On 27. 11. 21 22:34, jwinnie@tilde.institute wrote:
Hello OpenBSD users and devs,
I am wondering if there are plans to change the
default window manager in OpenBSD.
Currently, the default WM is fvwm, with cwm and
openbox available as alternatives. However, none
of these are particularly user
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 04:36:58AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> jwinnie@tilde.institute said on Sat, 27 Nov 2021 16:34:48 -0500
>
> >Hello OpenBSD users and devs,
> >
> >I am wondering if there are plans to change the
> >default window manager in OpenBSD.
> >
Henderson
wrote:
> On 2021-11-27, jwinnie@tilde.institute wrote:
> > Hello OpenBSD users and devs,
> >
> > I am wondering if there are plans to change the
> > default window manager in OpenBSD.
> >
> > Currently, the default WM is fvwm, with cwm and
> &g
On 2021-11-27, jwinnie@tilde.institute wrote:
> Hello OpenBSD users and devs,
>
> I am wondering if there are plans to change the
> default window manager in OpenBSD.
>
> Currently, the default WM is fvwm, with cwm and
> openbox available as alternatives. However, none
> o
jwinnie@tilde.institute said on Sat, 27 Nov 2021 16:34:48 -0500
>Hello OpenBSD users and devs,
>
>I am wondering if there are plans to change the
>default window manager in OpenBSD.
>
>Currently, the default WM is fvwm,
The only thing wrong with fvwm is it ships with such
Hi,
jwinnie@tilde.institute wrote on Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 04:34:48PM -0500:
> I am wondering if there are plans to change the
> default window manager in OpenBSD.
No, i don't think there is any interest.
Experience taught us that importing additional code into the base
sytem is
Feel free to send patches.
BUT your definition of "user friendly" may not be someone else's.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 5:37 PM wrote:
> Hello OpenBSD users and devs,
>
> I am wondering if there are plans to change the
> default window manager in OpenBSD.
>
>
Hello OpenBSD users and devs,
I am wondering if there are plans to change the
default window manager in OpenBSD.
Currently, the default WM is fvwm, with cwm and
openbox available as alternatives. However, none
of these are particularly user-friendly, simple,
or modern, and I think it might be
hardware but I'm not aware of any
technical reasons why Firefox should be significantly faster with one
rather than another.
You'd still be using gtk either way I imagine.
Regards
Ed Gray
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021, 3:48 pm Mihai Popescu, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Technically speaking, is it
Hello,
Technically speaking, is it possible for a window manager to have a
performance impact on running applications in the GUI area?
Real case: i had to run firefox very fast on a fresh snapshot install, so i
used the default fvwm instead of cwm. The graphical response is instant,
much much
On Sun 2018.09.16 at 17:10 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018-09-16, ?? wrote:
> > Thank you very much, it works.
> > I always thought this would restart my whole session and I would loose
> > all my open windows.
>
> It does actually rest
On 2018-09-16, Родин Максим wrote:
> Thank you very much, it works.
> I always thought this would restart my whole session and I would loose
> all my open windows.
It does actually restart the window manager, but information relating to
the session (group etc) is stored "attached&q
Thank you very much, it works.
I always thought this would restart my whole session and I would loose
all my open windows.
15.09.2018 21:38, Antoine Jacoutot пишет:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 08:41:52PM +0300, Родин Максим wrote:
Hello,
May be a silly question,
how can I make the cwm window
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 08:38:25PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 08:41:52PM +0300, Родин Максим wrote:
> > Hello,
> > May be a silly question,
> > how can I make the cwm window manager reread its config file
> > without loosing my working
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 08:41:52PM +0300, Родин Максим wrote:
> Hello,
> May be a silly question,
> how can I make the cwm window manager reread its config file
> without loosing my working session?
>From cwmrc(5):
BIND FUNCTION LIST
restart Restart the runni
Hello,
May be a silly question,
how can I make the cwm window manager reread its config file
without loosing my working session?
--
Maksim
On Mon 2016.12.05 at 14:21 +0100, Rudolf Sykora wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying cwm for a while and would like to
> ask a question about it. As cwm seems to be developed
> within openbsd, I dare ask here.
>
> I seem to need desktops, thus my .cwmrc contains
>
> sticky yes
> bind M-1
Hello,
I've been trying cwm for a while and would like to
ask a question about it. As cwm seems to be developed
within openbsd, I dare ask here.
I seem to need desktops, thus my .cwmrc contains
sticky yes
bind M-1grouponly1
bind M-2grouponly2
bind M-3grouponly3
bind M-4
>At 7 Apr 2015 05:07:58 + (UTC) from Joel Rees :
>
>Switch back to the virtual console you ran startx from after you try the
>menu items and read the messages waiting there for you.
>
>(Of course, I was confused until yesterday, too.)
You're right ... I thought I saw that the WM changed, but w
On 06 Apr 2015, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
[snip]
>
> https://opensource.conformal.com/wiki/spectrwm
>
> Is a tiling wm and hacked up by OpenBSD devs. I'd be using that but I'm
> not sure I could make it easy for my users to use it (not it's aim) and
> until I have time to find out then I like to use
On Apr 7, 2015 8:42 AM, "patrick keshishian" @
gmail.com > wrote:
>
> On 4/6/15, L.R. D.S. @
mail.com > wrote:
> >>At 6 Apr 2015 23:12:43 + (UTC) from Brian Callahan @ devio.us >:
> >>
> >>Or, and this is just a hypothesis, you don't have all those other things
> >>and FVWM lists those for conv
says that
i3 is a tiling window manager, completely written from scratch. The
target platforms are GNU/Linux and BSD operating systems, our code is
Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) under the BSD license.
---
tuyosi takesima
On 4/6/15, L.R. D.S. wrote:
>>At 6 Apr 2015 23:12:43 + (UTC) from Brian Callahan :
>>
>>Or, and this is just a hypothesis, you don't have all those other things
>>and FVWM lists those for convenience.
>
> No, I can load everything normally...
> ok, I'm a bit worried now. I always check the sig
>At 6 Apr 2015 23:12:43 + (UTC) from Brian Callahan :
>
>Or, and this is just a hypothesis, you don't have all those other things
>and FVWM lists those for convenience.
No, I can load everything normally...
ok, I'm a bit worried now. I always check the signatures before/after install.
You fol
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 07:12:43PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
> Or, and this is just a hypothesis, you don't have all those other things
> and FVWM lists those for convenience.
I include CWM and FVWM, I don't know why include two WM.
--
Regards
Henrique Lengler
On 04/06/15 19:08, L.R. D.S. wrote:
>> At 6 Apr 2015 22:55:07 + (UTC) from Ted Unangst :
>>
>> Huh?
> Well, I was MitM'd ? The current snapshot (install57.iso) have all that
> packages here...
> When 'startx' they enter on Fvwm by default and when click on screen have:
> (Re)Start > WM's
>
O
>At 6 Apr 2015 22:55:07 + (UTC) from Ted Unangst :
>
>Huh?
Well, I was MitM'd ? The current snapshot (install57.iso) have all that
packages here...
When 'startx' they enter on Fvwm by default and when click on screen have:
(Re)Start > WM's
L.R. D.S. wrote:
> I think developers could do with WM the same done with lynx, remove and put
> on ports.
> I don't think someone need all the 9 WM on base system (fvwm, cwm, wm2, twm,
> ctwm, flwm, mwm, openbox and tvtwm).
Huh?
carbolite:~> wm2
ksh: wm2: not found
carbolite:~> ctwm
ksh: ctwm:
I think developers could do with WM the same done with lynx, remove and put on
ports.
I don't think someone need all the 9 WM on base system (fvwm, cwm, wm2, twm,
ctwm, flwm, mwm, openbox and tvtwm).
That's bloat. And flwm need fltk 1.3.X. JWM is really user friendly, minimal,
don't have depende
On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:11:21 +0900
Joel Rees wrote:
> On my twelve or thirteen year old single-processor 32-bit box running
> a Japanese IME and stuff that works with Japanese, fvwm doesn't really
> feel any lighter. Typing really lags sometimes when the processor gets
> busy.
>
> Which is what I
>> patience.
> >>
> >> (I need to check my X11 configuration.)
> >>
> >> But fvwm, the "default" window manager, is no lighter than XFCE4.
> >
> >
> > Do you mean xfwm which is based on fvwm, if so the lightness is
> > likely
Eivind Eide writes:
>> i recommend jwm as window manager .
>
> Second that. It's a good WM for slow systems. But obsd port sticks at 2.1.0
> http://openports.se/x11/jwm
> while upstreams have 2.2.2
> http://www.joewing.net/projects/jwm/release-2.2.shtml#v2.2.2
> ..
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:19:57 +0900
> Joel Rees wrote:
>
>> I'm using XFCE4 okay. It's a bit heavy, but I can use it, with patience.
>>
>> (I need to check my X11 configuration.)
>>
>> But fvwm,
On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:19:57 +0900
Joel Rees wrote:
> I'm using XFCE4 okay. It's a bit heavy, but I can use it, with patience.
>
> (I need to check my X11 configuration.)
>
> But fvwm, the "default" window manager, is no lighter than XFCE4.
Do you mean xfw
Otsukaresama desu.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Tuyosi Takesima wrote:
> thanks fo reply .
> i understand jwm's state at present.
>
> openbsd's default X window manager(i don't know it's name) is
> difficult to use especially non-english language user .
>
i use ibus-anthy
$ pkg_info | grep ibus
ibus-1.5.5 intelligent input bus framework
ibus-anthy-1.5.4japanese input engine for ibus
and start by it
/usr/local/bin/ibus-daemon -d -x -r
i'll try cwm someday after studing it .
thank you.
---
tuyosi takesima
On 2015-04-06 09:59:29, Tuyosi Takesima wrote:
> thanks fo reply .
> i understand jwm's state at present.
>
> openbsd's default X window manager(i don't know it's name) is
> difficult to use especially non-english language user .
>
> it's defect is
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 09:59:29AM +0900, Tuyosi Takesima wrote:
> thanks fo reply .
> i understand jwm's state at present.
>
> openbsd's default X window manager(i don't know it's name) is
> difficult to use especially non-english language user .
OpenBSD hav
thanks fo reply .
i understand jwm's state at present.
openbsd's default X window manager(i don't know it's name) is
difficult to use especially non-english language user .
it's defect is that it doesn't show the state of input method.
jwm show the state of input
> i recommend jwm as window manager .
Second that. It's a good WM for slow systems. But obsd port sticks at 2.1.0
http://openports.se/x11/jwm
while upstreams have 2.2.2
http://www.joewing.net/projects/jwm/release-2.2.shtml#v2.2.2
...probably have to read myself up on updating obsd ports
Hi , all .
i recommend jwm as window manager .
it is light ant easy to use .
so it is used on puppy linux .
1) pkg_add jwm
2) .xinitrc
jwm
3) startx
that all
tuyosi takesima
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:50:50 +0100, marc wrote:
> Hi all,
> Subject: Choosing a window manager...
All of you - you are completely misguided.
The redmoondian horror misled you to use crude stuff.
(Hey, if you're american: crude is *not* a noun here!!!)
'Cause there is one, and onl
No. Before that.
- Original Message -
From: marc
Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011 5:09 pm
Subject: Re: Choosing a window manager...
To: Kevin Chadwick
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> > If there's a beginning to time then what started it or what made
> what> started time. What ma
On 2011-03-15, Bret Lambert wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
>>> I'm deciding between kde, xfce, gnome, and fluxbox (in order of
>>> preference). Any experiences? Any relevant security issues on any of them?
>>>
>>
>> What you're asking is akin to:
>>
>> "Hey everyone,
> If there's a beginning to time then what started it or what made what
> started time. What made what made dark matter.
are you talking about the console? :)
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:32:50 +0300
Krutov Mikle wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 02:50:50PM -0400, marc wrote:
> >
> > I'm deciding between kde, xfce, gnome, and fluxbox (in order of
> > preference). Any experiences? Any relevant security issues on any
> > of them?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marc
> >
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:23:36 -0400
Fasil Alemante (falem...@princeton.edu) wrote:
> There should be at least one evangelist.
Fuck off ya gay
Only kidding...
...yeah that's too polite for a stereotype evangelist
Still kidding
There should be at least one evangelist.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Chadwick
Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011 6:05 am
Subject: Re: Choosing a window manager...
To: misc@openbsd.org
> If you want security use something with a smaller code base or no xorg
> at all (switch off
> More northern than the North Pole :: Earlier in time than the
> beginning of time itself
We can always measure north more accurately by whatever parameters we
define.
If there's a beginning to time then what started it or what made what
started time. What made what made dark matter. The paradox
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 02:50:50PM -0400, marc wrote:
>
> I'm deciding between kde, xfce, gnome, and fluxbox (in order of
> preference). Any experiences? Any relevant security issues on any of them?
>
> Thanks,
> Marc
>
Hello, list!
Just for my information:
I can not even imagine 'security issue
If you want security use something with a smaller code base or no xorg
at all (switch off the x aperture with sysctl), if you want features,
use your choice of kde.
> I've always found it important to believe in something. I'm of the belief
> that I'm always right and everyone else is wrong. It
- Original Message -
| thx bryan.
|
| btw. im atheist.
I've always found it important to believe in something. I'm of the belief that
I'm always right and everyone else is wrong. It helps me get through the day.
;)
--
James A. Peltier
IT Services - Research Computing Group
Simon Fra
Hey Brian,
thanks for asking this question, saved me from having to type this
out...quietly awaiting response now.
-F
- Original Message -
From: marc
Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 1:33 pm
Subject: Re: Choosing a window manager...
To: Bryan Irvine
Cc: marc , misc@openbsd.org
>
thx bryan.
btw. im atheist.
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:50 AM, marc wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm deciding between kde, xfce, gnome, and fluxbox (in order of
>> preference). Any experiences? Any relevant security issues on any of
>> them?
>
> what's wrong with afterstep? ;-)
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:03:02PM -0700, Kevin Smith spoke thusly:
> > I'm deciding between kde, xfce, gnome, and fluxbox (in order of
> > preference). Any experiences? Any relevant security issues on any of them?
> >
>
> What you're asking is akin to:
>
> "Hey everyone, I'm trying to decide be
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 17:56, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> This is really funny.
>
>> I'd suggest kde, xfce, gnome, and then fluxbox, according to your preference.
>
>
Scrotwm... it's like tmux, but for your desktop. Easy, light,
intuitive (i miss it when I have to work in our labs on CentOS).
Hell,
This is really funny.
> I'd suggest kde, xfce, gnome, and then fluxbox, according to your preference.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:50 PM, marc wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm deciding between kde, xfce, gnome, and fluxbox (in order of
> preference). Any experiences? Any relevant security issues on any of them?
>
> Thanks,
> Marc
I'd suggest kde, xfce, gnome, and then fluxbox, according to your preference.
> > I'm deciding between kde, xfce, gnome, and fluxbox (in order of
> > preference). Any experiences? Any relevant security issues on any of them?
>
> what's wrong with afterstep? ;-)
It used to be better when its name was written `bowman'.
Grumpy
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> What you're asking is akin to:
>
> "Hey everyone, I'm trying to decide between:
> Catholicism, Judaism, Buddhism, and Hinduism.
>
> What's the best?"
rotfl :) :)
You made my day.
cheers,
david
On Mar 15 14:50:50, marc wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm deciding between kde, xfce, gnome, and fluxbox (in order of
> preference).
If that's your order of preference, then KDE, obviously.
> Any experiences? Any relevant security issues on any of them?
>
> Thanks,
> Marc
you should consider buddhism the way to real life, to get freedom in your
mind, in your heart and on your computers ...
>
> From: Bret Lambert
> Sent: Tue Mar 15 21:22:32 CET 2011
> To: Kevin Smith
> Subject: Re: Choosing a window manager.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> I'm deciding between kde, xfce, gnome, and fluxbox (in order of
>> preference). Any experiences? Any relevant security issues on any of them?
>>
>
> What you're asking is akin to:
>
> "Hey everyone, I'm trying to decide between:
> Catholicism
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> What you're asking is akin to:
>
> "Hey everyone, I'm trying to decide between:
> Catholicism, Judaism, Buddhism, and Hinduism.
>
> What's the best?"
>
Buddhism, you dummy!
:-)
--
chs,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:50 AM, marc wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm deciding between kde, xfce, gnome, and fluxbox (in order of
> preference). Any experiences? Any relevant security issues on any of them?
what's wrong with afterstep? ;-)
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:03:02 -0700
Kevin Smith wrote:
> > I'm deciding between kde, xfce, gnome, and fluxbox (in order of
> > preference). Any experiences? Any relevant security issues on any of them?
> >
>
> What you're asking is akin to:
>
> "Hey everyone, I'm trying to decide between:
> Cath
> I'm deciding between kde, xfce, gnome, and fluxbox (in order of
> preference). Any experiences? Any relevant security issues on any of them?
>
What you're asking is akin to:
"Hey everyone, I'm trying to decide between:
Catholicism, Judaism, Buddhism, and Hinduism.
What's the best?"
Hi all,
I'm deciding between kde, xfce, gnome, and fluxbox (in order of
preference). Any experiences? Any relevant security issues on any of them?
Thanks,
Marc
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Peter Hessler wrote:
> ln -s .xinitrc .xsession
>
>
> On 2009 Aug 19 (Wed) at 11:32:05 + (+), Chris wrote:
> :I am trying to get a new wm (scrotwm) and added it to .xinitrc but
> :it's not working. Every time I press ALT-CRTL-Backspace and log back
> :again
keep it simple.
#!/bin/sh
#
exec scrotwm
#
#exec /usr/X11R6/bin/scrotwm
#
2009/8/19 Joachim Schipper :
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:32:05AM +, Chris wrote:
>> I am trying to get a new wm (scrotwm) and added it to .xinitrc but
>> it's not working. Every time I press ALT-CRTL-Backspace and log
ln -s .xinitrc .xsession
On 2009 Aug 19 (Wed) at 11:32:05 + (+), Chris wrote:
:I am trying to get a new wm (scrotwm) and added it to .xinitrc but
:it's not working. Every time I press ALT-CRTL-Backspace and log back
:again, I get landed on fvwm. Not sure what I'm doing wrong.
:The same .x
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:32:05AM +, Chris wrote:
> I am trying to get a new wm (scrotwm) and added it to .xinitrc but
> it's not working. Every time I press ALT-CRTL-Backspace and log back
^^^
> again, I get landed on fvwm. No
What do you use? xdm or startx?
if you use xdm - you should use .xsession instead
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:32:05 +
Chris wrote:
> I am trying to get a new wm (scrotwm) and added it to .xinitrc but
> it's not working. Every time I press ALT-CRTL-Backspace and log back
> again, I get landed on
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:32:05AM +, Chris wrote:
> I am trying to get a new wm (scrotwm) and added it to .xinitrc but
> it's not working. Every time I press ALT-CRTL-Backspace and log back
> again, I get landed on fvwm. Not sure what I'm doing wrong.
> The same .xinitrc works on another box r
I am trying to get a new wm (scrotwm) and added it to .xinitrc but
it's not working. Every time I press ALT-CRTL-Backspace and log back
again, I get landed on fvwm. Not sure what I'm doing wrong.
The same .xinitrc works on another box running bash shell for a normal user.
My shell is ksh, user chr
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 05:33:34PM +1100, Chris wrote:
> xidle -delay 3 -sw -program "/usr/X11R6/bin/xlock -mode bat" -timeout 5
>
> Could anyone please tell me what I'm doing wrong?
Do you have the above line starting in the background (with &) before
invoking awesome? I haven't been using xidle
I'm using awesome window manager and trying to configure xlock so my
system gets locked after "x" seconds if I don't touch the keyboard or
mouse. But nothing seems to be happening after "x" seconds.
I tried to put the following in my .Xdefaults
XIdle
cause it was in base,
> > and finaly I found it
> > > more attractive. Taste matter.
> > ( CWM's binary is almost twice the size of DWM:)
> > 32.0K /usr/bin/dwm
> > 52.0K /usr/X11R6/bin/cwm
> >
> > But I really don't know about libraries and memory
>> What I need is a GNU-Screen-like
>> graphical-window-manager. Smaller than
>> DWM and have a permissive license.
>
> Do you know 'ratpoison' [0]?
> It's not under a permissive license nor smaller than
> dwm, but it's GNU-Screen-like.
>
>
CWM's binary is almost twice the size of DWM:)
> 32.0K /usr/bin/dwm
> 52.0K /usr/X11R6/bin/cwm
>
> But I really don't know about libraries and memory
> usage etc. )
>
> What I need is a GNU-Screen-like
> graphical-window-manager. Smaller than
> DWM and have a
cwm. I think I've never felt so comfortable
> >> with a WM, I'm very happy it's in base and I join you to thank the
> >> devs. Thanks !
> >
> > Really..? So a tilling window manager was not your thing?
>
> kind of, tought you can use dwm without
y happy it's in base and I join you to thank the
>> devs. Thanks !
>
> Really..? So a tilling window manager was not your thing?
kind of, tought you can use dwm without tilling. I like the idea I
don't have to care about sizing or placing the windows. Anyway at the
end they wher
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:08:47AM +, Nicolas Legrand wrote:
> Igor Zinovik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm moving from dwm to cwm. I think I've never felt so comfortable
> with a WM, I'm very happy it's in base and I join you to thank the
> devs. T
ng with new tool called cwm.
> I like to thank (thank you, thank you, thank you) Owain Ainsorth, Okan
> Demirmen and all other who brought this brilliant tool to the base!
>
> Definitely it is a fastest window manager i ever used. Very comfortable
> and keyboard oriented. A bit stra
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 05:45:09AM +0400, Igor Zinovik wrote:
> Definitely it is a fastest window manager i ever used. Very comfortable
> and keyboard oriented. A bit strange (no window titles), now i have to
> modify my shell prompt to see what machine i use, but it worth it.
> Bye,
ant tool to the base!
>
> Definitely it is a fastest window manager i ever used. Very comfortable
> and keyboard oriented. A bit strange (no window titles), now i have to
> modify my shell prompt to see what machine i use, but it worth it.
> Bye, bye Openbox, you lacked `exec' f
fluxbux > cwm.
Seriously, cwm can't even compete with fluxy... cwm is for people for people
who seem to forget their using X.
Get the drift? :D
Hello.
Yesterday i upgraded my X and now i'm playing with new tool called cwm.
I like to thank (thank you, thank you, thank you) Owain Ainsorth, Okan
Demirmen and all other who brought this brilliant tool to the base!
Definitely it is a fastest window manager i ever used.
I like blackbox.
2008/5/5 Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I dont know if it is the place to ask it, but that window manager uses? And
> why?
>
> Regards
blackbox, because is easy config
Regards.
Dmitri.-
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 09:32:47PM +0200, Manuel Wildauer wrote:
> Fluxbox
>
> On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:29:42PM -0300, Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez wrote:
> > I dont know if it is the place to ask it, but that window manager us
Fluxbox
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:29:42PM -0300, Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez wrote:
> I dont know if it is the place to ask it, but that window manager uses? And
> why?
>
> Regards
---end quoted text---
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:39:03AM -0700, andrew fresh wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 01:18:06PM +0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:29:42PM -0300, Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez wrote:
> > > I dont know if it is the place to ask it, but that window manage
18:06PM +0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:29:42PM -0300, Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez
> wrote:
> > > I dont know if it is the place to ask it, but that window manager
> uses? And
> > > why?
> >
> > I use cwm (its in base)
>
> I have to ag
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 01:18:06PM +0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
> On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:29:42PM -0300, Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez wrote:
> > I dont know if it is the place to ask it, but that window manager uses? And
> > why?
>
> I use cwm (its in base)
I have to agree wit
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:29:42PM -0300, Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez wrote:
> I dont know if it is the place to ask it, but that window manager uses? And
> why?
I use cwm (its in base)
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if fvwm (default) had a traybar (and taskbar) for programs like pidgin or
> aMSN, that4s be great.
if you don't like fvwm (it's certainly ugly) you can try the options
mentioned. I prefer KDE.
By the way, there
John Nietzsche wrote:
Does anybody knows how to get multiple workspace in openmotif that
comes with openbsd 4.3 ?
Thanks in advance.
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I dont know if it is the place to ask it, but that window manage
till very usable. If you like ultralight
things look at a dynamic window manager (dwm). It has less than 2000 lines
of C code.
Best,
Predrag
> 2008/5/5 Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:16:06PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>> > On S
Does anybody knows how to get multiple workspace in openmotif that
comes with openbsd 4.3 ?
Thanks in advance.
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I dont know if it is the place to ask it, but that window manager uses? And
> why?
>
> Regards
driguez
> wrote:
> > > I dont know if it is the place to ask it, but that window manager
> uses? And
> > > why?
> >
> >
> > I don't understand the question. Are you asking what window manager I
> > use? icewm: small, easy to configure, has a taskbar
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
