Here is two messages from Hugo Leisink (Hiawatha developer). You'll
note that the first has a newer date than the later, that's because I
delete it, and I asked Hugo to send it to me again :P
Thought that his words could be useful.
Greetings.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Hugo
Here is two messages from Hugo Leisink (Hiawatha developer). You'll
note that the first has a newer date than the later, that's because I
delete it, and I asked Hugo to send it to me again :P
Thought that his words could be useful.
Only useful if you are trolling.
Hilter.
Godwin.
Done.
Jason George wrote:
Here is two messages from Hugo Leisink (Hiawatha developer). You'll
note that the first has a newer date than the later, that's because I
delete it, and I asked Hugo to send it to me again :P
Thought that his words could be useful.
It is interesting and honestly I didn't
On Dec 7, 2007 10:51 AM, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason George wrote:
Here is two messages from Hugo Leisink (Hiawatha developer). You'll
note that the first has a newer date than the later, that's because I
delete it, and I asked Hugo to send it to me again :P
Thought
Ste Jones wrote:
Just to say lighttpd appears to be BSD licensed
http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/browser/trunk/COPYING
Between appears to be and being, there is a difference.
Right from the home page,
http://www.lighttpd.net/
fifth line And best of all it's Open Source licensed under the
On 12/7/07, Andris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is two messages from Hugo Leisink (Hiawatha developer). You'll
First of all, you have to take a look at the webserver market. You use
Apache, IIS, Lighttpd or you don't use anything at all. If you want
Ok, I'll take the bait:
On Dec 7, 2007 12:41 PM, Eric Furman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The deal breaker for Hiawatha, IMO (and I know it counts for nothing),
was his I will never abandon the GPL statement.
People really need to read the entire email before commenting. I'm
not negative towards using the BSD
license for
On Dec 7, 2007 2:41 PM, Eric Furman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:39:39 -0600, Gregg Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On 12/7/07, Andris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is two messages from Hugo Leisink (Hiawatha developer). You'll
First of all, you have to take a look
On Dec 7, 2007, at 9:41, Eric Furman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:39:39 -0600, Gregg Reynolds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On 12/7/07, Andris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is two messages from Hugo Leisink (Hiawatha developer). You'll
First of all, you have to take a look at
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 03:14:19PM +, Jason George wrote:
Only useful if you are trolling.
Hilter.
Godwin.
Done.
you forgot one step my dear friend :
1. hilter
2. godwin
3. ?
4. profit !
ok ok im out. i know the way out...
-[]
--
unzip ; strip ; touch ; grep ; find ;
while people are still reading this thread, i'll take this opportunty to
remind folks that if you'd like to help, please _test_ the very
important ipv6 patchset for the existing httpd(8).
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20071206151810
Whatever.
I'm responsible for tracking down an annoying bug Antoine Jacoutot had
with hiawatha on some machines. Namely, hiawatha was not starting up if
you had 1024 file descriptors available, or something really weird like that.
Turns out the culprit was bad coding habits. Some system call was
This horse is dead, Jim.
Well, fix it, Bones.
Sorry Jim, there's no way to do that.
Damnit, Bones.
--
Christopher Linn celinn at mtu.edu | By no means shall either the CEC
System Administrator II | or MTU be held in any way liable
Center for Experimental Computation | for any
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:39:39 -0600, Gregg Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On 12/7/07, Andris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is two messages from Hugo Leisink (Hiawatha developer). You'll
First of all, you have to take a look at the webserver market. You use
Apache, IIS, Lighttpd or you
On Dec 7, 2007 4:15 PM, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ste Jones wrote:
Just to say lighttpd appears to be BSD licensed
http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/browser/trunk/COPYING
Between appears to be and being, there is a difference.
Right from the home page,
http://www.lighttpd.net/
On Dec 7, 2007 5:10 AM, Andris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is two messages from Hugo Leisink (Hiawatha developer). You'll
note that the first has a newer date than the later, that's because I
delete it, and I asked Hugo to send it to me again :P
-- Forwarded message --
What is wrong with using the ports/packages system?
Why do people keep asking to replace x with y in base?
Whenever something is ready for base it'll happen. Until then you are
saying: you idiots don't know what you are doing because you are using
x instead of y. Nice start to get a discussion
$ lynx http://hiawatha.leisink.org
Looking up hiawatha.leisink.org
Unable to locate remote host hiawatha.leisink.org.
Alert!: Unable to connect to remote host.
lynx: Can't access startfile http://hiawatha.leisink.org/
What an extremely reliable webserver!
(Yea, server-reliability !=
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Ste Jones wrote:
Just to say lighttpd appears to be BSD licensed
http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/browser/trunk/COPYING
Between appears to be and being, there is a difference.
Just to clarify: 1- the author claims that it is under the BSD license.
Well, the author is the
On Dec 7, 2007 7:32 PM, Andris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007 3:57 PM, Ste Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But hey I am not an Openbsd developer and can't comment on the
security of lighttpd's code, but I think most people would agree it
would be better to have a maintained piece of
The latter is far more accurate than the former.
Greg
Good god folks, just stop it. It's GPL, so it isn't going to happen.
-Bob
On Dec 7, 2007 8:21 AM, Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As to this point, I see both sides not really giving a chance to
listen to the other. He finds BSDers abrasive; Funny, I've more found
linux to be the bastion of irritating screechy fanbois. This is a sign
that we (myself
On Dec 7, 2007 3:57 PM, Ste Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But hey I am not an Openbsd developer and can't comment on the
security of lighttpd's code, but I think most people would agree it
would be better to have a maintained piece of BSD software opposed to
a fairly stagnant bit of GPL.
On Dec 7, 2007 2:41 PM, Eric Furman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I'll add my own two p.
Even tho I know nobody asked.
http://www.acme.com/software/thttpd/
Not feature rich, but it's small, fast and strives for security.
Seems to have a BSDish license as well.
License example of thttpd:
/*
On Dec 3, 2007 10:53 PM, Damien Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Secondly, I don't think anyone in OpenBSD would display as much hubris
as this claim on the Hiawatha home page: Hiawatha's source code is
free of security-bugs.
Heh, OK.
I was reading about Hiawatha security features, and seems like a
perfect fit for OpenBSD goals. I'd volunteer to talk to Hugo Leisink
(the developer) and see if the code could be relicensed if the project
has interest in it. IMHO, replacing forked software with actively
developed one is a good
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Andris wrote:
I was reading about Hiawatha security features, and seems like a
perfect fit for OpenBSD goals. I'd volunteer to talk to Hugo Leisink
(the developer) and see if the code could be relicensed if the project
has interest in it. IMHO, replacing forked software
On Monday 03 December 2007 20:53:31 Damien Miller wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Andris wrote:
I was reading about Hiawatha security features, and seems like a
perfect fit for OpenBSD goals. I'd volunteer to talk to Hugo Leisink
(the developer) and see if the code could be relicensed if the
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:20:39PM -0500, STeve Andre' wrote:
On Monday 03 December 2007 20:53:31 Damien Miller wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Andris wrote:
I was reading about Hiawatha security features, and seems like a
perfect fit for OpenBSD goals. I'd volunteer to talk to Hugo Leisink
29 matches
Mail list logo
