Re: dhclient broken on 2015-09-21 amd64 snapshot

On 2015/09/23 08:16, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 07:37:05AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2015-09-22, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > > I just updated my current box to yesterdays (2015-09-21) snapshot. Now > > > it won't keep a network address.

Separators [Was: lighter sleep]

North American? ... On 22/09/15 12:45 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote: From: Christian Weisgerber Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:29:03 + (UTC) On 2015-09-21, Stefan Sperling wrote: The function that parses funny numbers is iswdigit() which gets a wchar_t. But

Re: ugen0 instead of urtwn0

> Those instructions are for 5.8 or possible 5.7, they aren't needed for > -current snapshots which already include this change. > Of course, I read the files. -- Thuban PubKey : http://yeuxdelibad.net/Divers/thuban.pub [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which

Gmane carries Squish OpenBSD Source Changes aggregate lists

Hi misc@ advocacy@ As mentioned on the OpenBSD Mailing Lists page [1] in the Other Lists section, the fine folks at squish.net [2] run daily and weekly source changes and ports changes summary lists: [1] http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html#OtherLists [2]

Re: ugen0 instead of urtwn0

On 2015-09-23, Thuban wrote: > * Stefan Sperling le [22-09-2015 11:33:28 +0200]: >> >> Starting with pristine OpenBSD 5.8 kernel source (or 5.7, if you want to >> try your luck), add the line [..snip..] > Thank you for this very complete explanations. > >

rookie questions about flavors

Hello, I'm not sure to understand correctly somme points : 1. A snapshot is a build made at one time of the developpement, more recent than *-stable* flavor. It is not *-current*. Can we consider a snapshot as an unreleased *5.8* at this time. Or is it above *5.8*? 2. In odrer to build the system,

Re: rookie questions about flavors

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:55:21PM +0200, Thuban wrote: > Hello, > I'm not sure to understand correctly somme points : > 1. A snapshot is a build made at one time of the developpement, more > recent than *-stable* flavor. > It is not *-current*. Can we consider a snapshot as an unreleased *5.8* >

Re: Making IPv6 NAT prefer privacy address

On 23 September 2015 at 15:34, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Em 23-09-2015 04:40, Stuart Henderson escreveu: >> Saves messing about with DHCPv6-PD > > I see. So you translate from what exactly? Wouldn't it be better to use > af-to instead of nat? Hello, Rather than

Re: Making IPv6 NAT prefer privacy address

Em 23-09-2015 04:40, Stuart Henderson escreveu: > Saves messing about with DHCPv6-PD I see. So you translate from what exactly? Wouldn't it be better to use af-to instead of nat? But I can relate to that, given that my CPE will give me a PD, but won't route packets back because it thinks the

Re: Booting Live openbsd image on fat32 media

The Windows DISKPART command-line utility (Windows Vista and later) can split your USB disk into multiple partitions. There are no GUI tools that can do this, to the best of my knowledge, though perhaps the Disk Management (diskmgmt.msc) snap-in can. On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:24:40 +0330 Mohammad

Re: rookie questions about flavors

Thanks a lot for this answer. > > 3. If one use a 5.8 snapshot (i.e [1] ), is it possible to apply updates > > for 5.8 *-stable* later? > > No. As I said earlier (and would be clear from a careful reading of the FAQ), > snapshots track -current, not -stable. Finding an install58.iso in a snapshot

Re: rookie questions about flavors

On 2015-09-23 09:41, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:55:21PM +0200, Thuban wrote: Is it possible to upgrade from 5.7 yo 5.8 using this flag : cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -rOPENBSD_5_8 -P src In almost all cases, a binary upgrade followed by sysmerge will be quicker

Re: dhclient broken on 2015-09-21 amd64 snapshot

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 07:37:05AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015-09-22, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > I just updated my current box to yesterdays (2015-09-21) snapshot. Now > > it won't keep a network address. > That's a recent bug - should be fixed if you

Re: rookie questions about flavors

Josh Grosse wrote: > On 2015-09-23 09:41, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 02:55:21PM +0200, Thuban wrote: > > >> Is it possible to upgrade from 5.7 yo 5.8 using this flag : > >> cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -rOPENBSD_5_8 -P src > > > > In almost all cases, a binary upgrade

Re: SR RAID5 rebuild/stability issue.

On Tuesday 22 September 2015 09:58:57 Karel Gardas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > > Karel Gardas [gard...@gmail.com] wrote: > >> Let me ask, should SR RAID5 survive such testing or is for example > >> rebuilding with off-lined drive considered

Re: Making IPv6 NAT prefer privacy address

Em 23-09-2015 11:49, Stuart Henderson escreveu: > Exactly. It also makes it easier to handle multiple ISPs for load-balancing > or failover, which IPv6 handles poorly (short of using BGP). Wouldn't multipath and properly constructed ifstated scripts be better in this case? Like reloading dhcpv6

Re: rookie questions about flavors

Am Mittwoch, den 23.09.2015, 14:55 +0200 schrieb Thuban: > 1. A snapshot is a build made at one time of the developpement, more > recent than *-stable* flavor. Correct. > It is not *-current*. Can we consider a snapshot as an unreleased > *5.8* > at this time. Or is it above *5.8*? At this

Re: Making IPv6 NAT prefer privacy address

Em 23-09-2015 11:16, Marios Makassikis escreveu: > Rather than announcing the prefix obtained via DHCPv6-PD you can pick a prefix > from fd00::/8 and announce that on your network. > It is the equivalent to RFC1918 addresses, except it is for IPv6. Figured it. These are ULA, right? > Therefore,

Re: SR RAID5 rebuild/stability issue.

On Monday 21 September 2015 23:02:39 Karel Gardas wrote: > Hello, > > due to work on SR RAID1 check summing support where I've touched SR > RAID internals (workunit scheduling) I'd like to test SR RAID5/6 > functionality on snapshot and on my tree to see that I've not broken > the stuff while

Re: Making IPv6 NAT prefer privacy address

On 2015/09/23 16:16, Marios Makassikis wrote: > On 23 September 2015 at 15:34, Giancarlo Razzolini > wrote: > > Em 23-09-2015 04:40, Stuart Henderson escreveu: > >> Saves messing about with DHCPv6-PD > > > > I see. So you translate from what exactly? Wouldn't it be better

Re: rookie questions about flavors

On 2015-09-23 10:52, Ted Unangst wrote: You may well be the first person to even try it. Peter was correct, though. It is *possible*. :) I haven't produced live media since 5.1, so it's been several years since I last needed to do this. And, if I'd done a better job of pre-launch

Re: Making IPv6 NAT prefer privacy address

Giancarlo, Why are you unable to route your DHCPv6-PD? I ask because I have been able to use OpenBSD as a typical IPv4 NAT type of router as well as a pure IPv6 router (does use pf for firewalling the router and the PD subnet, but no NAT on IPv6) all for my home network LAN. I use a fair bit of

Adding zombies to a pf table?

Hello, Zombies are often attacking ports which don't have services running, such as telnet (most popular indeed), mysql, 3551, 8080, 13272, etc. With a default pf block drop in on $ext_if, how can those source ips be added to a table? Which all can be dropped & small queued. I've tried to

Re: dhclient broken on 2015-09-21 amd64 snapshot

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 01:27:27PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015/09/23 08:16, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > Can you point me at the bug fix? I was looking at cvsweb again and the > > newest change I could see there is 2 weeks ago... > I believe this is the issue fixed by this commit -

Re: UEFI boot attempt on AM1 platform with logs (9/16 snapshot)

> This picture shows > > Load address: Loader Data (2) 0xd0 for 4096KB FATAL > > This is what I want to know. 0xd0 + 4M is overlapping the kernel > area. > > I think the following diff or > > http://yasuoka.net/~yasuoka/BOOTX64.EFI > (updated) > > will fix the problem. Great,

Re: Making IPv6 NAT prefer privacy address

On 2015-09-22, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Nat on IPv6? Why? Saves messing about with DHCPv6-PD ;)

Re: dhclient broken on 2015-09-21 amd64 snapshot

On 2015-09-22, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > I just updated my current box to yesterdays (2015-09-21) snapshot. Now > it won't keep a network address. That's a recent bug - should be fixed if you update again. > I'm seeing a note on the current FAQ from the 12th

Re: Making IPv6 NAT prefer privacy address

On 2015-09-22, Daniel Gillen wrote: > Hi > > I currently have the following rule to nat traffic out to the internet: > > match out on $if_ext inet6 from $if_int:network to any nat-to ($if_ext) > > But this chooses from one of the configures addresses (using round-robin).

HDMI on hp pavilion 10 10-f014au ?

Is there anything that can be done to get HDMI video functioning on this HP Pavilion 10 10-f015au? (dmesg below) After switching several times between virtual consoles with X11 running, it will begin to mostly mirror the laptop display on the HDMI device (a Toshiba Regza TV). It will be missing

Re: ugen0 instead of urtwn0

* Stefan Sperling le [22-09-2015 11:33:28 +0200]: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:14:22AM +0200, Thuban wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a usb wifi dongle supposed to work with urtwn firmware. > > usbdevs returns WNA 1000Mv2 Netgear listed here [0] > > > > But the device is detected as

Re: ipsec tunnel over IPv6

Nevermind! Worked it out… I spotted that the pings I were doing from the gateways were using the source address of the external interface, which was not part of the SA. explicitly adding the source address of the *internal* interface means it now looks good: # traceroute6 -s

Re: Recommended miniPCI express wireless module for PC Engines' APU system board?

The reason I am so onto this, is, there has been so many posts and threads has been here praising the PC Engines APU boards. I assume quite a few of you use it as a router, given its Ethernet ports. Then, why not add a wireless access point, too? That might be a popular request as well. Wi-Fi is

Re: Adding zombies to a pf table?

Craig Skinner wrote: > Hello, > > Zombies are often attacking ports which don't have services running, > such as telnet (most popular indeed), mysql, 3551, 8080, 13272, etc. > > With a default pf block drop in on $ext_if, how can those source ips be > added to a table? Which all can be

ipsec tunnel over IPv6

Hi all, I’ve just tried to set up an IPSec tunnel between two IPv6 networks, over IPv6 between the OpenBSD gateways. Isakmpd seems to have set the SAs up, but traffic is not flowing over the tunnel. A ipsec.conf: ike dynamic esp from 2001:470:1f1d:301::/64 to 2001:41c8:11a:5::/64 local

Re: Recommended miniPCI express wireless module for PC Engines' APU system board?

> I bought this card for my APU: > > http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005HMZ8B2/ > > Has worked great in AP mode. You will need the > bracket to make it full height. When I bought > it, it was $15, too. > > If I remember correctly, it shipped from China or > Tiawan and the estimate was a month, but it

Re: SR RAID5 rebuild/stability issue.

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Joel Sing wrote: > RAID5 should work (ignore RAID6 - it is still incomplete) and rebuilding > should be functional: > > http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article=20150413071009 > > When I reenabled RAID5, I had tested it reasonably as I could, but

Re: UEFI boot attempt on AM1 platform with logs (9/16 snapshot)

On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:40:52 -0500 Brian Conway wrote: >> This picture shows >> >> Load address: Loader Data (2) 0xd0 for 4096KB FATAL >> >> This is what I want to know. 0xd0 + 4M is overlapping the kernel >> area. >> >> I think the following diff or >> >>

Re: Recommended miniPCI express wireless module for PC Engines' APU system board?

On 2015-09-23, Adam wrote: >> I bought this card for my APU: >> >> http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005HMZ8B2/ >> >> Has worked great in AP mode. You will need the >> bracket to make it full height. When I bought >> it, it was $15, too. >> >> If I remember correctly, it

Re: rookie questions about flavors

On 2015-09-23, David Dahlberg wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 23.09.2015, 14:55 +0200 schrieb Thuban: >> >> Is it possible to upgrade from 5.7 yo 5.8 using this flag : >> cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -rOPENBSD_5_8 -P src > > Er, ay, never done it this way but I should