Hi,
I use OpenBSD 4.2-current on IBM ThinkPad X60, and face similar issue
mentioned in PRs' #5239, and #5577 - as soon as I insert a PCMCIA card
in the slot (mine is Sierra Wireless AirCard 555), the kernel panics.
This happens if I boot with the card in the slot, or if I insert the
card in the sl
2007/10/26, Jake Conk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> I was trying to restart my server and noticed it wasn't coming back
> online so when I went down to go take a look at it I was having a RAID
> problem. This is what was showing on the screen:
>
> ...
> PARTIALLY TRUNCATED INODE I=720
> THE FOL
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 08:08:46AM -0600, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a HP Pavilion dv8000 too and, after install 4.2, i go back to
> 4.1. The audio on vlc, xine, xmms sounds too fast and cut from time to
> time (5-6 sec in
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:21:32 -0400, "Douglas A. Tutty"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:19:19AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > I'm running an OpenBSD server with a lot of users and project groups.
> > > Each project has its own group or two to protect it's files from other
If your are just concerned about files, then (IIRC) OpenAFS can give you
more groups (prob. 20) and if you use PTS then more can be worked out.
However, that would be directory level access and not for individual
files.
-Lars
> > While those factors do exist, the biggest factor is probably that the
> > clocking parts are supplied by the lowest bidder, and there is no need
> > to be higher quality than the competition. Leaky capacitors? Who
> > cares. Tantalum and ceramic are the same, right? Anything to
> > eek out
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:19:19AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I'm running an OpenBSD server with a lot of users and project groups.
> > Each project has its own group or two to protect it's files from other
> > users.
> >
> > How do you guys usually solve this problem when user needs to be
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 11:39:28AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> While those factors do exist, the biggest factor is probably that the
> clocking parts are supplied by the lowest bidder, and there is no need
> to be higher quality than the competition. Leaky capacitors? Who
> cares. Tantalum a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I check that option on audioctl and it was ok. And remember: on
OpenBSD 4.1 sounds good (only xmms is going faster...).
The other problem (the bigger) it was the incredible low speed to
access the hard disk. Right now, like i said before, i
Hello,
I was trying to restart my server and noticed it wasn't coming back
online so when I went down to go take a look at it I was having a RAID
problem. This is what was showing on the screen:
...
PARTIALLY TRUNCATED INODE I=720
THE FOLLOWING SYSTEM HAD AN UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY:
ffs: /r
Don Jackson wrote:
I wanted to add my 2 cents to this thread.
Ignoring the debate/flamage on this thread regarding the security
merits/risks of virtualization, I beleive there are a number of us who
would like the option to run OpenBSD as a guest under various virtual
machine frameworks. Even i
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 03:27:07PM -0700, Adam Getchell wrote:
> On 10/25/07, Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:45:23PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> > > At 02:28 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > > >Sure you do. You claim that the following statement
2007/10/25, Boris Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello Mark,
>
> Thursday, October 25, 2007, 4:13:09 PM, you wrote:
>
> MZ> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 11:19:21AM -0500, Boris Goldberg wrote:
> >>
> >> Thank you very much for that (valuable) reply!
> >> BTW, this is an argument for making an Op
2007/10/26, Adam Getchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 10/25/07, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You're also a sysadm who refuses to read a paper written by a google
> > researcher, who's team found massive bugs in every VM.
>
> That's not quite correct. Restating (yet) again:
>
> 1. Or
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 14:39 -0700, Don Jackson wrote:
> no channels at
> tached
Well, "no channels attached" tells me its a hardware issue
(cables`n`shit), or the software failing to properly probe the hardware.
Does it work in another system under another platform (Linux LiveCD,
etc.).
I
2007/10/25, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> At 05:08 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, Stuart VanZee wrote:
> >I finally get it...
> >
> >LEE! YOU ARE A FUCKING GENIUS!
[+]
> you mean security from those bad
> guys, apparently you are talking about security from the
> damn sheep who couldn't break th
On 10/25/07, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're also a sysadm who refuses to read a paper written by a google
> researcher, who's team found massive bugs in every VM.
That's not quite correct. Restating (yet) again:
1. Ormandy [1] states that Xen's design is congruent with good se
On 10/25/07, Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:45:23PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> > At 02:28 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > >Sure you do. You claim that the following statement is wrong, but you
> > >don't offer any explanation. That's crap.
> > >
On 10/25/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, if I take your point or 'applications domain' and and translate this
> in more practical term and stop using words out of the far fetch paper
> and use more pragmatic day to day example. You argue that in this case,
> if a setup is using
L. V. Lammert wrote:
Certainly! That is not the point, however. The point is that users of
OTHER 'application domains' have better security with a VM (or one of
the other approaches discussed) because THEIR environment has no ability
to interact with the OTHER environments. The digression into
Hello,
The OpenBSD web site states that Cyclades-Z series multiport serial
cards are supported via the cz driver:
Serial Ports
Cyclades-Z series multiport serial boards (cz) (G)
I am running OpenBSD 4.1 stable, on i386.
I installed a Cyclades Ze PCI card, and hooked it up to the externa
* Don Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-25 13:33:29]:
> I wanted to add my 2 cents to this thread.
>
> Ignoring the debate/flamage on this thread regarding the security
> merits/risks of virtualization, I beleive there are a number of us who
> would like the option to run OpenBSD as a guest un
Hello Mark,
Thursday, October 25, 2007, 4:13:09 PM, you wrote:
MZ> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 11:19:21AM -0500, Boris Goldberg wrote:
>>
>> Thank you very much for that (valuable) reply!
>> BTW, this is an argument for making an OpenNTPD ntpdate tool or adding
>> one_time_synchronization fun
At 05:08 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, Stuart VanZee wrote:
I finally get it...
LEE! YOU ARE A FUCKING GENIUS!
Beautiful!
[Taking Bow]
Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Why would you want to be unable to edit the start of a long line?
> > i think he wants line wrapping instead of scrolling. i know i do. :)
>
> Correct.
> So I guess you can't turn it off?
No, you can't. And if you could, you would get something lik
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 11:19:21AM -0500, Boris Goldberg wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for that (valuable) reply!
> BTW, this is an argument for making an OpenNTPD ntpdate tool or adding
> one_time_synchronization functionality into ntpd. :)
>
>From ntpd(8):
-s Set the tim
I finally get it...
LEE! YOU ARE A FUCKING GENIUS!
Hey everyone...
In Mr. Lammert's world, as long as NOBODY is trying to
break the system, VMs give a HUGE security plus!
Problem is, there are a lot of very bad motherfuckers out
there who ARE trying to break the system. So, when someone
st
On 10/25/07, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I noticed one problem with the disklabel output while installing 4.2
> > It automatically detected the file system in my first slice which is
> > fat32 wrongly as 4.2BSD
>
> disklabel does not "automatically detect" filesystem types.
>
Than
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:45:23PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> At 02:28 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> >Sure you do. You claim that the following statement is wrong, but you
> >don't offer any explanation. That's crap.
> >
> >"There is *nothing* in any virtualization software that m
I wanted to add my 2 cents to this thread.
Ignoring the debate/flamage on this thread regarding the security
merits/risks of virtualization, I beleive there are a number of us who
would like the option to run OpenBSD as a guest under various virtual
machine frameworks. Even if it is less secure t
> At 01:58 PM 10/25/2007 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > Certainly! That is not the point, however. The point is that users of
> > OTHER
> > > 'application domains' have better security with a VM (or one of the other
> > > approaches discussed) because THEIR environment has no ability to interac
At 01:58 PM 10/25/2007 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Certainly! That is not the point, however. The point is that users of
OTHER
> 'application domains' have better security with a VM (or one of the other
> approaches discussed) because THEIR environment has no ability to interact
I apologize for saying it is not compatible but i don't know exactly what is
the problem.
I had another dell server running without problem, when it was replaced by
the new server with a raid controller, gives these
problems of inconsistency disk and freeze.
Something that no comment was that
> Certainly! That is not the point, however. The point is that users of OTHER
> 'application domains' have better security with a VM (or one of the other
> approaches discussed) because THEIR environment has no ability to interact
^
On 25/10/2007, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/25/07, Christian Weisgerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a way to turn off the long line scrolling in ksh?
> >
> > No.
> > Why would you want to be unable to edit the start of a
Hi Timo,
> Yeah, that was pretty much caused by the gmail account. The pf.conf I
> have on my server is formatted correctly.
Since we're on the subject of dumb ideas... What happens when you start
over with only your NAT rule and slowly start adding the additional rules?
So, start over, start o
At 03:09 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, Stuart VanZee wrote:
Quite frankly, I tire of your dumb-ass attitude. This was VERY ON TOPIC.
Indeed it is! I also tire of the dumb replies that don't have any
relationship to the original subject.
Security for the "applecation domain" is a function of the le
L. V. Lammert:
>At 12:08 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, Stuart VanZee wrote:
>
>>The reason that people are going to #2 is that, if you are concerned about
>.security, that is the optimal way of setting things up. One box, one
>>task. That is true "separation". In this light, the question of if #3 is
>>mo
I'm testing openbsd and routing in a basic setup.
router-01 and router-02 are access routers with dynamic routing,
both connect to a lan where firewall-01 resides.
Both router-01 and router-02 have a static route for the network
behind firewall-01.
router-01# cat
/etc/hostname.em1
inet 192.168.1.
On 10/25/07, Christian Weisgerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to turn off the long line scrolling in ksh?
>
> No.
> Why would you want to be unable to edit the start of a long line?
i think he wants line wrapping instead of scrolling. i
At 02:28 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
Sure you do. You claim that the following statement is wrong, but you
don't offer any explanation. That's crap.
"There is *nothing* in any virtualization software that makes having it
*more secure* than not having it at all."
Quit dodging li
Quoting "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Problem: in your analogy, there is some limit to the number of bad guys
> before they become obvious to local law-enforcement. In the computer
> case, best to consider the number of bad guys unlimited; you can only
> limit the _rate_ at which they
Yeah, that was pretty much caused by the gmail account. The pf.conf I
have on my server is formatted correctly.
Timo
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
On Oct 25, 2007, at 11:58 AM, Timo Myyrd wrote:
Any other ideas?
Here's a dumb idea: In your posting, a lot of lines in your pf.conf
file are
wrapped. I
Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to turn off the long line scrolling in ksh?
No.
Why would you want to be unable to edit the start of a long line?
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:26:53 -0500, "L. V. Lammert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:23 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, you wrote:
>>On Oct 25, 2007, at 10:06 AM, "L. V. Lammert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Jason Dixon wrote:
There is *nothing* in any virtualization s
On Oct 25, 2007, at 11:58 AM, Timo Myyrd wrote:
Any other ideas?
Here's a dumb idea: In your posting, a lot of lines in your pf.conf
file are
wrapped. I *hope* that happened in email and isn't actually the case in
the pf.conf file? One of those "Sir, is the computer actually plugged
in?" quest
We have are planning to get for 2Mbps lines from the same ISP(their max).
The lines will have different routers in front of them so they can be
configuered
to be in different networks.
|--
Ah, I forgot to mention that the packet forwarding is indeed enabled
already.
I checked the sample pf.conf on your webpage and edited it to change the
interface names and commented the queue rules. I then loaded the rules
with "pfctl -f /etc/pf.new" but still I could only access my server from
At 12:23 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
On Oct 25, 2007, at 10:06 AM, "L. V. Lammert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Jason Dixon wrote:
There is *nothing* in any virtualization software that makes having
it *more secure* than not having it at all.
Is that direct en
> synchronization isn't a one-time thing. it's an ongoing process. a
> peecee isn't a terribly controlled environment - you have electrical
> noise, temperature changes, processor loads, interrupts ... all of
> which make it very difficult to keep time on a free-running clock.
While those factors
* Boris Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-25 18:57]:
> BTW, this is an argument for making an OpenNTPD ntpdate tool
well, it is already there, it is called rdate.
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, M
On 10/25/07, Boris Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you very much for that (valuable) reply!
> BTW, this is an argument for making an OpenNTPD ntpdate tool or adding
> one_time_synchronization functionality into ntpd. :)
no, it's not making an argument for a one-shot sync attempt
At 12:08 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, Stuart VanZee wrote:
The reason that people are going to #2 is that, if you are concerned about
security, that is the optimal way of setting things up. One box, one
task. That is true "separation". In this light, the question of if #3 is
more secure than #1 is tr
* J??rg Streckfu?? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-25 16:16]:
> Just one question. If you terminate the wan fibre on a switch and put a
> redundant router behind it, the switch himself turns out to be a single
> point of failure, right?
yes.
> Or do you have a second uplink which terminates on a sec
On Oct 25, 2007, at 10:06 AM, "L. V. Lammert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Jason Dixon wrote:
There is *nothing* in any virtualization software that makes having
it *more secure* than not having it at all.
Is that direct enough for you?
No, because it's wrong.
You're f
I think you forgot to count power savings here?
Theo de Raadt wrote:
And when physical servers cost less than some vmware licenses
Then it is even more dumb to defend such stupid practices.
Hi,
On 25/10/2007, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a HP Pavilion dv8000 too and, after install 4.2, i go back to
> 4.1. The audio on vlc, xine, xmms sounds too fast and cut from time to
> time (5-6 sec interv
On 10/25/07, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 'obvious' security benefits were in two or three other posts, . but, to
> summarize:
>
> > Separate UID/PWs for each domain/VM
Uh, how else would it work? How is this specific to virtualization?
> > Separate admin configurations & tool
At 12:23 PM 10/25/2007 -0400, you wrote:
On Oct 25, 2007, at 10:06 AM, "L. V. Lammert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Jason Dixon wrote:
There is *nothing* in any virtualization software that makes having
it *more secure* than not having it at all.
Is that direct enough for
Hello Brian,
Wednesday, October 24, 2007, 3:28:36 PM, you wrote:
B> OpenNTPD runs as a 'daemon,' yes, but it does so using privilege
B> separation and other goodies. The network code runs as a normal user,
B> isolated from other users. This is superior to running rdate AS ROOT
B> from a cronjob
At 12:01 PM 10/25/2007 +1000, Damien Miller wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> I still stand by my original statement. Running application 'domains' in
> VMs instead of on a single server increases security.
It no worse security-wise to run applications on VMs rather than on the
> I'm running an OpenBSD server with a lot of users and project groups.
> Each project has its own group or two to protect it's files from other
> users.
>
> As i know each user can have not greater than 16 groups.
> As the solution, i can change value of NGROUPS_MAX in sys/syslimits.h.
> But it r
> I noticed one problem with the disklabel output while installing 4.2
> It automatically detected the file system in my first slice which is
> fat32 wrongly as 4.2BSD
disklabel does not "automatically detect" filesystem types.
in the past, you have SPECIFICALLY said it was a 4.2 filesystem on
th
>>What you're saying, appears to be:
>>
>>1) 3 applications in one OS - less secure.
>>2) 3 applications in 3 physical servers - more secure
>>3) 3 applications in 3 virtual servers each running one OS - in
>>between #1 and #2 for security
>
>Yes, indeed!
>
>>What the others are telling you is t
At 08:06 PM 10/24/2007 -0400, Brian wrote:
Hi!
I think you are missing the point about x86 hardware being a mess.
No, I'm not. The discussion has nothing to do with hardware, but thanks for
the info.
Lee
At 09:57 PM 10/24/2007 -0400, you wrote:
You apparently missed my post. Allow me to re-summarize the situation.
There is *nothing* in any virtualization software that makes having
it *more secure* than not having it at all.
Is that direct enough for you?
Perfectly clear, and I agree totally
At 09:15 PM 10/24/2007 -0700, you wrote:
On 10/24/07, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have no clue what you're trying to say??? The original comment was the
> the number of vulnerabilities is a inverse measure of the security risk
> associated with a given OS.
Please stop feeding th
At 09:53 PM 10/24/2007 -0400, you wrote:
L. V. Lammert wrote:
The more discrete the security model (i.e. File/Print users are not valid
on the httpd server) the better.
There's something I think you don't see here. Let's assume, for a moment,
that you have a VM host running two guests, one O
At 09:46 PM 10/24/2007 -0400, you wrote:
On 10/24/07, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, it's YOU that missed the point! I never said or made any comparison
> to physical machines - the entirety of that I said is:
>
> "Running services/application domains in VMs increases security.
On 10/24/07, Damien Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You obviously didn't read Tavis' virtualisation security paper. VM escape
> vulnerabilites are not theoretical. Tavis found vulnerabilities in every
> VM he tested using only a couple of fuzzers.
Restating my earlier post again, in regards t
At 05:56 PM 10/24/2007 -0700, you wrote:
L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>security issues and protections do not add up like numbers.
>
> Sure they do. If I'm running Windoze as a guest OS, there are hundreds or
> thousands of possible vulnerabilities. If I'm runng OBSD as a guest OS,
>
Hi there,
Is there a way to turn off the long line scrolling in ksh?
I have been searching the manual, it mentions the feature, but does
not indicate if you can turn it off.
--
Best Regards
Edd
---
http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett
thanks everyone.
I got into kernel mode with the /bsd -c boot
I saw in the dmsg that was residual on the failing boot screen that :
uhci1: host controller halted
I disabled uhci* while in kernel mode - and on exit from kernel mode,
the system booted without error.
However this device only has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have a HP Pavilion dv8000 too and, after install 4.2, i go back to
4.1. The audio on vlc, xine, xmms sounds too fast and cut from time to
time (5-6 sec intervals)even playing internet radioand the HD
access sucks. For example: i spent
Am Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:25:32 +0200
schrieb Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * N.J. Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 19:28]:
> > I have two servers that I would like to setup to run OpenBGPD for our
> > border routers.
> >
> > I need to find a supported PCIe (not PCI-X) fiber card that r
Hi,
I installed OpenBSD 4.2 on CD on my amd64 that was running OpenBSD 4.0 fine.
I tried to mount the sparc64 CDROM to copy ports.tgz
But I get the following Error
# mount_cd9660 /dev/cd0c /mnt/
mount_cd9660: /dev/cd0c on /mnt: No medium found
# mount_cd9660 /dev/cd0c /mnt/
mount_cd9660: /dev/cd0
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Jason Dixon wrote:
> You apparently missed my post. Allow me to re-summarize the situation.
>
No, I didn't.
> There is *nothing* in any virtualization software that makes having
> it *more secure* than not having it at all.
>
> Is that direct enough for you?
>
No, because it
Timo,
If this box is going to be a firewall and you expect to pass packets from
one interface to the other you _MUST_ enable packet forwarding. Even if pf
is setup correctly for your network, no packets will traverse between your
internal and external networks unless packet forwarding is turned on
Hi,
I noticed one problem with the disklabel output while installing 4.2
It automatically detected the file system in my first slice which is
fat32 wrongly as 4.2BSD
But fdisk detected it correctly during the install phase
After the install I got inside the System to investigate.
The file system i
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 08:37:02PM +1300, Richard Toohey wrote:
> On 25/10/2007, at 8:28 PM, Richard Toohey wrote:
>
> >You are in charge of getting four ambassadors to a meeting. As
> >well as making sure they are happy and fed, you are in charge of
> >their security.
> >
> >All four are hat
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:07:59PM -0500, Tony Abernethy wrote:
> > only an idiot would think that separatey
> > physical machines would NOT increase security
>
> Many IBM PCs vs IBM mainframe
Apples and oranges. When people compare one box to many, they're
talking about the same arch of box.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 11:03:56AM -0200, Marcus Andree wrote:
> comments inline.
>
> On 10/25/07, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > thanks for your fast answer.
> >
> > Marcus Andree schrieb:
> > > Maybe you'll have to compile a new kernel. There's an options(4) option
> > > call
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:37:32AM -0200, Marcus Andree wrote:
> On 10/25/07, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've tried to run 5 QEMU guests simultanously but when trying to start
> > the 5th I'll get the following error message:
> >
> > warning: could not open /dev/tun7 (No suc
comments inline.
On 10/25/07, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your fast answer.
>
> Marcus Andree schrieb:
> > Maybe you'll have to compile a new kernel. There's an options(4) option
> > called tun. I had to add something like
> >
> > pseudo-device tun 16
>
> I read som
On 10/25/07, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried to run 5 QEMU guests simultanously but when trying to start
> the 5th I'll get the following error message:
>
> warning: could not open /dev/tun7 (No such file or directory): no
> virtual network emulation
> Could not initialize d
Hi,
thanks for your fast answer.
Marcus Andree schrieb:
> Maybe you'll have to compile a new kernel. There's an options(4) option
> called tun. I had to add something like
>
> pseudo-device tun 16
I read something while googling for this issue that you had to add
something like that for old
On 24/10/2007, Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Seriously, what (affordable) non-x86 hardware options are available,
> especially those without AMT or AMT-like backdoors?
>
> http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/articles/eng/1148.htm
> http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/
Alexander Hall wrote:
> Christopher Bianchi skrev:
>> Hello everyone. My situation is this:
>> i've a laptop, a Sharp pc-ax10 with Windows 2000 preinstalled , without
>> cdrom, floppy. I wish install OpenBSD on it. Naturally bios can't boot
>> from USB.
>> So i've thinked to boot the bsd.rd , but h
On 25/10/2007, Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/25/07, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The workaround is to do something like this, with a shorter filename
>
> or make sure you have a long filename in the root directory of the
> partition or mount with -l.
Aha! great.
Th
Hi,
I've tried to run 5 QEMU guests simultanously but when trying to start
the 5th I'll get the following error message:
warning: could not open /dev/tun7 (No such file or directory): no
virtual network emulation
Could not initialize device 'tap'
I have no idea why it looks for /dev/tun7 but aft
Hardware: ALIX Board from PC Engines
FreeBSD:
dmesg:
Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Fou
On 2007/10/25 08:50, Rodrigo V. Raimundo wrote:
> could the virtualization environment be secure if all guest OSes run in
> userland? (User-Mode Linux, QEMU without acceleration, ...)
Some qemu bugs were specifically mentioned in the paper.
Maxim Bourmistrov wrote:
>
> Some odd chipset, like SiS900 (sis0), do not wake up until your computer
> is in hibernated mode.
> This can be read from linux-driver.
>
> FYI:
> I have been playing with experimental WOL-patches for freebsd (partially
> ported them to openbsd) for 3COM-cards.
> Thos
With all this discussion some questions went to me:
what's the hardware needed to do full and secure (para)?virtualization ?
is there some arch with this support ever created?
could the virtualization environment be secure if all guest OSes run in
userland? (User-Mode Linux, QEMU without accelerat
Hi!
I'm running an OpenBSD server with a lot of users and project groups.
Each project has its own group or two to protect it's files from other
users.
As i know each user can have not greater than 16 groups.
As the solution, i can change value of NGROUPS_MAX in sys/syslimits.h.
But it requires ``
On 10/25/07, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The workaround is to do something like this, with a shorter filename
or make sure you have a long filename in the root directory of the
partition or mount with -l.
---
Lars Hansson
Stijn wrote:
> What I would do to test this:
>
> -Connect another box with crossover cable to re0.
> -Run tcpdump on both systems (as root)
> -(optional: Play with fixed speed/duplex settings)
> -Launch a wol and see if it reaches the other system (you do specify the
> network to send it to?)
Yep
On 10/25/07, Dominik Zalewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How to enable RAID 1 and sync first disk with second one without installing
> everthing from scratch like in those howtos?
well, apart from the fact, that these howtos are a bit outdated, as usual,
they do more or less describe what to do.
Jon Sjvstedt wrote:
>
> Please dont kill me :) I'm really not experienced with this
> kind of stuff.
Looks like you maybe cloned an 8GB disk to the 250GB disk
and are now running out of space on the cloned file system.
fdisk wd0 should give you the MS-DOS partitioning (what BIOS sees)
16383/16/6
Dear All,
I have a machine with two Maxtor 160GB hard disks. I've installed OpenBSD 4.2
on first one and I would like to use second one as a mirror.
As far as I understood I will have to repartition and reinstall whole system
to enable second disk as a mirror. All I want is to have software RAI
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
