Hi,
I setup a tunnel between a pix and an openbsd isakmpd to
connect two networks behind each tunnel endpoint.
pinging through the tunnel from both sides works, for
the first 15 minutes. then the ping stops working.
When I recreate the tunnel, then the ping starts to
work
Hello all,
I bought D-Link G650 (ath) - which is present in
http://openbsd.org/i386.html list.
When I put this card into my laptop (Toshiba Satellite S6157) and try boot
-current (GENERIC) I
get panic message at the end of boot.
= panic message =
On 20:52 Wed 12 Sep , Pau Amaro-Seoane wrote:
You'll notice that Mark Kohut (Lenovo's worldwide analyst) cannot tell
the difference between linux and BSD (both freebsd and openbsd fall in
the category of linux) but, in any case, maybe you feel like
clicking the OpenBSD entry... I did
If I remember correctly, you have to use FS type RAID, and not FS type FS_RAID.
for the partition layout, the /boot on 100MB is to allow the machine
to boot, but after that, you put all your files in logical
subdivisions of the raid array.
I my case, I didn't use wd*a (/boot) in the /etc/fstab, as
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:15:50PM -0700, Jake Conk wrote:
Hey,
I tried following that article but I got stuck at the part where you
start partition your second drive. I created the first partition with
100mb and type of 4.2 BSD then when I tried to create the second
partition on my drive
Hello Miod,
Thursday, September 13, 2007, 10:58:21 AM, you wrote:
I bought D-Link G650 (ath) - which is present in
http://openbsd.org/i386.html list.
When I put this card into my laptop (Toshiba Satellite S6157) and
try boot -current (GENERIC) I
get panic message at the end of boot.
Hello Evgeniy,
Thursday, September 13, 2007, 10:41:53 AM, you wrote:
Hello all,
I bought D-Link G650 (ath) - which is present in
http://openbsd.org/i386.html list.
When I put this card into my laptop (Toshiba Satellite S6157) and try boot
-current (GENERIC) I
get panic message at the
On 2007/09/13 10:10, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
By the way, I recall rumours about some other RAID implementation coming
in OpenBSD 4.2. Does anyone know, just rumours?
It's there, but not in GENERIC. Note the CAVEATS.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=softraid
Theo de Raadt wrote:
I recognize that writeup about the Atheros / Linux / SFLC story is a
bit complex, so I wrote a very simple explanation to someone, and they
liked it's clarity so much that they asked me to post it for everyone.
Here it is (with a few more changes)
-
starting
http://www.x.org/docs/AMD/
_
The next generation of Hotmail is here! http://www.newhotmail.co.uk
To reproduce the stalling problem I am doing an FTP download from my
local ISP. The stalled transfer shows duplicate acks when analyzed with
wireshark expert info composite.
To rule out the hardware I used IPCop which works fine.
I thought it might be a window scaling misconfiguration but I
I'd like to know why /dev/cd0a and /dev/rcd0a device files (at my
machine) refer to the same physical device, given that one is not a
symlink to the other one, and vice-versa, and also given that cd0a is
a block device and rcd0a is a character device.
The kernel handles two kinds of device
Hi all,
I'd like to know why /dev/cd0a and /dev/rcd0a device files (at my
machine) refer to the same physical device, given that one is not a
symlink to the other one, and vice-versa, and also given that cd0a is
a block device and rcd0a is a character device.
Thanks in advance.
--
Joco Salvatti
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 07:09:09AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
Free software: It's all about the price.
The rest of the talk about freedom, etc. is just trying to keep
them from looking like cheap, greedy bastards.
At least for an awful lot of 'em.
I have to point out that I have been told on
Hi,
I got a panic recently, too, after trying to insert my CF card into the
cf reader, which seems to be connected to pcmcia. As we discussed on IRC
it seems to have something in common. Maybe it's the same reason? The
trace seems identical.
I submitted a bug report... maybe somebody can see
Thanks folks.
On 9/13/07, Miod Vallat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to know why /dev/cd0a and /dev/rcd0a device files (at my
machine) refer to the same physical device, given that one is not a
symlink to the other one, and vice-versa, and also given that cd0a is
a block device and
On 9/11/07, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are no DVDs, it's only CDs but they come in a DVD-case. That is
why people call it 'DVD's.
Thank you so much :-)
I just placed my first ever order by a friend's credit card.
Kind Regards
Siju
Hi,
My X40 disk also died two month ago. All attempts to find that somehow
special 1.8 NONE-ZIF connector disk failed so far.
I saw that Henning has the same problem and already asked on misc@ for
such a disk. If somebody has another of those for me, it would be most
helpfull. Using the X40
Hello,
I have a similar, if not identical, pcmcia problem on my lenovo thinkpad x60s:
http://cvs.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-wrapper?full=yesnumbers=5239
kind regards,
- -
Didier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Julian Leyh
Sent:
On 2007/09/13 15:25, Marcus Glocker wrote:
My X40 disk also died two month ago. All attempts to find that somehow
special 1.8 NONE-ZIF connector disk failed so far.
I saw that Henning has the same problem and already asked on misc@ for
such a disk. If somebody has another of those for me,
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-13 16:05]:
if anyone comes across a batch of these drives (1.8 44-pin travelstar;
they have been discontinued), pipe up, I am sure there are some other
developers with these machines that might want to pick up a spare.
On 2007/09/13 16:59, nothingness wrote:
You can find some here (via a Swiss pricecheck site ):
http://www.toppreise.ch/prod_103419.html
those are zif. the following are the 44-pin ones:
HTC424020F7AT00 08K1394 1.820GBATA-5
HTC424040F9AT00 08K1393 1.840GBATA-5
My OpenBSD 4.0 mail filter (running amavisd-new) has been up and
running well for 70 days. I received a complaint of delays this
morning. Indeed, I see that servers which had been whitelisted by
spamd were no longer so. I verified that spamlogd is still running.
Does anyone have any ideas how
Juan Miscaro wrote:
My OpenBSD 4.0 mail filter (running amavisd-new) has been up and
running well for 70 days. I received a complaint of delays this
morning. Indeed, I see that servers which had been whitelisted by
spamd were no longer so. I verified that spamlogd is still running.
Does
Juan Miscaro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
morning. Indeed, I see that servers which had been whitelisted by
spamd were no longer so. I verified that spamlogd is still running.
Does anyone have any ideas how this could have happened?
Whitelist entries do expire after a while (a little more
spamlogd not only needs to be running, but it needs to
see the connections - your pf rules need to log them correctly.
The best way to see if this is happening is to fire
off some debug level syslogging, and see if spamlogd is logging lines
for the hosts that connect in. You
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:29:02AM -0400, Juan Miscaro wrote:
My OpenBSD 4.0 mail filter (running amavisd-new) has been up and
running well for 70 days. I received a complaint of delays this
morning. Indeed, I see that servers which had been whitelisted by
spamd were no longer so. I
* Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-13 17:25]:
On 2007/09/13 16:59, nothingness wrote:
You can find some here (via a Swiss pricecheck site ):
http://www.toppreise.ch/prod_103419.html
i found countless price comparision sites listing them. and then either
ZIF or listed without a
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 07:48:46AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 07:09:09AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
Free software: It's all about the price.
The rest of the talk about freedom, etc. is just trying to keep
them from looking like cheap, greedy bastards.
At least
On 9/13/07, Julian Leyh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20:52 Wed 12 Sep , Pau Amaro-Seoane wrote:
You'll notice that Mark Kohut (Lenovo's worldwide analyst) cannot tell
the difference between linux and BSD (both freebsd and openbsd fall in
the category of linux) but, in any case, maybe you
On 9/13/07, Claudio Jeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FSF should take a deep breath and apologize to Reyk, apologize to
Theo, apologize to OpenBSD and apologize to the open source community at
large.
While reading this I got a mail that OpenSolaris released the adapted
version of our
--- Bob Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spamlogd not only needs to be running, but it needs to
see the connections - your pf rules need to log them correctly.
The best way to see if this is happening is to fire
off some debug level syslogging, and see if spamlogd is logging
Hi All
I am trying to read-only the system but having a seperate location rw
In order to do this, I want to re-locate the user account files so accounts
can still be added when in read-only mode.
I have tried doing ln -s /confs/passwd /etc/passwd etc.. but when I try to
create an account it
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, James Mackinnon wrote:
I am trying to read-only the system but having a seperate location rw
In order to do this, I want to re-locate the user account files so accounts
can still be added when in read-only mode.
I have tried doing ln -s /confs/passwd /etc/passwd etc..
What is the proper format for entering manual keys directly into the
ipsec.conf file?
Test file ipsec.test:
esp from 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.1.1 \
spi 0x1011:0x1010 \
auth hmac-sha1 enc aes \
authkey 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890 \
enckey 12345678901234567890123456789012 \
#
Hello all,
I am attempting to create an assembly program (for a class) on OpenBSD. The
teacher has no issue with me developing the code based on the UNIX-based
assembly (int 0x80 syscalls vs. int 0x21 Dos Function), but he does not want
me to use 32-bit code. I believe this has something to do
Sorry Folks!
On 9/13/07, Joco Salvatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ola Pessoa da lista,
Em qual arquivo do OpenBSD eu defino o major number para os
dispositivos (device e pseudo-device)? Pesquisei em varias fontes a
mais prsximo foi a do NetBSD que diz que os major numbers ficam em
On 9/13/07, Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/07, Julian Leyh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20:52 Wed 12 Sep , Pau Amaro-Seoane wrote:
You'll notice that Mark Kohut (Lenovo's worldwide analyst) cannot tell
the difference between linux and BSD (both freebsd and openbsd fall
Ola Pessoa da lista,
Em qual arquivo do OpenBSD eu defino o major number para os
dispositivos (device e pseudo-device)? Pesquisei em varias fontes a
mais prsximo foi a do NetBSD que diz que os major numbers ficam em
/usr/src/sys/conf/majors. Mas nco encontrei este arquivo nas fontes do
OpenBSD!
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 07:09 -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
GNUspeak:
These are definitely not the views of the GNU project. They *might* be
views of the self-styled Linux nerds that think they are k00l and
eleet because they read Slashdot, but to imply the GNU project
espouses these views is, quite
Hi all,
In which OpenBSD file do I define the major number for devices (both
regular and pseudo-device)? I have searched in several sources, and
the closest answer was for NetBSD, which says that major numbers are
in /usr/src/sys/conf/majors. But I have not found this file in OpenBSD
sources.
On 9/13/07, Shawn K. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 07:09 -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
GNUspeak:
These are definitely not the views of the GNU project. They *might* be
views of the self-styled Linux nerds that think they are k00l and
eleet because they read Slashdot, but
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 12:32 -0700, Darren Spruell wrote:
Before you embark on your storm in a teacup, re-read (and re-read
again if you still don't get it) Nick's message. It's clear you
missed/misunderstood half of the points he was making.
1) I'm on the list, no need to CC me.
2) Like, duh,
In which OpenBSD file do I define the major number for devices (both
regular and pseudo-device)? I have searched in several sources, and
the closest answer was for NetBSD, which says that major numbers are
in /usr/src/sys/conf/majors. But I have not found this file in OpenBSD
sources.
Noone
2) Like, duh, I understand perfectly well what his point is: to slander
the GNU project and its users. I re-read the message several times
before replying.
out in the slashdot crowd, there is a trend to say anything neccessary
to get what they want, including explaining away actual law and
On Wednesday 12 September 2007 22:57, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Reyk can take them to court over this, but he must do it before the
year 2047.
Except he took most of it from Sam Leffler who said it is OK to license under
the GPL. So while it's good to see you defending your code, it was not
On 2007/09/13 11:43, Jeff Simmons wrote:
What is the proper format for entering manual keys directly into the
ipsec.conf file?
Test file ipsec.test:
esp from 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.1.1 \
spi 0x1011:0x1010 \
auth hmac-sha1 enc aes \
authkey 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890 \
[IMAGE]Having trouble reading this email? See it in your browser
ArabianBusiness.com Daily News Alert
GHMK ]m Gacf^Z:
GaCMO ,13 SHJcHQ 2007
[IMAGE]
GaCNHGQ GaQFmSmI
GaSZfOmI JHdm SfQGp HcamGQ OfaGQ Zal GaMOfO GaZQG^mI
Reyk can take them to court over this, but he must do it before the
year 2047.
Except he took most of it from Sam Leffler who said it is OK to license under
the GPL. So while it's good to see you defending your code, it was not
entirely yours to start with.
Reyk's work (the replacement
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 04:07:38PM -0400, steve szmidt wrote:
On Wednesday 12 September 2007 22:57, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Reyk can take them to court over this, but he must do it before the
year 2047.
Except he took most of it from Sam Leffler who said it is OK to license under
the GPL.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 02:08:21PM -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
| On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 07:09 -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
| GNUspeak:
|
| These are definitely not the views of the GNU project. They *might* be
| views of the self-styled Linux nerds that think they are k00l and
| eleet because they
Hello list,
We recently updated a 3.7 machine running awstat(perl) to parse all our
websites logs with the biggest being around 1GB.
When parsing the big log it randomly segfaults on 4.1, 3.9 and 3.8, we
tried new clean release installs and it still segfaults. On 3.7 it works
flawlessly, on 3.8
* Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070912 02:45]:
On Wednesday 12 September 2007 08:41:26 Greg Thomas wrote:
I don't have much to add other than I experience the same thing with
many Flash sites.
Same here only it does not happen only with flash sites.
Sometimes, just starting opera and
Shawn K. Quinn Wrote:
You know, it's fine if you hate the GPL. But I'll be damned if I just
sit here and let you spread outright Goddamned *lies* about the free
software movement and the people that represent it.
GPL is just a license, hate is a too strong word for it.
We usually prefer to
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 05:25:32PM -0300, Alejandro Lozanoff wrote:
Hello list,
re
We recently updated a 3.7 machine running awstat(perl) to parse all our
websites logs with the biggest being around 1GB.
When parsing the big log it randomly segfaults on 4.1, 3.9 and 3.8, we
tried new clean
| While it may be seen as distateful to make modifications to BSD-licensed
| code, and place those modifications under the GPL or a similar share
| alike license, based upon what I understand of copyright law, it's
| perfectly legal. Even though BSD-style licenses are compatible with the
|
I have been very quiet on this for weeks now, but this really start to
piss me off at the highest level!
The bottom line is original work was stolen and copyrights are not
respected period!
Dance as much as you want around it, hide behind lawyers, word
definition twisted, false pretend,
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
Free as in Freedom! (but Free as in no monetary charge beats
the hell out of taking a stand)
Again, Richard Stallman's famous speech makes it clear monetary charge
is not the reason for the free software movement.
At least at one time (and
On 9/13/07, Jeremy C. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the printed, comb-binded, March 1987 Sixth Edition, version 18 of
the GNU Emacs Manual. It includes the 1985/1986 version of the GNU
Manifesto which says on page 244:
If programmers deserve to be rewarded for creating innovative
On Thursday 13 September 2007 16:19, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Reyk can take them to court over this, but he must do it before the
year 2047.
Except he took most of it from Sam Leffler who said it is OK to license
under the GPL. So while it's good to see you defending your code, it was
Rui,
as you are not a lawyer, you should stop to interpret any law, copyright
questions or give any legal advice from your own interpretation. This will
give a wrong assumption to the story. When there is a statement needed,
please let talk the legals and until they give advise, you should stop
I hope one day soon OpenBSD will adopt a nice ncurses setup similar to
something like FreeBSD with ease to it.
I don't think it's worth putting my efforts into. The current
installer is about the easiest thing I have to deal with from AIX, 4
linux distributions, and FreeBSD.
As
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 12:50:31AM +0200, Reiner Jung wrote:
as you are not a lawyer, you should stop to interpret any law, copyright
questions or give any legal advice from your own interpretation.
Go see if I'm employed by Microsoft, will you?
It's in every citizen's duty to know about the
Thanks for your explanation and quick response, however with
-Uusemymalloc it segfaults almost when it starts. At least it showed
that the problem comes from that way, probably the mymalloc is worse
than the OpenBSD one. :P
We found what appears to be a workaround on awstats.
Changing
Rui,
what have this to do with Microsoft? I assume nothing. Don't let us mix up
this topic. The question here is not Microsoft again OpenBSD, Linux or ...,
the point is that here nobody should give any interpretation without
licensed to practice law. So let the specialist decide on the topic.
On Sep 13, 2007, at 5:26 PM, Matthias Kilian wrote:
Fancy curses interfaces or
even high-resolution progress bars with dancing puffy animations
won't change this.
Speak for yourself ... my professional life would be profoundly
changed by
dancing puffy animations during the OpenBSD install
Now if you'd advice people with something better than bullshit it might
be worth it. You have proven time and time again that you have no grasp
whatsoever on copyright law. You have absolutely no clue and it is my
duty to clarify this to the community.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:58:43PM +0100,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 04:49:26PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
I hope one day soon OpenBSD will adopt a nice ncurses setup
similar to something like FreeBSD with ease to it.
[...]
As OpenBSD grows there simply is no reason, or logic to keeping
around such an archaic method of installation it
On Sep 13, 2007, at 6:49 PM, Bob Beck wrote:
I hope one day soon OpenBSD will adopt a nice ncurses setup
similar to something like FreeBSD with ease to it.
I don't think it's worth putting my efforts into. The current
installer is about the easiest thing I have to deal with from AIX,
sorry, this should go to ports@
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:47:35AM +0200, Thomas Schoeller wrote:
here is a updated port with all my suggestions included.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 04:46:37PM +0200, Thomas Schoeller wrote:
hello,
runs fine for me on macppc and i386 against a Cisco
here is a updated port with all my suggestions included.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 04:46:37PM +0200, Thomas Schoeller wrote:
hello,
runs fine for me on macppc and i386 against a Cisco Systems, Inc./VPN
3000 Concentrator Version 4.1.7.Q
suggestions:
- remove .orig files
-
Steve Szmidt wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2007 16:19, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Reyk can take them to court over this, but he must do it before the
year 2047.
Except he took most of it from Sam Leffler who said it is OK to license
under the GPL. So while it's good to see you defending
I hope one day soon OpenBSD will adopt a nice ncurses setup similar
to something like FreeBSD with ease to it.
Honestly, I don't see why. How does making the installer more
complicated is going to help anything.
I recently sat a friend down to show how easy an install was. This
was on a
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:35:35 -0400, Stephan Andre' wrote:
I hope one day soon OpenBSD will adopt a nice ncurses setup similar
to something like FreeBSD with ease to it.
Honestly, I don't see why. How does making the installer more
complicated is going to help anything.
I recently sat a
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:35:35 -0400, Stephan Andre' wrote:
I hope one day soon OpenBSD will adopt a nice ncurses setup similar
to something like FreeBSD with ease to it.
Honestly, I don't see why. How does making the installer more
complicated is going to help anything.
I recently sat a
Im currently running openbsd 4.1 on my server, Proliant 8500. This server
is SMP with 4x 700MHz PIII proc. Im just wondering, is it using all four
cpu's? or do I have to configure the system to utilize SMP?
P.S. I did show my appreciation, and I bought a CD!
Thank you,
Cyrus
Bob Beck wrote:
As OpenBSD grows there simply is no reason, or logic to keeping
around such an archaic method of installation it now uses.
I await your diffs! Please feel free to write one that works, and
fits on the install media for 10 architectures.
I assume you're only encouraging this
On 9/13/07, Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Beck wrote:
As OpenBSD grows there simply is no reason, or logic to keeping
around such an archaic method of installation it now uses.
I await your diffs! Please feel free to write one that works, and
fits on the install media for
I'm just installed 4.1 on a Soekris net5501 board (i386) with one of
their vpn1411 cards installed. The chip on this card is a Hifn 7955.
dmesg shows the card:
hifn0 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 Hifn 7955/7954 rev 0x00: LZS 3DES
ARC4 MD5 SHA1 RNG AES PK, 32KB dram, irq 15
But SSH connection
I installed FreeBSD once in my life. Took me 3 tries and I am sure some
kittens were murdered in the process. I am also pretty sure I wept at
some point. Honestly I can't remember a much worse installer; maybe SCO
OpenServer but not by much.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cyrus
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 7:24 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: SMP
Im currently running openbsd 4.1 on my server, Proliant 8500. This
server
is SMP with 4x 700MHz PIII proc. Im
Cyrus wrote:
Im currently running openbsd 4.1 on my server, Proliant 8500. This server
is SMP with 4x 700MHz PIII proc. Im just wondering, is it using all four
cpu's? or do I have to configure the system to utilize SMP?
P.S. I did show my appreciation, and I bought a CD!
Thank you,
On 9/13/07, Cyrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im currently running openbsd 4.1 on my server, Proliant 8500. This server
is SMP with 4x 700MHz PIII proc. Im just wondering, is it using all four
cpu's? or do I have to configure the system to utilize SMP?
SMP is the kernel that supports multiple
On 9/14/07, Cyrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im currently running openbsd 4.1 on my server, Proliant 8500. This server
is SMP with 4x 700MHz PIII proc. Im just wondering, is it using all four
cpu's? or do I have to configure the system to utilize SMP?
[snip]
You will have to use the bsd,mp
Just to share my personal experiences with the OpenBSD Installer, I thought I
would add to this thread.
I was a Free OS's *nix newbie trying to get around. At first, I tried Beta
Stampede Linux, but it couldn't handle the hardware on my laptop. I could not
figure out how to fix it, and it took
Darren Spruell wrote:
I've found times where a default layout would have been useful, but on
the other hand I've been bitten more than once by a default layout
(from the sysinstall [A]utomatic partitioner) that didn't set up a big
enough /tmp for my needs. The result was spending extra time
On 9/13/07, Darren Spruell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/07, Cyrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im currently running openbsd 4.1 on my server, Proliant 8500. This server
is SMP with 4x 700MHz PIII proc. Im just wondering, is it using all four
cpu's? or do I have to configure the system to
It boggles my mind that we can lie around complacently, arguing about
installer menus and taking the bait from trolls, while our freedoms
are quickly eroding away. The rights and recognition of one of our
own developers (reyk@) have been molested, and all we've done as a
community is to
Hi,
-Original Message-
On Behalf Of Marco Peereboom
Sent: Friday, 14 September 2007 12:03 PM
I installed FreeBSD once in my life. Took me 3 tries and I
am sure some
kittens were murdered in the process. I am also pretty sure I wept at
some point. Honestly I can't remember a
For the scenario where you have two openbsd hosts, one connected to
the second with a serial null modem cable, what is the right device to
use when connecting using tip(1) from the first to a console on the
second?
These suggest that cua is the right device to use:
Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 07:09 -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
GNUspeak:
These are definitely not the views of the GNU project. They *might* be
views of the self-styled Linux nerds that think they are k00l and
eleet because they read Slashdot, but to imply the GNU project
Darren Spruell wrote:
...
If cua00 is the right device to use when connecting out, why the
missing phone number error?
That means your /etc/remote file is still at its defaults (which
perhaps should change):
tty00|For hp300,i386,mac68k,macppc,mvmeppc,vax:\
As we are on the subject and I do not want to deviate from the original
question, I would however appreciate suggestions as to how I can have a
one server witch can actually have up to 32 serial console to control
LOM on Sun server. I may need up to 48 in one case, but instead of using
a bunch
Marco Peereboom wrote:
I installed FreeBSD once in my life. Took me 3 tries and I am sure some
kittens were murdered in the process. I am also pretty sure I wept at
some point. Honestly I can't remember a much worse installer; maybe SCO
OpenServer but not by much.
I second that! If FreeBSD
I do not have experience with the net5501, but as for the vpn1411, you
may want to check out this thread:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=117826557508813w=2
It talks about recompiling the GENERIC kernel minus a few options, which
has the side effect of fixing SSH connection problems with
On 9/14/07, Bob Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope one day soon OpenBSD will adopt a nice ncurses setup similar to
something like FreeBSD with ease to it.
I don't think it's worth putting my efforts into. The current
installer is about the easiest thing I have to deal with from
96 matches
Mail list logo
