jeff wrote:
Sean Knox wrote:
The only people who can help is your ISP. Talk to them and hopefully
they can trace the attack upstream.
I once added this to pf.conf to mitigate a DDoS. It appeared to have
worked, but it may have been a placebo effect ;)
set optimization aggressive
set ti
thank you Matt and jeff ,you are right.
now
# tcpdump tcp port www #
14:15:07.899030 167.189.45.0.15724 > XXX.XXX.X.XXX.www: S
1731350873:1731350873(0) win 16384
14:15:07.899132 23.138.127.48.17439 > XXX.XXX.X.XXX.www: S
1731350793:1731350793(0)
Sean Knox wrote:
The only people who can help is your ISP. Talk to them and hopefully
they can trace the attack upstream.
I once added this to pf.conf to mitigate a DDoS. It appeared to have
worked, but it may have been a placebo effect ;)
set optimization aggressive
set timeout tcp.first
The only people who can help is your ISP. Talk to them and hopefully
they can trace the attack upstream.
sk
# tcpdump tcp port www #
12:23:56.149316 44.199.41.224.57807 > XXX.XXX.X.XXX.www: S
1731400694:1731400694(0) win
16384
12:23:56.149422 189.51.106.160.64931 > XXX.XXX.X.XXX.www: S
1731400698:1731400698(0) win
16384
12:23:56.149541 193.133.170.
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Marcelo de Souza wrote:
> Or, what would be a good method for tests regarding this subject?
install openbsd. put machine on network. does it work?
--
And that's why Fischer would have beaten Kasparov.
On 7/28/05, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Have anyone bought any servers from a Tier-1 (ibm, hp, dell[1]) recently
> > that is opteron based, that works fine with openbsd?
>
> The IBM's I bought are all 325's, I will have a 326 shortly.
Can't find any, their website states that 325'
Send data to :[EMAIL PROTECTED], PLEASE!
And about performance reason?
Thanks once more.
On 7/28/05, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Shawn K. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-28 14:58]:
> > > On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 17:36 -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> > > > Why do you say that? performance and security implications
> >
Once again I'm reminded why I rarely participate in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Perhaps
someone will find this first part of this thread useful, but beyond
that I'm calling it quits.
Marti
On 7/28/05, Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:56:28 -0700 Marti Martinez
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Shawn K. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-28 14:58]:
> > On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 17:36 -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> > > Why do you say that? performance and security implications
> >
> > amd64 supports W^X in hardware, i386 doesn't.
> >
>
> Bingo. You got it.
This is hogwash. Our
* Shawn K. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-28 14:58]:
> On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 17:36 -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> > Why do you say that? performance and security implications
>
> amd64 supports W^X in hardware, i386 doesn't.
>
Bingo. You got it.
-Bob
> Have anyone bought any servers from a Tier-1 (ibm, hp, dell[1]) recently
> that is opteron based, that works fine with openbsd?
The IBM's I bought are all 325's, I will have a 326 shortly.
>
> Additionally, any success with hardware raid? I realize you can use
> non-onboard PCI cards, b
> Btw. FreeBSD is doing bind so fast because they have random ephemeral
> ports disabled by default.
Translation for those who don't get that: They sacrifice security for
performance by default, making many tcp attacks easier. They then have
a knob to turn on better security.
-Bo
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:38:31 -0600 Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are running production web servers on OpenBSD running on IBM
> 325E's as well as Sun V20Z's, running OpenBSD. We've had decent luck
> with both the i386 and amd64 distro on those. I have used a demo HP
> with good s
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 02:03:49PM -0400, Jason Crawford wrote:
>>There is a note somewhere on the OpenBSD website about installing on
>>machines with little ram. Basically, you need to drop to a shell,
>>manually enable swap, then go back to the installation p
Hi,
I've been following the discussion about opteron servers, and when I am
finally allowed to go get a few servers, I find that HP and IBM have both
changed their servers. IBM's eserver 325 is now 326, and HP's DL145 G1 is
now the G2.
Have anyone bought any servers from a Tier-1 (ibm, hp, dell[1
use tethereal(1) :D
"I am not your puppet. Since when? Now get your spongy ping ass out there
and dance for the cameras" -Nora in (Death to Smoochy)
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:55:43 +0400
From: Mike Belopuhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Michael Favinsky
On 2005-07-28 13:21:06 -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> BTW, my one bitch about the v20z is sun are a bunch of retards
> and put all the vents on the top and bottom, so I'm reluctant to rack
> them one on top of the other.
The only thing from Sun on the v20z is the label (and an os
which you won't u
--On 28 July 2005 20:53 +0200, Ulrich Kahl wrote:
Stuart Henderson schrieb:
Oh, I have one of those. Unless it's a late revision, using the
on-board cache only the first 128mb RAM is cacheable (K6-III helps
on this motherboard due to the on-chip cache). And don't forget, if
your filesystems a
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 15:26 -0700, Michael Favinsky wrote:
> Has anyone tried a tcpdump | more ? Or a tcpdump | grep?
>
> When I try to pipe tcpdump output to either more or grep I don't get any
> network data output. Anyone have any explanation for this behavior?
>
use stdout line buffered mod
That did it. RTFM :)
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 3:47 PM
To: Michael Favinsky; misc
Subject: Re: tcpdump | more doesn't produce output
--On 28 July 2005 15:26 -0700, Michael Favinsky wrote:
> Has anyone trie
--On 28 July 2005 15:26 -0700, Michael Favinsky wrote:
Has anyone tried a tcpdump | more ? Or a tcpdump | grep?
It sounds like you want to make the output line-buffered, see
tcpdump(8).
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 03:26:23PM -0700, Michael Favinsky wrote:
> Has anyone tried a tcpdump | more ? Or a tcpdump | grep?
>
> When I try to pipe tcpdump output to either more or grep I don't get any
> network data output. Anyone have any explanation for this behavior?
tcpdump -l. see the man p
Has anyone tried a tcpdump | more ? Or a tcpdump | grep?
When I try to pipe tcpdump output to either more or grep I don't get any
network data output. Anyone have any explanation for this behavior?
This issue's on OpenBSD 3.6. Here's a dmesg from the host in case it helps.
OpenBSD 3.6 (GENERIC)
Thank you for contacting us. As per your request, you will receive no
further newsletters from Zeus Technology.
If you have received this message in error, or would like to continue to
receive newsletters from Zeus, please reply to this email.
Zeus receives resounding endorsements for innova
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:23:16PM -0500, Ober Heim wrote:
> http://www.linbsd.org/bench says it all to me :D
>
Please no, Fefes benchmark does not measure network performance.
The only network related benchmark in that suite is the bind test and this
one has nothing todo with network performance
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:54:21PM -0400, G Douglas Davidson wrote:
> I'm having an issue announcing a "NO_EXPORT" network to our upstream
> and I'd like a way to prove that I am in fact sending the network in
> question (if in fact I am). It seems the "log updates" does not apply
> to sent upd
Am Donnerstag, 28. Juli 2005 23:43 schrieben Sie:
Hi Art,
> > I was just wondering why amdpm isnt included in GENERIC. Are there any
> > issues one should be aware of? Or is it just that noone uses it at all?
>
> Why should it be?
You might have guessed this, but for people with appropriate hard
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:56:28 -0700 Marti Martinez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Like I said, I'm willing to believe that GENERIC works. But your "1)
> Install OpenBSD" suggestion is unrealistic. I'm installed OpenBSD
> hundreds of times, and am reasonably good at it. This is, however, the
> first t
Stephan Tesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> I was just wondering why amdpm isnt included in GENERIC. Are there any issues
> one should be aware of? Or is it just that noone uses it at all?
Why should it be?
//art
Please find below a copy of this month's Zeus newsletter. I hope you find
it informative, and if you have any questions, please feel free to email
me back.
It's been a busy month for us here at Zeus. We've announced the launch of
a new range of ZXTM appliances (more detail below), and on top of
> suggested /etc/skel/ modifications
The reason I proposed a umask of 077 is that I discovered just a few
files scattered through my directories with owner:group of root:daf (I'm daf,
the only user of this system). All the other files in my directories are
daf:daf,
and I cannot imagine any scena
Quoting Moritz Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>shell server. Who says that the admin is any more trustworthy than some
> >>other, regular users?
> >
> > They are not, but most of the time they give you confidential information
> > that you must use on that box that you use for stuff other users may
http://www.linbsd.org/bench says it all to me :D
"I am not your puppet. Since when? Now get your spongy ping ass out there
and dance for the cameras" -Nora in (Death to Smoochy)
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Marcelo de Souza wrote:
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:44:45 -0300
From: Marcelo de Souza <[EMAIL
On Thursday 28 July 2005 16:44, Marcelo de Souza wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Can anybody point me any technical documentation that compares
> OpenBSD vs FreeBSD in terms of network performance?
>
> Or, what would be a good method for tests regarding this subject?
> And what about the appropriate t
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 17:36 -0300, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Why do you say that? performance and security implications
amd64 supports W^X in hardware, i386 doesn't.
--
Shawn K. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Like I said, I'm willing to believe that GENERIC works. But your "1)
Install OpenBSD" suggestion is unrealistic. I'm installed OpenBSD
hundreds of times, and am reasonably good at it. This is, however, the
first time I've done an install on a serial only system, and my post
was not a complaint abou
There is not likely to be an up-to-date set of *reliable* performance tests
that you can just look at on the web. The best thing you can do is make your
own based on the criteria that you are trying to compare them on, then
install FreeBSD and OpenBSD and see what works better for your specific
I'm having an issue announcing a "NO_EXPORT" network to our upstream
and I'd like a way to prove that I am in fact sending the network in
question (if in fact I am). It seems the "log updates" does not apply
to sent updates, just received.
Any suggestions appreciated.
--
G. Douglas Davidson
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:20:30 -0700 Marti Martinez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The most obvious problem I had was that /dev/com0 either didn't exist
> or didn't work properly, so I'd lose serial access once the kernel
> booted. with the new config, /dev/com0 worked, so it was trivial to
> get the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ever heart of a multiuser system where one user shouldn't be able to
acces the files of another user? Not all users are thinking about this
issue and many forget to change the modes for confidential files. IMO,
But keeping confidential files on "true" multiuser systems
Hi there,
Can anybody point me any technical documentation that compares
OpenBSD vs FreeBSD in terms of network performance?
Or, what would be a good method for tests regarding this subject?
And what about the appropriate tools?
Thank you in advance.
--
Marcelo de Souza
Sorry for my questions, but:
On 7/28/05, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-27 19:52]:
> > I run heaps off Dell PowerEdge 1550, 1650, 1750 and 1850 without issues.
>
>FWIW I also run a pile of dell 650, 750, 1650, 1750 machines
> with good
The most obvious problem I had was that /dev/com0 either didn't exist
or didn't work properly, so I'd lose serial access once the kernel
booted. with the new config, /dev/com0 worked, so it was trivial to
get the serial access working throughout the entire boot to login
process. I had other problem
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 11:56:03 -0700 Marti Martinez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, in that case, no one has posted easily accessible information on
> how to make GENERIC work with Soekris. I spent a few hours searching
> the web, the archives, etc and doing several reinstalls. In the end,
> recomp
Is there a way to get the system to report the auth mechanism (skey)
used when there is a failed login?
--
Will Backman - Network Administrator
Coastal Enterprises, Inc.
http://www.ceimaine.org
> At work I don't really have a choice -- we can either buy Sun or
> Dell, or spend weeks justifying not using the approved vendors.
>
Then my reccomendation under your supported hardware agreement
is exactly what I use:
sun V20Z server
Dell Perc4/DC raid card
Timothy Donahue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is fairly easy to customize since the adduser command is just a
> perl script. (Hint: I believe that line 1143 in 3.7 might be a good
> place to start looking.)
I know, just wanted to say that changing it is not stupid. ;)
Moritz Grimm <[EMA
i remember i had read somewhere that it will run well on 16MB ram as
long as i don't use X applications. i'll run memtest86+ too and see
what comes of it.
sharad birmiwal
On 7/29/05, Hannah Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 02:03:49PM -0400, Jason Crawford
Edd Barrett schrieb:
The raid will use 3 or 4 identical harddrives.
Is that mirrored? If so, heres a gotcha:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=raidctl&sektion=8
"Note as well that RAID 1 sets are currently limited to only
2 components. At present, n-way mirroring is not possible.
the following lines are what I added to the NET4801 config file that I
found on the web:
option SYSVMSG # System V-like message queues
option SYSVSEM # System V-like semaphores
option SYSVSHM # System V-like memory sharing
These were in an archiv
i'll try getting more ram although i'm not sure i'll find edoram that
easily here. i know i have 32MB more ram somewhere in my closet, will
add that too.
thanks
sharad birmiwal
On 7/28/05, Hannah Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 11:17:59PM +0530, Sharad B
Kevin wrote:
>On 7/28/05, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> I don't have an 1850 because by the time they came out,
>>Dell didn't have an amd64 based server, and Sun and IBM did, so we
>>switched. Prior to that I bought lots of dell stuff and had good
>>experiences with them. (sti
OK, in that case, no one has posted easily accessible information on
how to make GENERIC work with Soekris. I spent a few hours searching
the web, the archives, etc and doing several reinstalls. In the end,
recompiling with the NET4801 config gave me a no-problems install, and
tweaking a few lines
Stuart Henderson schrieb:
--On 27 July 2005 15:13 +0200, Ulrich Kahl wrote:
I plan to set up a fileserver using RAIDframe - I can't afford a
hardware RAID-controller like Megaraid i4 (around EURO 280,--) and
used ones are impossible to get, so I will use the software version.
As long as you'
On 7/28/05, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I don't have an 1850 because by the time they came out,
> Dell didn't have an amd64 based server, and Sun and IBM did, so we
> switched. Prior to that I bought lots of dell stuff and had good
> experiences with them. (still do with their disk
Hello!
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 02:03:49PM -0400, Jason Crawford wrote:
>There is a note somewhere on the OpenBSD website about installing on
>machines with little ram. Basically, you need to drop to a shell,
>manually enable swap, then go back to the installation process you
>were at, and then hav
Quoting Hannah Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:50:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Quoting Moritz Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >> > Ever heart of a multiuser system where one user shouldn't be able to
> >> > acces the files of another user? Not all u
On 7/28/05, Sharad Birmiwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all
> i'm new to OpenBSD. i've worked on linux but wanted to try OpenBSD for
> a test firewall and file server that i have to build.
> i'm using a Pentium-1 (133 Mhz) box with 16 MB ram. i downloaded the
> iso file and all the packages for
* Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-27 19:52]:
> I run heaps off Dell PowerEdge 1550, 1650, 1750 and 1850 without issues.
FWIW I also run a pile of dell 650, 750, 1650, 1750 machines
with good success. I use the ami builtin for raid on the 1650 and 1750
with good success running
Hello!
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 11:17:59PM +0530, Sharad Birmiwal wrote:
>hi all
>i'm new to OpenBSD. i've worked on linux but wanted to try OpenBSD for
>a test firewall and file server that i have to build.
>i'm using a Pentium-1 (133 Mhz) box with 16 MB ram. i downloaded the
>iso file and all the
--On 28 July 2005 23:17 +0530, Sharad Birmiwal wrote:
could it be a problem with the ram or hdd?
Most likely ram. Try memtest86+. Reseating the memory modules may
possibly help.
We are running production web servers on OpenBSD running on IBM
325E's as well as Sun V20Z's, running OpenBSD. We've had decent luck
with both the i386 and amd64 distro on those. I have used a demo HP
with good success too, but don't have one in production anywhere.
I'm not using
hi all
i'm new to OpenBSD. i've worked on linux but wanted to try OpenBSD for
a test firewall and file server that i have to build.
i'm using a Pentium-1 (133 Mhz) box with 16 MB ram. i downloaded the
iso file and all the packages for version 3.7.
during installation, in the last step when it creat
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 08:30:59AM -0700, Marti Martinez wrote:
:In this vein, no one has put a Soekris 4801 kernel config file out
:there that works with httpd, so wihtout further ado,
Yes they have. Its called GENERIC.
Hello!
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 06:50:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Quoting Moritz Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > Ever heart of a multiuser system where one user shouldn't be able to
>> > acces the files of another user? Not all users are thinking about this
>> > issue and many forget to
On 7/27/05, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If nothing else, dmesg tells us if someone is running a Theo-built
> kernel, a home-built GENERIC (which we have to take with a big grain of
> salt until we commit those changes that prevent even root from editing
> /usr/src/sys/arch/*/conf/G
On Thursday 28 July 2005 12:37 pm, Dave Feustel wrote:
> On Thursday 28 July 2005 11:24 am, Moritz Grimm wrote:
> > Dave Feustel wrote:
> > >>And
[snip]
> > of this anecdote: A pal once had to deal with a probably-owned OpenBSD
> > box, because his clueless co-admin installed an outdated, vulnerabl
Quoting Moritz Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Ever heart of a multiuser system where one user shouldn't be able to
> > acces the files of another user? Not all users are thinking about this
> > issue and many forget to change the modes for confidential files. IMO,
>
> But keeping confidential
I never received any responses on this so I thought I'd rephrase the
question before I spend more time on this...
Does nmap work for anyone when scanning hosts on the Internet using
3.7's kernel pppoe?
Thanks,
Danny
Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
> Anyone else experiencing issues when scanning a hos
On 7/28/05, Jason Opperisano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:22:56PM +0200, Johan P. Lindstrvm wrote:
> > Just finished installing OpenBSD 3.7 from CD onto VM Ware Workstation
> > 5 build 13124 with Windows XP sp2 as host OS.
> >
> > As Client OS I chose FreeBSD, VM Ware too
On Thursday 28 July 2005 11:24 am, Moritz Grimm wrote:
> Dave Feustel wrote:
> >>And
> >>there are also still numerous ways of breaking OpenBSD inspite of sane
> >>defaults and exploit mitigation techniques in place.
> >
> > Is there any way I can tell whether my system has been broken as you
>
Dave Feustel wrote:
And
there are also still numerous ways of breaking OpenBSD inspite of sane
defaults and exploit mitigation techniques in place.
Is there any way I can tell whether my system has been broken as you describe?
This really depends ... I can't tell specifics. I mentioned this
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:22:56PM +0200, Johan P. Lindstrvm wrote:
> Just finished installing OpenBSD 3.7 from CD onto VM Ware Workstation
> 5 build 13124 with Windows XP sp2 as host OS.
>
> As Client OS I chose FreeBSD, VM Ware tools not installed, virtual
> terminals CTRL+ALT+Fn does not work s
Yes, but I was asking if it was an OpenBSD packaging
problem. It's not about startup, it's about file
locations, which is specific to this _OpenBSD_
package. Reread the original email. The whole thing.
--- eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 10:54:36 -0700, stupidmail4me
> pro
Hi guys,
I was just wondering why amdpm isnt included in GENERIC. Are there any issues
one should be aware of? Or is it just that noone uses it at all?
Thanks,
Stephan
On Thursday 28 July 2005 10:09 am, Moritz Grimm wrote:
> And
> there are also still numerous ways of breaking OpenBSD inspite of sane
> defaults and exploit mitigation techniques in place.
Is there any way I can tell whether my system has been broken as you describe?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
> Especially if you are slapping dual or quad port cards in there, the
> faster PCI will be a big help.
Can you advice me a 4 eth pciX card compatible with openbsd
Thanks
Matteo
iD8DBQFC0hAB/TjXD9LUVswRArFuAJ9mn7hHvAZKuW6o7yhZ+VJCVLLnaACfRHXq
u
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 06:54:28AM +0200, Matteo Mancini wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi *,
>
> I've to build an high performance openbsd firewall with ids included.
> I think to use the server in subject, does any one have tried it??
For a price that is in the sa
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
This kind of paranoia adds nothing to security (~/.ssh and others that
need it are already set to restrictive permissions), and there is no
privacy from root no matter what. The rest is, again, personal
preference and/or something about local policies.
Ever heart of
The best way to get the answer is to state a contrary fact, rather than to
ask for advice here. :D
I would have said "OpenBSD console switching in VMWARE kicks butt!" and
waited for those with real information to counter you, then show their
cards :D
"I am not your puppet. Since when? Now get you
On Jul 11, 2005, at 12:54 AM, Matteo Mancini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi *,
I've to build an high performance openbsd firewall with ids included.
I think to use the server in subject, does any one have tried it??
Avoid the SATA, go with SCSI. Works great.
--
Jas
For what it's worth, in my efforts of finding and acquiring sk(4)
based network adapters I have found that the D-LINK DGE-530T cards are
still att first revision as of today's date and the tech support team
(.se) knows of no plans to change chipsets.
-- JPL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi *,
I've to build an high performance openbsd firewall with ids included.
I think to use the server in subject, does any one have tried it??
Thanks
matteo
iD8DBQFC0ft3/TjXD9LUVswRAhZ9AJ0dlMdDutnM+OodDWOl35TCZ/+M3QCgr9g4
OlQ9j7F3pCELrU4GuLHHorM=
=H
On Thursday 28 July 2005 08:00 am, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Moritz Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This kind of paranoia adds nothing to security (~/.ssh and others that
> > need it are already set to restrictive permissions), and there is no
> > privacy from root no matter what. The rest i
Hi
Hifn has a new crypto card out since may, HIPP 7855 HXL, does anyone
know if this is supported?
Regards,
Fredrik Widlund
http://www.hifn.com/products/HIPP7855HXLboard.html
Hi,
Is there horde "sork" module in OpenBSD ports ?
I find out imp, turba, kronolith, nag... but no sork
Thanks
On 7/27/05, Johan P. Lindstrvm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just finished installing OpenBSD 3.7 from CD onto VM Ware Workstation
> 5 build 13124 with Windows XP sp2 as host OS.
--- cut ---
Look how interesting this got, now in this thread we have a way to
dodge the virtual terminal issue and bet
Matthew Bettinger wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Can anyone recommend a decent rack server from HP, Dell, IBM or CDW
>that will run OpenBSD for webserver use? I would prefer a machine
>that has SCSI drives with Mirror Raid capabilities. I know I can go
>piecemeal one from FRY's but I need one that can have a
Moritz Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This kind of paranoia adds nothing to security (~/.ssh and others that
> need it are already set to restrictive permissions), and there is no
> privacy from root no matter what. The rest is, again, personal
> preference and/or something about local polic
Mh, I just deleted some text I wrote to 1) and 2), because most if it
was already said. It boils down to "personal/administrational preference
and/or policy", "the current defaults are just fine and logical" and
"trivial to change".
Dave Feustel wrote:
Also modify adduser so that the home dir
>My solution was: unplug that shit and buy a cheap and supported (REAL)
>compatible sb.
Doh !
Screwed over again. Good answer though, time to hit the shop.
Thanks.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 09:36:29AM +0200, Juan J. Martmnez wrote:
> Woh! I think you're another unhappy user of a SB Live! *5.1* (from
> DELL). Welcome to the club.
Absolutely ages ago I found http://www.opensound.com/ and was able to use
one of their drivers under OpenBSD 2.x.
They're still goin
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 06:11:52PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
| On Wednesday 27 July 2005 04:23 pm, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 12:13:01PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
| > | 1) add the line
| > | umask 077
| > | to .profile
| >
| > This breaks certain ports (as I found out the ha
El jue, 28-07-2005 a las 09:15 +0200, tony sarendal escribis:
> emu0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Creative Labs SoundBlaster Live" rev 0x00: irq
> 10
> ac97: codec id 0x83847608 (SigmaTel STAC9708/11)
> ac97: codec features 18 bit DAC, 18 bit ADC, SigmaTel 3D
> audio0 at emu0
>
> I can't get any sig
emu0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Creative Labs SoundBlaster Live" rev 0x00: irq 10
ac97: codec id 0x83847608 (SigmaTel STAC9708/11)
ac97: codec features 18 bit DAC, 18 bit ADC, SigmaTel 3D
audio0 at emu0
I can't get any sign of life at all from this one. Even cat'ing a file
to /dev/audio0 gives me n
97 matches
Mail list logo
