Quoth Gustavo Rios Saturday, November 05, 2005 8:40 PM
Hey folks,
sorry, but i found this on the web. May someone tell if it is serious,
i myself could not believe it.
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=424451seqNum=1
UNIX was a terrific workhorse for its time, but
, where
you work with multiple directories, each can be on a separate
partition...
I thought fsck on 300GB was painful. 2TB...
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
There is a legitimate use for top posting.
Deletion and/or answer of message in 10 to 15 seconds or less.
The stunt is essentially the same as stuff in newspapers.
The reporter writes. The editor puts as much as will fit in the alloted
space and ignores the remainder without even looking. The
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:06:11
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a legitimate use for top posting.
Deletion and/or answer of message in 10 to 15
seconds or less.
Nonsense. Just because your MS Outlook does not
support or is not
configured
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:07:47
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:06:11 +0100
Constantine A. Murenin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 19/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a legitimate use for top posting.
Deletion and/or answer of message in 10 to 15
seconds or less.
press.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
The first thing to do is to copy the drive with the photos
to fresh disk space before further damage is done to the originals.
Expect recovery to be long and painful even with some tools
to make it easier.
There are people here that know a lot more about this than I, but the
first thing is to get
multiple communities and I was also forced to use an external
route-server to see what was happening in my test network. I intend to
give this a new try when I have finished the project I'm currently
working on.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied
The editing is perfectlty safe.
It is the reading of a file that is being changed that is unsafe.
Of course there's Microsoft Windows.
- --- Original Message --- -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:39:47
OM I know this behaviour form every
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
These cards don't seem to be ath anymore.
The relevant bits from my dmesg.
rl0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 D-Link Systems
530TX+ rev 0x10: irq 11 address 00:11:95:24:6a:0d
rlphy0 at rl0 phy 0: RTL internal phy
rl1 at pci1 dev 1 function 0 D-Link Systems
530TX+ rev 0x10: irq
On 29/09/05, Schvberle Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope this proves to be useful to someone,
Daniel
I personally find all network performance/routing info on openbsd interesting.
Thanks Daniel.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied
Making is a process.
Toast is not a process.
- --- Original Message --- -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 02:30:10
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Security is everything you've ever said, plus a
process.
If it is secure, it doesn't need a
Security is everything you've ever said, plus a
process.
No. security does not require the process.
Attempted security (that doesn't quite work) requires a process.
Like the difference between does work and should work.
and the motherboard
boxes), were brand new.
Any suggestions?
TIA.
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just
retarded and need treatment w/ electricity and if that does
not help then perhaps should not use computers...
.
Thanks.
Tony Lambiris wrote:
I (think I) found the problem... I will be posting a patch shortly if I
confirm my suspicions.
Thanks.
Tony Lambiris wrote:
We have some motherboards with (what we think) are the same chips and
revisions with the same hard drives, but some drives are being
detected
I forgot to ask, would it be bad practice to just add
PCI_PRODUCT_VIATECH_VT82C571 to one of the cases in the switch
statement? It seems like this might go a little deeper
Tony Lambiris wrote:
Well I thought I knew what the problem was (nope).. I found something
interesting though
+ reg |= (VP3_CFG_TRIGGER_EDGE shift);
pci_conf_write(ph-ph_pc, ph-ph_tag,
VP3_CFG_PIRQ_REG, reg);
break;
Tony Lambiris wrote:
I forgot to ask, would it be bad practice to just add
PCI_PRODUCT_VIATECH_VT82C571 to one
a temporary fix for me.
Over and out, sorry again for the noise.
Tony Lambiris wrote:
Sorry for all the noise, this seems to have fixed it (from NetBSD):
--- via82c586.c.origMon Sep 12 19:38:35 2005
+++ via82c586.c Mon Sep 12 20:27:28 2005
@@ -256,9 +256,10 @@
reg
nice to use, it is
starting to give me the same feeling as pf. I got a 10 router bgp-only
test network up and running in just a few hours, most of the time was
spent installing the boxes.
/Tony S
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't
On 06/09/05, Karl Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tony sarendal wrote:
I've started to test bgpd to see if I can use if for a future project.
Are there any plans to make bgpctl show communities, originator-id and
cluster-list ?
Any plans of adding route-refresh to bgpctl ? Something like
I use OpenBSD boxes with a few 4xFE on two sites as switches/routers =)
I'm am happier with them than the cheapo switches I replaced.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
in internet/universe behaviour shows that
there is an infinite amount of porn, you just have to tweak
net.inet.somaxporn correctly.
/Tony
.
Is there any vendor that doesn't do that ?
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
architecture of input file `some.o' is
incompatible with i386:x86-64 output
Is compiling this way possible at all?
Ted Unangst wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Stuart Henderson wrote:
--On 29 August 2005 16:34 -0500, Tony Lambiris wrote:
Is there a way to compile something on i386 OpenBSD box
I actually hacked an existing util for NetBSD to run flawlessly on
OpenBSD (I have a Dell inspiron 700m).
You can get it here:
http://lysergik.com/~tony/openbsd.phtml
Baldur Sigurpsson wrote:
hi
use this thing:
http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/i855vidctl/
just remember to put the command
I know this will run fine, but will the dual-core and such be detected
and setup correctly, or is this an amd64 specific thing?
TIA.
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just
retarded and need treatment w/ electricity and if that does
Security is not having to say how high? when someone says jump!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Miroslav Kubik
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 4:54 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Shouldn't OpenBSD X11 come out with -nolisten tcp as
Is there a way to compile something on i386 OpenBSD box to run on amd64?
or is there a sysctl option I am missing?
Thanks.
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just
retarded and need treatment w/ electricity and if that does
not help
Thanks for not taking the easy route.
Changes are always painful, but if they deliver then it's worth it.
spkr0 at pcppi0
sysbeep0 at pcppi0
dkcsum: wd0 matches BIOS drive 0x80
root on wd0a
rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just
retarded and need treatment w/ electricity and if that does
not help
one path go down, the bgp session will go down and your network
will re-route.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
Alexey E. Suslikov wrote:
Nick Holland wrote:
PERSONALLY, I prefer to call the single processor kernel bsd.sp,
bsd.sp is not correct if you crazy about correct terminology :)
bsd.up (uniprocessor) is correct one.
Alexey.
Maybe it's just me, but everytime I see up I see down as its implicit
Unless I am very much mistaken, this is Unix not Multics.
To do anything with the rings, you must make userland
into a three-ring circus.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dave Feustel
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 4:05 PM
To: Theo de Raadt
Rings and segments are pretty much orthogonal concepts.
C is hardly unique in not supporting segmentation.
The only languages I am aware of that even come close are Burroughs
Algol and PL/I (and as always Basic Assembly). (Lisp?)
But overriding is the fact that x86 supporting segments does not
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
[snip]
We chose to use 0 for outside 1 for internal and 2 for server. I cannot
fool anybody into thinking that 2 looks like S, dammit!
From the land down under: Australia.
Do we look umop apisdn from up over?
[snicker] try a mirror.
But seriously folks, that looks like THE
emu0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Creative Labs SoundBlaster Live rev 0x00: irq 10
ac97: codec id 0x83847608 (SigmaTel STAC9708/11)
ac97: codec features 18 bit DAC, 18 bit ADC, SigmaTel 3D
audio0 at emu0
I can't get any sign of life at all from this one. Even cat'ing a file
to /dev/audio0 gives me
My solution was: unplug that shit and buy a cheap and supported (REAL)
compatible sb.
Doh !
Screwed over again. Good answer though, time to hit the shop.
Thanks.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
channels:2 samplerate:44100 bitrate:192
SDL: Audio timeout - buggy audio driver? (disabled)
audio: Bad file descriptor
Any ideas are welcome.
I intended to leave the box at my parents house since we currently live
in different countries and supporting old windows boxes is no fun.
/Tony
# dmesg
OpenBSD
This *may* help.
man mount
softdep
(FFS only.) Mount the file system using soft dependen-
cies. Instead of metadata being written immediately,
it
is written in an ordered fashion to keep the on-disk
It would be nice to see a comparison between em and sk.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
I couldn't help it, it's my nature =-
From a Toshiba Satellite, maybe not too dissimilar:
I assume the Q of pckbc0 ISA Q Port 0x60/5 is a typo
Seems to be a pckbc0 and a pckbd0
Beyond that I'm out of my depth. (way out;)
Loading...
probing: pc0 mem[639K 478M a20=on]
disk: fd0 hd0+
OpenBSD/i386 BOOT 2.06
boot
booting hd0a:/bsd:
The Linksys WRT54g has a 4-port switch, an RJ45 jack labeled Internet,
and an access point which can speak 11Mbps and/or 54Mbps.
What I do on our local lan is essentially to use it/them as a bridge.
Turn off the Linksys DHCPD, set the internal IP address, set a password,
set whatever parameters
Just guessing, but it looks like you are at the very fringe of what BIOS
can and cannot access. Insignificant differences have large consequences,
just like a few inches near the edge of a cliff. If so, any recompile of
the kernel would be unbootable.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
The following seems to work.
$ year=2005
$ foo=$(expr $year - 1900 )
$ dayscount=$(expr $foo \* 365 )
$ echo $dayscount
38325
Problems include an unescaped asterisk
man expr indicates that parentheses should work
but my playing with them seems to indicate otherwise.
---Correction:
$
is there a way to have fdisk re-inititalize the disk (fdisk -i disk)
without being prompted to go ahead with the init?
thanks.
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just
retarded and need treatment w/ electricity and if that does
not help
man crontab (from fresh OBSD 3.7)
FILES
/var/cron/cron.allow list of users allowed to use crontab
/var/cron/cron.deny list of users prohibited from using crontab
/var/cron/tabsdirectory of individual crontabs
I think there's a reason that they include the man
5% or so is reserved for root and is not available.
When everybody has run out of disk space, it is very helpful
if the situation does NOT apply to root.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Matthew S Elmore
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:35
Filesystem 512-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/wd0a 256252180540 6290074%/
256252 blocks less 5% reserve.
This gives 243440 blocks total available for users.
less 180540 gives 62900 blocks currently available for users.
180540/243440 gives
Dunno if it will help but
Writing to a fresh floppy (W98)
foo.txt
bar.foobar
dir dir.txt
The (possibly) long filename take up an extra directory slot
and is in the proper case.
Floppy should be FAT12 (very limited number of clusters)
but this has nothing to do with long file names.
The extension
Check /etc/man.conf
from fresh 3.7 install (with bash and a few others installed)
?? Did you install the man pages ??
bash-3.00$ cat /etc/man.conf
# $OpenBSD: man.conf,v 1.8 2001/04/05 19:05:49 millert Exp $
# Sheer, raging paranoia...
_versionBSD.2
# The whatis/apropos database.
User A is on the east coast.
User B is on the west coast.
They both use the same computer.
What time is it?
UTC is the correct time.
User wants to view time in his own time zone.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
C. L. Martinez
Sent:
If you use ping -I, how about ssh -b also ?
/Tony
Correctness is difficult.
Actually, security is the easier part.
(and it's easier to keep score;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
chefren
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 6:17 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Theo gave an interview to Forbes
3.7 's boot parameter changed or parameter I set
was wrong, please let me know correct thing.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you
workaround). I still
have yet to test sound and such (even though it is detected
successfully), but once I straighten everything out with this laptop, I
will post a dmesg and the code to fix the VBIOS.
ROCKIN!! :)
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
so if it is really hard for you then perhaps
the / partition,
then copy /var and /usr with tar/pax/cpio, switch the disks and pray
it works.
Do you think the above steps might work or did anyone do this before?
Thank you for your time.
Mihai IACOB
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
so if it is really hard for you then perhaps you are just
Dunno if relevant, but a long time ago, routing ethernet
over an internal SLIP connection (don't ask, fiber is much better),
connections were real flaky until I upped the MTU on the
SLIP connection to 1500. Seems Microsoft likes to put a
Don't Fragment into the TCP/IP setup and silently ignores
The gcc thread. The advice is to NOT use strange optimizations.
The experience supports that advice. This is similar to people
not following a recipe and complaining that the recipe doesn't work.
This thread is started by someone with a degree in teaching
computer science, who is afraid to
Some people on this list seem to have some anger management issues.
Some people not on this list seem to have some anger management issues.
Both statements true and both statements approximately equally relevant.
Overall, this list seems quite a friendly place, and if anything
is surprising, it
OpenBSD has an annoying habit of being right.
Perhaps if OpenBSD can be civilized into not speaking their minds,
OpenBSD won't be so annoying (by not being so right).
That seems to be the implicit thrust of these thingees.
Flames invited if I've misread the situation.
-Original Message-
On Thursday 09 June 2005 22:00, nate wrote:
Tony Sarendal said:
When it comes to network performance most plattforms have limitations in
packets per second before bandwidth. Please post the performance in pps
also,
as that is more interesting and more relevant, especially in the GigE
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 22:39, Sean Knox wrote:
Tony Sarendal wrote:
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 20:17, Sean Knox wrote:
I installed the NIC to the shared PCI slot and it has helped, but not
as much as I expected. Now that all NICs are sharing an IRQ, interrupt
usage has dropped from ~90
have you faced such problem ?
Every day.
]
Sort out the internet redundancy and the firewall redundancy separately.
Internet redundancy is simple, get an AS some PI addresses and run BGP.
For firewall redundancy and openbsd see carp and pfsync.
/Tony S
--
---
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP
is this?
i386
http://www.tyan.com/products/html/tomcati845gl.html
BIOS 2.01
copied over..how?
(there's a lot of wrong ways. Few right ways)
dd if=floppy??.fs of=/dev/rsd0c bs=512 on other box
failed to boot..how?
Loading:.
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
so if it is really hard
://www.neomedia.it
___
You didn't mention if ou also upgraded your ports tree to 3.7-release or
just the base binaries and Kernel.
Yes, it is from 3.7 CD too.
Bye.
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
so if it is really hard for you
No, they hate it when you do things that are advised against and that tend
to
run into trouble and you expect them to bail you out when you don't even
supply any hard information about the failures.
I've been following this thread, actually a bit amazed at the reticence of
the
developers. About
Some I've been in, the owner never gets a chance. You're already out of
there. Forcibly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Markus Kolb
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 5:06 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Problems with CPU/ARCH specific
and mount the writeable parts of the system with mount_mfs -P?
yes.
--
Tony Lambiris [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
End users are ruining computing.
Results can be a bit, ... interesting if there is a Linux swap partition in
existence.
(That's partition as in DOS/Windows/Linux, not partition as in BSD)
The swap is activated by default and the verification errors can be
interesting.
badblocks probably gives better assurance that the disk is in
Are you saying that instead of distinguishing between
foo and my foo,
the distinction should be between
everybody's foo and foo
for some spelling of everybody's
?
- --- Original Message --- -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, 15 May 2005 14:43:00
On Mon, 16
Can you put the files on two different disk drives?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Mikhail Malamud
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 9:39 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: fdisk and disklabel C/H/S
--- Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Further, since the switch is manageable, it has some ability to report port
status.
Odds-on that there is a disagreement on FULL/HALF-DUPLEX between the switch
and the network card.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Stuart Henderson
Sent:
601 - 672 of 672 matches
Mail list logo
