Is anyone still doing marketing or PR for SL?
On Wednesday, December 4, 2019, Sean DALY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Unless I missed something, I didn't see any followup on this
>
> My credits expire at the end of the year, which really means in the next
> couple of weeks bec
er will be required for the designated press
contact
Sean
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 3:50 PM Sean DALY wrote:
> anytime is fine
>
> if you are able to organize a shared document like googledocs we and
> others could collaborate on it
>
> Limit is 600 or 700 words, I need to chec
rst draft?
>
> Cordially,
> Vipul Gupta
> Mixster <https://mixstersite.wordpress.com/> | Github
> <https://github.com/vipulgupta2048>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:05 PM Sean DALY wrote:
>
>> Vipul – it would be best to find a topical subject, "news&
Do let me know which of these topics we can brainstorm on. Some topics
> might be overlapping, I just a made a rough list from the top of my mind.
>
> Cordially,
> Vipul Gupta
> Mixster <https://mixstersite.wordpress.com/> | Github
> <https://github.com/vipulgupta2048>
>
In principle the 29th of June, but I am asking for an extension
Sean
On Monday, June 24, 2019, Alex Perez wrote:
> Sean,
>
>
>
> Sean DALY wrote on 6/24/19 2:16 PM:
>
>> Hi SL marketing team,
>>
>> My company has an unused press release credit which will
Hi SL marketing team,
My company has an unused press release credit which will expire soon and
which I could use for Sugar Labs. Distribution is PR Newswire in English
for US market. If you have a topical message to get out (GSoC? latest Sugar
version? a deployment?), or even just an “alive & kick
Hi Alex,
The pr@sl.o went to Walter and me. I have no idea how to change it, sorry.
Sean
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Alex Perez wrote:
> Sean,
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> I just saw I am still listed [1] as the SL PR contact, with the dead phone
>> number.
>>
> I have removed your name from the PR
Hi Dave,
I just saw I am still listed [1] as the SL PR contact, with the dead phone
number.
Could you please update that page.
You may also want to consider publishing some PR milestones now and then,
with the most recent communiqué dating from 2014 any journalist might
assume the project is fal
So your idea is: no trademarks at all? Do you think Sugar Labs should give
up its trademark?
Is your goal to undermine Sugar Labs and/or OLPC?
Sean
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Sebastian Silva wrote:
> On 15/09/17 10:59, Sean DALY wrote:
> > The copyrights are licensed unde
on and, if it passes,
>>>> the results be reported to Tony by Adam, our SFC liaison. Of course, if the
>>>> motion does not pass, we will need to continue the discussion.
>>>>
>>>> I second the motion.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
be found here:
https://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/foss-primer.html#x1-660005.4.2
Sean.
Le jeu. 14 sept. 2017 à 09:02, Sebastian Silva
a écrit :
> On 14/09/17 08:00, Sean DALY wrote:
> > Sebastian — these principles apply to copyright, not trademarks,
> > patents, or trade secrets.
Sebastian — these principles apply to copyright, not trademarks, patents,
or trade secrets.
Sean
Le jeu. 14 sept. 2017 à 08:50, Sebastian Silva
a écrit :
>
>
> On 14/09/17 07:37, Sean DALY wrote:
>
> Laura, I am not a lawyer, but the inclusion of a trademarked logo does not
Laura, I am not a lawyer, but the inclusion of a trademarked logo does not
make software nonfree. Software is copyrighted after all; it's the license
that brings freedom to it. In the absence of a formal trademark agreement,
lawyers look at the way a trademark is used, and what the trademark owner
wish to design marketing
materials to resemble the Sugar interface.
Sean
[1] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Marketing_Team/Booth_Banners
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Laura Vargas wrote:
>
> 2017-09-13 16:02 GMT-05:00 Sean DALY :
>
>> In the past, OLPC was amenable to the use of the xo
https://www.sugarlabs.org/2014/01/22/Sugar-Labs(R)-Educational-Nonprofit-Celebrates-Two-Google-Code-In-Grand-Prize-Winners/
It seems some links to visuals associated with press releases didn't
survive the site change. AFAICT the broken links just have embedded
newlines, should be OK if newlines re
al of our PR communiqués were datelined Cambridge.
If you decide to keep it going and need my assistance, I'm around.
Sean.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> On 24 June 2016 at 05:21, Sean DALY wrote:
>
>> Dropping IAEP from a marketing discuss
Here's a fairly simple project we tried to get off the ground a couple of
times and didn't: branded merchandise (t-shirts, mugs, messenger bags,
&c.). The new marketing team may wish to pick this up.
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/2009-May/001108.html
This old list of print-on-deman
This study (on Marketing Team homepage) had flaws, but the methodology of
interviewing 85 community members was sound.
Here's a reminder of their suggested mission statement:
Sugar Labs is an educational nonprofit dedicated to enhancing the learning
experience of children worldwide through the us
FYI, in the past, we have used the following target categories for PR, in
hit-parade order (always the first three, a fourth or fifth cat from the
rest dependning on the content):
Education
High Tech - Software
High Tech - Public Sector/Government
Hispanic Wire
Children & Youth
Nonprofit Industry
had been to disrupt the MS/Intel sales force talking points. The marketing
team which was numerous at the time all knew the strategy.
Sean.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Sean DALY wrote:
> Hi Dave, sorry whatever is not in the Marketing mail archive will be in
> the Marketing IRC lo
gt;
> On 23 June 2016 at 07:21, Sean DALY wrote:
> > OK Dave, you're the new Marketing Coordinator!
>
> The wiki page https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Marketing_Team had:
>
> 1 (617) 500-9610
>
> [[Marketing Team/Phone]] is the new number that journalists can call for
pecific
> than "Re: Contents of Marketing digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: [SLOBS] [IAEP] Fwd: Google for NonprofitsAffiliation
> Request Sent (Sean DALY)
> 2. Re: The End of Sugar (thought exercise) (Walter Bender)
> 3. Re: [SL
Dave - I did already, see the threads
Sean
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Hi Sean
>
> Sincerel I'm sorry to hear that.
>
> Please do share with us the old marketing strategy, I am keen to see it :)
>
> Cheers
> Dave
> On Jun 23,
AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Hi Sean
>
> On 22 June 2016 at 15:37, Sean DALY wrote:
> >
> > We agree on using Google AdWords, but no work has been done on
> communication
> > strategy, and although I am thrilled there is interest in marketing, I am
> > also ver
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Walter Bender
wrote:
> It is a matter for the marketing team, which seems to have reached
> consensus.
We agree on using Google AdWords, but no work has been done on
communication strategy, and although I am thrilled there is interest in
marketing, I am also ve
- Forwarded message --
From: Dave Crossland
Date: Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: [IAEP] 172 XO-1s for $24 each (+ freight) $4,000 total
To: Sean DALY , iaep
Cc: Sugar Labs Marketing
On 14 June 2016 at 12:09, Sean DALY wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:5
be substantial. However more often than not a diluted
brand loses its power and is considered has-been, irrelevant or worthless.
Sean.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> On 14 June 2016 at 10:14, Sean DALY wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Dave Crossla
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> A brand that is not being diluted is stale, rigid, dying.
I completely disagree, but it doesn't matter.
Sean.
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> > That color combination has been very widely copied, even today.
>
> I think the amount of copying ought to be seen as a metrics of success
> for a brand.
>
Sure, except it dilutes the brand.
>
>
> > which is why I invested in the SL br
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> The green case is probably the most important thing, I think, because
> of that brand equity
>
The green and white case (perhaps with a "crank handle") is the only brand
equity OLPC (and Sugar Labs) have. That color combination has been v
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:05 PM, samson goddy
wrote:
> And Sean, i really want to make this madatory to all members in SL. Since
> you are in-charge of marketing how can i get started?
Samson - I'm afraid there's no mandatory anything :-) nearly all of us are
unpaid volunteers... I'm nobody's
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Ifeanyi Peter
wrote:
> Maybe anytime we have suggestions that concerns Marketing, we would just
> forward it to the Marketing Dept. for review. How to I join the marketing
> team as well, I have some suggestions.
Thanks Ifeanyi
To join the Marketing team, just
I'm sorry, I don't see how SL can support a new paid position. My
suggestion would be to evaluate how the paid Translation Manager position
works out.
I'm glad Samson you are eager to work on social media (as I've said),
however I don't understand your marketing objectives. Put another way, just
w
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 6:27 PM, samson goddy
wrote:
> should we use the adventage of the monetizing
My point of view is that we "monetize" through CTAs and fundraising, rather
than wait 27 years to get the resources we need through random ads.
Sean.
___
Yes Samson, the SFC fulfills these criteria. I am sure we would qualify.
But as Adam says, let's sort out what we want to do first before going to
the SFC. First step is a donor link which lands on their page with SL as
prefilled choice.
I suggest we try to go for Google Ad Grants, but this requir
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Walter Bender
wrote:
> How about "turtle in a box" videos? That would be aligned with our
> mission/vision :)
Indeed! if there is any way to generate zillions of views it's with turtles
;-)
___
Marketing mailing list
M
Samson - what about Google's program for nonprofits?
https://www.google.com/grants/
Sean
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:34 PM, samson goddy
wrote:
>
> okay i am going to create an open doc in google then explain further about
> the video ads. The youtube ads is not as you think, that's why me and
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> I am eager to see real data on this
YouTube advertiser RPM (revenue per thousand views), called eCPM by YouTube
("effective cost per thousand"), commonly varies from 50 US cents to $5
(before Google's Adsense 45% cut). I say commonly, bec
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> I'm not saying if $X or $Y is greater; I am saying that we don't know
> which is greater, and Samson will learn a lot by trying to maximize
> the revenue of both.
>
In that case, I'm saying random ads will generate peanuts, while
well-thou
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Your assertion that SL would see more revenue from CTA compared to ads.
How can I make up data for a fundraising drive which hasn't happened yet?
Sean
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> What data do you have to back up this assertion? :)
Um, which assertion?
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
I myself don't see an upside with allowing random ads to be associated with
Sugar Labs, for the tiny amount of income we might receive. If indeed our
US nonprofit status through SFC would allow gains from advertising. Far
better to do Calls to Action ("CTA" in their jargon) and Annotations,
request
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> $600 is plenty serious :)
So, for $600 anyone can contribute random code which will be used
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketin
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Using gitorious we are running this experiment for $0, which is why I'm
> keen to get the move to github over with :)
Let's be as serious about marketing as we are about coding.
Sean
___
Market
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Offering to suggest a codename is hardly "handing over marketing." Let's
> experiment! :)
Let's experiment with random code to be inserted anywhere, for only $600!
:)
___
Marketing mailing list
Handing over marketing to anyone with a deep pocket is incomprehensible to
me, I'd much rather just see "gold sponsor status" or something similar. Do
people really need the recognition?
I'm also confused about the public statement bit - don't we already have
member pages? Important contributions
Hi Dave,
these are indeed useful for non-marketers to get a feel for how a
competitive landscape study is presented, or how a marketing plan is built.
There are differences with SL, in particular there are no funds for market
studies (or actual marketing for that matter).
I believe I did a SWOT
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Walter Bender
wrote:
> The site is hosted in github now [1], so we can accept pull requests (or
> comments/issues) for changes. Could you please let us know what typos you
> found?
>
> [1] https://github.com/sugarlabs/www-sugarlabs
>
Ah hi Walter what's the best
... who can fix those?
I am relieved to see that the press page survived at its permalink.
Sean
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 21 April 2016 at 09:08, Sean DALY wrote:
>
>> I didn't realize the existing site had been scrapped already.
>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Juan Carlos Murillo wrote:
> Also, if there is a range of different colors for the logo, then a good
> idea might be to use the same logo color for the websites that have more
> related content between them (i.e. homepage and activities).
I didn't realize the ex
Developer discussion about SL brand identity.
Hopefully the MIT Sloan conclusions will be taken into account
Sean
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dave Crossland
Date: Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign
To: Juan Carlos Murillo
Cc:
pose the minimum build order is $2M. While those 1 laptops
> are in inventory, they tie up the funds. When all of the laptops have been
> paid for and deployed, a new order can be placed. Better would be to order
> 20,000 units at $4M. Then when 10,000 have been deployed and paid
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Are all the PRs in 2013/14/15/16 listed on that page?
>
Yes indeed. We considered doing one for the TripAdvisor grant, but decided
it was better to wait for results. There has been lessening press interest
in SL, parallel to OLPC, but th
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Given the trademark fee was recently paid to renew the trademarks, I guess
> the merits were accepted
For an organization with the possibility of widespread recognition, owning
your trademark is a vital step. It could be compared to owni
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar on Facebook
> app(Sugarizer)(sugar activities))
>
> Interesting thread and timely. I'm headed to SF (from DC) to attend the
> Facebook Developer's Conference. There is a pre-conference workshop on
> Monday for NGOs. I'll keep
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Lionel Laské
wrote:
> In my point of view Facebook is not a platform. But it's probably possible
> to run Sugarizer (or a part of it) into the Facebook context.
>
> BTW I'm agree with Sean, it has sense only if we've got a marketing plan
> to be there.
>
> The fir
omputer-based learning tool?
> * a cool guy interested in fun games?
>
>
> Well it depends on how I feel
> About facebook:
> Sometimes "a cool guy interested in fun games".
>
> But "I used to" submit patches for sugar core.
> I was a gci winner twice with
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:10 PM, samson goddy
wrote:
> I think that doing ads on facebook or twitter will be great.
Samson... at the risk of repeating myself... who are the ads geared to?
What do the ads say? Is the objective to boost random traffic on facebook,
or traffic more likely to adopt
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:13 PM, samson goddy
wrote:
> a proposal of targeting more users via the social media (Facebook and
> twitter). And i will submit it this week or next so we will know that to do.
Great! So... what is our target or targets? What is our objective or
objectives? What is ou
Hi Ignacio
are you ...?
* a donor interested in supporting a project to support financially?
* a developer interested in a project to volunteer with?
* a teacher interested in a classroom computer-based learning tool?
* a parent interested in a home setting computer-based learning tool?
* a cool
Thanks for this Samson
note that the format is xlsx, not xls, I had to rename the extension to
load it into OpenOffice
I'm aware that the numbers are very low. Once SL chooses its vision and
roadmap, we can develop a marketing strategy and do stuff.
thanks
Sean
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:19 PM,
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> One of the ideas of Sugar is to raise awareness about the software freedom
> movement, and as such, providing the full experience within the facebook
> police-state playpark is an own-goal. We should reach people where they are
> in the play
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> How many kids is Sugar targetting?
>
> Low millions? Or billions?
>
A few years ago, I estimated at around 10 million the number of teachers in
classrooms with younger children, and I suggested we target them. Any
teacher-friendly, ultrasi
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> I agree that it would be awesome if someone holding the Treasurer office
> was also actively fund raising for the project!
>
Fundraising requires a clear vision & roadmap - positioning, technical -
and the associated marketing materials (
Sean
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
> On 25 March 2016 at 08:26, Sean DALY wrote:
>
>> I pushed to have a common navbar on all our sites some years ago, at the
>> time developers didn't want to help code & deploy that. I can refer yo
runs the existing web site infrastructure and who are the stakeholders
> that authorise changes to prominent pages?
>
>
> On 25 March 2016 at 04:46, Sean DALY wrote:
>
>> Greetings Juan Carlos,
>>
>> I think it's clear that users of the several Sugar Labs websites w
Greetings Juan Carlos,
I think it's clear that users of the several Sugar Labs websites would
benefit from more integrated navigation. This problem was identified in
2009 when the current main SL site went up, at that time we tried to deploy
a standardized menu bar across the SL websites but were
Hi Ifeanyi Matthew,
There hasn't been much marketing activity lately in the absence of a
roadmap, funds, and developer resources.
In the past the Design team assisted the Marketing team, for example:
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Marketing_Team/Booth_Banners
in SL marketing, the most important v
Hi Samson, I never used the twitter account and never knew the password
myself
Sean
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:58 PM, samson goddy
wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I have been trying to reset the twitter page of the sugarlabs for the past
> 1 month now. I discussed with Ignacio about resetting the p
This 204-page report is available online here (PDF):
http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/deliver/9815021e.pdf?itemId=/content/book/9789264239555-en&mimeType=application/pdf
main links page is here:
http://www.oecd.org/education/students-computers-and-learning-9789264239555-en.htm
a 63-slide briefing (po
in a couple of days ok
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
wrote:
> Sean,
> Could you reply?
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
>
>> Hi Samson, this is a copy/pasted form letter, the tipoff is they mention
>> "company" whi
Hi Samson, this is a copy/pasted form letter, the tipoff is they mention
"company" which means they did not bother spending three clicks to find out
about Sugar Labs.
If their event is legit, we can always ask them if they will assist a
nonprofit like us in attending, with travel, room & board :-)
Thanks Peter, I was watching that too.
If I understand correctly switching/changing the sections or adding an
Activity is beyond tweaks? while text changes are tweaks.
I'm quite happy with it, even though there are lots of changes we suggested
which aren't in.
I feel the only tweak still to make
Peter - here is Iain's document:
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20150519/bdaf00ca/attachment.html
Sean
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
> Gonzalo - Iain had already consolidated all changes but Peter doesn't want
> to deal with a t
Gonzalo - Iain had already consolidated all changes but Peter doesn't want
to deal with a text file.
Sean
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
wrote:
> Iain, Sean, Sam,
>
> _Please_consolidate_the_changes_before_send_to_Peter_.
>
> Peter,
> when need this be finished?
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
ltimedia as it stands should be deleted.
>
> Regards,
>
> Iain
>
>
> On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 09:29 +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
> > thanks Iain looks good
> >
> > some typos:
> > Wwork -> Work
> >
> > FotoToon -> OK is singular not plural
&g
f. "office
desktop") which probably came in from copy/pasted text should either be
replacd with simple double parentheses (" ") or the HTML entities
“ and ”
thanks
Sean
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Iain Brown Douglas <
i...@browndouglas.plus.com> wrote:
> On
me up
> with the final edits so I can submit them early next week as a single
> final edit.
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Sean DALY wrote:
> > Peter - are the intro edits I sent going in?
> > thanks
> > Sean
> >
> >
> &
Peter - are the intro edits I sent going in?
thanks
Sean
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Peter Robinson
wrote:
> It's already in process
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Sam P. wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > I think Walter send out a good copy [1] with headers - maybe we could use
> > those
en the
specific advantages of the Soas spin.
many thanks
Sean
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Peter Robinson
wrote:
> See the post I just sent to the list less than a hour ago :-)
>
> Thanks Sean,
>
> Peter
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
> >
Hi Tom, Gonzalo had mentioned this, I have a rewrite of the introduction in
the works and Sam's Activity texts are good. The main issue is explaining
that SOAS Desktop is not a desktop (!)
Peter is coordinating on the Fedora side.
Sean
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Gilliard
wrote:
>
Peter - I can refresh the intro text for them, if you have the list of
included Activities handy. As I remember those are a subset of Activities
packaged for Fedora?
Sean
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Gonzalo Odiard
wrote:
> Fedora Design Team is working in the new Fedora Spins site.
>
> Sug
A large-scale ($1.3 billion budget for iPads, pearson software, wifi
infrastructure, target 650K students) education ICT project started in 2013
and meant to eliminate the digital divide which has gone awry. The
superintendent resigned and is under FBI and SEC investigation for corrupt
bidding proc
Dan - two years ago we arrived at 3 million by estimating 2.6 million XO
laptops delivered, Sugar on Intel Classmates in Argentina (between 50K and
100K of the approximately 1.5 million locally assembled from 2011 - the
others had been running Windows and may have been reconditioned to
GNU/Linux),
cc'ing the Marketing list - the one everyone forgets as soon as they
discuss marketing.
The MarketLab study we worked on back then confirmed what we already knew -
that Sugar's websites did not accompany teachers interested in Sugar, and
that Sugar absolutely needed a simple installer. They also a
http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/mediapacks/makeitdigital/micro-bit
article, with video:
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-31834927
"The Micro Bit will be a small, wearable device with an LED display that
children can programme in a number of ways. It will be a standalone,
entry-level coding dev
Hi Samson,
I didn't know or forgot that SL had a twitter account. Sorry, I have no
other information.
What kind of tweets would you like to send?
Sean
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:43 AM, samson goddy
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been trying to find out about the Twitter password, I found out
> th
Hi Tymon,
I think it's great you have stepped up to rework the sl.o website.
Christian who designed the original pages had worked on a new framework a
while back, but we got bogged down trying to find usable (both attractive
and legal) visuals of kids using Sugar.
I have a typographical suggesti
http://blogs.iadb.org/desarrolloefectivo_en/2014/09/19/laptops-children-darth-vader/
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
on iTunes, Google Play, Amazon Instant Video.
article in The Next Web, with extended scenes not in the cinema release
http://thenextweb.com/media/2014/09/26/web-personal-documentary-one-laptop-per-child-spread-internet/
Sean.
___
Marketing mailing list
Yes, saw that too.
They should have read their archives:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8117064.stm
Sean.
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 5:12 PM, John Watlington wrote:
>
> Someone needs to write this reporter and explain that
> system on a stick isn't a new concept...
>
> http://www.bbc.com
at, May 3, 2014 at 9:21 PM, samson goddy wrote:
> Hello Team
> i really want to thank you guys for the courage to help Sugarlabs FB page
> with me, i want to say a big thanks to you. And i also want to remind you
> that we are gonna be having meeting on Sunday.
> so mine Time zon
http://heidicohen.com/global-social-media-trends/
Some key findings:
* Facebook still world leader, but down 3%, and losing in teen (16-24)
demographic. With the increased fragmentation of social media, has it
peaked?
* Video is a key activity, see YouTube stats
* Mobile gaining ground and is n
@NachoDeTodos <https://twitter.com/NachoDeTodos>
> +598 91 686 835
> nachoe...@gmail.com
>
>
> 2014-04-25 11:03 GMT-03:00 Sean DALY :
>
> Puneet, Samson, Ignacio
>
> I'm pleased you all want to contribute to communication & marketing
>
> i invite you to join
know the community better and may be
>> become interested and volunteer in :)
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Sean DALY wrote:
>>
>>> Puneet - what kind of messages do you have in mind?
>>>
>>> we've wanted someone to be on th
I actually can be switched down to moderator until such time as I get
> the energy to do more.
>
> OK, I've switched you to Moderator. Wishing you a speedy recovery and
> energy boost!
>
> > Like it or not, Facebook is a massive global platform and we should
> welcome some
; Mike
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Apr 24, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Sean DALY wrote:
>>
>> a worthy question
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Puneet Kaur
>> Date: Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:41 PM
>&
a worthy question
-- Forwarded message --
From: Puneet Kaur
Date: Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:41 PM
Subject: [Sugar-devel] admin of sugarlabs fb page
To: Sugar Devel
Anyone here has an idea who is the admin of this page -
https://www.facebook.com/pages/SugarLabs/187845102582 ?
http://opensource.com/education/14/1/teaching-kids-linux
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
http://www.ilovefreesoftware.com/14/linux/free-linux-os-learning-sugar-stick.html
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
1 - 100 of 696 matches
Mail list logo
