On 4/6/07, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 06:52:25PM +0200, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor wrote:
> On 4/5/07, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >I've got this linksys SRW2016 managed 16 port gigabit switch at home.
> >The only problem with it, is that the
This is not so much a response to you Steven, as to the entire OpenBSD
community.
quoth the Steven Harms:
> There are two roads, the high and the low road. I am not sure why an adult
> (assuming) needs to be educated on this.
High road? Is that how you would describe Theo's handling of this si
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:38:51PM -0400, Trash Compactor wrote:
> And since the greylisted entry doesn't see anymore activity, after
> the 4 hours elapse, it just quietly bows out and exits... stage-left
> even!
>
> /Jason
spamd used to reaper any outstanding GREYs when an IP ascended
to
poking archives, i have the impression that ami(4) family has the best
chance of being the card with the greatest degree of userland
visibility, but wanted to check if that's the case.
need a low-profile ATA (parallel) controller who can take
four drives.
it'd be cool if it does hardw
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
After install samba from ports (samba-3.0.21bp4) i can see in the swat(8) man
page:
"In /etc/inetd.conf you should add a line like this:
swat stream tcp nowait.400 root /usr/local/samba/sbin/swat swat"
But swat binary is, actually, on "/usr/l
On 4/5/07, Artyom Goryainov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, all! How can I painlessly upgrade OpenBSD 3.1 to 4.0 without
reinstalling all system and soft?
Just bite the bullet and start fresh with 4.1. Probably faster than
going 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.1.
Greg
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
I have been interested for quite some time in making a Switch with OpenBSD
See this post
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2007-03/2353.html
you may find this interesting
Sam Fourman Jr.
Sam, while I'm sure that was fun to setup I have t
And since the greylisted entry doesn't see anymore activity, after
the 4 hours elapse, it just quietly bows out and exits... stage-left
even!
/Jason
On Apr 5, 2007, at 11:18 PM, RW wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 18:06:29 -0700, John N. Brahy wrote:
I've been looking at the source and I've read
Hi, all! How can I painlessly upgrade OpenBSD 3.1 to 4.0 without
reinstalling all system and soft?
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 18:06:29 -0700, John N. Brahy wrote:
>I've been looking at the source and I've read the man page but I don't
>see a way to convert a greylisted entry to a whitelisted entry.
>
>Is it possible or just unnecessary?
>
># spamdb -a 12.34.56.78
># spamdb | grep 12.34.56.78
>WHITE|12.
I've been looking at the source and I've read the man page but I don't
see a way to convert a greylisted entry to a whitelisted entry.
Is it possible or just unnecessary?
# spamdb -a 12.34.56.78
# spamdb | grep 12.34.56.78
WHITE|12.34.56.78|||1175817375|1175819030|1178929430|1|2
GREY|12.34.56.78|
On 4/5/07, Steve Shockley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Siju George wrote:
> I wish somebody would design a simple hardware that has 24 or more NIC
> ports ( and of course WiFi ) and processor than can install OpenBSD.
> With PF then I could have a very inexpensive managed switch with ACLS
> for all
Siju George wrote:
I wish somebody would design a simple hardware that has 24 or more NIC
ports ( and of course WiFi ) and processor than can install OpenBSD.
With PF then I could have a very inexpensive managed switch with ACLS
for all hosts on the network:-)
The problem isn't just getting lot
There are two roads, the high and the low road. I am not sure why an adult
(assuming) needs to be educated on this. The guy took code and relicensed
it. That sucks. We know. But instead of trying to work with him, and
educated him (since he does do a ton of work on free software), Michael
effe
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 06:52:25PM +0200, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor wrote:
> On 4/5/07, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >I've got this linksys SRW2016 managed 16 port gigabit switch at home.
> >The only problem with it, is that the firmware well eh, sucks. The
> >telnet interface can't confi
On 4/5/07, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/5/07, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think the ARM 946 has a MMU which I'm pretty it needs to run
OpenBSD. So I think you are out of luck. Don't know if Linux runs on
systems without MMU but it's worth a try.
One o
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/04/04/wireless_code_cracking/
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 08:26:06PM -0300, Andr?s Delfino wrote:
> On 4/5/07, Rogier Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 4/6/07, Andris Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> What's wrong? They protect their license. Period.
> >No one seems to dispute the right of copyright holders to protect
Hi,
After install samba from ports (samba-3.0.21bp4) i can see in the
swat(8) man page:
"In /etc/inetd.conf you should add a line like this:
swat stream tcp nowait.400 root /usr/local/samba/sbin/swat swat"
But swat binary is, actually, on "/usr/local/libexec/swat" and not on
"/usr/local/sa
* Andr?s Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-05 20:26:06]:
> First, this wouldn't happen cause I prefer the BSD license, but, if
> someone violates the copyright of my work, I'll take that guy down. In
> the most publicly and shameful way.
>
Heh. I think the person that's feeling the biggest b
On 4/5/07, Rogier Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/6/07, Andris Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's wrong? They protect their license. Period.
No one seems to dispute the right of copyright holders to protect their
licence.
That said, there are more ways than one to protect one
On 4/6/07, Andris Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's wrong? They protect their license. Period.
No one seems to dispute the right of copyright holders to protect their
licence.
That said, there are more ways than one to protect one's licence. It
hardly seems unreasonable to privately co
Andris Delfino wrote:
Yes, and he was wrong. He shouldn't base his work in copylefted
software (if he intend to release the result as non-copylefted).
Licenses are licenses.
Yes, Marcus made a mistake. But not the mistake this GPL zealots seem to
think (not knowing that copying GPL code is n
On 4/5/07, Steven Harms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This isnt a question of him being wrong, its a question of HOW IT WAS
HANDLED. Get it?
The simple courtesy of privately emailing someone would have taken 30
seconds and would have saved everyone a bunch of time, energy, and
embarrassment.
On 4
This isnt a question of him being wrong, its a question of HOW IT WAS
HANDLED. Get it?
The simple courtesy of privately emailing someone would have taken 30
seconds and would have saved everyone a bunch of time, energy, and
embarrassment.
On 4/5/07, Andris Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6-apr-2007, at 0:51, Andris Delfino wrote:
Yes, and he was wrong. He shouldn't base his work in copylefted
software (if he intend to release the result as non-copylefted).
Licenses are licenses.
Would it be wrong to develop software using e
yeah, this is akward...
i guess i should plug my mpi in again.
On 05/04/2007, at 2:50 AM, Thierry Lacoste wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 17:37, Chris Black wrote:
Thierry Lacoste wrote:
I installed OpenBSD on a Dell PowerEdge with
a raid1 array controlled by a SAS 5iR controller
thanks to
On 4/5/07, Andris Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/5/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andris Delfino wrote:
> > What's wrong? They protect their license. Period.
>
> Where the hell is the open community is going these days, I have no
> clue... Look to me it sure enjoy destro
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 05:25:53PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> A great day for the Open Source community I tell you.
In the public, most people talking about "open source community"
don't really care about open source or community at all -- they
just want great software for cheap, and they aren
On 4/5/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andris Delfino wrote:
> What's wrong? They protect their license. Period.
Did you read the full tread first before you wrote this? Did you look at
the code in CVS, did you even see Marcus reply and why?
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ke
Andris Delfino wrote:
What's wrong? They protect their license. Period.
Did you read the full tread first before you wrote this? Did you look at
the code in CVS, did you even see Marcus reply and why?
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/1573
I don't think you did!
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> And this make it even worst:
>
> http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38746
Typical of that rag. The author talks as if bcw was part of
a release, not some sort of development code. Apparently
GPL means "Go Piss in the Lake".
...
> Where
On 4/5/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And this make it even worst:
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38746
All good work and good faith to come with better end results is
wrongfully drag into mud.
I read all the thread and this makes me sick!
It only makes me more
Interesting.
Decided to update non-production critical system and ran into the following
on the arch/alpha processor blend during the (make build) portion of the
userland builds.
arch/i386 works fine. So this could possibly be a compiler setting.,,
Although,, I am having userland compile issue
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 08:53:36PM +0200, lukasz wrote:
> Is someone working on filesystem ACLs and hiding processes like ACLs,
> kern.ps_showallprocs from freebsd?
> if no how can i get similar effect?
No, but there used to be a patch for 3.7 or thereabouts that 'solved'
this issue in a 'proper'
And this make it even worst:
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38746
All good work and good faith to come with better end results is
wrongfully drag into mud.
I read all the thread and this makes me sick!
It only makes me more sick with anything carrying GPL, Linux, and
Broadc
On 4/5/07, lukasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is someone working on filesystem ACLs and hiding processes like ACLs,
kern.ps_showallprocs from freebsd?
no.
I think it is sad, and a horrible representation of GPL coders. Michael
doesn't speak for all of us, and it is clear to anyone with common
sense that the first thing you do is contact in private.
On 4/5/07, Bret Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 13:16 -0600, Diana Eicher
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 13:16 -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
> and info why here,
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/1558/
>
>
With apologies to everyone for off-color language...
What a bunch of douches.
Diana Eichert wrote:
bcw(4) is gone
Marcus Glocker, [EMAIL PROTECTED], knows a big deal about wireless
LANs. He has been involved in many of our wirelesss driver, he has also
written applications for wireless applications like rtunes. He wrote
the nostromo webserver. He is certainly the
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:55:10PM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
> In case you don't follow -current commits,
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=117579052530442&w=2
>
> bcw(4) is gone
I don't believe Michael's initial intention was to have this happen, but
the nature of his first email made it al
and info why here,
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/1558/
In case you don't follow -current commits,
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=117579052530442&w=2
bcw(4) is gone
Is someone working on filesystem ACLs and hiding processes like ACLs,
kern.ps_showallprocs from freebsd?
if no how can i get similar effect?
thanks for answers
--
ubuntu.i386.pl
Matiss Miglans wrote:
Hi good people !
I need to make connection from server witch is in LAN1 to server witch
is in LAN3.
And I need to make another connection from that same server witch is in
LAN3 to that same server witch is in LAN1.
There is 3 different company Ethernets, and I need to make
Hi good people !
I need to make connection from server witch is in LAN1 to server witch
is in LAN3.
And I need to make another connection from that same server witch is in
LAN3 to that same server witch is in LAN1.
There is 3 different company Ethernets, and I need to make this
connection troug
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:55:55AM -0500, John Brooks wrote:
> > 2007/4/3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > dmesg
> > > gateway# dmesg
> > > OpenBSD 3.5 (GENERIC) #1: Sat May 1 08:18:25 PDT 2004
> >
> > Sorry for not being more helpfull, but why are you running a firewall
> > with at least one known remote ro
Are you referring to the recent IPV6 issue or another?
--
John Brooks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> 2007/4/3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > dmesg
> > gateway# dmesg
> > OpenBSD 3.5 (GENERIC) #1: Sat May 1 08:18:25 PDT 2004
>
> Sorry for not being more helpfull, but why are you running a firewall
> with at l
On 4/5/07, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello all,
I've got this linksys SRW2016 managed 16 port gigabit switch at home.
The only problem with it, is that the firmware well eh, sucks. The
telnet interface can't configure everything (just basic setup, you can't
even set up SNMP or VLANs) a
Because I Dual Boot I use OpenBSD to hack on Wireless, and FreeBSD 6.2
as a Basic Desktop System.
Sam Fourman
On 4/5/07, Dan Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm just curious... why would you use such an expensive video card in an
OBSD system?
danno
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Jon Steel wrote:
> Hi
>
> Ive found a way to freeze a program when using rThreads and using a
> function pointer back to one of the threads from within a shared
> library. The higher the level of interrupts on the system, the more
> frequently the problem occurs. The problem c
On 4/5/07, Jon Steel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ive found a way to freeze a program when using rThreads and using a
function pointer back to one of the threads from within a shared
library. The higher the level of interrupts on the system, the more
frequently the problem occurs. The problem can b
Hello all,
I've got this linksys SRW2016 managed 16 port gigabit switch at home.
The only problem with it, is that the firmware well eh, sucks. The
telnet interface can't configure everything (just basic setup, you can't
even set up SNMP or VLANs) and the webinterface only works correctly
wit
Hi
Ive found a way to freeze a program when using rThreads and using a
function pointer back to one of the threads from within a shared
library. The higher the level of interrupts on the system, the more
frequently the problem occurs. The problem can be duplicated as follows:
1. Create a child rT
I'm just curious... why would you use such an expensive video card in an
OBSD system?
danno
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Sam Fourman Jr.
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 2:52 AM
To: OpenBSD-Misc
Subject: dmesg for Asus Striker Extreme Mo
At 02:22 PM 4/4/07, Peter Fraser wrote:
I use an approach to upgrading that I have not seen written
anywhere. It does need additional space in the root partition
but with disks these days that is not normally a problem.
First copy away the "important parts" of the root partition
onto another pa
***
Warning: Your file, no filename/Presentation1.ppt, was not scanned by InterScan
MSS.
***
Hello,
I'm trying to setup smtp-vilter-1.3.6p0 with sendmail on 4.1_STABLE.
smtp-vilter works with the regex and the clamd backend but _not_ with the
"attachment
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, sweetnsourbkr wrote:
John Gould wrote:
Burn a single session CD-R it should just work! Why are you trying to make
and boot a multi session CD? There really is no need!
The packages aren't included in cd40.iso, are they? From what I understand,
I must either do what I di
58 matches
Mail list logo
