extended, whether there's a convention about how to deal with larger
files, or whether it's sheer accident that it works.
Besides, having media types that can't be fully utilized is neither
useful nor acceptable, imho, but the solution can't be make only
smaller media.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Sun, 01.02.2009 at 18:34:31 +0100, Pierre Riteau pierre.rit...@gmail.com
wrote:
You seem to be mistaken.
yes. Thanks to all of you, and note to self: Don't post when
tired and distracted...
Kind regards,
--Toni++
, it says that the queue should be able to use up
to 80% of 970Kb (= 776Kb), only that it doesn't.
Any ideas, please?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
everyone else.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
On Fri, 30.01.2009 at 13:51:23 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net
wrote:
altq on $ext_if bandwidth 1800Kb qlimit 2500 hfsc (linkshare 1800Kb
upperlimit 1800Kb) queue { otheroffice, some other queues }
queue otheroffice priority 5 bandwidth 970Kb qlimit 500 hfsc (linkshare 970Kb
in the process... maybe.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi Henning,
On Mon, 22.12.2008 at 21:41:18 +0100, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de
wrote:
scrub in $somewhere from $foo to $bar max-mss 1400
is perfectly valid.
thanks for the example!
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Thu, 29.01.2009 at 14:47:30 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net
wrote:
And we get the joy of threading them together ourselves, understanding
OpenBGPd's code in the process... maybe.
can I just plug in a bgpd from -current into a 4.4, or preferably 4.3
system, assuming that I
this looks like the same approach suggested by the
draft RFC4893bis
I should dig this one up. In any case, the patch looks much like the
minimal patch that Claudio floated on the list in December. Can someone
please promote it to errata?
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
...
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Tue, 27.01.2009 at 21:37:28 +, Dieter open...@sopwith.solgatos.com
wrote:
Toni writes:
positives and false negatives. After deciding that the results were
far too unreliable, the page was pulled.
That too. For one thing people were entering the serial numbers
using lower
answers, which turns out to be quite a
nuisance!
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
negatives. After deciding that the results were
far too unreliable, the page was pulled.
Toni reports that ES and ES.2 may be affected.
This I took from a Seagate web page. Stuart Henderson has posted the
link, and I had the same link in my email which I received from
Seagate, so, I'd say, the link
of the required documentation inhouse.
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
it about
with FLOSS.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
correct about the 320 log entries?
My dealer told me a similar story, but I don't know where he had it
from.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
a gap in the man page, imho.
many of the views from pftop are also available in systat
(in the base OS) these days.
see systat queues, systat rules, systat pf etc.
systat queues does not work if you're not root, but otherwise, it
fills a gap, too.
Thank you!
Kind regards,
--Toni++
regards,
--Toni++
for the OpenBSD side of things, not
necessarily for the other machines he mentioned, and if he'd be
switching legs, he'd had to shuffle around several MACs per try
(obviously).
Kind regards,
--Toni++
not in 4.4).
Try sh netstart broken-interface to see proper error messages.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
On Tue, 06.01.2009 at 06:27:17 -0500, ppruett-lists ppru...@webengr.com wrote:
Actually a lot linux users suggest using mysql for the non relational
authentication tables
;)
I knew you've got to be kidding!
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Tue, 06.01.2009 at 14:42:09 +0100, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de
wrote:
* Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net [2009-01-06 12:25]:
This pattern comes up often, but almost noone suggests an alternative
LDAP server package.
I am not aware of any. Lack of options doesn't make
to be the prerequisite for the ability to
modify existing object's DNs.
openldap is still a piece of shit, but the ldbm backend is probably the
sanest one.
This pattern comes up often, but almost noone suggests an alternative
LDAP server package.
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
).
This is OpenBSD 4.4-stable.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
hosting, esp. email, bounced messages
upon 4xx without retrying at all. :(
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
playing by the rules,
especially as they mostly filed my mails to Yahoo! members into the
member's junk folder, and so far didn't respond as to why they're doing
it, or how one could change that.
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
to their
intended usage, so what might work for me, might not work for you.
Some somewhat popular projects to look at should imho include Request
Tracker, Trac, Roundup, and maybe OTRS.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
ticketing with it. If it's still the case that some of these systems
don't run well on OpenBSD (this was at some point the case with RT,
which tends to require rather current Perl stuff), I'd prefer to
resolve these problems instead of switching software packages.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
, I need several
attempts to get a useful connection.
So far, I was writing this off as you get what you pay for, although
I have much less trouble with Linux connecting to the same ISP.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
patched).
Any ideas about how to better debug such a problem are very much
appreciated!
Kind regards,
--Toni++
On Fri, 19.12.2008 at 10:38:28 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net
wrote:
Ping with oversized packets (I see 1548 bytes with tcpdump, and the
user set a packet size of slightly more than 1500 bytes) from
The user uses this command to test from his desktop computer:
ping 1.2.3.4 -l 1500
Hi,
thanks for answering. I have some comments, though:
On Wed, 17.12.2008 at 07:33:19 -0700, Duncan Patton a Campbell
campb...@neotext.ca wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:40:35 +0100 Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote:
I have question regarding Ethernet flow control. It would be nice
seen such a thing somewhere (tx_pause,rx_pause), but can't
find it right now. Checking my machines did not turn up anything.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
a bandwidth difference between the routers and his uplink, things
should start working again.
The bandwidth difference could probably be achieved by trunking.
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
per NIC on which it is
enabled, though.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
on
top of Django (www.djangoproject.com).
Hopefully one day, some one will have an itch to scratch that will not
be PHP based.
No need to let yourself be blinded by the plethora of PHP stuff, imho.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Thu, 11.12.2008 at 21:12:43 +, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2008-12-11, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote:
On Thu, 11.12.2008 at 02:29:22 +, Stuart Henderson
s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2008-12-10, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote
Hi,
thanks for your answer.
On Thu, 11.12.2008 at 02:29:22 +, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2008-12-10, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net wrote:
Example:
pass on $ext_if all max-mss 1400
you should use scrub on ... max-mss 1400
I have seen, and verified
is generally much faster than recovery from a compromized
physical machine, provided you have a clean image lying around, and you
are sure that the host is not compromized. But noone can guarantee you
that.
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
, or
whether this functionality is just not implemented, and pfctl catches
that case.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
is to not do
what I suggested above, but instead to go to /usr/share/sendmail/cf,
edit one of the files in there, and re-run 'make' to update the real
configuration in /etc/mail, but I don't know how to do the same
thing in those .mc files.
3. Restart sendmail.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
out means
that you don't have a tunnel after that.
Just my 0.2 cents...
Kind regards,
--Toni++
On Fri, 21.11.2008 at 13:05:16 +0100, Guido Tschakert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I suggest: use slurpd and make it redundant ;-)
Or use syncrepl and make it redundant.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
to this list, but would you use it
if I'd write it and give it to you? I'm sceptical, to say the least.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
using this: http://smtpd.develooper.com/
It's BSD licensed, too.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
in
the code).
Kind regards,
--Toni++
.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
On Tue, 30.09.2008 at 14:54:25 -0400, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately no. But I think one of the ports maintainers was
looking at it for 4.4.
*LOL*
There are some semi-finished ports floating around in the archives.
You might want to make a stab at it, too.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Kind regards,
--Toni++
= somekey
[LINK]
Phase= 2
ISAKMP-Peer = HP
This should imho read 'CONN' instead of 'HP'.
164004.288475 Exch 10 exchange_finalize: 0x85b87500 unnamed no policy
policy responder phase 2 doi 1 exchange 5 step 0
You need to specify a policy.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
with
existing counterparts of all kinds, most of them Windows boxen.
Any help is very much appreciated!
Kind regards,
--Toni++
through
Hurricane Electric. Ie, non-IPSEC traffic went through, but IPSEC
traffic was blocked.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
all attached keyboards, imho.
Logging in via SSH was no problem, however.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
OpenBSD 4.3 (GENERIC.MP) #1582: Wed Mar 12 11:16:45 MDT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 536473600 (511MB)
avail mem = 508956672 (485MB)
mainbus0
enable routing to discontiguous networks over VPN, and/or
what can I do to debug this problem further?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
adjust the broadcast address. If you do this interactively, do it in
one go.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
, yet.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
no qualms with running Linux, then I'd like to suggest KVM (would
like to see something like this in OpenBSD, too).
http://kvm.qumranet.com/
Kind regards,
--Toni++
rebooting, although load and cpu usage was quite low. If you
have ideas about what to dig, that would be great.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
for example in an IRC shell where most people do that
first? Could it be used with lots of data to crack open future sessions?
--
Toni Spets
to passwords typed
within the session e.g. su, sudo, ssh to another host, ...
Wait, how do you know someone is typing a password inside the session
and not just writing a text file or typing arbitrary commands?
--
Toni Spets
Hi,
On Thu, 11.09.2008 at 10:05:36 +0200, Markus Friedl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:11:05PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
I've just discovered that this is unsupported.
How difficult would it be to add support for this?
why not just tag the packet on enc0 and altq
to the 'wheel' group, only
to permit key-based login.
What gives?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Wed, 10.09.2008 at 11:57:46 +, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Specifically, is the user's home directory writable by wheel?
no, I've checked this. But I will have to check whether Hannah's hint,
too... (should have had this idea earlier, doh!).
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi Hannah,
On Wed, 10.09.2008 at 13:56:23 +0200, Hannah Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(I.e. check whether there's some intervening dir that's not accessible
to user admin/group admin, but to group wheel).
that was the problem, thanks!
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
I've just discovered that this is unsupported.
How difficult would it be to add support for this?
TIA!
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Thu, 04.09.2008 at 09:56:32 +0200, Christophe Rioux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
installation, but I don't find the sys.tar.gz (needed to recompile the
kernel with the raid features).
you could get a CVS checkout. The tree has been tagged, as far as I can
see.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
with the flow of ACKs to assign incoming
bandwidths, but can do so with the current software. Right?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
and memory in your box.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
in one go if you want to be sure in
the manual, though. ;)
But of course, if you have problems, suspect the memory, and maybe even
have other chips to swap in, I'd also not wait that long to get
confirmation.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
, employ window
scaling, delaying ACKs, and ECN to make the other side send their
packets at a slower rate. This should work unless the other side is
broken, or simply a rogue site. I don't know how much overhead such a
mechanism will introduce, though.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
problems running nginx as a reverse proxy for Zope? We
do it, and it gives us less trouble than the built-in Apache, I must
say (even ignoring the system load).
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Mon, 14.07.2008 at 12:44:15 +0200, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bigger HP Procurve switches are ok. Some shit, as usual, but all
in all very usable.
what do you mean by bigger?
Routers: OpenBSD, what else?
Erm, and on the hardware side, please?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
with less impact
than backporting 2.3.43 from -current.
In any case, I'd like to know whether you'd prefer such problems to be
reported on misc@, ports@ (I didn't do that to keep clutter out while
approaching freeze), or upstream's tracker directly.
TIA!
Kind regards,
--Toni++
hit that this is unfeasible?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Tue, 05.06.2007 at 17:30:47 +0200, Stefan Castille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dmesg will follow as soon as i can reboot one of these machines
look at /var/run/dmesg.boot. That might be what you're looking for.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
you are at it, make sure
that you grab the 1.4.9 update.
* Your KDE bindings should be completely unaffected, imho.
* You might need to configure LDAP access directly in your config
file, outside of KDE's tools.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
as of today (I didn't notice it earlier), I see this problem on one of
my machines:
# netstat -rnf inet
netstat: sysctl of routing table: Cannot allocate memory
This machine receives two full feeds @ ~255k routes each.
Any idea about how to combat this, please?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
/
Kind regards,
--Toni++
about what to offer to
you...
Kind regards,
--Toni++
to work well under OpenBSD)
No, and I can't recommend PHP in any case.
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Hi,
reading about spamd having changed the database format (recently?), how
do I best achieve replicating and merging the spamdb database(s) across
a number of machines, maintaining consistent white- and greylisting
entries?
Or is this not yet supported (the docs suggest so)?
Best,
--Toni++
away with that extra stuff I'm doing...
Best,
--Toni++
it
by not using sendmail, but this is not an ideal solution, and I thought
the sendmail fans on the list could simply show off their superiority.
;-)
Best,
--Toni++
,
--Toni++
and
DS [192.168.1.10]
Unfortunately, sending mail that way fails because Sendmail insists in
using the IP address of the interface going out to the Internet.
What gives?
TIA!
Best,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Fri, 16.11.2007 at 16:25:40 +0100, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-11-16 12:39]:
I've removed the '-s' flag for this reason, although I would very much
prefer to have it in place in the case that I have net access. I don't
know whether
.
Best,
--Toni++
to ipsec.conf).
An upgrade to 4.2 could be possible if that would solve the problem.
Any ideas about what that could be, or how to cope with it?
TIA!
Best,
--Toni++
) looks a bit different. It
complains that there is no valid C (or C++) compiler. Wish I had my
CDs, too...
Best,
--Toni++
commercial
users of OpenBSD, like eg. VMware, you are simply destroying that
credibility and respect you have worked to earn over the years.
Best,
--Toni++
we fall. There's a
variation that goes like this: Two people quarreling makes the third
(bystander) happy.
Best,
--Toni++
Note to self:
On Wed, 22.08.2007 at 17:13:30 +0200, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have routing problems with OSPF. For reasons I don't understand right
now, routing does not get adapted in the right way.
looking into the plus42.html file, it looks like I should be (or at
least start
probably start using snapshots really soon now. ;-}
Best,
--Toni++
) this are most welcome!
All relevant are OpenBSD 4.1/i386 -stable, as of May 24th, and a Cisco.
TIA!
Best,
--Toni++
do
not send each other messages).
thanks for clearing it up - my bad (RFC 2328, section 10.4).
Best,
--Toni++
is the Cisco machine.
Restarting the ospfd on one or the other machine has no effect I could
determine so far.
Any ideas are most welcome!
Best,
--Toni++
of power and reliability) AMD chip,
I'm all ears, too.
TIA!
Best,
--Toni++
Hi,
On Tue, 07.08.2007 at 16:22:08 +0200, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27.06.2007 at 11:08:16 -0600, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://download.intel.com/design/processor/specupdt/31327914.pdf
looks like intel pulled that paper. I'm unable to find it and would
!
Best,
--Toni++
r2 in the beginning?
I thought that the oder in which sessions go up (or down) would
(should) not matter...
Best,
--Toni++
201 - 300 of 446 matches
Mail list logo
