Re: [MBZ] ADDED Automatic Transmission issue 1983 300D 195K. Shifts in Reverse but issue with Forward. Help!!!

2013-08-11 Thread OK Don
I'd look for an indie Mercedes shop first, there's a better chance that they have done a B2 replacement than a generic tranny shop. If you can find a tranny shop that specializes in MB and BMW, then that's even better (we had one in Norman, OK). On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Robert Koziak wro

Re: [MBZ] ADDED Automatic Transmission issue 1983 300D 195K. Shifts in Reverse but issue with Forward. Help!!!

2013-08-11 Thread Allan Streib
There's a good chance mine isn't right. The PO had obviously worked on the vacuum plumbing because it's all connected with plastic "tee" fittings not the proper rubber "wye" fittings. Anyone have a diagram of how the lines are supposed to connect? Allan "Kaleb C. Striplin" writes: > Should be

Re: [MBZ] ADDED Automatic Transmission issue 1983 300D 195K. Shifts in Reverse but issue with Forward. Help!!!

2013-08-11 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
Should be hooked to the vacuum valve on the IP. On 8/11/2013 5:03 PM, Allan Streib wrote: Allan Streib writes: The vacuum hose connects to a switch valve at the top of the engine valve cover. The valve is tied into the throttle linkage and has a bunch of vacuum lines connected to it. The li

Re: [MBZ] ADDED Automatic Transmission issue 1983 300D 195K. Shifts in Reverse but issue with Forward. Help!!!

2013-08-11 Thread Allan Streib
Allan Streib writes: > The vacuum hose connects to a switch valve at the top of the engine > valve cover. The valve is tied into the throttle linkage and has a > bunch of vacuum lines connected to it. The line to the transmission > runs down and behind the engine. Actually I'm wrong about that

Re: [MBZ] ADDED Automatic Transmission issue 1983 300D 195K. Shifts in Reverse but issue with Forward. Help!!!

2013-08-11 Thread Robert Koziak
Subject: Re: [MBZ] ADDED Automatic Transmission issue 1983 300D 195K. Shifts in Reverse but issue with Forward. Help!!! Mitch Haley writes: > I think your trans gets its throttle signal from a Bowden cable, and the hose > they are talking about is probably to the modulator. Vac loss

Re: [MBZ] ADDED Automatic Transmission issue 1983 300D 195K. Shifts in Reverse but issue with Forward. Help!!!

2013-08-11 Thread Allan Streib
Mitch Haley writes: > I think your trans gets its throttle signal from a Bowden cable, and the hose > they are talking about is probably to the modulator. Vac loss to the > modulator > would give maximum shift firmness. I don't know if that would give it any > more > drive in the gears that

Re: [MBZ] ADDED Automatic Transmission issue 1983 300D 195K. Shifts in Reverse but issue with Forward. Help!!!

2013-08-11 Thread Allan Streib
> Not to my thinking, but I've never done it. > If the shift RPM is controlled by a vacuum signal, wouldn't a total loss of > vacuum give you upshifts at maximum RPM when you want minimum RPM? On the diesel I thought that the vacuum signal mainly affected the "firmness" of the shift not the shif

Re: [MBZ] ADDED Automatic Transmission issue 1983 300D 195K. Shifts in Reverse but issue with Forward. Help!!!

2013-08-11 Thread Allan Streib
When mine failed I found it very difficult to drive, but possible. I'd suggest taking it on a short drive around the neighborhood, assuming you're in a low-traffic area, to see if you feel like it's practical/safe to attempt driving to the shop. The vacuum hose connects to a switch valve at the t

Re: [MBZ] ADDED Automatic Transmission issue 1983 300D 195K. Shifts in Reverse but issue with Forward. Help!!!

2013-08-11 Thread Mitch Haley
Mitch Haley wrote: Not to my thinking, but I've never done it. If the shift RPM is controlled by a vacuum signal, wouldn't a total loss of vacuum give you upshifts at maximum RPM when you want minimum RPM? I think your trans gets its throttle signal from a Bowden cable, and the hose they are

Re: [MBZ] ADDED Automatic Transmission issue 1983 300D 195K. Shifts in Reverse but issue with Forward. Help!!!

2013-08-11 Thread Mitch Haley
Robert Koziak wrote: Hi, Researching the web suggested the car can be driven, without causing any further damage, if it's the B2 Servo. This because the B2 only affects the car getting into 1st & 2nd gear, 3rd, 4th and reverse are fine. The trick is getting the transmission into 3rd or

Re: [MBZ] ADDED Automatic Transmission issue 1983 300D 195K. Shifts in Reverse but issue with Forward. Help!!!

2013-08-11 Thread Robert Koziak
Hi, Researching the web suggested the car can be driven, without causing any further damage, if it's the B2 Servo. This because the B2 only affects the car getting into 1st & 2nd gear, 3rd, 4th and reverse are fine. The trick is getting the transmission into 3rd or 4th, one suggestion w