Hello.
How do I align the equation, with item 1?
See attached file.
Thanks
--
Ing. Alexis Salcedo
ECUACIÓN.lyx
Description: application/lyx
How do I highlight an equation in LyX?
Carlos Fernando Knauer
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
I'm trying to understand how I can add annotations that sit to the
right of each line of a multiline equation. For example, in a proof,
such annotations might provide justification for each step in the
proof.
In pure LaTeX I could accomplish this like so:
\begin{align*}
h(x) &=
Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
multiline equation, even though it is one single equation. I tried
deleting a re-entering it, but the multiline designation stuck. I tried
highlighting and going to Edit->Math->Change Formula Type->Displayed
For
On 10/02/2011 08:27 PM, Abiel Reinhart wrote:
I'm trying to understand how I can add annotations that sit to the
right of each line of a multiline equation. For example, in a proof,
such annotations might provide justification for each step in the
proof.
In pure LaTeX I could accomplish
On 10/02/2011 10:54 PM, David L. Johnson wrote:
On 10/02/2011 08:27 PM, Abiel Reinhart wrote:
I'm trying to understand how I can add annotations that sit to the
right of each line of a multiline equation. For example, in a proof,
such annotations might provide justification for each step i
I'm able to type plain text as you've suggested but I'm still unable
to get the alignment and spacing right. I can type text to the right
of an equation on a given line, spacing it out from the equation using
something like \quad. However, then the annotations from different
lines
On 10/03/2011 11:23 AM, Abiel Reinhart wrote:
I'm able to type plain text as you've suggested but I'm still unable
to get the alignment and spacing right. I can type text to the right
of an equation on a given line, spacing it out from the equation using
something like \quad. Ho
Thanks, after pasting in the text and then examining it I was able to
figure out the correct approach. It appears my earlier alignment
difficulty stemmed from placing the equals sign in its own column. Now
I create a four-column structure in the align environment, with
equation= in the first
align environment, with
equation= in the first column, equation in the second column, nothing
in the third column, and the annotation in the last column. This gets
me exactly what I had in pure LaTeX, which makes sense.
The problem really is in the default alignments that AMS-LaTeX uses
here. I don&#
On 03/10/2011 10:25 PM, David L. Johnson wrote:
The justification is different in LyX than it is in the output, which
might be something to worry about in the future.
I also have found that the display in LyX of the alignment of math
columns can get confused, although when you close and reopen
Andrew Morrison wrote:
Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
multiline equation, even though it is one single equation. I tried
deleting a re-entering it, but the multiline designation stuck. I tried
highlighting and going to Edit->Math->Change Formul
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 17:42, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Andrew Morrison wrote:
>
> > Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
> > multiline equation, even though it is one single equation. I tried
> > deleting a re-entering it, but the multiline de
On 26.07.04, Andrew Morrison wrote:
> Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
> multiline equation, even though it is one single equation.
This normally happens when you press Enter (or Ctrl-Enter?) If you
realize it immediately, undo (^Z for cua-bindings)
Andrew Morrison wrote:
> Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
> multiline equation, even though it is one single equation. I tried
> deleting a re-entering it, but the multiline designation stuck. I tried
> highlighting and going to Edit->Math-
Georg Baum wrote:
> Andrew Morrison wrote:
>
>> Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
>> multiline equation, even though it is one single equation. I tried
>> deleting a re-entering it, but the multiline designation stuck. I tried
>
Andrew Morrison wrote:
What it says is this:
\begin{multline}
\mathbf{u}=-\frac{1}{\rho}\int\bigtriangledown p\,
dt\label{eq:part_vel}\end{multline}
You encountered a bug. The menu menu Edit->Math->Change Formula
Type->Displayed don't work with multline environments. You should fill
out a bug rep
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 03:49:24PM -0500, Andrew Morrison wrote:
> Somehow, one of my display equations was created as (or morphed into) a
> multiline equation, even though it is one single equation. I tried
> deleting a re-entering it, but the multiline designation stuck. I tried
>
Hi
I want to achieve the following and wondered whether it is possible. I
think it should be can't get it to work.
I have an erray of equations
x=blah
y=boo eq(1.1)
z=cow
and I want a single equation number on the middle line as shown
Although I can get it not to number the first
Not strictly a lyx question but i hope the experinece on here can help me.
In Lyx/Latex how can I control the formatting of the equations numbers. At
present I have
(1.1) (1.2) etc...
what I need is
[1.1] [1.2] etc...
Is there a simple way to do this?
Geoff
Hello !
I would like to write a big equation using 2 or more lines. How do I do it
?
Thanks,
--
Carlos Fernando Knauer
Hi,
I am trying to create an array of three equations of the form
A = B+C
I want it to be a 3x3 array (so that A's are aligned '=''s are aligned
and B+C's are aligned.
In Lyx 1.3 it was sufficient to write A=B+C and then to Ctrl-ENTER
somewhere in the middle of the formula to get such an arra
Hi!
Any ideas on how to nicely write a fairly long equation on multiple
lines? here's an example of such an equation. Would you suggest
to extract the delta on another line?
Thanks,
--
myriam
test.lyx
Description: equation
Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
numbering?
Mike
Is there any way to get section/subsection reflected in equation numbering?
For example, I have a study guide that chapter 13.1 to 17.5, thats 36 pages
long with some 228 lines of equations. It would be more concise to be able
to reference equation 14.3.3, rather than Equation 94
--
Nick Kuzmik
Dear Lyx Users,
I am writing an article and I want to follow IEEE format guidelines. So I'm
making my article two columns. However, I have an equation which is too long
for a single column. Rather than break the equation in two, the IEEE has the
equation move to the bottom of the page whe
All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown correctly in
the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16071319.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
Thanks!
* Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. *
Profesor de Economía y Finanzas
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales
Universidad de los Andes
(56 2) 412-9650
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Avda. San
Hi,
I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered
but the label appears to the far right
of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label
appear at the far left of the equation.
Thank you very much for your help,
Paulina
On Aug 22, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Alexis Salcedo wrote:
Hello.
How do I align the equation, with item 1?
See attached file.
Thanks
Can you be more specific? What do you men by "align?"
Alexis Salcedo wrote:
Hello.
How do I align the equation, with item 1?
See attached file.
Thanks
Is this what you had in mind? (Disclaimer: horrible kludge. LaTeX
purists, please don't hate me!)
/Paul
ECUACIÓN2.lyx
Description: application/lyx
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array?
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@gmail.com
Hello,
I'm currently writing my master's thesis with Lyx and I have a question :
Is it possible to number the equations without the number of the section
before ? For now, when I insert a new numbered formula, it is numbered like
that : (4.13), meaning the 13th equation in the four
El jue, 22 sept 2022 a las 1:26, Carlos Knauer ()
escribió:
> How do I highlight an equation in LyX?
>
To change the text&symbols color, just select the whole equation and Right
click → Text properties → Customize.
To change the background, you can either follow section 9 of the M
What is with all these single word subject lines?
"How do I highlight an equation?" is much more informative as a
subject. ("in LyX" is probably not necessary when sending to a LyX
Users mailing list. In most cases I would presume you were asking
about how to do it in L
Hi,
In report style, how can I have equations to be numbered by incorporating
the "section numbers" in?
I can not show the section numbers in the section titles.
Say I have the section title for section 2 as:
PRELEMINARIES
my first equation should be numbered as:
y(t)=a.x(t)
I need help writing a element symbol (sim to H2O) the symbol should be like:
=
CO
3
I hope that shows correctly...but basically it's like CO2, but the =
sign and the # 3 are above each other in superscript and subscript. I
guess it would be like using the fraction without the line.
Hi,
I would like to add to the line of equations some explanations of
the kind [by (#)], e.g.:
MPP_L = \fi(x)-k \fi'(x) = [by (12.50)]
= APP_L - k MPP_K [by (12.46) and (12.49)]
However, there are only three columns in the equation editor.
What should I do?
T
If writing in straight LaTeX one can \begin{equation} ... \end{equation}
to put numbers to the right of equations. Numbering is turned off in
\begin{displaymath} mode.
LyX appears to support both inline math and display mode math. I have one
equation that I want to number so I can reference
Hi!
The style guidelines of a conference request that all the equations in my
paper should be left-aligned instead of the usual centered. Is there an easy
way how to change the alignment of all equations in my document?
Thanks and best regards,
Rainer Hoffmann
Hi ,
I am new to Lyx. I have a problem with Lyx in equation labeling in the
math mode. I use the version 1.3.1
In UserGuide it has shown how to label equations and when I do
Insert->Label from the math mode in the users guide and enter a label
then it works by showing (mathed:label). Howe
When I print in two-column format for a document, some long math
equations are truncated. So I want to change the font size of these
equations so that all the equations can be fit on the page. But it can
not be done by Layout-Character. Is there any other methods to resolve
the problem?
Cheers!
I have a question about equation numbering.
Suppose I have an equation that I've labelled:
x^2+y^2=r^2 (eq:circle)
Later in text I want to print it out again, WITH THE SAME
EQ. NUMBER so:
x^2+y^2=r^2 (eq:circle)
Unfortunately, this does not work. LaTeX gives the s
I would like to automaticaly break too long equations (that are wider than
the page)
I have heard about a package called breqn.sty but it doesn't seem to
work properly
I their a simple way to do this
--
"""
o o
+---o
Hi,
Is there a way to syncronize the number of equation to the use of the
equation? For example,
-
1+1=2 (#)
From (#) we know that addition is so easy ..
--
We don't know what the first # is until we see th
Hi,
in section 5.4 in he lyx user guide (german) is a eq_array shown, where the
1. and 2. equation is numbered and the 3 is not. How can i do that ?
Pressing "alt m n" like described there turns only all numbers on or of. What
is the trick ?
CU,
Torsten.
--
Torsten Hahn
TU Be
Hello,
I'm writing a IEEE Tran paper (twocolumn) and need to
write a very long equation, but I can't force Latex/Lyx to use
both columns for it. Is there any way to do this?
Thank you,
Matias.
Hi!
How do I remove an equation labeling?
Clearing the label does not seem to do the trick.
Lyx 1.2.2
Thanks,
myriam
Okay, I should know the answer to this, in LaTex I do. Using Lyx, ams article
style, with ams packages, what modification is needed to get the equation
numbers on the right? I know that righttag is an option for the amstex
package but it is not clear how to obtain this in Lyx.
best regards
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
I have an erray of equations
x=blah
y=boo eq(1.1)
z=cow
and I want a single equation number on the middle line as shown
Number just the second line with the shortcut M-N (not M-n). Or use the
corresponding Menu.
Isn't this described in the userguide?
regards Uwe
ed whether it is possible. I think it should be can't get it to work.I have an erray of equationsx=blahy=boo eq(1.1)z=cowand I want a single equation number on the middle line as shownAlthough I can get it not to number the first line by selecting label afterwards, it seems to want to label all sub
Hi Geoffrey Lloyd,
I looked at what people answer you, and gothered it with something i
have, to compute this answer:
You would need to add in ERT (Control + L) this:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesubsection.\arabic\{equation}}
Then you would need to use M-N lin Uwn said to place the
boo eq(1.1)
> z=cow
>
> and I want a single equation number on the middle line as shown
>
> Although I can get it not to number the first line by selecting label
> afterwards, it seems to want to label all subsequent lines.
>
You should use some nested equati
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
In Lyx/Latex how can I control the formatting of the equations numbers. At
present I have
(1.1) (1.2) etc...
what I need is
[1.1] [1.2] etc...
Is there a simple way to do this?
Ad the following line to the preamble:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@@{[#1]}}
regards U
On 11/14/05, Carlos Knauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello !
> I would like to write a big equation using 2 or more lines. How do I do it
> ?
See sub-section "multline environment" in
ftp://tug.ctan.org/pub/tex-archive/info/math/voss/mathmode/Mathmode.pdf
(LyX supp
s an array of two columns.
Does anyone know how to get the behaviour of LyX 1.3?
This is a known bug. LyX produces an anlign equation when you chose in
the document setting to use AMS-math explicitely.
You want an eqnarray environment. To produce this use the menu Insert ->
Formula -> Eqnarray environment.
regards Uwe
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:23:03AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Ilya Soifer wrote:
>
> >I want it to be a 3x3 array (so that A's are aligned '=''s are aligned
> >and B+C's are aligned.
> >In Lyx 1.3 it was sufficient to write A=B+C and then to Ctrl-ENTER
> >somewhere in the middle of the formula to g
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> As I said: The current behaviour was implemented explicitly as
Andre> response to a very detailed user-request.
Andre> I don't like it particularily, but I don't like the \# <-> #,
Andre> \{ <-> { business either.
What would you d
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 10:04:20PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> As I said: The current behaviour was implemented explicitly as
> Andre> response to a very detailed user-request.
>
> Andre> I don't like it particularily,
>>To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
>>From: Myriam Abramson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Equation help
>>Date: 03 Aug 2006 21:35:05 -0400
>>
>>
>>Hi!
>>
>>Any ideas on how to nicely write a fairly long equation on multiple
>>lines? her
Use the remreset package, available on CTAN.
Mike Reeks wrote:
> Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
> numbering?
> Mike
>
>
{equation}}
regards Uwe
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command in preamble numbers the equation in each section
.without the section number. I want the equation number in ascending order
irrespective of section number e.g. 1, 2, 3 etc for section n (before they were
numbered n.1, n.2 etc. I need to turn of a section
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there. The command in preamble numbers the equation in each
section .without the section number. I want the equation number in
ascending order irrespective of section number e.g. 1, 2, 3 etc for
section n (before they were
Thanks Jens.
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
> Dear Uwe
> Nearly ther
Dear Jens
In my preamble after the line
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
I added the line
@addtoreset{equation}{section}
which had nor effect. Have I followed your suggestion correcty, have I mispelt
it. What next?
Mike
From: Jens Noeckel
ines
\renewcommand\theequation{\arabic{equation}}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
at the very end of the preamble. If this still doesn't work, I would
empty out the preamble except for the two lines above, and switch to
a basic article class (article, or koma-article), so you can be sure
that \thee
re is no "remove reset" command in standard LaTeX.
Once remreset is downloaded and installed, you should need just this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You'll still need this line:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
to control how equation numbers are displayed.
If you DO want
6 15:51
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
each section? If so, then the only way to
Dear Jens
I only have the 2 statements you suggested in my preamble. I will try Richards
advice.
Best
Mike
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 09/08/2006 15:40
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation
t: Re: Equation numbering
Mike,
I'm assuming your document class is derived from "article". I don't
know what else you have in the preamble, but in order for this to
work one needs to make sure that no other package re-defines the
counters after your modifications. So
Mike Reeks wrote:
In my preamble after the line
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
I added the line
@addtoreset{equation}{section}
which had nor effect. Have I followed your suggestion correcty, have I mispelt
it. What next?
You missed the preceding "\": [EMAIL PROT
Dear Richard, Jens and Uwe
In the process of installing remreset.sty I noticed that it is already
installed in Miktex in texmf/tex/latex/carlisle so I am assuming therefore
that the commands
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
in my preamble will
mmand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
in my preamble will automatically be recognized. Anyway no point in installing
remreset twice. Any thoughts on why it's not working. Do I need to declare the
use of remreset.sty anywhere?
Best
Mike
From: Richard Heck [mai
Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
You'll need to \usepackage{remreset}.
Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Richard, Jens and Uwe
In the process of installing remreset.sty I noticed that it is already
installed in Miktex in texmf/tex/latex/carlisle so I am ass
Dear All,
So I've now used th follwing in my preamble
\usepackage{remreset}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
no errors but no success. Numbers are consecutive in each section starting with
1, so the renewcommand has got rid of the section number e.g Eq
Nick Kuzmik schrieb:
Is there any way to get section/subsection reflected in equation numbering?
For example, I have a study guide that chapter 13.1 to 17.5, thats 36 pages
long with some 228 lines of equations. It would be more concise to be able
to reference equation 14.3.3, rather than
Does anyone know a way to increase the font size of equations?
--
Nick Kuzmik
AIM nkuzmik
845-406-5115
Dan Kaplan wrote:
Dear Lyx Users,
I am writing an article and I want to follow IEEE format guidelines.
So I'm
making my article two columns. However, I have an equation which is
too long
for a single column. Rather than break the equation in two, the IEEE
has the
equation move to the b
Dear Lyx Users,
I tried the solution that Helge suggested, but its not working quite right.
I need to put a long equation at the bottom of a two column formatted paper.
LaTeX normally does not allow two-column-wide floats at the bottom, so I am
using the stfloats package to allow that. Then I
Dan Kaplan wrote:
However, the float ALWAYS appears at the bottom of the NEXT page, even if
there are no other floats on the page where I call that float. Any idea
what's going wrong and how I can get the equation float to go at the bottom
of the page I want it to be on? Thanks!
Seems
Dan Kaplan wrote:
Dear Lyx Users,
I tried the solution that Helge suggested, but its not working quite
right.
I need to put a long equation at the bottom of a two column formatted
paper.
LaTeX normally does not allow two-column-wide floats at the bottom, so
I am
using the stfloats package to
In 1.50 beta 3, there may be a bug in resizing equations. If I go to
preferences -> screen fonts and change the zoom from 150% (the default) to
anything else, the text is resized properly but the equations are not. This
was not a problem in the beta 2 version.
James
in LyX?
>
-
David Hewitt
Virginia Institute of Marine Science
http://www.vims.edu/fish/students/dhewitt/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16073725.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
rrectly in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX?
>>
>
>
Ok I have now read that post and it seems that there is currently no
solution to this problem and that its caused somewhere in the instant
preview implementation, or have I misread the post?
--
View this
blem and that its caused somewhere in the instant
> preview implementation, or have I misread the post?
>
-
David Hewitt
Virginia Institute of Marine Science
http://www.vims.edu/fish/students/dhewitt/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16078261.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello,
I am currently using lyx 2.0.0 for my thesis and have a very odd problem.
The equation numbering on the lyx GUI is totally wrong though they are correct
if I convert them View pdflatex.
For example, equation is displayed as (561) on lyx, but the pdf output shows
the correct numbering
Right click and choose "Toggle Labeling/Numbering"
On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:35 AM, FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the
equations in
LyX 1.6?
Thanks!
* Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. *
Profesor de Economía y Finanzas
Facultad d
> How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
> LyX 1.6?
Normally (Insert > Math > numberedformula) gives the equation number,
right justified, applicable in many journals and books.
Maybe this is not what you want ?
WAS
FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
If you're getting equation numbers on the left side, try adding 'reqno'
as a class option in Document -> Settings... -> Document Class.
/Paul
ht now I have all my equations
numbered but the label appears to the far right
of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label
appear at the far left of the equation.
Thank you very much for your help,
Paulina
How do I change an equation number that was chosen automatically from
forcing a particular number or symbol?
That is, I want the analog of \tag in Latex
For example, I have an equation that is numbered "(5)" which is chosen
by default because it comes after "(4)". That&
Julio Rojas writes:
>
> Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
> equation array? Or some rows from an array?
> -
> Julio Rojas
> jcredbe...@...
>
Please have a look at Help>Math (or Ecuacion
(2)
Xi+Xj<=1 for all i,j in P, i:
> Julio Rojas writes:
>
>>
>> Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
>> equation array? Or some rows from an array?
>> -
>
:
Z=sum(Xi) (2)
Xi+Xj<=1 for all i,j in P, i:
Julio Rojas writes:
Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
equation array? Or some rows from an array?
-
Julio Rojas
jcredbe...@...
be...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>> 2009/9/2 Ignacio García :
>>>
>>> Julio Rojas writes:
>>>
>>>> Dear all, is there a way to individually label some equations of an
>>>> equation array? Or some rows from an array?
>>>> -
ed) and indexing in the fifth column (right
aligned), which should work pretty well (it avoids gratuitous space in
the middle of the constraints).
I guess it's a matter of taste (unless the constraints get long enough
that eqnarray sends the equation numbers into another galaxy).
/Paul
n the fifth column (right aligned), which
> should work pretty well (it avoids gratuitous space in the middle of the
> constraints).
>
> I guess it's a matter of taste (unless the constraints get long enough that
> eqnarray sends the equation numbers into another galaxy).
cked into three columns), in which case I put
"maximize" and "subject to" in the left column, indexing in the right
column and everything else in the middle. Most times I create a display
equation, then create an array with five columns, and go from there. I
think I've
Hello,
Is there an option to have all the equations automatically numbered if
I only label some of them ?
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de
1 - 100 of 725 matches
Mail list logo
