On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, martin langhoff wrote:
> Chris,
>
> i'd bet my head a few months ago someone announced an apache::bench
> module, that would take a log and run it as a benchmarking secuence of
> HTTP requests. just get to the list archives and start searching with
I wrote a simple pe
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Jerrad Pierce wrote:
>
> > Is anybody using GzipChain?
>
> IIRC, Josh said he was. He didn't complain about it. Raved, in fact.
>
> > Is there some known means of verifying that it is in fact working properly?
>
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Sergeant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
.
> >
> > To redirect incoming url's that require database work to mod_perl
'heavy'
> > servers? Just like a smarter and more dynamic mod_rewrite? Yes?
>
> Yes basically, except its not a redirect. mod_backhand can use keep-al
"Christopher L. Everett" wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> I've written some mod_perl scripts that need testing
> over a million hits or so before I deploy it. I need
> to prove to myself and my marketing guy that my script
> has certain statistical properties, not the least of
> which is the question of
Hi there,
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Jerrad Pierce wrote:
> Is anybody using GzipChain?
IIRC, Josh said he was. He didn't complain about it. Raved, in fact.
> Is there some known means of verifying that it is in fact working properly?
LWP?
73,
Ged.
Hi again,
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Christopher L. Everett wrote:
> OK, I confess: I've written (probably yet another) mod_perl banner
> exchange.
Argh.
[snipped impressive numbers]
> That's what I meant by "certain statistical properties".
Interesting. Nothing to do with statistics, but intere
Is anybody using GzipChain?
Is there some known means of verifying that it is in fact working properly?
(Other than watching an unreliable browser progress bar)
Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
>
> > Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > >
> > > http://modperl.sergeant.org/ApacheConRep.txt
> > >
> > > Enjoy.
> >
> > Thanks for that Matt, I did enjoy it - IBM's party coninciding with Suns
> > keynote made me chukle ;-)
> >
> > I eventual
Chris,
i'd bet my head a few months ago someone announced an apache::bench
module, that would take a log and run it as a benchmarking secuence of
HTTP requests. just get to the list archives and start searching with
benchmarks and logs. CPAN is your friend, also.
there are at lea
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
> Matt Sergeant wrote:
> >
> > http://modperl.sergeant.org/ApacheConRep.txt
> >
> > Enjoy.
>
> Thanks for that Matt, I did enjoy it - IBM's party coninciding with Suns
> keynote made me chukle ;-)
>
> I eventually could not make the conferance due to a na
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
> Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > http://modperl.sergeant.org/ApacheConRep.txt
> > Enjoy.
> Thanks for that Matt, I did enjoy it - IBM's party coninciding with Suns
> I eventually could not make the conferance due to a nasty deadline
You missed a lot.
> Did Do
Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> http://modperl.sergeant.org/ApacheConRep.txt
>
> Enjoy.
Thanks for that Matt, I did enjoy it - IBM's party coninciding with Suns
keynote made me chukle ;-)
I eventually could not make the conferance due to a nasty deadline
Did Doug mention when mod_perl 2.0 would
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> exactly the same thing (changing server logs into a benchmark tool) at
> ApacheCon, only I can't for the life of me remember who it was.
Theo, during the mod_backhand talk, or at lunch just before, I can't
remember.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick Home
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Christopher L. Everett wrote:
> So, I apologize for not describing my problem clearly in the first
> place. And again, my questions are: How would I go about proving to
> myself that my script does what I designed it to do? Has anyone else
> dealt with a similar problem
14 matches
Mail list logo
