Re: Questions about memcached in general and failover

2012-10-22 Thread SAE
First of all I want to thank all of you for your replys and I want to apologize, that I didn't replied earlier, but part of last week I was ill. However, I may have not put enough emphasis on my real problem. Some users losing their sessions is one thing that isn't that pretty, but not the end

Re: Questions about memcached in general and failover

2012-10-22 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:09 AM, SAE simsimil...@googlemail.com wrote: But as explained above. If one of the memcached servers goes down. Some users experience the problem, that they not only get logged out but also have problems browsing the site at all or logging back in. Every page needs

Re: Questions about memcached in general and failover

2012-10-22 Thread Roberto Spadim
a point... a query like select * from session_table where session_id='x' where session_id is a primary key is very very fast, we are talking about 0.1 seconds, with memcached you are trying to go down to 0.01 seconds why should you care about speed in internet if the time to consider a page

Re: Questions about memcached in general and failover

2012-10-19 Thread Roberto Spadim
thereĀ“s another solution, but i don't remember the name, redis could do the job (i think) 2012/10/16 Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Kiran Kumar krn1...@gmail.com wrote: Memcache doesn't automatically comes with Replication facility (High Avialibility)

Questions about memcached in general and failover

2012-10-16 Thread SAE
Hello, We recently implemented memcached to keep our database from crashing because of too many connections to it. Now we have two memcached servers which handle the DB-access and as long as both servers are online we encounter no problems. However when one of the goes down. Half our users

Re: Questions about memcached in general and failover

2012-10-16 Thread Marco Oliverio
2012/10/16 SAE simsimil...@googlemail.com Hello, Hi We recently implemented memcached to keep our database from crashing because of too many connections to it. Now we have two memcached servers which handle the DB-access and as long as both servers are online we encounter no problems.

Re: Questions about memcached in general and failover

2012-10-16 Thread Kiran Kumar
garulf , Memcache doesn't automatically comes with Replication facility (High Avialibility) , i recomend you to use Repcache Patch on top of your existing mecached for obtaining Replication of data within your servers . The only issue i see is that Repcached only works / Successfully

Re: Questions about memcached in general and failover

2012-10-16 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Kiran Kumar krn1...@gmail.com wrote: Memcache doesn't automatically comes with Replication facility (High Avialibility) , i recomend you to use Repcache Patch on top of your existing mecached for obtaining Replication of data within your servers . The only

Re: Questions about memcached in general and failover

2012-10-16 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: If you are going to be stuck with this restriction - and have to build your own fail-over, is there any advantage to using memcache compared to redis with its much larger feature set? I agree. If you need durability