==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Surely the biggest question for a single state is what its immigration (and
thus
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Why doesn't everyone who might be involved in building a mass movement
concentrate
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Calm down Jeff, your response is disproportionate. There is certainly
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
Well, Jeff, do you really think there's any chance of bringing about some
dialogue
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I only know a certain amount of Ralph Miliband's writings, but would be
interested
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
I have refrained from commenting much on the several interesting threads that
==
Rule #1: YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
==
The SWP have instructed members and supporters to 'Vote Labour - without
I'm looking for recommendations for literature on the growth of Maoism in the
West, especially in the 1960s and 1970s. In particular, any material giving
some idea of how much information on life in Mao's China was known in the West
during this period would be of great interest. Not just
Thanks for all suggestions so far. The context for this is a projected
paper/article (just in the planning/abstract stage at the moment) looking at
various composers explicitly engaging with Maoist ideas in their work,
primarily Cornelius Cardew. But I'm interested in anything on the reception
Also, this book has been very severely criticised by many highly
knowledgeable scholars of modern China (lots on this can be found via a bit
of Googling).
Nonetheless, I have little more time for Mao than I have for figures of the
far right.
Solidarity,
Ian
From: Pat Costello pt_coste...@yahoo.com
As for my accidental remarks about Marxmale, I am very willing to be
convinced that i am wrong. I would really like to see a place where men
AND WOMEN can discuss marxist politics on the internet.
In light of the other comments, would you not be
From: Pat Costello pt_coste...@yahoo.com
I would have thought that indignation over the rape of a child would not
be debatable. Racist attacks, rape, police brutalitythese are merely
academic discussion for many on this list.
Total and utter bullshit. Just that some (I would hope most,
I don't care if you call be a breast-beating liberal, though I dislike
liberalism as much as anyone. But, more to the point:
You know Ian, take your breast-beating liberalism somewhere else, because
all you are doing is equivocating over the language of the law. Did the
court find that he
From: Pat Costello pt_coste...@yahoo.com
I am stunned that someone on this list would defend the rape of a child
(or any woman) simply because the rapist is an elite movie director who
has suffered some tragic events.
I don't know who is doing that.
Solidarity,
Ian
From: Donal Ó Cófaigh dona...@hotmail.com
I would also be interested in any works which open up the art to
criticisms of eurocentricism.
I forgot to answer this - the literature here is quite vast, but again
mostly written from a liberal perspective. Amongst the best earlier writings
you
I'm very glad the suspensions have been lifted. On the wider issues, I can't
really see how a Marxism discussion group could feasibly avoid all
discussion of the Soviet Union, but do understand that measures need to be
taken to avoid Trotskyist/Stalinist flame wars. Could there be some
From: Jeff meis...@xs4all.nl
When hearing this I cannot help but remembering the (almost surely)
widespread use of rape (apparently organized as a systematic policy) in
the
Bosnian war of the early 90's, when some Marxists (i.e. Stalinists)
found
themselves (for reasons I still cannot
17 matches
Mail list logo