On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 07:46:50PM +0200, Bret S. Lambert wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:38:54PM +, Jay K wrote:
My ideal setup would be:
1) no passwords (* in /etc/passwd or via vipw)
2) only ssh for remote access
i.e. no password-based security, only something better
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 02:02:26PM -0400, Adam M. Dutko wrote:
I recently tried to list contents of some of the CVS servers without doing a
checkout to see if it would be feasible to write a small script to identify
hot spots in the development tree based on recent commits. I believe this
Was using T61s and worked like a charm
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Clint Pachl pa...@ecentryx.com wrote:
I've been using an IBM Thinkpad T22 (P3 900MHz) laptop for quite some time
and I want to upgrade. I am looking for some expert advice on what to
upgrade to in the Thinkpad T-Series.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=127426139631321w=2
404
I still think that Adaptec was selled because of your stories :D It's
modern management style of thinking. Let's sell it (rename it) and we
can continue with our crap and advertise between people that Yeah,
those old products were bad, but now it's different, we are new
company, everything is
My xclient run under openbsd 4.7 and the server is cygwin on windows on my
local LAN. Everything works fine, but when I do an xlock or kdesktop_lock
it's very hard to relogin because top show me that xlock or kdesktop_lock use
the whole cpu.
Has somebody the same problem?
Stephan
OpenBSD the
2010/10/20 Fred Crowson fred.crow...@gmail.com:
My OpenBSD 4.8 disks turned up in the post this morning :~)
Awesome - thanks for another great release :~)
Fred
Mine arrived just minutes ago. From openbsdeurope to Holland. :)
Thanks devs and others who have made it possible!
Jasper.
--
We
Is there a way to redistribute routes from BGP to OSPF using bgpd and ospfd
?
I have a network where the core concists of openbsd devices using bgpd to
distribute
routing information. At present we need to use static routing if we connect
devices that
do not support BGP.
Regards Tony
Hi Tony,
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:44:46 +0700, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org
wrote:
Is there a way to redistribute routes from BGP to OSPF using bgpd and
ospfd
?
on bgpd.conf you might want to do this:
match from $peer1 inet prefix xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/xx prefixlen bla_bla set
rtlabel
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Tony,
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:44:46 +0700, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org
wrote:
Is there a way to redistribute routes from BGP to OSPF using bgpd and ospfd
?
on bgpd.conf you might want to do this:
match
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 19:25:22 +0700, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Insan Praja SW
insan.pr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Tony,
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:44:46 +0700, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org
wrote:
Is there a way to redistribute routes from BGP to
* Clint Pachl pa...@ecentryx.com [2010-10-23 03:11]:
I've been using an IBM Thinkpad T22 (P3 900MHz) laptop for quite
some time and I want to upgrade. I am looking for some expert advice
on what to upgrade to in the Thinkpad T-Series.
Two main considerations:
1. Core Duo 32-bit (T60) or
* Luca Corti l...@fantacast.it [2010-10-23 05:19]:
No big issues, but the fan is in fact a bit loud on OpenBSD, even when
running apmd -C. It could even suspend and resume correctly recently,
the T61 is completely silent btw, and suspend resume work just fine.
the wpi is crap (if anyone wants
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 14:29]:
rtlabel label
Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel routing
table.
Is this an error in the page or me reading it wrong ?
debatable... this could be worded better. with rtlabel foo, bgpd will
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 14:29]:
rtlabel label
Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel
routing
table.
Is this an error in the page or me
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 03:20:45PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 14:29]:
rtlabel label
Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel
On Wed, 22.09.2010 at 15:47:02 -0400, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com wrote:
Either will work fine so long as you purchase good NICs and avoid
cutting-edge (untested) hardware. The only things Linux does noticeably
better is:
* Dealing with SMP
* Dealing with lot's and
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 14:56:26 +0200
Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
I hate all that widescreen
shit. 14.1 1400x1050 is awesome.
Hear, Hear. I'm not alone in the quest that gets harder every day.
I've seen a revolutionary panasonic tv advert recently that reckons
they're tv is
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:48:51 +0200
Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote:
Also, Linux is better supported by hardware vendors, and/or much less
picky about hardware than OpenBSD is.
Ironically, I've found a system, don't know whether it's bios setup or
what, I haven't put my finger on it
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 15:04 +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
the wpi is crap (if anyone wants to do me a favor: send me something
that works reliably. the wpi in the X61s is the same shit, btw). loses
connectivity regularily and needs an down up dance.
That used to be the case, but with current
2010/10/23 Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk:
I've seen a revolutionary panasonic tv advert recently that reckons
they're tv is cinema proportion at 21:9. Rediculous, I've never seen a
cinema that shape and wouldn't go if there was one. The local 3d Imax
is almost square and it's much
On Oct 23, 2010, at 8:48, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote:
On Wed, 22.09.2010 at 15:47:02 -0400, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com
wrote:
Either will work fine so long as you purchase good NICs and avoid
cutting-edge (untested) hardware. The only things Linux does noticeably
better is:
cher monsieur comment vous et votre famille? J'ai obtenu votre page email
Maroc vrai jaune mon nom est Alamieyeseigha gouverneur de l'Itat de
Bayelsa ancienne du Nigeria suis rencontrez un problhme avec le
gouvernement du Royaume-Uni en raison de la nature de i inorme quantiti
diposie, je voudrais
On 2010-10-23, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org wrote:
rtlabel label
Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel routing
table.
I think this should be:
Add the prefix to the kernel routing table with the specified label.
Index: bgpd.conf.5
Just a small hint after the 60 series all thinkpads rock... but I
wouldn't go to T series unless you'll be moving quite seldom. My advice is a
whooping X61, ultraportable yet powerful and really silent.
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.orgwrote:
On 2010-10-23, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org wrote:
rtlabel label
Add the prefix with the specified label to the kernel
routing
table.
I think this should be:
Add the prefix
* Luca Corti l...@fantacast.it [2010-10-23 16:41]:
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 15:04 +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
the wpi is crap (if anyone wants to do me a favor: send me something
that works reliably. the wpi in the X61s is the same shit, btw). loses
connectivity regularily and needs an down
* Paolo Aglialoro paol...@gmail.com [2010-10-23 18:38]:
Just a small hint after the 60 series all thinkpads rock... but I
wouldn't go to T series unless you'll be moving quite seldom. My advice is a
whooping X61, ultraportable yet powerful and really silent.
the 4:3 14 T61 is still pretty
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 19:03]:
How does OpenBSD handle the same prefix being in both bgpd and ospfd ?
in general? OSPF routes have priority over BGP routes. that's
implemented kernel routing table side and the daemons setting the
priority field to their respective
The migration is aborted becouse the DC have a problem, so for the
moment the mirror is UP and running.
Sorry for the noise.
On 10/22/10 12:45, Gonzalo L. R. wrote:
Hi all,
The Argentinian Mirror is going down for 2 hours (aprox) we need to
change the DC, this take place tomorrow (Saturday
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 19:03]:
How does OpenBSD handle the same prefix being in both bgpd and ospfd ?
in general? OSPF routes have priority over BGP routes. that's
implemented kernel routing
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 19:03]:
How does OpenBSD handle the same prefix being in both bgpd and ospfd ?
in general?
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 20:50]:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org [2010-10-23 19:03]:
How does OpenBSD handle the same prefix being in both bgpd and ospfd ?
in general? OSPF routes have
Le Wednesday 22 September 2010 21:29:31, Rikky Taylor a icrit :
I was after some general advice. I need to setup a routing firewall with 3
interfaces, moderate traffic and a fair amount of NAT'ing in the rules.
Given identical modern server hardware would I expect a performance
difference
On Oct 23, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Jean-Francois wrote:
Le Wednesday 22 September 2010 21:29:31, Rikky Taylor a icrit :
I was after some general advice. I need to setup a routing firewall with 3
interfaces, moderate traffic and a fair amount of NAT'ing in the rules.
Given identical modern server
Hello!
I am wondering if anyone else has seen this problem in the latest current \
snapshots.
I have a C-program that uses the fmt_scaled function from util.h.
This program compiled and linked fine a couple of weeks ago but now I get the
\
following error:
/tmp//ccUmAX34.o(.text+0x34): In
link to libutil :-)
cc -o plop plop.c -lutil
Gilles
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 09:30:47PM +0200, Stefan Johansson wrote:
Hello!
I am wondering if anyone else has seen this problem in the latest current \
snapshots.
I have a C-program that uses the fmt_scaled function from util.h.
This
Hi,
I'm having difficulty to understand how softraid works ie. how to add chunks,
remove chunks, change and rebuild, add/remove hotspares.
The manpages bioctl softraid only mention basic configuration, but once the
raid is working ... any other related docs or man ?
Thanks,
J-F
I think that this will solve your hunt for informations ;-)
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/asiabsdcon2010_softraid/softraid.pdf
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Jean-Francois jfsimon1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm having difficulty to understand how softraid works ie. how to add chunks,
remove
Le Sunday 24 October 2010 00:34:53, Tomas Bodzar a C)crit :
I think that this will solve your hunt for informations ;-)
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/asiabsdcon2010_softraid/softraid.pdf
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Jean-Francois jfsimon1...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm having difficulty
The union of Ted and my diffs has been committed, so this is fixed for -current.
Philip Guenther
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote:
I am consistently getting this while compile the userland since Tuesday.
Does anybody else have it? It comes very early in the process too.
...
/usr/bin/awk -f /usr/src/lib/libcurses/tinfo/MKcodes.awk bigstrings=1
Softraid is not a volume manager. We don't support adding, removing chunks
after creation time. I'll take diffs for this however this is pretty far from
trivial.
On Oct 23, 2010, at 17:51, Jean-Francois jfsimon1...@gmail.com wrote:
Le Sunday 24 October 2010 00:34:53, Tomas Bodzar a C)crit :
I
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote:
On Wed, 22.09.2010 at 15:47:02 -0400, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com
wrote:
Either will work fine so long as you purchase good NICs and avoid
cutting-edge (untested) hardware. The only things Linux does noticeably
Received 4.8 CD set today in Arizona.
Many thanks to all the developers from a very satisfied OpenBSD
desktop user.
Gary
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 07:20:10PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Softraid is not a volume manager. We don't support adding, removing chunks
after creation time. I'll take diffs for this however this is pretty far from
trivial.
The one piece of information I found a bit unclear in the manual
How would softraid know which sd to rebuild if 3 are degraded?
Not debating the language couldn't be improved but that bit is IMO pretty
obvious.
On Oct 23, 2010, at 23:07, Niels Poppe ni...@netbox.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 07:20:10PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Softraid is not a
47 matches
Mail list logo
