:31:43 2012 +0200
Fix bug #8166: Crash on clicking away from empty paragraph
We rely on the 'or' operator to prevent us from calling
'notifyCursorLeaves' if one of the two cursors is broken. This doesn't
work when using the '|' operator. T
:43 2012 +0200
> >>
> >> Fix bug #8166: Crash on clicking away from empty paragraph
> >>
> >> We rely on the 'or' operator to prevent us from calling
> >> 'notifyCursorLeaves' if one of the two cursors is broken. This do
Op 23-5-2012 2:28, Pavel Sanda schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
commit 0a33374c0d8125e27666fe513506fb6069df453c
Author: Vincent van Ravesteijn
Date: Wed May 23 01:31:43 2012 +0200
Fix bug #8166: Crash on clicking away from empty paragraph
We rely on the 'or' o
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> commit 0a33374c0d8125e27666fe513506fb6069df453c
> Author: Vincent van Ravesteijn
> Date: Wed May 23 01:31:43 2012 +0200
>
> Fix bug #8166: Crash on clicking away from empty paragraph
>
> We rely on the 'or' oper
I'm headed to Oxford for a few days and expect to be extremely busy
while there. I'll check email from time to time, but probably won't be
much in evidence. I'm back the end of next week.
Richard
rgheck wrote:
FYI, I'll be in Scotland this week for work. I'll be reading email but
probably won't have much time to do more than that.
We'll be able to survive one week but not more!
Nice country Scotland, vave fun,
Abdel.
FYI, I'll be in Scotland this week for work. I'll be reading email but
probably won't have much time to do more than that.
rh
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please commit.
Done.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The problem occurs when the empty appendix is the last paragraph of
> the document. In this case, my earlier fix to bug 4212 is actually
> wrong (there is no need to preserve the Appendix status).
Looks straightforward enough.
> The patch is for branch and trunk.
>
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4352
The problem occurs when the empty appendix is the last paragraph of
the document. In this case, my earlier fix to bug 4212 is actually
wrong (there is no need to preserve the Appendix status).
The patch is for branch and trunk.
Juergen?
JMarc
svndi
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:21:50PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I am going away for some sailing.
See you next week.
--
Lgb
Have fun!
Or rather: Happy Sailing!
/C
- Martin
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:21:50PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I am going away for some sailing.
>
> See you next week.
>
> --
> Lgb
Have fun!
- Martin
pgp6NMbHTFHpJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I am going away for some sailing.
See you next week.
--
Lgb
I am away until 9/5. Bo, I am sorry I did not review your latest
autoopen patch. The fact that you have 5 parallel project does not
help...
JMarc
I will be away until April 24. I may be able to read some mail until
then, though.
JMarc
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Georg Baum wrote:
| > > Have anyone done any testing on 2243 at all?
| >
| > I have it in my tree, it works for me, but I have an old dvipng (version
| > 1.5) that works also without the patch. At least this indicates that
| > there are no regress
Georg Baum wrote:
> > Have anyone done any testing on 2243 at all?
>
> I have it in my tree, it works for me, but I have an old dvipng (version
> 1.5) that works also without the patch. At least this indicates that
> there are no regressions.
Bennett has tested it with a recent dvipng version, whi
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> The important point is that we should NOT discuss on the
Michael> IMPORTANCE of a patch. We are wasting energy this way. Let's
Michael> discuss the patches themselves.
I agree to do this for 1.4.1. But I want 1.4.0 first :)
JMa
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> > If you all are confident in the 2212 fix, it can go in.
>>
>> I am confident, but it's near-useless without also multi-par change
>> tracking (which would make this a useable feature). Cosmetic
>>>>> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Am Sonntag, 19. Februar 2006 13:30 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
>> I'll try to explain why am am just not releasing 1.4.0 right away:
>> I continue to see small dribble of work that
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Developer, if you have _anyting_ that you feel _must_ be included in
> 1.4.0, the time is to state so now, loud and clear.
It just turned out that we have a severe cursor misalignment problem with some
classes (beamer, hollywood, foils, slides, and others), see bug 23
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 08:53:34PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | >Developer, if you have _anyting_ that you feel _must_ be included in
> | >1.4.0, the time is to state so now, loud and clear.
> | >
> | All the
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| >Developer, if you have _anyting_ that you feel _must_ be included in
| >1.4.0, the time is to state so now, loud and clear.
| >
| All the change tracking stuff should go in. It can't get worse.
Which part of the CT featur
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The important point is that we should NOT discuss on the IMPORTANCE of
| a patch. We are wasting energy this way. Let's discuss the patches
| themselves.
The patches themselves (if they are correct) are not important, it
_is_ what they fix and and the IM
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 05:06:37PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > If you all are confident in the 2212 fix, it can go in.
> >
> > I am confident, but it's near-useless without also multi-par change
> > tracking (which would make this a useable feature). Cosmetic, a
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Developer, if you have _anyting_ that you feel _must_ be included in
1.4.0, the time is to state so now, loud and clear.
All the change tracking stuff should go in. It can't get worse.
Michael
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Developer, if you have _anyting_ that you feel _must_ be included in
1.4.0, the time is to state so now, loud and clear.
Due to the fact that everybody has a different opinion on what must be
included in 1.4.0, I would like to propose a different approach:
1. Let
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > If you all are confident in the 2212 fix, it can go in.
>
> I am confident, but it's near-useless without also multi-par change
> tracking (which would make this a useable feature). Cosmetic, as
> well. So... no, not now.
Do you mean because change tracking is not useable
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 04:01:14PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > Developer, if you have _anyting_ that you feel _must_ be included in
> | > 1.4.0, the time is to state so now, loud and clear.
> |
> | John targetted some bugs to 1.4.0 recently.
Am Sonntag, 19. Februar 2006 16:01 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | 2251 (well understood and tested)
>
> But only cosmetic. I do not understand why it cannot wait.
Sure it is not so important, but I do not understand why it should wait.
What do you expe
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Have anyone done any testing on 2243 at all?
> If not, this is not going into 1.4.0, if it is tested I may be swayed.
I have tested it with an older version of preview-latex and can confirm that
this still works.
I cannot say anything about the newer versions of prev
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | 1161 (because this is a UI change that is best done in a major release)
>
> I am ok with this one... as long as you german guys thing this is the
> right fix.
I think we all agree. I'll put it in.
Jürgen
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Developer, if you have _anyting_ that you feel _must_ be included in
| > 1.4.0, the time is to state so now, loud and clear.
|
| John targetted some bugs to 1.4.0 recently. Of these, I would like to see
| the following in 1.4.0:
|
| 2251 (well understo
Am Sonntag, 19. Februar 2006 13:30 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> I'll try to explain why am am just not releasing 1.4.0 right away: I
> continue to see small dribble of work that obviously some people deem
> very important for a release.
I believe that this is a big misunderstand
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Developer, if you have _anyting_ that you feel _must_ be included in
| > 1.4.0, the time is to state so now, loud and clear.
|
| LyX's default banner.ppm ;-)
:-) I'll do that when I make the branch.
--
Lg
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Developer, if you have _anyting_ that you feel _must_ be included in
> 1.4.0, the time is to state so now, loud and clear.
LyX's default banner.ppm ;-)
Jürgen
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | At the moment it seems that everyone, without exception, is frustrated
> | by the current deadlock.
>
> I'll try to explain why am am just not releasing 1.4.0 right away: I
> continue t
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| At the moment it seems that everyone, without exception, is frustrated by the
| current deadlock.
I'll try to explain why am am just not releasing 1.4.0 right away: I
continue to see small dribble of work that obviously some people deem
ver
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I am leaving now for some vacation. I won't return until August 29.
>
| Have fun. I will.
Have a good one.
--
Lgb
I am leaving now for some vacation. I won't return until August 29.
Have fun. I will.
JMarc
Now is vacation time. I will be back at the beginning of august.
Have fun.
JMarc
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:32:57PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > I will expect you all to be sensible and ocnservative in what you
| > commit to the tree while I am away.
|
| So please clarify what exactly falls under "ocnser
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:32:57PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I will expect you all to be sensible and ocnservative in what you
> commit to the tree while I am away.
So please clarify what exactly falls under "ocnservative"
lest we venture to forbidded places ;-)
I'll be gone for a week. I had some vacation left...
I will expect you all to be sensible and ocnservative in what you
commit to the tree while I am away.
I might check in from time to time...
--
Lgb
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:01:35PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> As far as I know, the lfun is already disabled when you are not at the
> relevant place. The code for that is in lyxfunc.C:368.
Ah! I'm just slow... great
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 12:40:59PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Martin> wrote:
>> Thanks to you. Now you can begin to polish it :)
Martin> Speaking of which, the below makes the LFUN conditional upon
Martin> being in a suitable
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The yellow tooltip box that pops up after hoveering over e.g. the width
> field in the graphics dialog doesn't go away if the dialog is closed by
> pressing
Yep, here too.
I think there may be a list of problems with tooltips in a tabbed dialog.
E.g: w
The yellow tooltip box that pops up after hoveering over e.g. the width
field in the graphics dialog doesn't go away if the dialog is closed by
pressing
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Friday 08 March 2002 15:06, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:12:53PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > As I will be travelling next week, I expect to find
> > that 1.2.0pre1 will be available for download on
> > Friday March 15.
>
> This leaves us with 11 years and a few days if
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:12:53PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> As I will be travelling next week, I expect to find
> that 1.2.0pre1 will be available for download on
> Friday March 15.
This leaves us with 11 years and a few days if I am not mistaken.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .
As I will be travelling next week, I expect to find
that 1.2.0pre1 will be available for download on
Friday March 15.
Good luck!
Martin
msg34160/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi there,
As I mentionned earlier today, I will be away next week until friday.
Have a nice week.
JMarc
I will not be available here until next monday (small trip to Italy
(Firenze) :).
Interesting message, isn't it?
JMarc
On Fri, 12 Feb 1999 13:59:16 +1000 (GMT+1000), Allan Rae wrote:
>Well, you could pinch 1.0.1 but we're giving it away free so that's
>hardly stealing. ha ha ha
Hi all you starving LyX devies,
from the frontiers of advanced science (a bar in Buenos Aires) I just
received the ul
After a few more reads, it seems that I only have to submit the initial
proposal, which has no equations, as word or wp. They take paper for
the final work.
This begs the question of why a word processor format rather than plain
text should be used . . .
--
I'll be gone from 30. Dec until 14. Jan.
My brother and I are going on vacation to South Africa, so I will not
be able to release 1.0.0 on Jan. 1.
I guess it is easiest to wait with the release until I get back.
So long.
Lgb
ps. Happy New Year.
56 matches
Mail list logo
