On 2005-11-03 17:20:33 -0600, Daniel A. Ramaley wrote:
> On Thursday 03 November 2005 08:59, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> >http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/65660
> >
> >A MacMini is cheaper and runs OBSD.
>
> That's not entirely accurate; though a Mac Mini will run OpenBSD, it is
> not cheaper.
On Thursday 03 November 2005 08:59, Martin Schrvder wrote:
>On 2005-11-03 08:20:47 -0600, Jared Solomon wrote:
>> "The AOpen MiniPC measures 6.5 x 6.5 x 2 inches, is powered by an
>> Intel Pentium M or Celeron M processor"
>
>http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/65660
>
>A MacMini is cheaper and
On 2005-11-03 08:20:47 -0600, Jared Solomon wrote:
> "The AOpen MiniPC measures 6.5 x 6.5 x 2 inches, is powered by an
> Intel Pentium M or Celeron M processor"
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/65660
A MacMini is cheaper and runs OBSD.
Best
Martin
--
http://www.tm.
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS8464432110.html
This looks like something cool to add.
"The AOpen MiniPC measures 6.5 x 6.5 x 2 inches, is powered by an
Intel Pentium M or Celeron M processor"
--
The only way to keep your health is to eat what you don't want, drink
what you don't like, and do
Please guys, can we stop this fight over who does what and how to be
accessible from where.
In the interest of bringing peace back on misc@ I will extend the offer
to host this on high capacity network if the community really want it.
More then once the community always say, yes this is great
2005/10/22, Jurvis LaSalle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I totally agree!
A brief recap of the "Which SATA controller to
purchase" thread, "OpenBSD Hardware Sales" thread,
and all the MetaStore threads:
-user asks misc@ which hardware to purchase
for OBSD 3.Y. The user wants to know how to
match supported chipsets with actual products.
-the list says, "Gee, wouldn't
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 21:43:11 -0800, Szechuan Death <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason Dixon wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Good luck with that MetaStore thing. I'm sure it's going to be a huge
>> success.
>
> Thank you, although the goal is not that it be a "success" for me,
> but rather that it will provid
Please take this off our lists. I am sure noone cares.
> > Why block access to your website in an attempt to block spam? Spam
> > harvesters? If so it's pointless, these lists are archived all over the
> > net, your address is already out there.
>
> No, I just block netblocks because I don't ca
Jason Dixon wrote:
Good luck with that MetaStore thing. I'm sure it's going to be a huge
success.
Thank you, although the goal is not that it be a "success" for me,
but rather that it will provide useful information to OpenBSD users
and assistance to the OpenBSD development team in negotia
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 16:57:18 -0800, Szechuan Death proclaimed...
> Okay, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Having heard the whining about my apparently
> unpopular
> policy WRT netblocks in certain filthy, spammer-ridden Third World
> shitholes that should be nuked from orbit to protect the Internet
> from th
On Oct 22, 2005, at 12:14 AM, Szechuan Death wrote:
Good luck with that MetaStore thing. I'm sure it's going to be a
huge success.
--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net
Jason Dixon wrote:
I have no intention of starting a flamewar with you, so please take this
as constructive criticism, not a throwing down of the gauntlet, as it
were.
Tragically, it is not constructive, and yes, it is very much a request
for a flamewar. It contains nothing of value; it can
On Oct 21, 2005, at 10:13 PM, Szechuan Death wrote:
Gordon Grieder wrote:
Why block access to your website in an attempt to block spam? Spam
harvesters? If so it's pointless, these lists are archived all
over the
net, your address is already out there.
No, I just block netblocks because I
Gordon Grieder wrote:
Why block access to your website in an attempt to block spam? Spam
harvesters? If so it's pointless, these lists are archived all over the
net, your address is already out there.
No, I just block netblocks because I don't care about any traffic
from those countries, whose
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:57:18PM -0800, Szechuan Death wrote:
> Okay, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Having heard the whining about my apparently
> unpopular
> policy WRT netblocks in certain filthy, spammer-ridden Third World
> shitholes that should be nuked from orbit to protect the Internet
Why block ac
searching my soul to determine that a) yes, I would like
the OpenBSD Metastore to be visible to these unwashed masses even
if they do harbor poorly-socialized wankers who abuse their (and my)
bandwidth, and that b) no, I am not going to change my policy about
which netblocks I accept traffic from, I have
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 07:19:49 -0400, Matt Rowley wrote:
>> >what i can't really understand is, why bother making a tool like
>> >this, if you are afraid that it is going to be used, or that someone
>> >will ssh scan you from taiwan? so let's just block all the non us
>> >countries or what?
>>
>>
> >what i can't really understand is, why bother making a tool like
> >this, if you are afraid that it is going to be used, or that someone
> >will ssh scan you from taiwan? so let's just block all the non us
> >countries or what?
>
> I'm not afraid that it's going to be used. I _want_ it to be
hmm, on Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 11:06:35PM -0800, Szechuan Death said that
> I think you need a serious education about what rights you actually
> have. I do not _have_ to listen to or respond to any traffic from
> anybody, the end. I respond to whom I choose.
never said a word about rights. you m
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 07:15:26 -0800
Szechuan Death <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alternately, find an ISP that is not so braindamaged that they get
> netblocks from another country.
Well, we ARE the ISP and no, it's not braindamaged of us to get netblocks
from Taiwan (for numerous reasons that is
frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 07:15:26AM -0800, Szechuan Death said that
Yup, looks like. Sorry, Charlie. Take a flight to Taipei and snuff
a spammer or scriptkiddie, if everybody does that TW can be put back on
the "Civilized Net Nation" list. Arguments that US contain
Martin Schrvder wrote:
On 2005-10-13 07:15:26 -0800, Szechuan Death wrote:
there's nothing I care about in Taiwan enough to do so. Alternately,
Then stop buying anything manufactured in Taiwan (or China).
HTH. HAND.
Martin
I'm sorry - by what theory do you claim that I have to listen
On 2005-10-13 07:15:26 -0800, Szechuan Death wrote:
> there's nothing I care about in Taiwan enough to do so. Alternately,
Then stop buying anything manufactured in Taiwan (or China).
HTH. HAND.
Martin
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de
hmm, on Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 07:15:26AM -0800, Szechuan Death said that
> Yup, looks like. Sorry, Charlie. Take a flight to Taipei and snuff
> a spammer or scriptkiddie, if everybody does that TW can be put back on
> the "Civilized Net Nation" list. Arguments that US contains the most
> spam lor
As you want everyone to look at this can help, you *should* probably remove
the blocking you have in place.
Just my $0.02 worth.
On 10/13/05, Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And of course this message ended up in my spam-filter, and I'm not
> even going to tell it it was a mistake. =)
>
And of course this message ended up in my spam-filter, and I'm not
even going to tell it it was a mistake. =)
Szechuan Death wrote:
> Lars Hansson wrote:
>
> > Our ip addresses are assigned from TWNIC, even though we're not actually in
> > Taiwan, so that's probably why. The CIDR blocks in questio
Lars Hansson wrote:
Our ip addresses are assigned from TWNIC, even though we're not actually in
Taiwan, so that's probably why. The CIDR blocks in question is 203.65.244.0/22
and 203.65.248.0/22.
# cb findip 203.65.244.1 203.65.248.1
Netblock 203.64.0.0/14 is in country TW (TAIWAN)
Netblock 20
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 05:55:47 -0800
Szechuan Death <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nah, he's probably bouncing off my router. While I don't think he's
> running afoul of my OpenBSD pf-friendly auto-retrieval and aggregator
> for netblocks by country (http://www.sdeath.net/cb/, if anybody cares),
> in
matt valdes wrote:
$ telnet www.sdeath.net 80
Trying 64.4.231.19...
Connected to www.sdeath.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
Try a traceroute or tcptraceroute
Nah, he's probably bouncing off my router. While I don't think he's
running afoul of my OpenBSD pf-friendly auto-retrieval and aggregat
Lars Hansson wrote:
For those who didn't know, the MetaStore is at the following link:
http://www.sdeath.net/obsdstore
Maybe it's just me but I've never been able to connect to that site:
$ telnet www.sdeath.net 80
Trying 64.4.231.19...
telnet: connect to address 64.4.231.19: Connection
> For those who didn't know, the MetaStore is at the following link:
>
> http://www.sdeath.net/obsdstore
Maybe it's just me but I've never been able to connect to that site:
$ telnet www.sdeath.net 80
Trying 64.4.231.19...
telnet: connect to address 64.4.231.19: Connection timed out
---
Lars Han
New stuff has been added. Thanks to those who provided me information
on the Plextor PX-716A, the RouterBoard rb44, the Zonet ZEW2500p, and
the SysKonnect SK-98xx series.
A problem with Internet Explorer (naw, really?) that was reported to me
as preventing comments from being added has been fixe
Szechuan Death wrote:
> The MetaStore has been updated - comments are now enabled, you can post
> comments under each item listed. Drivers for hardware are also listed.
> Some other categories have been added, and some other stuff has changed
> in the background.
>
> Also, some new items have bee
The MetaStore has been updated - comments are now enabled, you can post
comments under each item listed. Drivers for hardware are also listed.
Some other categories have been added, and some other stuff has changed
in the background.
Also, some new items have been added. The more hardware that
> D-Link DWL-G650
https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/forms/blobs/retrieve.cgi?attachment_id=303696&native_or_pdf=pdf
I don't think you understand at all.
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:08:44AM -0800, Szechuan Death said that
> > http://www.sdeath.net/obsdstore
>
> nice work and all.
> but please don't put frames on openbsd.org
>
Nice work, .. *including* the frames.
Lee
hmm, on Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 05:08:44AM -0800, Szechuan Death said that
> http://www.sdeath.net/obsdstore
nice work and all.
but please don't put frames on openbsd.org
-f
--
how many of you believe in telekinesis? raise my hand!
Szechuan Death wrote:
> The MetaStore is at this point essentially complete, save for content.
> There are links on the page to assist in populating it. There are
> about 20 pieces of hardware featured on this: IT NEEDS MORE.
> I have received several bits and pieces of information, but to make
OpenBSD users:
In light of the recent post about ath(4) D-Link cards of particular
revision numbers not functioning properly, anyone who has the following
cards and can verify their functionality under some version of OpenBSD,
please inform me of that fact:
D-Link DWL-G520
D-Link DWL-G650
Senao
The MetaStore is at this point essentially complete, save for content.
There are links on the page to assist in populating it. There are
about 20 pieces of hardware featured on this: IT NEEDS MORE.
I have received several bits and pieces of information, but to make
this more useful, I need even
According to the manpages, MegaRAID controllers are "supported" using
the ami(4) driver. However, I have heard some things to the contrary.
Therefore, I am uncertain and will ask the question:
ATTENTION ALL OPENBSD USERS!
If you POSSESS or HAVE PERSONALLY WITNESSED any of the following cards
FU
42 matches
Mail list logo
