On 23 aug 2011, at 01:32, john slee wrote:
> On 22 August 2011 23:45, Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote:
>>> As http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html states, there's little you can
> tweak
>> to improve your numbers; just get a nice-clocked, good cache-sized CPU and
>> give it some loving.
>>
>> The FAQ you r
James Colannino wrote:
> On 08/17/11 06:23, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
>
>> could you provide a dmesg and the list of commands that you run and
>> that didn't work?
>
> Sorry it took me so long to get back to everyone. I've been having all
> sorts of other issues at work that have prevented me fr
Le Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:49:47 +0200,
Per-Olov SjC6holm a C)crit :
Hello,
> Have not tried current, but will try current as soon as I can.
> Also... I will try to do some laborations with CPU speed of the core
> the OpenBSD virtual machine has. This to see how the interrupts and
> throughput is rel
Le Mon, 22 Aug 2011 20:04:50 + (UTC),
Stuart Henderson a C)crit :
Hello,
> OpenBSD has another way to handle this, MCLGETI.
Is there a documentation (for the human being, not the developer)
about how MCLGETI works? (don't find a lot about it)
Thanks, regards.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:10:05AM +0200, Per-Olov SjC6holm wrote:
> If you please will explain how "baddynamic" and avoiding certain ports will
> affect what we are talking about...
>
> Naaahh lets forget that section
I believe people are referring to the text above that:
One goal of OpenBSD
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Patrick Lamaiziere
wrote:
> Le Mon, 22 Aug 2011 20:04:50 + (UTC),
> Stuart Henderson a C)crit :
>
> Hello,
>
>> OpenBSD has another way to handle this, MCLGETI.
>
> Is there a documentation (for the human being, not the developer)
> about how MCLGETI works? (
On 2011-08-22, Per-Olov Sj?holm wrote:
> MCLGETI ?? Is it in if_em.c if I want to see how it is implemented?
it's in various files, see mbuf(9) and look for videos/slides from talks
by dlg (David Gwynne), there's an asiabsdcon talk with more details and quite
possibly some others.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:42:59AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-08-22, Per-Olov Sj?holm wrote:
> > MCLGETI ?? Is it in if_em.c if I want to see how it is implemented?
>
> it's in various files, see mbuf(9) and look for videos/slides from talks
> by dlg (David Gwynne), there's an asiab
Hi David (and thank to all the others for you reply),
I didn't have time to work on it but will have some time this week.
I think my main problem was from my Windows 7 laptop that look like to
block traffic until it "understand" that traffic can pass.
A exemple we often see with Windows 7 is
Hi all,
as some of you maybe know there's new player on OS market called
http://smartos.org . What's starting to be interesting is their "port"
of KVM to Solaris code base which is used as a kernel module.
Bryan Cantrill didn't talk much about licenses in his paper
http://www.linux-kvm.org/wiki/i
Postovani,
Zurka Forum sa vama u jos boljem izdanju!
Besplatan download najnovijih filmova,muzike,programa,
igrica,erotskih filmova, domacih i stranih i jos puno toga, noviteti svakoga
dana ! Zurka Forum se trudi da svojim clanovima maksimalno izadje u susret.
Proverite sta imamo novo za vas
On 23 aug 2011, at 10:54, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Le Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:49:47 +0200,
> Per-Olov SjC6holm a C)crit :
>
> Hello,
>> Have not tried current, but will try current as soon as I can.
>> Also... I will try to do some laborations with CPU speed of the core
>> the OpenBSD virtual machi
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Per-Olov SjC6holm wrote:
> On 23 aug 2011, at 10:54, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
>> Le Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:49:47 +0200,
>> Per-Olov SjC6holm a C)crit :
>>
>> Hello,
>>> Have not tried current, but will try current as soon as I can.
>>> Also... I will try to do some
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 06:17:53PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as some of you maybe know there's new player on OS market called
> http://smartos.org . What's starting to be interesting is their "port"
> of KVM to Solaris code base which is used as a kernel module.
>
> Bryan Cantrill
On 22 August 2011 17:19, Jan Stary wrote:
> With today's snapshot, I can no longer kill X with crtl+alt+backspace.
> Has something changed? Is DontZap turned on by default now? I am not
> using any config file.
I'm completely talking out of my arse here, but I have a strong hunch
that this change
On 8/23/2011 10:17 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
Hi all,
as some of you maybe know there's new player on OS market called
http://smartos.org . What's starting to be interesting is their "port"
of KVM to Solaris code base which is used as a kernel module.
Bryan Cantrill didn't talk much about licenses
martian67 [martia...@gmail.com] wrote:
>
> It is extremely clear, no non-ISC licensed/similarly licensed
> software will be imported into base. Peroid.
I don't know about that. Quite a bit of GPL software is now being incorporated
into the base tree. In fact, Theo is almost finished importing
On 08/23/11 12:17, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
...
> OpenBSD is really clear about its policy, but do you think that it's
> really possible to port stuff this way and made it available as
> module without need for change of license or worrying about shark
> suits?
"porting" stuff isn't the issue, usually
> yeah, you gotta wonder about that.
> No, really, you don't.
> Those that tell you it is about "Freedom" are mostly full of shit.
> It's about "it didn't cost me anything" to most of them.
We've got an entire operating system which is completely free as a
base; besides that, a shrinking set of GP
19 matches
Mail list logo
