
> When I used LyX regularly, I used to show it to my PhD colleagues (not
> LaTeX users) and they were usually impressed. If there had been a bundle
> installer at the time I think it would have been quite easy to get them to
> try it. It might even have been possible to get my supervisor to use
John McCabe-Dansted schrieb:
Currently if the user chooses to "Show changes in output",
but does not use pplatex as an output filter, LyX happily
throws all the new text and old text into a big confusing
jumble.
First, I cannot reproduce a case where new and old text is mixed.
I also thought
> Could you please give read access to the files in this directory. I'm
> currently not allowed to download the files from there.
Please try again.
(Strange default setting though.)
Bo
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Bo Peng schrieb:
I have uploaded the latest installer and deps package with qt4.2.2 to
http://www.lyx.org/~bpeng . They seem to work.
Could you please give read access to the files in this directory. I'm
currently not allowed to download the files fro
John McCabe-Dansted schrieb:
On 1/24/07, Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Go to Change Tracking->Accept all changes
> LyX will crash with the following error:
This is fixed in latest 1.5.0svn.
I've updated, and I'm still getting the same bug. Could you try
opening the attached file (n
On 1/28/07, Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
> The problem is partially fixed, but
>
> 1. qt >= 4.2.2 is required
This is bad.
But if you ever want to insert the break at non-TOP dock, 4.2.2 is required.
As already announced, I have a different solution in the pip
Uwe,
- Item "Insets|n" "help-open ExtendedInsets"
+ Item "Figures, Tables, Floats, Notes, Boxes|g"
"help-open ExtendedInsets"
are you kidding? The German translation of this already-to-large menu
entry is
"Abbildungen, Tabellen, Gleitobjekte, Notizen, Boxen"
whi
>As I said, since dvipost _is_ installed in such cases, I'd prefer the
>warning "Dvipost is not installed correctly on your system. Re-install
>(including pplatex) and reconfigure"
Done. New patches below:
--- 1.5.0svn ---
Index: converter.C
==
Bo Peng schrieb:
I have uploaded the latest installer and deps package with qt4.2.2 to
http://www.lyx.org/~bpeng . They seem to work.
Could you please give read access to the files in this directory. I'm currently not allowed to
download the files from there.
regards Uwe
John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> OK, here are the new patches:
As I said, since dvipost _is_ installed in such cases, I'd prefer the
warning "Dvipost is not installed correctly on your system. Re-install
(including pplatex) and reconfigure"
Jürgen
On 1/28/07, Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, this should not happen. Dvipost comes with a Makefile that installs
> everything for you (on Unix, on Windows, it is installed by the installer
> AFAIK). Anyway, people seem to do all sorts of things.
The makefile generated by confi
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Second option would be that you request SVN access Bernhard. The laws
and duties related to such access are listed somewhere in the archive by
Georg. If you agree with them (and I think you will ;-)) please come in!
If you finds those laws and dut
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes it does. While cooling down in reading your email I came to the
proposal I just posted.
There's been so much traffic... which post is this?
Oops, now I saw it. Never mind.
/C
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bo was in a bad mood... but I personally feel that you should not
restrain yourself when humour is involved. At the end of the day, we're
trying to have fun while doing something useful for the greater good of
humanity and the entire universe, aren
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
.. this is then the definite line.
I now have
- Python, ImageMagick, and Ghostscript (bundled, not separately
installed because only the needed files are bundled)
Please correct me if I've gotten this wrong:
* Python, ImageMagick and Ghostscript are
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Just a minor thought regarding FTP-servers that are down. What would
you think about storing a copy of the packages on e.g. ftp.lyx.org?
I don't think we should do this. We surely have enough traffic and also
lyx.org is sometimes down.
I know all the
Bo Peng wrote:
> The problem is partially fixed, but
>
> 1. qt >= 4.2.2 is required
This is bad.
> 2. toolbars on the same line are restored to different lines
This is bad as well.
As already announced, I have a different solution in the pipe (only inserting
ToolbarBreaks if the toolbar exceed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Bo Peng wrote:
I think your attack was bad. Naugthy Bo, bad Bo! SCNR :-)
I am too old to be called naughty
I apologize for that, I got carried away and I was really only trying
for a comic effect with alliteration. Maybe it should just have b
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Bo Peng wrote:
I guess Joost is at a better position to comment on this but talking
about whose installer is kind of silly for a GPL project. We have to
call Joost or Uwe's installer because we have two now.
I agree. What we need is to achieve consensus. And I think there
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Uwe Stöhr already denoted this small bug in his mail from 03 Jan 2007 -
but the discussion then was only about the status of status.15x ;-)
After saving a new file or "save as.." the filename is not updated in
the tab. This patch fixes this.
It looks good to me. As thi
Bo Peng wrote:
The reason is that the qt save dialog asks and lyx itself asks too.
The qt part can easily be turned
off by the attached patch.
I would say yes but let us wait for a qt guy's opinion.
It looks sane, put it in.
Abdel.
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Bo Peng wrote:
I think your attack was bad. Naugthy Bo, bad Bo! SCNR :-)
I am too old to be called naughty
I apologize for that, I got carried away and I was really only trying for
a comic effect with alliteration. Maybe it should just have been
... was bad.
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Edwin Leuven wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we probably should supply a minimal installer for LyX, i.e.
something that installs the LyX application and nothing else.
note that joost's installer basically works like this by skipping the
download of the componen
Bo Peng wrote:
1. we keep Joost's minial installer (8M), which installs lyx only and
optionally download all components. I like Joost's installer because
it can be compiled directly from a fresh svn tree (no IM etc), using
as simple as 'scons installer', and it does not require admin
privilege.
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 04:18:45PM +1800, Bo Peng wrote:
> >My approach would be to simply erase all session stuff related to
> >toolbar appearance and positioning and just Qt integrated support.
>
> What I am not quite sure is about the interaction between backend and
> frontend. You see, addTool
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 05:11:48PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> >So let me be frank this one time:
> >
> >Joost took my installer code and modified it on his own without
> >informing me what and why he has changed things. Then he upload it to
> >SVN and boom: We had a n
Bo Peng wrote:
I object. Both of the installers have minimal and full versions. We do
not need a second 'full featured' lyx-distribution. I propose that
1. we keep Joost's minial installer (8M), which installs lyx only and
optionally download all components. I like Joost's installer because
it c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we probably should supply a minimal installer for LyX, i.e.
something that installs the LyX application and nothing else.
note that joost's installer basically works like this by skipping the
download of the components...
Experts
might use it for this reason
61 matches
Mail list logo
