On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:55:23AM -0800, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 06:22:07PM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 10:40:52AM +, C. L. Martinez wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Where can I see what new features will be released in VMM
dera...@openbsd.org (Theo de Raadt), 2017.03.06 (Mon) 21:51 (CET):
> Well, is mentioning this even important?
That adding/removing disks might change the numbering of existing disks
is basic unix knowledge, I suppose.
But it might answer questions which are otherwise taken to the mailing
lists?
Hello,
I noticed socppc has not been built since 5.8. I guess we can consider it dead
and remove it from 61.html. While at it, delete the duplicate mention of hppa.
Denis
Index: 61.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/61.html,v
retrieving r
Hi,
how can I monitor the bandwidth and know what client is occupying the
bandwidth ?
Thank u.
http://www.ex-parrot.com/pdw/iftop/
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:28:50 +0100
Frank White wrote:
> Hi,
> how can I monitor the bandwidth and know what client is occupying the
> bandwidth ?
> Thank u.
>
--
thrph.i...@gmail.com
On 03/07/17 12:08, thrph.i...@gmail.com wrote:
> http://www.ex-parrot.com/pdw/iftop/
systat(1) states
>
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 11:28:50 +0100
> Frank White wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> how can I monitor the bandwidth and know what client is occupying the
>> bandwidth ?
>> Thank u.
On 2017-03-04, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> This is my home workstation from which
> I want to connect to my two ALIXes.
I would definitely just go for two separate USB-RS232 adapters in
this scenario.
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:28:50AM +0100, Frank White wrote:
> how can I monitor the bandwidth and know what client is occupying the
> bandwidth ?
There are quite a number of options available, depending on whether you're
mainly
interested in a 'live' view or collecting data over time.
For live
On 2017-03-04, Mihai Popescu wrote:
>> add athn0
>
> If i recall correctly, from some discussion on misc@, you cannot use a
> wireless interface in a bridge ( athn0 or all, I'm not sure). But
> maybe I say something wrong, search the archive.
You can bridge a wlan interface in hostap mode to an e
On 2017-03-05, Joe Gidi wrote:
> In the case of my admittedly Frankensteined system, it was needed. The files
> from Raspbian were different. I will do a clean install when the next snap
> comes out with the latest firmware, DTBs, etc.
>
> Do you know why u-boot.bin didn't make it to my USB drive
> know what client is occupying the bandwidth
trafshow from ports.
Is systat able to show kb/s realtime?
I found nothing to implement the relayd MIB in the SNMPD source code apart
from the traps part.
So it seems this is still a WIP.
Anyone could confirm that ?
--
Cordialement,
Pierre BARDOU
-Message d'origine-
De : BARDOU Pierre
Envoyé : lundi 6 mars 2017 16:46
À : misc@openbsd.org
Objet :
Hi, I have a new openbsd firewall but I have one strange problem... it is
really slow for surfing internet.
I have discovered that if I use squid as proxy (installed on the firewall)
the internet speed is ok. If I don't use squid the browsing is very very
slow... also if I ping google from a client
Before I make a decision, I want to ask you for suggestions.
I want to make a small file server, just to separate important
files from my working system. Two disks as Raid 1. Files are to
be read with NFS. Emphasis:
(1) Data Integrity (not security :).
(2) some degree of indepencence from hardw
Le 2017-03-07 17:29, Roderick a écrit :
Before I make a decision, I want to ask you for suggestions.
I want to make a small file server, just to separate important
files from my working system. Two disks as Raid 1. Files are to
be read with NFS. Emphasis:
(1) Data Integrity (not security :).
(
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Solène Rapenne wrote:
> Le 2017-03-07 17:29, Roderick a écrit :
>
>> Before I make a decision, I want to ask you for suggestions.
>>
>> I want to make a small file server, just to separate important
>> files from my working system. Two disks as Raid 1. Files are
On 2017-03-07 11:29, Roderick wrote:
Before I make a decision, I want to ask you for suggestions.
I want to make a small file server, just to separate important
files from my working system. Two disks as Raid 1. Files are to
be read with NFS. Emphasis:
(1) Data Integrity (not security :).
FF
On 2017-03-07, Roderick wrote:
> Disk are to be readable for many decades. Standard File System
> readable after moving the Disks to another computer, different
> hardware, perhaps with different OS.
*uncontrollable laughter*
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber
Thank you very much to all!
This feature make my laptop happy again.
On Thursday, 2 March 2017 15:32:40 CET, Theo Buehler wrote:
Hi, you may have seen that a version of this was committed today:
CVSROOT:/cvs
Module name:src
Changes by: nat...@cvs.openbsd.org 2017/03/02 03:38
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
On 2017-03-07, Roderick wrote:
Disk are to be readable for many decades. Standard File System
readable after moving the Disks to another computer, different
hardware, perhaps with different OS.
*uncontrollable laughter*
Then y
On Mar 07 16:29:12, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
> (2) some degree of indepencence from hardware and operating system.
> Disk are to be readable for many decades. Standard File System
> readable after moving the Disks to another computer, different
> hardware, perhaps with different OS.
Jus
I can read till now very old SCSI disks, also 3 1/2'' floppies, but
not always 5 1/4'' (because of the low level formatting). Of course,
And even much older magnetic tapes are easier to read than floppies.
I had already done the 5-8->5.9, 5.9->6.0 route when I got the note reading
saying how lucky I was ...
What actually provoked this upgrade was the acquisition of a new Soekris
Net6501-50, to replace my old Net5501. My home internet connection had
gotten faster than the old Net5501 100MB NICs could
On 2017-03-07, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
> softraid / regular hardware raid does the same checksumming, ZFS just
> implements a ton of extra nice features such as snapshots, compression,
> cow, etc... at the cost of a large amount of RAM. It's probably safe to
> say we will never see it i
On 12/12/2016 16:55, Joe Holden wrote:
On 12/12/2016 10:27, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 11/12/16(Sun) 00:50, Joe Holden wrote:
On 10/12/2016 08:43, Mihai Popescu wrote:
seeing some bizarre behaviour on one box, on one specific interface:
Hello,
This looks like some stupid TV game, where conte
On 2017-03-07 14:16, Stuart Henderson wrote:
- ZFS *does* checksum, even on mirrors, and can pick which of a pair of
mirrored drives is good and use it to correct the other one.
That i was not aware of, i only thought ZFS did that on RAIDZ pools.
Regardless of whether it will happen or not, I
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:26 PM, wrote:
> On 2017-03-07 14:16, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>
>> - ZFS *does* checksum, even on mirrors, and can pick which of a pair of
>> mirrored drives is good and use it to correct the other one.
>
>
> That i was not aware of, i only thought ZFS did that on RAIDZ p
On 2017-03-07 15:34, Karel Gardas wrote:
So if data correctness is your mantra, you don't need whole ZFS for it.
ZFS appeals to me for the snapshots / compression type stuff.
Well, I've not submitted my code yet
for the second attempt (first you can find in the archive) since I got
kind of st
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 9:22 PM, wrote:
> On 2017-03-07 15:34, Karel Gardas wrote:
>>
>> So if data correctness is your mantra, you don't need whole ZFS for it.
>
>
> ZFS appeals to me for the snapshots / compression type stuff.
Oh, I've mistaken you for OP.
>> Well, I've not submitted my code y
Hi there,
I have to live up to my obligations - and one of them is to be able to
work with M$-Word docs. I used to do this with SoftMaker's office suite,
but since Linux-compat is gone I am stuck with LibreOffice which is just
a PITA.
As at the end of the day I have to deliver results in a form m
I believe that the short answer is no, but devs will know for sure.
-l
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have to live up to my obligations - and one of them is to be able to
> work with M$-Word docs. I used to do this with SoftMaker's office suite,
> but sin
Hi,
Stefan Wollny wrote on Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:01:49PM +0100:
> ANY chance that there will be a way to run Linux binaries again?
Usually, i'm wary of making definite statements about the future,
but in this case, a clear "NO" semms like a very safe bet.
Syscall compat layers cause maintenan
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
Regarding your task at hand:
If you want to run MS Word, your best bet is running MS Windows.
If you want to run binary-only Linux software, your best bet is
running Linux. Ideally, on dedicated hardware that is not
connected to the Internet.
We use O
On 2017-03-07 15:57, Karel Gardas wrote:
RAID10 should be simple. RAID6 is in tree in some form. W.r.t.
HAMMER2/ZFS as a ZFS user using ZFS solely for more than 10 years
already, I'm not so keen anymore about COW due to fragmentation.
Otherwise snapshots are nice, but I'd rather snapshots to be a
One alternative, for production of Word documents, might be to use
Pandoc for converting from a lightweight markup language to DOCX. There
is no OpenBSD package for Pandoc, and building it OpenBSD can be tricky,
but I have succeeded with GHC 7.10.3 (wxallowed has to be enabled on
home and tmp). You
Am 03/07/17 um 22:43 schrieb Ingo Schwarze:
> Hi,
>
> Stefan Wollny wrote on Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:01:49PM +0100:
>
>> ANY chance that there will be a way to run Linux binaries again?
>
> Usually, i'm wary of making definite statements about the future,
> but in this case, a clear "NO" semms l
Am 03/07/17 um 22:50 schrieb Damian McGuckin:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>
>> Regarding your task at hand:
>>
>> If you want to run MS Word, your best bet is running MS Windows.
>> If you want to run binary-only Linux software, your best bet is
>> running Linux. Ideally, on dedica
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Yes - I will (again) contact SoftMaker trying to persuade them to
provide an OpenBSD-version of their office suite. But they seem to have
none with some decent Unix/OpenBSD-knowledge, just Linux. Sigh...
I would buy SoftMaker on OpenBSD.
Regards - Dami
> Any help ?
Yes. Look here: http://www.openbsd.org/support.html
For the sake of those 150 users ...
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:52:39 +1100 (AEDT)
Damian McGuckin wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Stefan Wollny wrote:
>
> > Yes - I will (again) contact SoftMaker trying to persuade them to
> > provide an OpenBSD-version of their office suite. But they seem to
> > have none with some decent Unix/OpenBSD-kn
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Frank White wrote:
> Hi, I have a new openbsd firewall but I have one strange problem... it is
> really slow for surfing internet.
> I have discovered that if I use squid as proxy (installed on the firewall)
> the internet speed is ok. If I don't use squid the brow
What about the some day upcoming RAID1C (RAID1-checksummed)?
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:39:50PM -0500, alexmcwhir...@triadic.us wrote:
> On 2017-03-07 15:57, Karel Gardas wrote:
> > RAID10 should be simple. RAID6 is in tree in some form. W.r.t.
> > HAMMER2/ZFS as a ZFS user using ZFS solely for more than 10 years
> > already, I'm not so keen anymore about CO
On 03/07/17 13:21, Roderick wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
>> On 2017-03-07, Roderick wrote:
>>
>>> Disk are to be readable for many decades. Standard File System
>>> readable after moving the Disks to another computer, different
>>> hardware, perhaps wi
Softmaker doesn't support any of the BSDs - they've done it years ago
for FreeBSD but the customer's interest was too little.
Am 07.03.17 um 23:52 schrieb Damian McGuckin:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Stefan Wollny wrote:
>
>> Yes - I will (again) contact SoftMaker trying to persuade them to
>> provide a
Hi,
I use Word Online on my OBsd laptop, which does help. I appreciate that
requires an Office 365 subscription which may not make it a palatable
option.
Regards,
Leighton
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Andre Ruppert
Sent: 08
Am 03/07/17 um 23:32 schrieb Stefan Wollny:
> at home this is the way I go, too. But I have to travel to my client's
> place (by train!) and when working in the evening in the hotel room like
> tonight (as I have to leave the office building by 8 pm at the latest)
> it is somewhat inconvenient to t
47 matches
Mail list logo
