Thanks Brad! ;=)
Bert Koelewijn wrote:
Hi,
Are all security patches applied to MAIN, already applied to the
OPENBSD_4_0 stable branche?
If not, does this have any security consequences?
Thanks,
Bert
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:24:49AM -0700, Jeff Ross wrote:
Rainer Giedat wrote:
Hi Stuart,
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 04:59:21PM -0500, stuartv wrote:
This project is all part of my devious plan to gradually
convert to an all (or at least mostly) OpenBSD environment
here at work (psst...
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:49:01AM +0500, Igor Goldenberg wrote:
Hello.
Will it be possible to build GENERIC kernel for the next OpenBSD
release 4.1 using release or stable 4.0 system (with comp40.tgz set
installed)?
I need this to know to decide put /usr on raid or not. Because if /usr
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:03:05 -0800, Alexander Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
RAID, kiddo.
It's more complex. It is something else that can go wrong.
And...it DOES go wrong. Either believe me now, or wish you believed me
later. Your call. I spent a lot of time profiting from people who
I'm really happy since i can now try to work with the wpi(4) on my
laptop.
I freshly installed 4.0 and got
wpi0 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG rev 0x02: irq
10, address 00:13:02:18:e5:b2
but as soon as i try
ifconfig wpi0 up
and the driver try to load the firware i got
wpi0:
On 03/11/06, Alexander Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what complexity?
RAID, kiddo.
It's more complex. It is something else that can go wrong.
And...it DOES go wrong. Either believe me now, or wish you believed me
later. Your call. I spent a lot of time profiting from people who
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:10:50PM -0500, Michael Lockhart wrote:
All,
Here's a question that I wanted to pose to the OpenBSD community about
managing and maintaining a large number of OpenBSD systems in the
field. To provide some background, we currently have 650+ OpenBSD 3.2
systems in
Another solution would be, once 4.1 gets out to unpack the base41.tgz,
etc41.tgz and comp41.tgz into /usr/somewhere then unpack or checkout
using cvs the 4.1 kernel sources in there as well.
Once you are in this situation you can chroot to this new fake 4.1
system: chroot /usr/somewhere /bin/sh
On 2006/11/03 11:34, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
Another solution would be, once 4.1 gets out to unpack the base41.tgz,
etc41.tgz and comp41.tgz into /usr/somewhere then unpack or checkout
using cvs the 4.1 kernel sources in there as well.
Nice idea, and it works sometimes, but only when
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 10:56 +0100, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
If i can do anything to help you debug this problem, please let me know,
I'll try.
Could be this related?
CVSROOT:/cvs
Module name:src
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006/11/01 04:25:01
Modified files:
* Stuart Henderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 2006/11/03 11:34, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
Another solution would be, once 4.1 gets out to unpack the base41.tgz,
etc41.tgz and comp41.tgz into /usr/somewhere then unpack or checkout
using cvs the 4.1 kernel sources in there as well.
[And I did read FAQ Chapter 14 forth and back]
I have a working install on sd0. There are plenty of data on separate
partitions on sd0 that I don't need, but it's a good install. Therefore
I'd like to transfer the system only to sd1.
dd if=/dev/rsd0c of=/dev/rsd1c transfers the whole disc. Which
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:04:03 +0100, ropers wrote:
Repeat after me:
Complexity is the worst enemy of security. Secure systems should be
cut to the bone and made as simple as possible. There is no substitute
for simplicity. (Schneier)
RAID is wonderful in theory.
But it ain't so easy to escape bad
Uwe Dippel wrote:
[And I did read FAQ Chapter 14 forth and back]
I have a working install on sd0. There are plenty of data on separate
partitions on sd0 that I don't need, but it's a good install. Therefore
I'd like to transfer the system only to sd1.
dd if=/dev/rsd0c of=/dev/rsd1c
Hello,
I got a laptop with the operating system FreeBSD 6.1 with router
firewall netgear
and an ADSL modem to connect on the internet. I would like to setup a
personnal firewall
on my computer and I choose OpenBSD pf. The only network interface is ndis0.
The filtering method is quite simple :
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 07:05:58AM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
Adding another question:
man restore says:
# newfs /dev/rrp0g eagle
# mount /dev/rp0g /mnt
# cd /mnt
# restore rf /dev/rst8
I don't understand 'eagle'; man newfs didn't give me much of a clue.
yikes. No idea. I'm
Hello! :-)
I try to use OpenBSD 4.0 on an Apple Mac mini (Intel, bought last
month, latest Boot ROM version MM11.0055.B05, latest SMC version
1.3f4). Installation from CD works fine without configuring the
network, but as soon as I try to bring the network card up, the system
hangs as described
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 07:05:58AM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
Adding another question:
man restore says:
# newfs /dev/rrp0g eagle
# mount /dev/rp0g /mnt
# cd /mnt
# restore rf /dev/rst8
I don't understand 'eagle'; man newfs
I have some random time out errors on wpi, with a new leveno 3000 N100
768 Notebook
but it generally works
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 11/3/06, Massimo Lusetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 10:56 +0100, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
If i can do anything to help you debug this problem,
* Michael Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-02 18:33]:
All,
Wrap your bloody lines!
Here's a question that I wanted to pose to the OpenBSD community about
managing and maintaining a large number of OpenBSD systems in the field. To
provide some background, we currently have
Thanks for the ideas!
And if I understand correctly the most easy and safe way to build
custom kernel for a new release is to temporary setup this release on
any computer (maybe even under virtual machine) and build the kernel
there. And then use generated kernel instead of bundled one for the
Thanks, I do stand corrected.
Next time I spec out firewalls, I will keep your arguments in mind for
sure, they do make a lot of sense.
Alec
J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:03:05 -0800, Alexander Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
RAID, kiddo.
It's more complex. It is something
On 2006/11/03 09:26, Edward A. Gardner wrote:
At 07:12 31-10-2006, Diana Eichert wrote:
The problem or unfortunate feature of both of these is that the only path
between the NICs and memory is a single shared PCI.
EMB-5840 has 64/66
the MB-06047 I spotted the other month has PCI-Express
At 07:12 31-10-2006, Diana Eichert wrote:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Tom Cosgrove wrote:
Although they're not yet available, Wim is hoping to sell
http://www.liantec.com/product/emboard/EMB-5740.htm soon.
See http://www.kd85.com/liantec.html.
Thanks
Tom
look like a more interesting choice
On Fri, November 3, 2006 0:10, Theo de Raadt said:
Will it be possible to build GENERIC kernel for the next OpenBSD
release 4.1 using release or stable 4.0 system (with comp40.tgz set
installed)?
That would be a bit hard, since 4.1 is about 6 months away.
But I get your drift. Can you use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could somebody send me yaifo 0.2 so that I propably can make the changes
to the code by myself?
http://erdelynet.com/downloads/yaifo-0.2.tgz
I'm trying to get an external usb audio device working on 4.0 release:
uaudio0 at uhub1 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0: FORTEMEDIA FM1083,
rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2
uaudio0: ignored audio interface with 2 endpoints
uaudio0: audio rev 1.00, 5 mixer controls
audio1 at uaudio0
I'm a little
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 08:45 -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
* Michael Lockhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-02 18:33]:
All,
Wrap your bloody lines!
I agree
Here's a question that I wanted to pose to the OpenBSD community about
managing and maintaining a large number of OpenBSD systems
Greetings:
I just upgraded to 4.0 (without incident) and copied in the new source
trees from the CD. A cvs update to the 4.0 patch branch brought in a
number of changes that look suspiciously like some of the latest 3.9
errata entries. And yet, the 4.0 errata page is empty.
This seems odd. Was
Does OpenBSD accually run on a Nintendo DS?
is it a i386? or ARM?
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 11/2/06, Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be too much trouble to post the entire dmesg from the Nintendo DS?
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 11/2/06, Guido Tschakert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damian
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:11:55AM -0500, Will H. Backman wrote:
I did try pointing /dev/audio at /dev/audio1, but xmms just said that
there was permissions denied on /dev/audio.
You did run MAKEDEV(1) to create /dev/audio1 and friends,
didn't you?
Ciao,
Kili
--
Inches.
An
s has been brought up every other day. Read the archives please.
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:06:25PM -0700, Mark Zimmerman wrote:
Greetings:
I just upgraded to 4.0 (without incident) and copied in the new source
trees from the CD. A cvs update to the 4.0 patch branch brought in a
number of
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:06:25PM -0700, Mark Zimmerman wrote:
Greetings:
I just upgraded to 4.0 (without incident) and copied in the new source
trees from the CD. A cvs update to the 4.0 patch branch brought in a
number of changes that look suspiciously like some of the latest 3.9
errata
Mike Erdely wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could somebody send me yaifo 0.2 so that I propably can make the changes
to the code by myself?
http://erdelynet.com/downloads/yaifo-0.2.tgz
I'm talking to myself now, but ...
I've posted some patches that enable you to run YaifO under 3.9 and 4.0.
Hi,
I have a doubt about if OpenBSD/PF can NAT 40Mbits with a simple rule
set and like 60 redirects.
The box has a xeon proc and two integrated NICs, one fxp and a bge,
can it handle it?
Thanks
Edward A. Gardner wrote:
Admittedly the price of gigabit NICs has come down to where I'd rather
see them than 100mbit NICs. They have advantages even if unable to run
at full speed. But running multiple gigabit links full speed, these
boards won't. Sigh.
Unless the 10/100 chips have
Der Engel wrote:
I have a doubt about if OpenBSD/PF can NAT 40Mbits with a simple rule
set and like 60 redirects.
The box has a xeon proc and two integrated NICs, one fxp and a bge,
can it handle it?
How many packets per second? Or, how big are the packets? The fxp
would be the bottleneck
You really need to offer more information. The packet per second
metric is more relevant than bit/s. How many packets?
Best,
Josh
On 11/3/06, Der Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a doubt about if OpenBSD/PF can NAT 40Mbits with a simple rule
set and like 60 redirects.
The box has a
On 2006/11/03 16:02, gwes wrote:
Der Engel wrote:
I have a doubt about if OpenBSD/PF can NAT 40Mbits with a simple rule
set and like 60 redirects.
The box has a xeon proc and two integrated NICs, one fxp and a bge,
can it handle it?
How many packets per second? Or, how big are the
Absolutely.
Alec
Der Engel wrote:
Hi,
I have a doubt about if OpenBSD/PF can NAT 40Mbits with a simple rule
set and like 60 redirects.
The box has a xeon proc and two integrated NICs, one fxp and a bge,
can it handle it?
Thanks
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:09:17PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote:
On Oct 31, 2006, at 9:44 PM, Damian Wiest wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:10:25PM +, Douglas Hunter wrote:
NYCBSDCon2006 now has its talks available in MP3 and with slides
in pdf from
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:56:07PM -0600, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
Does OpenBSD accually run on a Nintendo DS?
is it a i386? or ARM?
Sam Fourman Jr.
The OP's not running OpenBSD on the DS, he's trying to connect his DS
to an OpenBSD server with a Nintendo Wi-Fi adapter plugged in.
I'll
I am just getting back into using OpenBSDI see that 4.0 has more support
for the Areca SATA RAID cards, but do ot list them in the supported devices
list. It just has a note showong 4.0 features.
That said, when installing 4.0 on my machine with an Areca sata raid
controller (ARC-1110), it
On 2006-11-03T15:09, Robert George Ababurko wrote:
I am just getting back into using OpenBSDI see that 4.0 has more support
for the Areca SATA RAID cards, but do ot list them in the supported devices
list. It just has a note showong 4.0 features.
That said, when installing 4.0 on my
Igor Goldenberg wrote:
Thanks for the ideas!
And if I understand correctly the most easy and safe way to build
custom kernel for a new release is to temporary setup this release on
any computer (maybe even under virtual machine) and build the kernel
there. And then use generated kernel
On 04/11/2006, at 9:09 AM, Robert George Ababurko wrote:
I am just getting back into using OpenBSDI see that 4.0 has
more support
for the Areca SATA RAID cards, but do ot list them in the supported
devices
list. It just has a note showong 4.0 features.
That said, when installing 4.0
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:27:14PM -0500, Jason Murray wrote:
On Fri, November 3, 2006 0:10, Theo de Raadt said:
Will it be possible to build GENERIC kernel for the next OpenBSD
release 4.1 using release or stable 4.0 system (with comp40.tgz set
installed)?
That would be a bit hard,
Hi,
Having this ftp problem with a 3.9 box, the box has one external
interface and two internal interfaces each one for different subnets,
the PF conf is very simple, my problem is after a while clients can't
access ftp, in either subnet, rebooting the box fixes the problem but
then after a
Ok, i ran ftp-proxy command and ftp access started working again for
the clients, that solves the rebooting part :)
my pf.conf:
# macros
ext_if=fxp0
int_if=xl0
int_if2=bge0
both={xl0 bge0}
tcp_services={ 22 80 113 }
icmp_types=echoreq
# options
set block-policy return
set loginterface $ext_if
On 11/3/06, Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does OpenBSD accually run on a Nintendo DS?
No, unless someone has a hidden port.
is it a i386? or ARM?
ARM.
Sam Fourman Jr.
--
I'm trying to launch the internet; so I open a terminal and go
percent sign 'Internet' at the prompt and
I guess i was mistaken , I had thought that the OpenBSD support for armish
http://www.openbsd.org/armish.html
would also include devices like the Nintendo DS
I guess there must be a Gap in my Knowledge :)
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 11/3/06, Arnaud Bergeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/3/06, Sam
my {archive,google}-fu isn't up to this task, so i have to bother the
list about this.
I'm trying to get X working in more than 8bit on a 400mhz tiBook, and
can't find a good modeline/hsync/vrefresh. Xorg -configure produces
nothing useful.
Thanks,
Ben
52 matches
Mail list logo
