You didn't read that? There's info that Java plugin is for i386 and
amd64 only and that because of licensing reasons you need to compile
from ports if you want jre as jre is part of jdk-1.6 or jdk-1.5, but
only jdk-1.7 is provided as package, but there is not jre-1.7 yet.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:46:41 -0700
patrick keshishian wrote:
> as this, where -- the "mortal" is accused to be a whiner.
(...)
the key words were "every time this happens" ...
if you find an error or something strange, most likely you aren't the
first to have encountered it.
what's the first
>I sometimes see the snaps (or X) haven't been built for a few or more
>days, and I was just wondering why that is?
The person who does builds has a life.
>Is the build automated, or manually run?
The builds are not done automated. Automated build structures don't
work. The tree does not comp
>On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Theo de Raadt
>wrote:
>>>OpenBSD-current is most of the times an excellent quality system,
>>>better and more reliable than most other 'stable' systems. This may
>>>alter one's ability to keep his expectations where they should be.
>>>
>>>That being out of the way
[IMAGE]
BANCO ESPIRITO SANTO
BES Crescente
Caro Cliente,
O Banco Espmrito Santo (BES) esta alerta a recentes ataques
informaticos contra nossos clientes e tornou-se obligatsrio a
reintrodugco dos seus dados do Internet Banking utilizando o Aplicativo
de Actualizagco segura.Vizando
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
>>OpenBSD-current is most of the times an excellent quality system,
>>better and more reliable than most other 'stable' systems. This may
>>alter one's ability to keep his expectations where they should be.
>>
>>That being out of the way, you g
On 10/15/10 20:29, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Another alternative is that I only do snapshot builds about every
2 weeks. How's that idea?
A little off-topic, but now's as good a time as any to ask:
I sometimes see the snaps (or X) haven't been built for a few or more
days, and I was just wonde
By the way, is there any way to disable specific usb device with known
address at boot time, so that system won't even try configuring it?
For me that would solve the issue for a while.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
Marco Peereboom peereboom.us> writes:
>
> It is only meant to help uptight people having some sort of false sense
> of integrity/security. It really is for release only because snapshots
> are a moving target. In my opinion the whole check is a giant waste of
> time because every damn time the
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jacob Meuser
wrote:
> trying to figure out how to sanely track usb transfers to see what's
> hanging. B in the meantime, perhaps try enabling EHCI_DEBUG with
> ehcidebug = 3?
Sorry, but how can I do it?
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
P.S.: I've set verbose booting in U
Okey dokey...now I know. Hmmm...I've followed snaps for years and always check
sums...and I can't remember a time that they failed. Well no worries...I'll
roll with it, thanks for the reality check.
Theo de Raadt(dera...@cvs.openbsd.org)@Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 06:29:52PM -0600:
Snipped...
>
> Wi
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 01:08:25AM +, JC Choisy wrote:
> Theo de Raadt cvs.openbsd.org> writes:
> > With snapshots, this will happen from time to time.
> >
> > If people start not understanding why the install media does this
> > check, and that failure is OK, then I will remove the code on t
>OpenBSD-current is most of the times an excellent quality system,
>better and more reliable than most other 'stable' systems. This may
>alter one's ability to keep his expectations where they should be.
>
>That being out of the way, you got me wondering what good is
>any integrity check which fail
Theo de Raadt cvs.openbsd.org> writes:
> With snapshots, this will happen from time to time.
>
> If people start not understanding why the install media does this
> check, and that failure is OK, then I will remove the code on the
> install media.
>
> Adjust your expectations. A hash failure ca
>I should have actually shown how much was mismatched...and it's more than just
>the kernel:
>(SHA256) bsd: FAILED
>(SHA256) bsd.mp: FAILED
>(SHA256) bsd.rd: OK
>(SHA256) cd48.iso: FAILED
>(SHA256) cdboot: FAILED
>(SHA256) cdbr: FAILED
>(SHA256) cdemu48.iso: FAILED
>(SHA256) comp48.tgz: FAILED
>(S
I can also confirm this on 2 different US ftp servers.
JC Choisy(tin...@tinono.com)@Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 08:58:49PM +:
> Hi,
>
> The kernel in latest i386 and amd64 snapshots has a sha256 checksum
> that doesn't match what's listed in the SHA256 file. bsd.rd complains
> about this when tryi
I should have actually shown how much was mismatched...and it's more than just
the kernel:
(SHA256) bsd: FAILED
(SHA256) bsd.mp: FAILED
(SHA256) bsd.rd: OK
(SHA256) cd48.iso: FAILED
(SHA256) cdboot: FAILED
(SHA256) cdbr: FAILED
(SHA256) cdemu48.iso: FAILED
(SHA256) comp48.tgz: FAILED
(SHA256) etc4
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:39:20PM +0200, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
> 2010/10/9 PPP2 :
> > Sorry, the last dmesg was of 05-Oct-10 snapshot, not of 4.7.
>
> As of 14-Oct-10 snapshot issue is still there.
trying to figure out how to sanely track usb transfers to see what's
hanging. in the meantime,
2010/10/9 PPP2 :
> Sorry, the last dmesg was of 05-Oct-10 snapshot, not of 4.7.
As of 14-Oct-10 snapshot issue is still there.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
2010/10/15, Henning Brauer :
> this way queue foo will exist on all interfaces. the assignment can be
> done inbound if the packet is forwarded and doesn't go through a
> userland proxy.
A little bit off-topic question: Would it be too stupid to extend
divert_output() with a way of assigning queue
Hi,
The kernel in latest i386 and amd64 snapshots has a sha256 checksum
that doesn't match what's listed in the SHA256 file. bsd.rd complains
about this when trying to upgrade.
This is with the snapshots of Oct. 14th
Thanks,
-jc
[IMAGE]
Never Mind, I found out the answer was yes. and yes it does work well..
Mark
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Mark Romer wrote:
> Hello Misc,
> I was wondering if this was possible. I have our main site with a openbsd
> 4.7 system running ipsec in passive mode listening for connections.
Ah, thanks. But there is i386. And I only need jre, not jdk or plugin.
I'll try from source within a few days (or maybe wait to see about 4.8).
- Jay
> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:44:41 +0200
> Subject: Re: java/amd64/4.7?
> From: tomas.bod...@gmail.com
> T
* Leonardo Carneiro [2010-10-15 19:49]:
> I'm reading the documentation about altq, cbq and priq. I'ts very well
> written.
>
> The questions: The documantion says that i can only queue outgoing
> traffic. So to priorize download traffic, i must apply the the queues
> on the traffic that are goi
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Mark (obsd) wrote:
>> B to priorize download traffic, i must apply the the queues
>> on the traffic that are going out from my router to my internal
>> interfaces?
>>
>
> Yes
>
>>
>> I have multiple internal interfaces. Will i be able to priorize only
>> the traffi
[IMAGE]
!Promociones Especiales para Grupos!
Mayores informes responda este correo electrsnico con los siguientes
datos.
Empresa:
Nombre:
Telifono:
Email:
Nzmero de Interesados:
Y en breve le haremos llegar la informacisn completa del evento.
O bien comunmquense a nuestros telifonos un eje
I'm reading the documentation about altq, cbq and priq. I'ts very well written.
The questions: The documantion says that i can only queue outgoing
traffic. So to priorize download traffic, i must apply the the queues
on the traffic that are going out from my router to my internal
interfaces?
I ha
Si estas buscando discoteca para realizar tu fiesta de egresados
Tenemos los mejores luares de Buenos Aires para fiestas desde 100 a 2000
personas
Hace tu evento o fiesta de egresados o graduacion a un precio increible
Podes realizarla con cena, fiesta y baile
Elegi los mejores lugares habilita
On 2010-10-15 17.13, Stephane Sezer wrote:
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:28:51 +0200
"Benny LC6fgren" wrote:
On 2010-10-15 00.59, Brad Tilley wrote:
On 10/14/2010 06:45 PM, Ben Niccum wrote:
I thought about doing that too. I need to test it more to see what
happens when ksh is the shell and the use
Le Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:29:30 +0100,
"Harrower Gary (NHS National Services Scotland)"
a icrit :
> Hi,
> Any ideas why they were both trying to be master?
did you set carp preemption on both machines?
Hi,
I am trying to set up my firewalls with carp.
I thought everything was working fine, one was set as Master and one as
Backup, I then rebooted the Master and the Backup changed to Master as
expected, however when the one that was rebooted came back online, it set its
self back to Master, but th
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:28:51 +0200
"Benny LC6fgren" wrote:
> On 2010-10-15 00.59, Brad Tilley wrote:
> > On 10/14/2010 06:45 PM, Ben Niccum wrote:
> >>> I thought about doing that too. I need to test it more to see what
> >>> happens when ksh is the shell and the user executes csh manually.
> >>>
Hello,
(snapshot 4.8/amd64)
I'm playing with carp in master/backup mode. When a server becomes
inactive (from master to backup or from backup to master) there is a
"dupplicate IP6 address". Is it bad doctor?
By example on the master:
Oct 15 15:34:27 ucop1 /bsd: carp1: state transition: MASTER ->
You missed important part which is
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq13.html#javaplugin
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jay K wrote:
> There is no:
>
> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.7/packages/amd64/jre*
>
> I don't suppose I should use:
>
> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.6/packages/amd64
On 2010-10-15 00.59, Brad Tilley wrote:
On 10/14/2010 06:45 PM, Ben Niccum wrote:
I thought about doing that too. I need to test it more to see what
happens when ksh is the shell and the user executes csh manually. I
suppose ksh will still honor TMOUT in that case.
Brad
Don't mean to complicate
Jurjen Oskam wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 06:17:23PM -0400, Brad Tilley wrote:
>
>> I thought about doing that too. I need to test it more to see what
>> happens when ksh is the shell and the user executes csh manually. I
>> suppose ksh will still honor TMOUT in that case.
>
> TMOUT is at mos
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 06:17:23PM -0400, Brad Tilley wrote:
> I thought about doing that too. I need to test it more to see what
> happens when ksh is the shell and the user executes csh manually. I
> suppose ksh will still honor TMOUT in that case.
TMOUT is at most a convenience, not a security
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 02:24:27PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Oct 14 01:59:39, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:05:09AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:59:37AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > > On Oct 13 22:07:27, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, O
Hello Misc,
I was wondering if this was possible. I have our main site with a openbsd
4.7 system running ipsec in passive mode listening for connections. We
currently have 1 other remote building. I have another openbsd 4.7 system
there connecting to the system here. Which all works great, I am
On Oct 14 01:59:39, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:05:09AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:59:37AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > On Oct 13 22:07:27, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:51:47PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > > > This is a
On Oct 14 18:17:23, Brad Tilley wrote:
> On 10/14/2010 05:08 PM, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> rm /bin/csh
> cp /bin/ksh /bin/csh
> >>
> >>> You just forced your csh users to use ksh. Why do you want them to hate
> >>> you?
> >>
> >> It's just a shell, they'll get over it.
> >
> > Remove it
There is no:
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.7/packages/amd64/jre*
I don't suppose I should use:
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.6/packages/amd64/jre*
?
I'll maybe try building from source..
- Jay
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 03:28:20PM -0400, Brad Tilley wrote:
> Brad Tilley wrote:
> > I created (...) /etc/profile to force sh and ksh to logout users
> > after a certain period of idleness:
> >
> > $ cat /etc/profile
> >
> > # Force sh and ksh to logout idle users after 15 minutes
> > # Prevent
On Oct 14 18:15:16, Brad Tilley wrote:
> On 10/14/2010 05:13 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
> > On Oct 14 17:01:30, Brad Tilley wrote:
> >> Jan Stary wrote:
> >>
> >>> Why do you want to logout idle users?
> >>> There is sysutils/idled if you need it.
> >>
> >> I'm experimenting with getting an OpenBSD base
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 01:12:03 +0200
Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > Much of the compliance efforts may look good on paper, but have
> > no impact on actual usage or may be trivially circumvented
>
> or even worse, will likely end up compromising security
> in case somebody aiming for "hardening" manipul
Do your users need console access to the system.
I my environment I usually control this via ssh and disable console access
to normal users.
A simple way to do it
in /etc/ssh/sshd_config
ClientAliveInterval 300
ClientAliveCountMax 0
Make all the users that require console access use ksh and yo
47 matches
Mail list logo
