On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:32 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After I have come to understand these tools a little better, I will try to
give a critique from the perspective of a WYSIWYG user. To the
moment, I am encouraged with what I have found, though much of
the
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:32 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After I have come to understand these tools a little better, I will try to
give a critique from the perspective of a WYSIWYG user. To the
moment, I am encouraged with what I have found, though much of
the
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:32 PM, William R. Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After I have come to understand these tools a little better, I will try to
> give a critique from the perspective of a WYSIWYG user. To the
> moment, I am encouraged with what I have found, though much of
> the
Bob,
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
So selecting to install 'for all users' doesn't create the userconfig
file structure in a user account, but 'for me only' does? Even in my
'all users' commonconfig folder there is no 'latex' folder, only a
'tex' folder. Easy enough to create though.
Two disclaimers
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob,
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
So selecting to install 'for all users' doesn't create the userconfig
file structure in a user account, but 'for me only' does? Even in my
'all users' commonconfig folder there is no
Respecting what follows, your corrections of my misunderstandings
are solicited.
OK. The digest goes like this:
1. It is the case that all installs to my single user computer are for
use by all users.
2. MiKTeX has a requirement that the user maintain any *custom*
class, style, include, other
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:31 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Respecting what follows, your corrections of my misunderstandings
are solicited.
OK. The digest goes like this:
1. It is the case that all installs to my single user computer are for
use by all users.
In this
, March 16, 2008 6:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: LyX User
Subject: Re: Layout and Class Files on Windows Distribution
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:31 PM, William R. Buckley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Respecting what follows, your corrections of my
misunderstandings are
solicited.
OK
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:10 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more comment. It seems that MiKTeX 2.7 may instead place the
texmf directory in the root of the hard drive. On my C drive, I find a
texmf directory so located.
Hadn't noticed it previously.
wrb
Where
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:10 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more comment. It seems that MiKTeX 2.7 may instead place the
texmf directory in the root of the hard drive. On my C drive, I find a
texmf directory so located.
Hadn't noticed it
-Original Message-
From: Bob Lounsbury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 7:51 PM
To: LyX User
Subject: Re: Layout and Class Files on Windows Distribution
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:10 PM, William R. Buckley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more comment
Bob,
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
So selecting to install 'for all users' doesn't create the userconfig
file structure in a user account, but 'for me only' does? Even in my
'all users' commonconfig folder there is no 'latex' folder, only a
'tex' folder. Easy enough to create though.
Two disclaimers
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob,
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
So selecting to install 'for all users' doesn't create the userconfig
file structure in a user account, but 'for me only' does? Even in my
'all users' commonconfig folder there is no
Respecting what follows, your corrections of my misunderstandings
are solicited.
OK. The digest goes like this:
1. It is the case that all installs to my single user computer are for
use by all users.
2. MiKTeX has a requirement that the user maintain any *custom*
class, style, include, other
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:31 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Respecting what follows, your corrections of my misunderstandings
are solicited.
OK. The digest goes like this:
1. It is the case that all installs to my single user computer are for
use by all users.
In this
, March 16, 2008 6:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: LyX User
Subject: Re: Layout and Class Files on Windows Distribution
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:31 PM, William R. Buckley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Respecting what follows, your corrections of my
misunderstandings are
solicited.
OK
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:10 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more comment. It seems that MiKTeX 2.7 may instead place the
texmf directory in the root of the hard drive. On my C drive, I find a
texmf directory so located.
Hadn't noticed it previously.
wrb
Where
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:10 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more comment. It seems that MiKTeX 2.7 may instead place the
texmf directory in the root of the hard drive. On my C drive, I find a
texmf directory so located.
Hadn't noticed it
-Original Message-
From: Bob Lounsbury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 7:51 PM
To: LyX User
Subject: Re: Layout and Class Files on Windows Distribution
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:10 PM, William R. Buckley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more comment
Bob,
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
So selecting to install 'for all users' doesn't create the userconfig
file structure in a user account, but 'for me only' does? Even in my
'all users' commonconfig folder there is no 'latex' folder, only a
'tex' folder. Easy enough to create though.
Two disclaimers
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob,
>
>
> Bob Lounsbury wrote:
>
> > So selecting to install 'for all users' doesn't create the userconfig
> > file structure in a user account, but 'for me only' does? Even in my
> > 'all users' commonconfig folder
Respecting what follows, your corrections of my misunderstandings
are solicited.
OK. The digest goes like this:
1. It is the case that all installs to my single user computer are for
use by all users.
2. MiKTeX has a requirement that the user maintain any *custom*
class, style, include, other
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:31 PM, William R. Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Respecting what follows, your corrections of my misunderstandings
> are solicited.
>
> OK. The digest goes like this:
>
> 1. It is the case that all installs to my single user computer are for
> use by all users.
t: Sunday, March 16, 2008 6:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: LyX User
> Subject: Re: Layout and Class Files on Windows Distribution
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:31 PM, William R. Buckley
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Respecting what follows, your
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:10 PM, William R. Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more comment. It seems that MiKTeX 2.7 may instead place the
> texmf directory in the root of the hard drive. On my C drive, I find a
> texmf directory so located.
>
> Hadn't noticed it previously.
>
> wrb
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:10 PM, William R. Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One more comment. It seems that MiKTeX 2.7 may instead place the
texmf directory in the root of the hard drive. On my C drive, I find a
texmf directory so located.
Hadn't noticed it
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Lounsbury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 7:51 PM
> To: LyX User
> Subject: Re: Layout and Class Files on Windows Distribution
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:10 PM, William R. Buckley
> <[EMAIL PROT
To all who have responded to my enquiries, thank you very much. This posting
details my experiences, and should assist others to both provide such further
assistance as will make it possible for me to effectively use LyX, and also
should
find utility in the development of LyX documentation.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:50 AM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not been able to use the LNCS .cls and .sty files which are supplied
by
Springer-Verlag, in their downloadable .zip file having the name llncs2e.zip
The zip file contains:
The files in this directory
Much good information has come from Bob Lounsbury. Thank you
for the attention to detail. Where would I have been expected to
read of the requirement to create such a texmf sub-directory, given
that it was not created automatically by either MiKTeX or LyX? Indeed,
why was such a directory not
William R. Buckley wrote:
Much good information has come from Bob Lounsbury. Thank you
for the attention to detail. Where would I have been expected to
read of the requirement to create such a texmf sub-directory, given
that it was not created automatically by either MiKTeX or LyX?
It
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So,
the layout file shows up in the TeX Information but, in the Document
Settings, the document class Springer LNCS shows up as unavailable.
I wasn't sure if this would happen or not since I don't have llncs.cls
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So,
the layout file shows up in the TeX Information but, in the Document
Settings, the document class Springer LNCS shows up as unavailable.
I wasn't sure if this would happen or not
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:20 PM, rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So,
the layout file shows up in the TeX Information but, in the Document
Settings, the document class Springer
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:20 PM, rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So,
the layout file shows up in the TeX Information but, in the Document
Settings, the document class Springer
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have searched, including by means of the automated tool applet supplied
with Windows, and not been able to find any reference to LOCALTEXMF
under any condition of case sensitivity. When I look under the Roots tab
of the MiKTeX settings application, I find just four
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have searched, including by means of the automated tool applet supplied
with Windows, and not been able to find any reference to LOCALTEXMF
under any condition of case sensitivity.
To all who have responded to my enquiries, thank you very much. This posting
details my experiences, and should assist others to both provide such further
assistance as will make it possible for me to effectively use LyX, and also
should
find utility in the development of LyX documentation.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:50 AM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not been able to use the LNCS .cls and .sty files which are supplied
by
Springer-Verlag, in their downloadable .zip file having the name llncs2e.zip
The zip file contains:
The files in this directory
Much good information has come from Bob Lounsbury. Thank you
for the attention to detail. Where would I have been expected to
read of the requirement to create such a texmf sub-directory, given
that it was not created automatically by either MiKTeX or LyX? Indeed,
why was such a directory not
William R. Buckley wrote:
Much good information has come from Bob Lounsbury. Thank you
for the attention to detail. Where would I have been expected to
read of the requirement to create such a texmf sub-directory, given
that it was not created automatically by either MiKTeX or LyX?
It
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So,
the layout file shows up in the TeX Information but, in the Document
Settings, the document class Springer LNCS shows up as unavailable.
I wasn't sure if this would happen or not since I don't have llncs.cls
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So,
the layout file shows up in the TeX Information but, in the Document
Settings, the document class Springer LNCS shows up as unavailable.
I wasn't sure if this would happen or not
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:20 PM, rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So,
the layout file shows up in the TeX Information but, in the Document
Settings, the document class Springer
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:20 PM, rgheck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, William R. Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So,
the layout file shows up in the TeX Information but, in the Document
Settings, the document class Springer
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have searched, including by means of the automated tool applet supplied
with Windows, and not been able to find any reference to LOCALTEXMF
under any condition of case sensitivity. When I look under the Roots tab
of the MiKTeX settings application, I find just four
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have searched, including by means of the automated tool applet supplied
with Windows, and not been able to find any reference to LOCALTEXMF
under any condition of case sensitivity.
To all who have responded to my enquiries, thank you very much. This posting
details my experiences, and should assist others to both provide such further
assistance as will make it possible for me to effectively use LyX, and also
should
find utility in the development of LyX documentation.
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:50 AM, William R. Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have not been able to use the LNCS .cls and .sty files which are supplied
> by
> Springer-Verlag, in their downloadable .zip file having the name llncs2e.zip
>
> The zip file contains:
>
> >The files in this
Much good information has come from Bob Lounsbury. Thank you
for the attention to detail. Where would I have been expected to
read of the requirement to create such a texmf sub-directory, given
that it was not created automatically by either MiKTeX or LyX? Indeed,
why was such a directory not
William R. Buckley wrote:
Much good information has come from Bob Lounsbury. Thank you
for the attention to detail. Where would I have been expected to
read of the requirement to create such a texmf sub-directory, given
that it was not created automatically by either MiKTeX or LyX?
It
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, William R. Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So,
> the layout file shows up in the TeX Information but, in the Document
> Settings, the document class Springer LNCS shows up as unavailable.
I wasn't sure if this would happen or not since I don't have
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, William R. Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So,
the layout file shows up in the TeX Information but, in the Document
Settings, the document class Springer LNCS shows up as unavailable.
I wasn't sure if this would happen or
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:20 PM, rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob Lounsbury wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, William R. Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> So,
> >> the layout file shows up in the TeX Information but, in the Document
> >> Settings, the
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:20 PM, rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob Lounsbury wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:49 PM, William R. Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> So,
> >> the layout file shows up in the TeX Information but, in the Document
> >> Settings, the
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have searched, including by means of the automated tool applet supplied
with Windows, and not been able to find any reference to LOCALTEXMF
under any condition of case sensitivity. When I look under the Roots tab
of the MiKTeX settings application, I find just four
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William R. Buckley wrote:
>
> >
> > I have searched, including by means of the automated tool applet supplied
> > with Windows, and not been able to find any reference to LOCALTEXMF
> > under any condition of case
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul A. Rubin
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 11:16 AM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Layout and Class Files on Windows Distribution
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have need for the LNCS layout, and am
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul A. Rubin
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 11:16 AM
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Layout and Class Files on Windows Distribution
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have need for the LNCS layout, and am
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul A. Rubin
> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 11:16 AM
> To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Subject: Re: Layout and Class Files on Windows Distribution
>
> William R. Buckley wrote:
> > I ha
To: William R. Buckley
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Layout and Class Files on Windows Distribution
William R. Buckley schrieb:
What is less clear is the use of texhash, as it is not part
of the LyX
distribution.
You don't need to use this cind of command line commands
To: William R. Buckley
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: Layout and Class Files on Windows Distribution
William R. Buckley schrieb:
What is less clear is the use of texhash, as it is not part
of the LyX
distribution.
You don't need to use this cind of command line commands
8 8:33 AM
> To: William R. Buckley
> Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Subject: Re: Layout and Class Files on Windows Distribution
>
> William R. Buckley schrieb:
>
> > What is less clear is the use of texhash, as it is not part
> of the LyX
> > distribution.
>
>
William R. Buckley schrieb:
What is less clear is the use of texhash, as it is not part of the LyX
distribution.
You don't need to use this cind of command line commands. The best and easiest way of getting a full
featured LyX/LaTeX system on WIndows is to reinstall your current LaTeX
William R. Buckley schrieb:
What is less clear is the use of texhash, as it is not part of the LyX
distribution.
You don't need to use this cind of command line commands. The best and easiest way of getting a full
featured LyX/LaTeX system on WIndows is to reinstall your current LaTeX
William R. Buckley schrieb:
What is less clear is the use of texhash, as it is not part of the LyX
distribution.
You don't need to use this cind of command line commands. The best and easiest way of getting a full
featured LyX/LaTeX system on WIndows is to reinstall your current LaTeX
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have need for the LNCS layout, and am having trouble using this with LyX. You
will perhaps like to know that my prior experience with any TeX is zero. In the
past, I have used WYSIWYG systems (Ventura Publisher is my first choice, though
I am also passingly familiar
rgheck wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have need for the LNCS layout, and am having trouble using this with
LyX. You
will perhaps like to know that my prior experience with any TeX is
zero. In the
past, I have used WYSIWYG systems (Ventura Publisher is my first
choice, though
I am also
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I don't use LNCS myself, but since it ships as a style file rather
than a class file, I think you should be able to start a new document
in the default article class in LyX and then add '\usepackage{lncs}'
to the preamble (Document - Settings... - LaTeX Preamble). If
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have need for the LNCS layout, and am having trouble using this with LyX. You
will perhaps like to know that my prior experience with any TeX is zero. In the
past, I have used WYSIWYG systems (Ventura Publisher is my first choice, though
I am also passingly familiar
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have need for the LNCS layout, and am having trouble using this with LyX. You
will perhaps like to know that my prior experience with any TeX is zero. In the
past, I have used WYSIWYG systems (Ventura Publisher is my first choice, though
I am also passingly familiar
rgheck wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have need for the LNCS layout, and am having trouble using this with
LyX. You
will perhaps like to know that my prior experience with any TeX is
zero. In the
past, I have used WYSIWYG systems (Ventura Publisher is my first
choice, though
I am also
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I don't use LNCS myself, but since it ships as a style file rather
than a class file, I think you should be able to start a new document
in the default article class in LyX and then add '\usepackage{lncs}'
to the preamble (Document - Settings... - LaTeX Preamble). If
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have need for the LNCS layout, and am having trouble using this with LyX. You
will perhaps like to know that my prior experience with any TeX is zero. In the
past, I have used WYSIWYG systems (Ventura Publisher is my first choice, though
I am also passingly familiar
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have need for the LNCS layout, and am having trouble using this with LyX. You
will perhaps like to know that my prior experience with any TeX is zero. In the
past, I have used WYSIWYG systems (Ventura Publisher is my first choice, though
I am also passingly familiar
rgheck wrote:
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have need for the LNCS layout, and am having trouble using this with
LyX. You
will perhaps like to know that my prior experience with any TeX is
zero. In the
past, I have used WYSIWYG systems (Ventura Publisher is my first
choice, though
I am also
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I don't use LNCS myself, but since it ships as a style file rather
than a class file, I think you should be able to start a new document
in the default article class in LyX and then add '\usepackage{lncs}'
to the preamble (Document -> Settings... -> LaTeX Preamble). If
William R. Buckley wrote:
I have need for the LNCS layout, and am having trouble using this with LyX. You
will perhaps like to know that my prior experience with any TeX is zero. In the
past, I have used WYSIWYG systems (Ventura Publisher is my first choice, though
I am also passingly familiar
78 matches
Mail list logo
