On 06/02/07, Xavier Mertens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *,
I've a problem with an Apache web server hit by f*cking spammers...
I would like to filter some URLs (unused but still used by the bots) *BEFORE*
they reach the httpd processes. What could be the best method? pf? something
else?
On 03/02/07, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please pardon the off topic post but last month some people on this list
were wondering about Friendly Registrars after what happened to
Fyodor (of nmap fame) with is seclists.org domain being shut down by
godaddy.
On 28/01/07, Brian Candler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:36:38AM -0800, Joe wrote:
whats sad is how many people will never let go of NAT after they migrate
to ipv6.
It's not sad; for many people it would be essential. How would you like your
48-bit MAC address to become
Hi,
Anyone tried subj?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16856167012
http://www.msicomputer.com/product/p_spec.asp?model=Axis_700_Lite
It looks pretty-pretty nice, and goes for a very reasonable price --
about 202,32 USD delivered for a complete barebone -- it includes
case,
On 14/01/07, Samurai Chef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/14/07, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about thinking if he is allowed to use the (copyrighted) artwork for
commercial use?
Did he get the permissions? Does he have an OK from the copyright owner
to market these mugs using a
On 12/01/07, andrew fresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to shut down my laptop using the voltage sensors.
Unfortunatly I can't test this with a generic kernel because all my
sensors on my only -current box come from the ACPI subsystem.
The problem is, the limits don't seems to work:
$
On 17/11/06, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Williams wrote:
This is a light duty firewall, going on a DSL line (2.5 M). I will be
running spamd and perhaps squid (transparant caching web proxy), so the
demands will not be much on the hardware.
I'd like a (modern) motherboard that just
On 09/11/06, Eric Huiban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
has anyone advise to find cheap sensors (temperature, but also humdity,
pressure, light, electricity before UPS, ...) which are known to work
with openbsd ?
[...]
Modems are also great thing to recycle
from junk yard as monitor for power
On 18/10/06, Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/10/06, Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out OpenBSD :)
http://www.bsdstats.org/
For historical reference, info taken from bsdstats.org:
If you have any questions, comments, or suggestions, please send
On 18/10/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/10/06, Bob Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theo president ! :)
What an interesting idea. I would vote for him...
I wouldn't, and I count him as a friend. The president is a puppet
whore of special interest groups and shitheads,
On 18/10/06, Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out OpenBSD :)
http://www.bsdstats.org/
For historical reference, info taken from bsdstats.org:
If you have any questions, comments, or suggestions, please send email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating System
Systems This
On 18/10/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/18/06, Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out OpenBSD :)
http://www.bsdstats.org/
based on the country distributions, i'm gonna guess this isn't quite a
representative sample. just a hunch though.
OpenBSD seems to lead in
On 12/10/06, RedShift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Sampson wrote:
Due to the recent flair over the use of the Firefox logo, the GNU camp
has decided to fork the entire project, into IceWeasel. The idea here
is that they can't use the FF logo freely, so of course they must fork
it. I just
On 12/10/06, Kurt Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/community-edition-policy.html
OpenBSD is complying with the published guidelines for
the community edition. That is the only point that matters.
If the Mozilla Foundation thinks differently, I'm
On 06/10/06, Diana Eichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Bob Beck wrote:
Unfortunately, fixing the government while maintaining the universal
democracy that is practically insisted upon by the USA as world
uber-cop makes that a very difficult task. Democracy gets you
.
Sincerely,
Constantine A. Murenin, B.Sc. (Hons).
Hi misc@,
In the light of the recent discussions about Intel, I'd like to remind
misc@ subscribers that Intel publishes information about all their top
people that are responsible for producing wireless devices.
Intel doesn't publish the email addresses of these top people, but
knowing Intel's
On 03/10/06, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a) Intel doesn't own the technology, but licensed it from another
vendor. The licensing terms don't allow Intel to release full
details.
b) Intel has agreements with other customers/vendors to not release
information
On 14/09/06, Gilles Chehade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco Peereboom wrote:
Bash should be bashed. Its horrible garbage and should be banned from the
face
of this earth. We all know that real men use ksh.
what you really meant was `real men use csh/tcsh' right ? :-)
Yep, I don't get what
On 10/09/06, Alec Berryman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried to contact Intel about the Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG
firmware, but my email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the suggested
Peter now seems to work at http://www.soonr.com/web/front/team.jsp
contact in iwi(4)) bounced because it's now
On 05/09/06, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think that binary only drivers are well enough.
Surely better than nothing but ...
No fucking way. No support is FAR FAR better than a blob. Yes, really!
Indeed! When something brakes, do you want it to continue to work as
if
On 31/08/06, Miod Vallat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, FreeBSD seems to want Linux's fame and fortune and is gladly
giving away its history of a stable, clean codebase to get it. The
winning logo was honestly the last straw for me, though, so maybe that
says something about me...
Yes, it
On 31/08/06, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Harpalus a Como wrote:
I'm just a lurker on the OpenBSD list, but I think Charles is right about
Linux. The code is better then people give it credit for, and considering
it's vast popularity and what all it's
On 31/08/06, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Pedro Martelletto wrote:
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 06:50:00PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Even at the kernel level? Look at device drivers and vendors as one
example ... companies like adaptec have to write *one*
On 11/07/06, Weldon Goree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the buffer must hold? And how do I get all of them at once like (I
think) sysctl(3) says I can?
You can't get them all at once with one sysctl(3) call, as the memory
they occupy is not allocated continuously -- a linked list is used,
and each
On 11/07/06, Weldon Goree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the source, `/sbin/sysctl hw.sensors` calls its own main
parsing routine 256 times to check each of the 256 possible sensors and
allocates its own list from the results. Eek. Since I'm just writing a
Yes, I thought the same thing
On 21/06/06, Joco Salvatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the attacker could enter in single
user mode, without the need for the root password, and load a
malicious kernel module.
The attacker cannot load a malicious kernel module on OpenBSD, because
OpenBSD specifically does not support loadable
On 22/06/06, Ryan McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 01:04:00PM +0100, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
On 21/06/06, Joco Salvatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the attacker could enter in single
user mode, without the need for the root password, and load a
malicious kernel
On 22/06/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/22/06, Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops. :) I guess I misunderstood
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open_source_operating_systems
where Kernel type refers solely to the provided kernel of the OS
itself
Hello,
I'm running an sshd on port 53 (domain) as there is some convenient
wireless hot-spot that allows for both udp and tcp connection on this
port without any authentication. :)
(Yes, there is not even a need for NSTX!)
How do I tell my named(8) to only listen on udp ports, and leave tcp
On 20/06/06, Gilles Chehade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:07:25 +0100
Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm running an sshd on port 53 (domain) as there is some convenient
wireless hot-spot that allows for both udp and tcp connection on this
port
On 20/06/06, Gilles Chehade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:28:28 +0100
Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/06/06, Gilles Chehade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:07:25 +0100
Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
On 13/06/06, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The simple fact is that anyone who wants access to Hifn's documentation
need only log on to our extranet site (http://extranet.hifn.com/home/)
to download as much as they like.
That URL is not a place where you can download data sheets. That
On 11/06/06, Hamorszky Balazs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for some help on an article on wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open_source_operating_systems
Whilst there, what about another important article that seems to have
a Linux POV?
On 08/06/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want 11g hostap on OpenBSD, currently you need a
Ralink device. Afaik if you want a decent antenna, this means
PCI/MiniPCI (or possibly some of the USB devices).
Based on some pictures, I think that Zonet ZEW2500P would be a good
On 09/06/06, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, 09.06.2006 at 13:10:40 +0100, Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on some pictures, I think that Zonet ZEW2500P would be a good
candidate for a ural(4) USB 2.0 wireless device. It has a dandy
aerial, too
On 06/06/06, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 08:13, Ioan Nemes wrote:
The above article is a PR exercise, just testing the waters!
No, it's not just a PR exercise. The reason for the sudden retreat is that
they still want to be able to sell to the Taiwanese
On 26/05/06, Christopher Snell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/11/06, Chris Cappuccio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always run across cheap/free/lying around dell laptops that work great.
The sound works, the wireless might work, and suspend usually works. Right
now I have a dell latitude c400,
On 13/05/06, Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 03:44:41AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-13 03:00]:
Will it include the leap second patch Thorsten Glaser posted earlier
this week?
no.
Can I ask why his patch
On 11/05/06, rjn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking into getting a new laptop (I start college in the fall).
[...]
On 11/05/06, rjn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to thank everyone for their input. Although I won't buy
one immediately, I'll probably get a T43 as they are still
I didn't know that Linux has such an ugly dmesgs. Please, resist from
posting them on this list, they hurt my screen. :)
On 11/05/06, Timo Schoeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thus Robert spake:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus Robert spake:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus Alexander Farber spake:
Do you
On 12/05/06, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think drinking beer under a palm tree beats drinking beer at a
keyboard any day.
Why not drink a beer under a palm tree while at the keyboard?
Living in South Florida I have had the good luck to have many an
opportunity to do this... and I
Hi!
I'm wondering if there is a port of NSTX server and client for *BSD
systems? (I'd like to set-up OpenBSD as the server, and OpenBSD or OS
X 10.4 as the client.)
The stuff that I've downloaded from
http://nstx.dereference.de/nstx/nstx-1.1-beta6.tgz says that it's
linux only.
P.S. Are there
On 07/05/06, dave feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After running kde on 3.9 I found the following error messages in the kde error
log:
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
'/etc/samba/smb.conf'
kio (KDirWatch): WARNING: KDirWatch::removeDir can't handle
On 07/05/06, dave feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just upgraded to 3.9 yesterday and today I am having
severe network problems. This has been happening for the
past week, but is now much worse. Browser requests take forever
Clearly, it's OpenBSD's fault. Try downgrading to 3.8, or 3.7, or
On 07/05/06, Ilija Liebermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 11:35 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
On May 7, 2006, at 11:18 AM, dave feustel wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 10:53, Jason Dixon wrote:
On May 7, 2006, at 10:38 AM, dave feustel wrote:
After running kde on 3.9 I found
On 07/05/06, dave feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 16:16, D. E. Evans wrote:
Why are you repeating your question when you've already been
answered?
OK I didn't get it the first time. What was the answer?
Google is the answer. :)
On 05/05/06, chefren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please let other people think[0]
...
[0] and use Windows...
Think Different! :)
On 05/05/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/5/06, Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i would like to know how long should i wait before i receive my CD set?
Is there any reason for the delay?
Comments: Midia and Software costs should be listed separated.
see, here's your
On 03/05/06, Ste Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Theo the automated code scanner mentioned here?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/zd/20060502/tc_zd/177195
In reference to this commit
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/XF4/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Init.c.diff?r1=1.13r2=1.14
7 days
On 03/05/06, Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03/05/06, Ste Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Theo the automated code scanner mentioned here?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/zd/20060502/tc_zd/177195
In reference to this commit
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/XF4/xc/programs
On 02/05/06, Anton Karpov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
privileges to replace your compiler with backdoored one, he has another
65535 ways to abuse your box.
Did you mean 65536 ways?
Anyhow, I doubt many people nowadays have 16-bit boxes on public networks. :)
On 02/05/06, jared r r spiegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:33:48AM -0400, jared r r spiegel wrote:
i am not asserting that the compromise-pack did not have
a precompiled sshd binary for openbsd ( the prior hop
up the compromise chain in this case was a
On 02/05/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
once again, nothing changed. if it wasn't enabled in 3.8, it's not
enabled in 3.9 and it's not going to get enabled in 3.A.
eghhh... Is this the start of the version naming debate again? :)
What was the conclusion from the last time? ;)
On 22/03/06, Hannah Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 07:55:39AM +0059, Han Boetes wrote:
Keith Richardson wrote:
Hannah wrote:
Mailing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't work either (similar loop error
message). So could one please remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from
On 02/05/06, jared r r spiegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:49:07PM +0100, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
On 02/05/06, jared r r spiegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if we didn't have that little PIII/450 sitting next to the
machine now, for the purposes of bringing
On 03/05/06, Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/2/06, Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing is trusting the updated hostkey. Imagine you are a
sysadmin at a university. Do you keep the old hostkey when you
reinstall the system on a specific host? What about
On 16/04/06, Robert Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think so. In some cases the GSoC was not a real success.
Just check the mozilla SoC. People create broken stuff and wanted
their money. Then they just disappeared.
OpenBSD wants people who love to hack on stuff and not just hack
On 05/04/06, Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006 00:15:02 +0100 Andrew Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Linus faces this issue with future versions of Linux, he
doesn't like GPL 3 and won't accept it but he can't take GPL 2 off
Linux kernel since it is an evolving project and
On 05/04/06, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It means that a file with only #include statements is hardly
copyrightable and can be copied at will.
Can it really? I guess if in the end you make it KNF compliant and the
order of the various includes are changed, but are the exact same
If you want a good insight on the issue of legal implications of
creating derivative/non-derivative works with functionality that is
present in existing implementations, I suggest that you follow the SCO
vs. Linux lawsuit, the arguments around the issue are very relevant to
your question.
For
On 31/03/06, Hiro Protagonist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
below a small piece of code i found somewhere.
It works but mayby you wanna fix something.
[piece of code was here]
Why bother with manually compiling some third-party utility, when
rotatelogs(8) is already included with apache, see
Has anyone contacted Mark Shuttleworth for OpenSSH funding? I think
there is a very high probability that he would be happy to help
OpenSSH, maybe even pay someone fulltime to work on it...
(I remember from the beginning of 2004 that Shuttleworth was paying
some bugzilla developer such as to quit
On 27/03/06, Luca Losio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's always the polo shirt, or since you're in Europe, some of the gear
on https://kd85.com/notforsale.html perhaps.
Pics of the stuff?
The first link from the above page:
http://images.kd85.com/notforsale/
Hi!
I trust everyone had a lot of fun at the recent UKUUG LISA conference!
I've depicted some of this fun in the photographs, and here you can
see what you have missed if you have not attended:
URL:http://mojo.ru/uk/uug/2006-03/
;)
Having this opportunity, I would also like to thank everyone
On 16/03/06, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May be we just run a workstation dedicated to remotely connect to other
workstations, or servers that run X server only where it's needed and
that have no video card in these servers or workstations! (:
Ugh, you aren't supposed to run the X
On 13/03/06, Ramiro Aceves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you say that? Gnumeric works nicely under Linux. No problem at all.
If something is broken, it is broken. Period. Just because it seems to
work on Linux every time you try it, doesn't mean that they have no
programming mistakes in the
On 14/03/06, Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13/03/06, Ramiro Aceves [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you say that? Gnumeric works nicely under Linux. No problem at all.
If something is broken, it is broken. Period. Just because it seems to
work on Linux every time you try
On 12/03/06, Didier Wiroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've another question regarding compatbility with some websites using some
annoying third-party technologies like flash and java.
Unfortunately to get some info or make reservations online you can't avoid
these flash and java websites.
I
On 10/03/06, Wijnand Wiersma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/10/06, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But financially we are under strain, and it is not letting us grow any
of our bigger plans.
It sounds like you really have big plans. Maybe it is a good idea to
tell about
On 10/03/06, A Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A thought suddenly occurs. Perhaps big companies that use OpenBSD do not
want to disclose their use by donating because they fear that this might
give their competitors an advantage(now their competitors know what OS
they're using), or might help
On 02/03/06, Graham Toal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I do believe in Backup MX, as long as it does proper
relay checking. It's nice if it also does spam checking, but
not critical because your primary MX will still do that. However
Do you know just how disturbing it is to receive
On 02/03/06, Graham Toal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ host -t mx stonehenge.com
stonehenge.com mail is handled by 666 spamtrap.stonehenge.com.
stonehenge.com mail is handled by 5 blue.stonehenge.com.
Any mail delivered to spamtrap gets the following response:
450 Violation of RFC2821
On 02/03/06, David Terrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:38:09PM +, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Graham,
You seem to have some contradicting views on the matter. What is the
difference between greylisting and the aforementioned spamtrapping
approach? Isn't
On 27/02/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/02/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Van Hauser held a speach at the 22C3 about attacking IPv6.
He also said that even OpenBSD is affected by some of the attacks.
A working stream can be found here:
On 26/02/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Van Hauser held a speach at the 22C3 about attacking IPv6.
He also said that even OpenBSD is affected by some of the attacks.
A working stream can be found here:
On 20/02/06, Hannah Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:17:05PM +, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
[...]
Yes, there is always some compromise. But in this specific case we
have much less than even a fifth of memory actually being used for
programmes
On 20/02/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006/02/20 13:17, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
And 512MB, I must add, is the de facto minimum today for any machine,
For Windows PCs, maybe... Of the machines I have running OpenBSD, 64MB
is the most common RAM size, and those boxes
On 20/02/06, Hannah Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:49:01PM +, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
[...]
If this is a common state of affairs, you can always raise the
percentage of memory used for the buffer cache in the kernel, using
config -e
On 15/02/06, Sable Keech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TEMP1 is not shown when calling sysctl hw.sensors.
If I combine the command with 'openssl speed'
it shows the temperature.
Bad hardware? (new board, didn't run openbsd on it before,
so i dont know if it ever worked.)
viasio0 at isa0 port
Hello,
I have a box with 512MB of RAM, which is running a snapshot from 2006-02-13.
The box does not get used much, so most of the RAM stays still, i.e.
not used by the userland.
I am now quite surprised why OpenBSD does not use all of this RAM for
disc cache etc.
After rebooting the system,
On 11/02/06, Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hardly an expert so I hope you get some other opinions but here
are my thoughts:
On 2/10/06, Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At a remote location, I have two boxes that are connected with each
other via a serial cable
Our friend Peter seems to be gone or is hiding: Intel no longer
accepts mail for his account as listed in manuals for ipw(4) and
iwi(4).
URL:http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=109994542424009w=2
(2004-11-08)
Cheers,
Constantine.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mail
On 12/02/06, Moritz Lutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
i want to set up my screen resolution on tty to 1024x768 and smaller
fonts,
because i only work on tty on this maschine and this big fonts are a
very
bad on a 10,4 display. So is there a way to get this work. Because
i don't find
On 10/02/06, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
BSD on x86 has also suffered at the hands of these maniac virus
coders, so much so that there are hardly any BSD x86 web servers on
the web that haven't been repeatedly p0wned.
Hello,
At a remote location, I have two boxes that are connected with each
other via a serial cable, and through a router to the internet.
One of the boxes is OpenBSD 3.6, and I'd like to upgrade it to 3.8,
and then compile -current (I want to play with the kernel alongside
sensors.h / lm(4)).
It's a bit offtopic, but after some speculation in one slashdot-like
local forum, I've come to a conclusion that Linus has now rejected GPL
v3 for the same reasons that Theo rejects GPL in general, and Apache 2
licence in particular. :-) Well, I assume, it's a good start for them.
:-)
On 09/01/06, Shane J Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Julien,
On 09/01/2006, at 7:26 PM, Julien Bonastre wrote:
I can actually fully understand your disapproval at the idea of
using a torrent to distribute this file, and I can also emphasise
with your dislikening of trying to
Hi,
I know it's kind of early, but is OpenBSD/i386 going to run peacefully
on the yesterday-announced Apple MacBook Pro, or for that matter the
iMac with Intel Code Duo processor? :-)
Anyone has any plans on this matter?
Cheers,
Constantine.
On 22/12/05, eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's something strange. I'm trying to connect from a pf gateway to an ftp
server and it's failing in a very specific manner. Going through the pf
gateway works fine using passive mode, but from the gateway itself using
ftp(1) doesn't seem to work.
Hello,
Does anyone have any news on VIA C7, or VIA EPIA platform in general?
The current offers are so outdated, they still don't offer gigabit
ethernet in most solutions, and the things that are offered are indeed
overpriced (whereas VIA C3 is supposed to be a really cheap solution,
it looks
On 12/12/05, Tobias Ulmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:55:52PM +0001, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 01:38:57PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
No, but to the dot.login and dot.profile files in the same directory.
# chsh -s /bin/csh root
(login on
On 28/11/05, Jeremy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/05, Eric Faurot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/05, Jeremy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea has been mentioned in this thread that it's too difficult to
make websites work in multiple browsers and still be valid. That
On 01/11/05, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/05, Per-Olov Sjvholm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is what Dell says in the server manuals about enabling this feature in
bios:
--snip--
NOTICE: Before enabling the Speed Step option, ensure that the operating
system also
On 19/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a legitimate use for top posting.
Deletion and/or answer of message in 10 to 15 seconds or less.
Nonsense. Just because your MS Outlook does not support or is not
configured to support bottom-posting, doesn't mean that you should
Congrats from Mongolia.
and Happy birthday from Sweden!
And from a Norwegian in exile in Australia!
Happy birthday!
And from a Russian in Leicester, England!
Happy birthday, OpenBSD!!! Thanks to Theo and all of the developers,
it would not have happen without all of you chaps. ;-)
Hello,
I have an external USB 2.0 storage device with OpenBSD i386
installation and some free space. Is it possible to install
OpenBSD/macppc on that spare space without breaking my i386
installation?
How will it all work? Would it be possible to share /etc, /var and
/home partitions between
Hello,
I have an OpenBSD 3.7 i386 installation on an external usb-enclosure.
I have some space left, and I would like to create an msdos partition
(to transfer files between windows and OpenBSD).
I have tried to create one using OpenBSD's fdisk; then I have
formatted the new partition in windows
Hello,
I have an external USB 2.0 HDD on which I have successfully installed
OpenBSD/i386 3.7.
Is it possible to install both OpenBSD/i386 and OpenBSD/macppc on one
such drive in such a way that it will be possible to connect the HDD
to either i386 or PowerPC G4 computer and boot it either way?
On 07/07/05, Markus Wernig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
2) I assume that the answer to the following question is yes, but I'd
like to double-check: Is there really no way to upgrade a single
package/program to a recent version in a consistent way?
No. There is no
101 - 200 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
