Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I hope others join this conversation. To alpha or not to alpha?
If I was manager I would do aplha, do it quickly with very low
reuirements for bugs solved or fetures yet-to-be-delivered
and clearly state that in announcement.
No matter how better we became with autmated t
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 01:16:01AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> El 06.04.2017 a las 10:39, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes escribió:
>
> > Here are my comments after the battle:
>
> Now I found this post. Please send me important posts to me CC.
Uwe, it is not acceptable that you are not subscribed to the lis
Am Mittwoch, den 12.04.2017, 00:09 +0200 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> El 11.04.2017 a las 08:30, Jürgen Spitzmüller escribió:
>
> > And I tried to argue that I think these line edits are not a
> > suitable
> > UI.
>
> Hi Jürgen,
>
> now I get your point. Then I retract my patch.
>
> Scott announced yes
El 06.04.2017 a las 10:39, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes escribió:
Here are my comments after the battle:
Now I found this post. Please send me important posts to me CC.
+ New buffer parameters
+ - \is_formula_indent
The question is not whether the equation is indented, it is whether it
El 11.04.2017 a las 10:15, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes escribió:
But to be clear with you, if the hardcoded 30pt length stays, I will
probably ask for reverting the patch. An hint: what you need to use is
an empty length for default. Empty length is what I implemented for you
to get rid of some ugly
El 11.04.2017 a las 10:25, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes escribió:
Now, checking 'top' for a rotated caption will not nothing (you read the
rotating package documentation, didn't you?). It is like if I proposed
to add a "engrave the caption in golden letters" option. Users would be
free to use it ;)
El 11.04.2017 a las 08:14, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes escribió:
This looks OK to me.
Thanks for having a look.
It is now in.
regards Uwe
El 10.04.2017 a las 05:40, Scott Kostyshak escribió:
Uwe and Stephan, do you know if you will be available around these dates
to produce binaries?
I'm sorry, I cannot plan longer than about a week. I'll try to build a
binary as soon as possible after you send me the link to the release ZIP
f
El 11.04.2017 a las 08:30, Jürgen Spitzmüller escribió:
And I tried to argue that I think these line edits are not a suitable
UI.
Hi Jürgen,
now I get your point. Then I retract my patch.
Scott announced yesterday a plan for LyX 2.3.0 so it is indeed too late
for LyX 2.3.0 to do something.
On 04/11/2017 04:20 PM, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2017-04-11, PhilipPirrip wrote:
>> On 04/11/2017 11:23 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> My proposal of having "a general sheet where one could send options to
>> (the calls of) this and that package would be a good way to go - that
>> means, not by just
On 2017-04-11, PhilipPirrip wrote:
> On 04/11/2017 11:23 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> My proposal of having "a general sheet where one could send options to
> (the calls of) this and that package would be a good way to go - that
> means, not by just using \SendOptionsToPackage" will be a freestyle
On 2017-04-11, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 11/04/2017 à 18:59, Guenter Milde a écrit :
>> I am with Uwe here: the decision whether display formulas are centered or
>> left aligned is IMV (with the user hat on) a "mathematical" setting.
>> I would never expect it under "text"!
> What do thers
Le 11/04/2017 à 18:59, Guenter Milde a écrit :
I am with Uwe here: the decision whether display formulas are centered or
left aligned is IMV (with the user hat on) a "mathematical" setting.
I would never expect it under "text"!
What do thers think?
More important for me is, that the "fleqn"
Am Dienstag, den 11.04.2017, 18:46 +0200 schrieb mn:
> The missing features I need are mainly complicated bibliographies,
> biber
> and biblatex support, properly working natively together; targeted
> for 2.3?
Yes, and already implemented in the master branch, as a matter of fact.
Jürgen
signatu
Am Dienstag, den 11.04.2017, 11:52 -0400 schrieb PhilipPirrip:
> What I understood Juergen said is: one should have clickable buttons
> for
> every possible option, and no other way of passing options to the
> packages.
Where did I state this?
> What I'm saying, agreeing with Uwe, is that having
On 2017-04-06, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Dear all,
> There is a proposal to reorganize templates and examples folders. If we
> do want to do it, I think that soon would be a good time.
> To take a look at the proposal, check out:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8715
Several points:
* The OP
On 2017-04-08, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> El 07.04.2017 a las 10:26, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes escribió:
>> First we should remove our LyX developers hat and see that the text
>> layout is the layout of all elements on the page (not
>> everything-that-is-not-mathed). In this respect, your new option really
On 11.04.17 14:58, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:38 AM, mn
>> Right now, I am struggling with bugs and also features lacking in
>> the latest stable LyX. And for some at least I know they are supposed
>> to be fixed or added in the next release so far, far on the horizon.
>
> W
Le 11/04/2017 à 18:00, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 16.11.06 WEST Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
I still get errors with Literate, knitr, listerrors, noweb2lyx, sweave,
DocBook and Rjournal.
Not that DocBook is not related with latex. So you can remove it from your
list o
On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 16.11.06 WEST Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> I still get errors with Literate, knitr, listerrors, noweb2lyx, sweave,
> DocBook and Rjournal.
Not that DocBook is not related with latex. So you can remove it from your
list of failures. :-)
--
José Abílio
On 04/11/2017 11:23 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> In fact you agree with Jürgen, IMO. He said it’s not enough to add a
line edit to add the options.
What I understood Juergen said is: one should have clickable buttons for
every possible option, and no other way of passing options to the packages.
Am 11.04.2017 um 16:25 schrieb PhilipPirrip :
>
> On 04/11/2017 02:30 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> And I tried to argue that I think these line edits are not a suitable
>> UI.
>> It is much more different, since the line edit are supposed complex
>> key-value pairs.
>
> Let me disagree with y
Le 11/04/2017 à 10:13, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Am Dienstag, 11. April 2017 um 09:33:15, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
I'm going to run ctest on last up-to-date master with last up-to-date TL 2016
- on pdf2 output for all but literate programming files;
For literate programming files disab
On 04/11/2017 02:30 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
And I tried to argue that I think these line edits are not a suitable
UI.
It is much more different, since the line edit are supposed complex
key-value pairs.
Let me disagree with you on this, Juergen. As a long-time user, I too
often missed be
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:38 AM, mn wrote:
> Right now, I am struggling with bugs and also features lacking in the
> latest stable LyX. And for some at least I know they are supposed to be
> fixed or added in the next release so far, far on the horizon.
>
Mike,
What are some of the present bugs
Le 06/04/2017 à 10:39, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Finally, I will comment on what I do not see: there is no code to show
to the user what the result is. So long for WYSIWYM. The math displayed
equations should be flushed left (with the correct indentation) on
screen. It is more work, but wit
Le 06/04/2017 à 10:39, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
HSpace formula_indentation;
Should be named mathindent
+formula_indentation = string();
Please do not initialize a HSpace object with a string.
Dear Uwe,
While trying to implement display of flushed equations, I found out
se
On 11.04.17 04:45, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> The requirements and expectations of an alpha are low. I think it is
> understood that there should not be any big features right before
> the feature freeze. But doing it this way allows us to get an alpha
> out quickly and get testing on 99% of the f
Le 11/04/2017 à 02:06, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
El 10.04.2017 a las 11:05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes escribió:
These environment always put the result its own page for technical
reasons. All the original reporter said is "I think the 'Here if
possible' and 'Here definitely' GUI options should still remai
Le 10/04/2017 à 23:20, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
Thanks. It works better but still the number of strokes depends on the
zoom level. For example
This is \xout{xout text}.
gives me 10 or 11 strokes (slashes) depending on the zoom level.
I do not think this is a problem (rounding effect). I would not
Am Dienstag, 11. April 2017 um 09:33:15, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien
> Le 11/04/2017 à 06:22, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:00:19PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 05:13:55PM +, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> >>
> >>> 88% tests passed, 669
Le 11/04/2017 à 09:45, Guenter Milde a écrit :
The Python convention is to leave out "== true" while in C++ this may be
required. (Python auto-converts any value to a Boolean if required in an
"if" clause.)
I do not see any reason to keep == true in C++ either.
JMarc
On 2017-04-11, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:41:57AM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
>> On Thursday, 6 April 2017 02.56.51 WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> > I see it's used in other places in lyx2lyx (grep for '== True'), so
>> > perhaps this is convention in Python?
>> Nope.
Le 11/04/2017 à 06:22, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:00:19PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 05:13:55PM +, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
88% tests passed, 669 tests failed out of 5553
Does this sound correct? I have TL2016 with all language collec
34 matches
Mail list logo
