[IMAGE]
Cher membre AccesD
Nous avons ricement ditermini que plusieurs ordinateurs ont tanti de
rentrer dans votre compte ` plusieurs reprise avec des mots de passe
erronis.Pour cela, nous vous prions de rentrer dans votre compte
banquaire en ligne, dâintroduire vos renseignement ainsi de virif
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 03:33:10PM +0500, Dmitry Slobodchikov wrote:
> That's all right, Thanks Everybody-
>
>
> /dev/dvd was simlink for /dev/cd0c described at the man.
either you made a typo there, or you need to read a little closer.
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 10:35:16AM +0100, Guido Tschakert wrote:
> Jacob Meuser wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:04:20PM +0500, Dmitry Slobodchikov wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Growisofs don't work too neither -Z nor -M arguments
> >>
> >>/home/zoosman->>dvd+rw-format -blank /dev/dvd
> >>* DVD&RW/-RAM fo
KumaloGreen CORPORATE TRAINING FOCUSED ON RESULTS
Services SETA Accredited: (Decision No. 0798) www.kumalogreen.co.za
The Complete Guide to Meetings and Minute Taking
20 21 Fe
Nick Guenther wrote:
> On 2/3/06, Melameth, Daniel D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't get it--it appears nmap is broken. Perhaps I'm overlooking
> > something obvious, but any thoughts appreciated...
> >
> >
> > An nmap scan gives me this:
> >
> > $ sudo nmap 208.139.x.x
> >
> > Startin
On 2/3/06, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone ever actually pushed a Soekris all out to see when it begins
> to choke? If so, where did it/they top out? It's great to remind us
> yanks that our residential broadband sucks compared to EUR and asia, but
> as you say, we'll catch u
On 2/3/06, Melameth, Daniel D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't get it--it appears nmap is broken. Perhaps I'm overlooking
> something obvious, but any thoughts appreciated...
>
>
> An nmap scan gives me this:
>
> $ sudo nmap 208.139.x.x
>
> Starting nmap 3.81 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ )
I don't get it--it appears nmap is broken. Perhaps I'm overlooking
something obvious, but any thoughts appreciated...
An nmap scan gives me this:
$ sudo nmap 208.139.x.x
Starting nmap 3.81 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2006-02-03 19:45
MST
Note: Host seems down. If it is really up, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I had trouble with this box with Xwindows after updating
src, ports, & XF4 & rebuilding everything. I tried putting
an old Voodoo Banshee in in lieu of the onboard video, did
an xorgconfig, & still couldn't use X. Finally thought to
disable onboard v
On 2/3/06, Gabriel George POPA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I saw that with a stock OpenBSD 3.8 system a CD-RW like this :
> PLEXTOR
> PX-W4012TU
> Hi-Speed USB 2.0 CD-RW Drive
> 40x CD-Write 12x CD-ReWrite 40x CD-Read
> works very well (with cdrtools and xcdroast). Should I repor
Joe S wrote:
> Be careful with Soekris. While DSL speed is stuck at 1.5 MB for you,
> many users are getting 6MB and higher is some parts of the world. It
> would not be advantageous to buy something like a soekris and grow out
> of it in 2 years when your ISP gets around to offering REAL speeds.
H
Not sure that it is any relevant.
Now if you were talking about having OpenBSD boot and run on Sun T1000
with the new T1 processor, then that might be a lot more interesting and
nice challenge however! (:>
I would chip in for that!!!
Having XP on iMac, no interest to me... May be the results
While we are at this, are there any small devices like this that can
firewall at 1000mbit?
I am looking for some nice options for transparant bridges but I don't
like to add 1u servers for this in the racks.
Wijnand
--
No virus was found in this outgoing message as I didn't bother looking.
This is
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 11:50:49PM +0100, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
> 2006/2/3, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 04:37:12PM -0500, Peter Fraser wrote:
> > > Since I believe that everyone agrees that ftp is
> > > horrible, particularly for firewalls. How come
> > > ther
I fail to see what this has to do with OpenBSD.
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 05:51:36PM -0500, Nick Bender wrote:
> Quick update on this.
>
> My intel iMac came this week and of course will not boot off a 3.8 cd
> as it uses EFI instead of BIOS.
>
> There's currently a $10,000 bounty for getting XP t
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
I am using a openbrick-e for years now as a home firewall, runs smooth
with openbsd.
http://shopping.hacom.net/catalog/index.php?cPath=22_45
I support this. I have 3 of those and they're just great.
No noise, very low power comsumption and for somethi
On Friday 03 February 2006 21:51, Bob Beck wrote:
> Why? if you allow anyone to connect to it anonymously
> what do you gain by using ssh? sftp (non anonymous) exists for
> a real reason (secure authenticated-by-ssh file transfer, i.e.
> particularly to allow up and download...)
>
> If
2006/2/3, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 04:37:12PM -0500, Peter Fraser wrote:
> > Since I believe that everyone agrees that ftp is
> > horrible, particularly for firewalls. How come
> > there is no equivalent to an anonymous sftp.
>
> Isn't there?
>
> Anonymous ftp
Quick update on this.
My intel iMac came this week and of course will not boot off a 3.8 cd
as it uses EFI instead of BIOS.
There's currently a $10,000 bounty for getting XP to boot:
http://windowsxp.onmac.net
There's also a FAQ tracking some of what's been tried, including
some having "brick
I am using a openbrick-e for years now as a home firewall, runs smooth
with openbsd.
http://shopping.hacom.net/catalog/index.php?cPath=22_45
--
No virus was found in this outgoing message as I didn't bother looking.
This is not an automated signature. I type this in to the bottom of every
message
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 04:37:12PM -0500, Peter Fraser wrote:
> Since I believe that everyone agrees that ftp is
> horrible, particularly for firewalls. How come
> there is no equivalent to an anonymous sftp.
Isn't there?
Anonymous ftp is just username/password authentication using a
well-known u
(trimming absurdly long Cc list)
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> I will say this, though. It takes about 35 seconds to do an "ipmitool sdr
> list full". Thus, for every two values you would like to graph in MRTG,
> you can add 35 seconds to the job's run time. The time it takes
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 13:59, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> On any number of occasions, I've offered personally to donate VMWare
> licenses to Net-SNMP developers to help bring *BSD support back into the
> mainstream >:} ... That's a standing offer and I'm sure there are plenty
> of corporations th
Thanks a bunch fella's.
I got TLS working. Except for the fact that I cannot use port 587 in
(yes I know) Outlook Express. If I keep it at port 25, everything runs
like a charm. The server is listening on port tcp 587. However, the
connection get's shut right after the first connect. Perhaps it's
Why? if you allow anyone to connect to it anonymously
what do you gain by using ssh? sftp (non anonymous) exists for
a real reason (secure authenticated-by-ssh file transfer, i.e.
particularly to allow up and download...)
If all you want is something "less evil for firewalls" Try u
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Marco Peereboom wrote:
What's wrong with?
# sysctl hw | grep ipmi
hw.sensors.0=ipmi0, Temp, OK, temp, 43.00 degC / 109.40 degF
hw.sensors.1=ipmi0, Planar Temp, OK, temp, 30.00 degC / 86.00 degF
hw.sensors.2=ipmi0, CMOS Battery, OK, volts_dc, 3.12 V
hw.sensors.3=ipmi0, Front F
Since I believe that everyone agrees that ftp is
horrible, particularly for firewalls. How come
there is no equivalent to an anonymous sftp.
Bob Beck wrote:
This is the right solution for roaming users, and is why
I will *not* make spamd ever have a notion of sasl :)
It is also, exactly, what we do here. Our users use
port 587 for this, NOT port 25
Doing it this way also helps those users who have ISPs who block
* Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-03 13:16]:
> On 2006/02/03 20:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > But I was hoping SpamD had some kind of understanding of SASL.
>
> I'm quite glad it *doesn't*. Port 587 (msa/submission) is the right
> answer here. I wouldn't want a daemon that's inten
You need to give some more to work with. Can you please figure out the serial
deal and send me that output please?
Thanks,
/marco
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:48:55AM +0059, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two systems here with an Intel SE7520JR2 board (that has an LSI Logic
> LSI53C1030
What's wrong with?
# sysctl hw | grep ipmi
hw.sensors.0=ipmi0, Temp, OK, temp, 43.00 degC / 109.40 degF
hw.sensors.1=ipmi0, Planar Temp, OK, temp, 30.00 degC / 86.00 degF
hw.sensors.2=ipmi0, CMOS Battery, OK, volts_dc, 3.12 V
hw.sensors.3=ipmi0, Front Fan, OK, fanrpm, 1258 RPM
hw.sensors.4=ipmi0, B
On Friday, February 3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I'm running Postfix 2.3.20050716-sasl2 (chrooted) and
> cyrus-sasl-2.1.20p4 on OpenBSD 3.8 stable. Everything is running peachy.
> My roaming users are able to connect and send e-mail.
We use authpf to do this. If you're authenticated through a
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Bruce Shaw wrote:
We've actually got several different problems here.
Specifically, the OpenBSD implementation we're seeing here seems to
provide sysctl style access to Sensor data, watchdog info, etc., but what
about other IPMI functions?
I've been working on better sen
On 2006/02/03 20:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But I was hoping SpamD had some kind of understanding of SASL.
I'm quite glad it *doesn't*. Port 587 (msa/submission) is the right
answer here. I wouldn't want a daemon that's intended to talk to bad
connections having such high access to the system.
> Either continue with today updates, or wait a few more days for a new
> snapshot, but the fixes are NOT in the snapshot you installed.
> A Trust me!
> Brad fixed them all and it is fast! But not in the snapshot yet, sorry.
Thanks for the clue.
I just looked at the snapshot directory and the fi
Thanks for your quick response Maxim.
Sure, I could enforce TLS connections for my roaming (outside/internet)
users. That might be a good solution and I would bypass SpamD.
I could also setup another postfix instance on another port and allow
sasl_authenticated only.
But I was hoping SpamD had so
Badbanchi Hossein wrote:
Hi,
I did exactly as you have written. I even reinstalled from scratch using the
snapshot
I had downloaded last night.
Here is some examples of some of the changes that fix all of this:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/pci/if_bge.c
Look at the time
Badbanchi Hossein wrote:
Hi,
I did exactly as you have written. I even reinstalled from scratch using the
snapshot
I had downloaded last night.
Both during the installation AND after a boot from the installed kernel I get
the
same error message, but the time it takes to time out is much less n
Hi all,
I'm running Postfix 2.3.20050716-sasl2 (chrooted) and
cyrus-sasl-2.1.20p4 on OpenBSD 3.8 stable. Everything is running peachy.
My roaming users are able to connect and send e-mail.
Now I wish to enable the fantastic SpamD feature in OpenBSD. However,
I'm foreseeing a problem. I do not want
Tim Donahue wrote:
On Thursday 02 February 2006 15:54, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Kenny Mann wrote:
I'm looking for something that which I can slap OpenBSD 3.8 on and use
it as a router.
This will be used for a house (~ 4 people) and I'm looking for
You could look at www.soekris.com. They're under
> -Original Message-
> From: Miguel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 4:14 PM
> To: Schvberle Daniel
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: pf sunfire v120 and iperf poor performance
>
> Schvberle Daniel wrote:
>
> >Which version of iperf are you using? I've had
Misc,
I've been working on a IP-TV multicast Video deployment over RPR (802.17)
at work and it has consumed a ton of my time both free and work which has
pulled me away from staying current with whats shaken in my most favorite
OS. While working with our encryption vendor last night (28 hour
Hi,
I did exactly as you have written. I even reinstalled from scratch using the
snapshot
I had downloaded last night.
Both during the installation AND after a boot from the installed kernel I get
the
same error message, but the time it takes to time out is much less now.
The same error message
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 05:59:54PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> I found the solution in the pf faq: skip lo0.
> This rule is not mentioned in Artymiak's book
> which I had been reading. I will now read the
> complete pf faq to see what I have not been
> aware of.
You can also do ``set skip on lo'
Schvberle Daniel wrote:
Which version of iperf are you using? I've had some issues with version 2
on i386 and amd64. It keeps the CPU on 100% and that can affect
the results.
im using
iperf version 2.0.2 (03 May 2005) pthreads
and the server its a sparc, not i386
---
Miguel
hi folks,
the $subject does not work, mii is not configured upon booting. as
result there is no media detected and i watch "vr0: watchdog timeout".
when i boot bsd.mp, ukphy catches up, but still shows:
ukphy0 at vr0 phy 20: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface
ukphy0: OUI 0x00, model 0x,
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Borghi Toscani | E - mail | Registrati | Inserisci un locale | Meteo |
News
[IMAGE]
NUOVI
INSERIMENTI
Newsletter della 6B0 settimana 2006
LINK
CONSIGLIATI
Podere tre Cipressi
LAST MINUTE IN TOSCANA
OFFERTE SOGGIORNI IN TOSCANA
OFFERTE LAST MINUTE FIRENZE
Last Minute Abeto
Thanks for pointing that out, Tom. I have used config before. I just blindly
followed the recommendations for using apcupsd on OpenBSD at
http://www.apcupsd.com/manual/USB_Configuration.html#SECTION000102300
I will switch back to GENERIC tonight.
On 2/3/06, Tom Cosgrove <[EMAIL PROTE
> On 2006/02/03 14:28, Dirk Fohrenkamm wrote:
>> The problem is that during boot OpenBSD limits access to only one of the
>> two virtual disks. During boot OpenBSD is complaining about a buggy
>> firmware:
>
> Have you tried upgrading the firmware?
Yes, I did (firmware 4.03 is the newest that I've
On 2006/02/03 14:28, Dirk Fohrenkamm wrote:
> The problem is that during boot OpenBSD limits access to only one of the
> two virtual disks. During boot OpenBSD is complaining about a buggy
> firmware:
Have you tried upgrading the firmware?
*sigh* ok, ignore that last posting.
I'm an idiot responding to these posts when I'm spaced out with a cold. (no
flame needed)
I was looking for 5725 not 5752. There is an ID for the 5752 in the driver
:P
Good luck,
- Andy
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Jeff Quast wrote:
> Below is a forward of the daily output I receive. I do have it configured to
> backup my root partition on the same disk, and I am aware how silly that
> is. This was done to see how it behaves for a future install where the root
> FS will be backed up on a
Hi,
I'm trying to install OpenBSD 3.8 on a (i386)-box with a HP NetRaid
controller (three SCSI channels) which is - of course - supported via the
ami(4) driver.
The problem is that during boot OpenBSD limits access to only one of the
two virtual disks. During boot OpenBSD is complaining about a b
I'm not sure about the level of support for this card in OpenBSD (this says
more about the level of support by Broadcomm for Open Source operating
systems development effort).
The bge driver does support some of that range of cards but I can't say if
that one specifically is supported. - if it use
Below is a forward of the daily output I receive. I do have it configured to
backup my root partition on the same disk, and I am aware how silly that
is. This was done to see how it behaves for a future install where the root
FS will be backed up on a separate disk.
I also realize this is not GENE
On 2/3/06, Badbanchi Hossein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> This morning I installed the kernel from the snapshot.
>
> The only (cosmetic) difference is that the time-out values are reduced, so
> it doesn't take that long as before for the system to boot, but
> the BCM5752 NIC is still not fun
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone can make a suggestion here.
I have been pushing my X server on my Zaurus, logged in as a regular user
whilst running a large compile in the background. This is really to test the
stability of the ws_drv patches that just came through on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In d
Hi,
This morning I installed the kernel from the snapshot.
The only (cosmetic) difference is that the time-out values are reduced, so
it doesn't take that long as before for the system to boot, but
the BCM5752 NIC is still not functioning properly!
Still the output of a "ls" command is interrupte
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 03:39:47PM -0800, Mike Keller wrote:
> Ok, before I get flamed up, I know this isnt
> supported, I just want to know if anyone has tried it.
>
> I would like to use an RSA / ACE server to
> authenticate locally on 3.8 (through radius).
>
> And
>
> I would like to run the
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Sobre nossa empresa Cadastre-se Dzvidas frequentes Fale conosco
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
O que i?
Como funciona?
Recursos e Benefmcios
Planos
Demonstragco gratuita
Fale conosco
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Sistema de Atendimento O
Hello all,
I saw that with a stock OpenBSD 3.8 system a CD-RW like this :
PLEXTOR
PX-W4012TU
Hi-Speed USB 2.0 CD-RW Drive
40x CD-Write 12x CD-ReWrite 40x CD-Read
works very well (with cdrtools and xcdroast). Should I report things
like these (is this important or not?)?
I
That's all right, Thanks Everybody-
/dev/dvd was simlink for /dev/cd0c described at the man.
Tank you-))
--
Q sb`femhel,
Dmitry mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which version of iperf are you using? I've had some issues with version 2
on i386 and amd64. It keeps the CPU on 100% and that can affect
the results.
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:04:20PM +0500, Dmitry Slobodchikov wrote:
Growisofs don't work too neither -Z nor -M arguments
/home/zoosman->>dvd+rw-format -blank /dev/dvd
* DVD&RW/-RAM format utility by <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, version 4.10.
:-( unable to open("/dev/dvd"): Invali
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:04:20PM +0500, Dmitry Slobodchikov wrote:
> Growisofs don't work too neither -Z nor -M arguments
>
> /home/zoosman->>dvd+rw-format -blank /dev/dvd
> * DVD&RW/-RAM format utility by <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, version 4.10.
> :-( unable to open("/dev/dvd"): Invalid argument
>
65 matches
Mail list logo
