om: "Herbert Voss"
> > To: "Patrick Dupre"
> > Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> > Subject: Re: A4 landscape ps2pdf
> >
> > Am 26.01.23 um 09:50 schrieb Patrick Dupre:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > As I said,
> > >
> &g
| | Room# D114A
===
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 9:55 AM
> From: "Herbert Voss"
> To: "Patrick Dupre"
> Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Subject: Re: A4 landscape ps
Am 26.01.23 um 09:50 schrieb Patrick Dupre:
Hello,
As I said,
ps2pdf -dAutoRotatePages=/None
does not help.
The only solution that I have now is
export latex
dvips
ps2pdf
It seems that lyx does not do that properly!
Provide a small example ...
Herbert
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx
Hello,
As I said,
ps2pdf -dAutoRotatePages=/None
does not help.
The only solution that I have now is
export latex
dvips
ps2pdf
It seems that lyx does not do that properly!
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ
Cedex FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)380395988| | Room# D114A
===
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 5:32 PM
> From: "Herbert Voss"
> To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Subject: Re: A4 landsca
| | Room# D114A
===
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 5:32 PM
> From: "Herbert Voss"
> To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
> Subject: Re: A4 landscape ps2pdf
>
>
>
> Am 25.01
Am 25.01.23 um 17:18 schrieb Patrick Dupre:
Hello,
I have a file in A4 landscape format which provides the right output if I
use ctlrR (viewing)
If I use ps2pdf (with option ps2pdf -dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY -dNoSafer $$i $$o)
the generated pdf file has a portrait form.
How can I fix this
Hello,
I have a file in A4 landscape format which provides the right output if I
use ctlrR (viewing)
If I use ps2pdf (with option ps2pdf -dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY -dNoSafer $$i $$o)
the generated pdf file has a portrait form.
How can I fix this?
Thank
On 2016-01-08, Georg Baum wrote:
...
> Yes, the detection order in lib/configure.py is wrong.
>> Should I file a bug report?
> You couldd as well fix it directly in configure.py.
Done. [9ff11a7935/lyxgit]
Günter
Guenter Milde wrote:
> If this is true, LyX configuration should choose "pdftops" if both tools
> are installed.
>
> However, on my system this seems not to be the case:
>
> * I have both, pdf2ps and pdftops (via package dependencies)
>
> * still, the LyX-determined converter for 2.2dev is
>
On 2016-01-07, Georg Baum wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Georg Baum
...
> BTW, pdftops is better than pdf2ps according to
> http://stefaanlippens.net/pdf2ps_vs_pdftops and also my own experience.
To sum this up:
Problem with pdf2ps: fonts are converted to bitmap fonts
Wit
uld be that on the other machine
> either pdftops or ps2eps (from ghostscript) is installed and found by LyX.
> BTW, pdftops is better than pdf2ps according to
> http://stefaanlippens.net/pdf2ps_vs_pdftops and also my own experience.
>
>
> Georg
>
Okay, thanks--I probably won&
Maria Gouskova wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Georg Baum
> wrote:
>> Maria Gouskova wrote:
>>
>>> This is Mac OS 10.8.5, LyX 2.1.4. I suspect I need to define a
>>> converter in Preferences/File handling, but am not having much luck
>>> finding the answer anywhere.
>>
>> Correct. If pdf
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Georg Baum
wrote:
> Maria Gouskova wrote:
>
>> This is Mac OS 10.8.5, LyX 2.1.4. I suspect I need to define a
>> converter in Preferences/File handling, but am not having much luck
>> finding the answer anywhere.
>
> Correct. If pdftops is in the path, then LyX shou
Maria Gouskova wrote:
> This is Mac OS 10.8.5, LyX 2.1.4. I suspect I need to define a
> converter in Preferences/File handling, but am not having much luck
> finding the answer anywhere.
Correct. If pdftops is in the path, then LyX should automatically define a
converter
pdftops -eps -f 1 -l 1
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Maria Gouskova wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am having trouble with aliasing graphics in the PDF. I have a vector
> graphics file (in PDF format, generated in R), and I am using the
> ps2pdf preview method because I am using an xypic-based tree package.
&
der, and includes some of the following document. If
that includes environments that shouldn't be in a header (for me,
usually a multiline displayed equation), it will choke in this manner.
Why it only does that with export to ps2pdf is not clear. Some
graphics, perhaps, being includ
iously enough I can export to a pdf file using Lyx's Export-
>PDF(pdflatex).
But when I try Export->PDF(ps2pdf) I get the above error.
I've pinged the classic thesis folks about this but am not sure if it
is a Lyx configuration problem on my end or a problem with the package
so
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 06:54:32 PM Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>
> wrote:
> >>> :-) Release appeared to work just fine :-)
> >>
> >> It (release) seems to work on my box, too.
> >
> > The code checks against rel*, actually. So relative would
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
>>> :-) Release appeared to work just fine :-)
>>>
>> It (release) seems to work on my box, too.
>
> The code checks against rel*, actually. So relative would work too :)
>
That's rel-ly nice. :)
Liviu
Le 10/07/2011 23:39, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
rel, not release.
rh
:-) Release appeared to work just fine :-)
It (release) seems to work on my box, too.
The code checks against rel*, actually. So relative would work too :)
JMarc
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
>> rel, not release.
>>
>> rh
>
> :-) Release appeared to work just fine :-)
>
It (release) seems to work on my box, too.
Liviu
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 03:12:12 PM Richard Heck wrote:
> On 07/09/2011 04:49 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Steve
Litt wrote:
> >> Here was my configure command:
> >> ./configure --with-version-suffix=200
> >> --enable-build-type=release --
> >>
> >> with-qt
t4, and the problem disappeared and I compiled LyX 2.0.0, and it
appears to be working pretty well now. Thanks!
I think the developers, on each new version, should document all
dependencies so compiling will involve more logic and less guesswork.
I'd imagine such a listing could probably be c
On 07/09/2011 04:49 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Here was my configure command:
./configure --with-version-suffix=200 --enable-build-type=release --
with-qt4-dir=/usr/lib/qt4
rel, not release.
rh
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> Here was my configure command:
>
> ./configure --with-version-suffix=200 --enable-build-type=release --
> with-qt4-dir=/usr/lib/qt4
>
> Here was the error message from ./configure:
>
> ==
> The following problems have b
Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2011 schrieb Steve Litt:
> On Saturday, July 09, 2011 06:22:19 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Litt
>
> wrote:
> > > On Saturday, July 09, 2011 03:35:24 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Steve Litt
> > >>
> > >
On Saturday, July 09, 2011 06:22:19 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Litt
wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 09, 2011 03:35:24 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Steve Litt
> >>
> >> > What am I doing wrong?
> >>
> >> Ubuntu ships the wrong
On 07/09/2011 03:04 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
>> On Saturday, July 09, 2011 06:22:19 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
>>
>>> ..but if you're OK with building, this should be straightforward:
>>> apt-get build-dep lyx
>>> ./configure --with-version-suffi
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Saturday, July 09, 2011 06:22:19 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
>
>> ..but if you're OK with building, this should be straightforward:
>> apt-get build-dep lyx
>> ./configure --with-version-suffix=-svn --enable-build-type=release
>> make
>> make in
On Saturday, July 09, 2011 06:22:19 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
> ..but if you're OK with building, this should be straightforward:
> apt-get build-dep lyx
> ./configure --with-version-suffix=-svn --enable-build-type=release
> make
> make install
What does "--enable-build-type=release" do for you?
On 07/09/2011 04:15 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> LyX is probably the #2 most important application in my business
> (VimOutliner is #1). It's important enough that I'm willing to compile
> my own, always assuming that there's a 2.x version that compiles well
> on Ubuntu 11.04. What do you think is
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Saturday, July 09, 2011 03:35:24 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Steve Litt
>> > What am I doing wrong?
>>
>> Ubuntu ships the wrong version. See this recent discussion [1][2].
>> See these instructions [3] on how
On Saturday, July 09, 2011 03:35:24 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Steve Litt
> > What am I doing wrong?
>
> Ubuntu ships the wrong version. See this recent discussion [1][2].
> See these instructions [3] on how to push the update to your
> system (never tried it). Alt
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> An untimely computer crash brought me to Ubuntu 11.04, which brought
> me to LyX 2.0.0rc3.
>
> Ctrl+D says "successful DVD preview, but does nothing. The View menu
> gives no ps2pdf choice, and when I cli
Hi all,
An untimely computer crash brought me to Ubuntu 11.04, which brought
me to LyX 2.0.0rc3.
Ctrl+D says "successful DVD preview, but does nothing. The View menu
gives no ps2pdf choice, and when I click the "View other formats"
choice, nothing opens up, even though I con
> If you use Coreldraw, don't export to jpg you graphic, but directly to eps
> type 2 and you will have best quality and no pixelated contours.
thats what I did, normaly I do the complete drawing but in this case I had to
include a jg.
With GIF-Export it works fairly well, thats what I found ou
On 2009-05-25, Robert Neumann wrote:
> Guenter Milde writes:
> I found a solution which is acceptable for me: I export it from
> CorelDraw as a grayscale-Gif. This works fairly well, at least I can
> life with that... Regards Robert
Fine. Generally, JPEG is not suited for drawings or any images
> Well, seems like the time to apologize. It was my point of view and I
> was wrong. Next time, I try to be more constructive...
Accepted;-)
Next time I have a problem, I will post the link to the old thread about the
strange fact that the newer latex takes more than twice the time immediately.
Guenter Milde writes:
> Do you scale the figure in question or set a fixed size? Re-sizing pixel
> images can lead to bad surprises.
yes, I just tried with 100%: No Difference.
> EPS and PDF can both "include" JPEG and PNG images -- in newer versions.
> Some convertors, however, will default
Guenter Milde schrieb:
On 2009-05-22, Florian Rubach wrote:
Robert Neumann schrieb:
Hello,
I have a problem with the quality of jpg-images.
...
I' using Lyx 1.3.4 on a Suse Linux (and I dont want to update, because
all new lyx are slower it has to to with the latex)
3 has no pixels either when I export to ps(as I just posted in
> reply to Steve) but when I use the ps2pdf from the new Linux on the old
> Linux, it still has pixels. So it is very odd to figure out where the
> problem lies.
Do you scale the figure in question or set a fixed size? Re
On 2009-05-22, Florian Rubach wrote:
> Robert Neumann schrieb:
>> Hello,
>> I have a problem with the quality of jpg-images.
> ...
>> I' using Lyx 1.3.4 on a Suse Linux (and I dont want to update, because
>> all new lyx are slower it has to to with the latex)
> Seriously, what do you expect? If y
reply to Steve) but when I use the ps2pdf from the new Linux on the old
Linux, it still has pixels. So it is very odd to figure out where the
problem lies.
Regards
Robert
Lyx 1.5 (Suse 11): no pixels
- I checked the ps-File on Lyx 1.3 (Suse 9.1): no pixels
So I figured out that the problem would be with ps2pdf on the old linux. I
replaced the ps2pdf on the Suse 9.1 with the one from the Linux 11: still
pixels.
So this seems really strange to me, cause I can see no
Robert Neumann wrote:
What I do not understand is:If you compare LyX 1.3 and LyX 1.6 on the same
system (using the same LaTeX installation), do you see a delay then?
As far as I remember: no. But I remember that it was extremly difficult to
install 1.4 on the SuSE Linux, because of YAST, which
Robert Neumann wrote:
> As far as I remember: no. But I remember that it was extremly difficult to
> install 1.4 on the SuSE Linux, because of YAST, which sticks to the lyx,
> that came with the distribution. (And I'm not such a Linux Pro that I could
> override this).
It will certainly be difficu
> What I do not understand is:If you compare LyX 1.3 and LyX 1.6 on the same
> system (using the same LaTeX installation), do you see a delay then?
As far as I remember: no. But I remember that it was extremly difficult to
install 1.4 on the SuSE Linux, because of YAST, which sticks to the lyx,
st quality and no pixelated contours.
>
> - Original Message - From: "Robert Neumann"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:32 AM
> Subject: Problems with jpg-quality with ps2pdf
>
>
> > Hello,
> > I have a problem with the quality of jpg-im
Robert Neumann wrote:
> It was definitely a big time-difference, with the books I was writing on
> with my last machine, it increased from 8 sec. to 25 or so and this feels
> like hours;-) I think it is no lyx problem but a latex-caused problem.
What I do not understand is:If you compare LyX 1.3 a
> It would be interesting to know what exactly causes this difference.
I spent two days on this, a couple of years ago, then I gave up and switched
back to the old Lyx. You can find the discussion here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/34234/focus=34251
It was definitely a big
nd $1.ind!
gvim $1.ilg $1.ind
echo ERROR: Inspect $1.ilg and $1.ind!
else
latex $1.tex
dvips -o $1.ps $1.dvi
# ps2pdf $1.ps
ps2pdf12 $1.ps
# xpdf $1.pdf &
fi
Anyway, theoretically if you use this shellscript on both LyX versions you're
do
Robert Neumann wrote:
> I write books with about 250 pages and 10 pic. On the "old" Lyx it takes
> around 25 sec. to produce a pdf, on the newer lyx it takes around 40 sec.
> When I do the final work I have to produce quite a lot of pdfs to check
> the pages. So just give it a try and count twenty
If you use Coreldraw, don't export to jpg you graphic, but directly to eps
type 2 and you will have best quality and no pixelated contours.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Neumann"
To:
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 10:32 AM
Subject: Problems with jpg-quality with ps2
Thankx for the very nice advice, especially the sarcastic note!
I write books with about 250 pages and 10 pic. On the "old" Lyx it takes
around 25 sec. to produce a pdf, on the newer lyx it takes around 40 sec.
When I do the final work I have to produce quite a lot of pdfs to check
the pages. So
Robert Neumann schrieb:
Hello,
I have a problem with the quality of jpg-images.
...
I' using Lyx 1.3.4 on a Suse Linux (and I dont want to update, because all new
lyx are slower it has to to with the latex)
Seriously, what do you expect? If you're not willing to upgrade, I don't
think there
; from the
compression around the numbers.
Them I create a pdf with ps2pdf and I get lots of these little dots.
So the jpg quality seems to be reduced by lyx during the export process, because
the dvi is fine.
I just need to use ps2pdf, because the pdf is processed at another place and
they can
christiaan pauw schrieb:
Thanks, I'll try using a eps image. The reason I used ps2pdf is because the
resulting pdf file is much smaller (the pdflatex file is 27M for a 50 page
document). Why is there such a big difference between the size of the pdf
files?
This is because PDF can only
.png (no BoundingBox)
>>
>
> This is no crash.
Sorry, sloppy terminology on my side.
> You used ps2pdf, that means that first a Postscript file is generated, and
> that can only contain EPS images. So it should work when you use pdflatex
> instead of ps2pdf, or when you use
christiaan pauw schrieb:
\rhead{\resizebox{2cm}{!}{\includegraphics{/Users/christiaanpauw/Pictures/logo.png}}}
The error message reads:
LaTeX Error: Cannot determine size of graphic in
/Users/christiaanpauw/Pictures/logo.png (no BoundingBox)
This is no crash. You used ps2pdf, that means
Hallo Everybody
I use LyX 1.6.1 on Mac OS X
I have a report with fancy header and a logo in the header. It compiles very
well with pdflatex but cannot compile with ps2pdf
here is part of my preamble
\usepackage{graphics}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\pagestyle{fancy}
\lhead{Report page heading
Hi all,
The new ps2pdf can screw up -- it can fail to correctly show Author, Title and
the like when viewed in Acroread 8. I haven't tried viewing PDFs built with
new ps2pdf on old Acroreads, so I can't draw a definitive conclusion.
So I used ps2pdf12, and all the properties read
Giuseppe Pagnoni wrote:
Dear Paul,
thank you very much for your comments. It is quite weird: if I export
my file prova.lyx in latex (pdflatex or plain) and run latex prova.tex,
the dvi file shows the picture correctly, and of course the picture is
kept through the chain of dvips and ps2pdf; if
Dear Paul,
thank you very much for your comments. It is quite weird: if I export
my file prova.lyx in latex (pdflatex or plain) and run latex prova.tex,
the dvi file shows the picture correctly, and of course the picture is
kept through the chain of dvips and ps2pdf; if I, however, try to
Giuseppe Pagnoni wrote:
I am using lyx with powerdot for a presentation. I am trying to insert
a figure within an ERT box, to get advantage of the \twocolumn command
of powerdot.
I discovered that lyx does not output figures to pdf when using ps2pdf
(I checked this with a new "ar
Dear all,
I am using lyx with powerdot for a presentation. I am trying to insert
a figure within an ERT box, to get advantage of the \twocolumn command
of powerdot.
I discovered that lyx does not output figures to pdf when using ps2pdf
(I checked this with a new "article" document co
Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2002 17:25 schrieb Herbert Voss:
> Jörg Haug wrote:
> > i want to create a PDF-file with good resolution on
> > screen so i changed to type1 fonts. The text is now
> > O.K. but i have a lot of math in my document. If i use
> > matptmx or
>
> hm, with this package everything sh
Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2002 17:25 schrieb Herbert Voss:
> Jörg Haug wrote:
> > i want to create a PDF-file with good resolution on
> > screen so i changed to type1 fonts. The text is now
> > O.K. but i have a lot of math in my document. If i use
> > matptmx or
>
> hm, with this package everything sh
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 04:35:24PM +0200, Jörg Haug wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i want to create a PDF-file with good resolution on screen
> so i changed to type1 fonts. The text is now O.K. but i
> have a lot of math in my document. If i use matptmx or
> euler i lose some minus sign and the bonds in
Jörg Haug wrote:
> i want to create a PDF-file with good resolution on screen
> so i changed to type1 fonts. The text is now O.K. but i
> have a lot of math in my document. If i use matptmx or
hm, with this package everything should be ok ...
> euler i lose some minus sign and the bonds in
Hello,
i want to create a PDF-file with good resolution on screen
so i changed to type1 fonts. The text is now O.K. but i
have a lot of math in my document. If i use matptmx or
euler i lose some minus sign and the bonds in my chemical
formulas (with ppchtex) are not present. Also subscript an
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 11:20:52PM -0300, Rodrigo Esteves de Lima-Lopes wrote:
> if you write n your preamble:
>
> \usepackage{times}
>
> it will deliver a much more readble pdf, but you might get a
> 'windows-like' font-effect.
Don't put it in the preamble, all you need to do is put it in the
On 12 Jul 2001, Myriam Abramson wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to convert some foiltex to pdf for a presentation.
> I put \usepackage[ps2pdf]{hyperref} in the latex preamble.
> ps2pdf works fine but the colors and the fonts come out terrible on
> acroread on the
mson wrote:
> Date: 12 Jul 2001 21:51:16 -0400
> From: Myriam Abramson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ps2pdf
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to convert some foiltex to pdf for a presentation.
> I put \usepackage[ps2pdf]{hyperref} in the
Hi!
I'm trying to convert some foiltex to pdf for a presentation.
I put \usepackage[ps2pdf]{hyperref} in the latex preamble.
ps2pdf works fine but the colors and the fonts come out terrible on
acroread on the pc. Any ideas?
Thanks,
--
myriam
IM: tok
>From the manpage: "it produces PDF 1.2 output...compressed with...gzip".
This suggests that in fact its compression is pretty good, probably better
than LZW.
--
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/rrt1001/ | certain, a. insufficiently analysed
76 matches
Mail list logo
