On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Richard Dale
richard.d...@telefonica.net wrote:
I personally think that the Nepomuk non-application specific integrated data
approach could be a killer feature of MeeGo. In comparison iOS is completely
Agreed. Luckily tracker will still be there on the
This is actually quite good in my view, we have a proven working in
the wild implementation in official , while all other components are
still there to experiment with or showcase when they become mature
enough.
-Sivan
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 12:19 +0200, Sivan Greenberg wrote:
This is actually quite good in my view, we have a proven working in
the wild implementation in official , while all other components are
still there to experiment with or showcase when they become mature
enough.
This is certainly a
On Friday, March 25, 2011 09:11:48 AM Ville M. Vainio wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Richard Dale
richard.d...@telefonica.net wrote:
I personally think that the Nepomuk non-application specific integrated
data approach could be a killer feature of MeeGo. In comparison iOS is
On Friday, March 25, 2011 09:11:48 AM Ville M. Vainio wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Richard Dale
richard.d...@telefonica.net wrote:
I personally think that the Nepomuk non-application specific integrated
data approach could be a killer feature of MeeGo. In comparison iOS is
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Richard Dale
richard.d...@telefonica.net wrote:
On Monday, March 07, 2011 10:06:08 PM Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Are you planning to support or implement a QSparql backend for EDS?
I suspect we'll never see QSparql in MeeGo the way things are going
On Friday, March 25, 2011 03:01:43 PM Ville M. Vainio wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Richard Dale
richard.d...@telefonica.net wrote:
On Monday, March 07, 2011 10:06:08 PM Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Are you planning to support or implement a QSparql backend for EDS?
I suspect
On 3/25/2011 8:24 AM, Richard Dale wrote:
On Friday, March 25, 2011 03:01:43 PM Ville M. Vainio wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Richard Dale
richard.d...@telefonica.net wrote:
On Monday, March 07, 2011 10:06:08 PM Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Are you planning to support or implement a
Hi Arjen,
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 17:30, Arjan van de Ven ar...@linux.intel.com wrote:
I wouldn't have thought there was, but obviously the statement above from
Arjan van de Ven concerned me.
my concern is based on the (lack of) progress around QSparql in MeeGo. I'm
sure it's all great in
On 25/03/11 09:11, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Richard Dale
richard.d...@telefonica.net wrote:
I personally think that the Nepomuk non-application specific integrated data
approach could be a killer feature of MeeGo. In comparison iOS is completely
Agreed.
2011/3/23 zoltan@nokia.com:
Since lot of time was anyway lost on the subject, and it's an important
subject, perhaps it would make sense to consecrate a wiki page to it,
including the main use cases to be solved, the solutions proposed, the test
data sets involved, test cases used for
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Dave Neary dne...@maemo.org wrote:
Hi,
A quick note on meritocracies.
Andrew Flegg wrote:
According to Imad Sousou at the last TSG meeting[1], the MeeGo
Technical Steering Group consists of two seats:
* Intel (Imad Sousou)
* Nokia (currently vacant
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Carsten Munk cars...@maemo.org wrote:
2011/3/23 zoltan@nokia.com:
Since lot of time was anyway lost on the subject, and it's an important
subject, perhaps it would make sense to consecrate a wiki page to it,
including the main use cases to be solved, the
Hi Carsten,
From: carsten.m...@gmail.com [mailto:carsten.m...@gmail.com
Sent: 24 March, 2011 09:08
Please also remember that if there is supposed to be a technology
selection, your dispute document also has to list people/companies
publically committed to the task of
On Thursday, March 24, 2011 06:20:52 PM zoltan@nokia.com wrote:
Hi Carsten,
From: carsten.m...@gmail.com [mailto:carsten.m...@gmail.com
Sent: 24 March, 2011 09:08
Please also remember that if there is supposed to be a technology
selection, your dispute document also has to list
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 08:23, zoltan@nokia.com wrote:
It looks like it was an internal Intel decision (or at least without Nokia). I
can't blame you on that, but if the governance model changed in the
background, would you state that on meego.com, just to avoid fights coming
from false
On Wednesday, 23 de March de 2011 08:41:35 Andrew Flegg wrote:
Imad also indicated that the TSG would grow - presumably in response
to Nokia's board's decision[3]. However, it would be sensible to
The growing of the TSG is to give room for others making investments and
shipping (or going to
From: Andrew Flegg [mailto:afl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 23 March, 2011 10:42
[1] http://trac.tspre.org/meetbot/meego-meeting/2011/meego-
meeting.2011-03-18-14.58.html
[2] http://trac.tspre.org/meetbot/meego-meeting/2011/meego-
meeting.2011-03-18-14.58.log.html#l-116
- from 15:32 onwards
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 09:20, zoltan@nokia.com wrote:
The latent hostility coming through from some !@nokia.com addresses is
unbecoming. ^
Hostility? No, mostly confusion and question marks.
Sorry for the confusion, please see the !. I was trying to
Hi,
A quick note on meritocracies.
Andrew Flegg wrote:
According to Imad Sousou at the last TSG meeting[1], the MeeGo
Technical Steering Group consists of two seats:
* Intel (Imad Sousou)
* Nokia (currently vacant after Valtteri Halla left Nokia)
Companies typically don't have
Am Mittwoch, den 23.03.2011, 08:41 + schrieb Andrew Flegg:
However, it would be sensible to
remember that this is a decision that Nokia's *board* took; not the
employees of Nokia who were - and are - participating in MeeGo. The
latent hostility coming through from some !@nokia.com
On Wed Mar 23 2011 05:36:42 PM EET, Mathias Hasselmann math...@openismus.com
wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 23.03.2011, 08:41 + schrieb Andrew Flegg:
However, it would be sensible to
remember that this is a decision that Nokia's *board* took; not the
employees of Nokia who were - and are -
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Carsten Munk cars...@maemo.org wrote:
Guys,
I think this discussion and (passive?) agressiveness has gone on for too
long. I would propose that if you have a problem with decisions made, present
a dispute to the TSG stating your exact objections, potential
From: Carsten Munk
Sent: 23 March, 2011 18:09
I think this discussion and (passive?) agressiveness has gone on for
too long. I would propose that if you have a problem with decisions
made, present a dispute to the TSG stating your exact objections,
potential solutions to the issue and let it
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 11:53 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
A quick note on meritocracies.
Andrew Flegg wrote:
According to Imad Sousou at the last TSG meeting[1], the MeeGo
Technical Steering Group consists of two seats:
* Intel (Imad Sousou)
* Nokia (currently vacant after
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Robin Burchell virot...@viroteck.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Sivan Greenberg si...@omniqueue.com wrote:
I'd also like to add that regardless of way the new architectural
decisions were made, he's communication of the decision was excellent
I
26 matches
Mail list logo
