On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Neil Mansilla wrote:
> I've successfully performed the same APXS make with mod_perl 1.25 and
> 1.25_01, but it breaks with the following error with 1.26:
>
> perl Makefile.PL USE_APXS=1 \
>WITH_APXS=/usr/local/apache_1.3.20/bin/apxs \
>PERL_STACKED_HANDLERS=1 PERL_US
I've successfully performed the same APXS make with mod_perl 1.25 and
1.25_01, but it breaks with the following error with 1.26:
perl Makefile.PL USE_APXS=1 \
WITH_APXS=/usr/local/apache_1.3.20/bin/apxs \
PERL_STACKED_HANDLERS=1 PERL_USELARGEFILES=0
[standard Makefile.PL output is fine.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Mak) wrote:
>Does this mean that if there's a heavily used script on my system that
>needs to be VERY fast, then it may be worth making it into a mod_perl
>handler? What are the caveats of using mod_perl handlers instead of normal
>scripts?
The basic idea is this: with a
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Philip Mak wrote:
> And sorry for my newbie-ish question, but what is the difference
> between "mod_perl handler" and "Apache::Registry mod_perl"?
http://perl.apache.org/guide/performance.html#Apache_Registry_PerlHandler_vs_
including the benchmarks
___
Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
> > I do feel that compile time matters, but really with 60 seconds
> > and high MaxRequestsPerChild, these systems are getting plenty
> > of compiling caching.
>
> The thing is, if mod_caucho takes 5 seconds the first time it hits each
> template, but is the fastest afte
Philip Mak wrote:
>
> In the recent Hello World 2000 benchmark posted by Joshua Chamas, mod_perl
> handler was shown to be even faster than static HTML (at least for running
> hello world), and twice as fast as using Apache::Registry to run a perl
> script.
>
> Does this mean that if there's a h
> Does this mean that if there's a heavily used script on my system that
> needs to be VERY fast, then it may be worth making it into a mod_perl
> handler?
Not unless you get astonishing amounts of traffic and your script does
almost nothing. These are very simple test cases, so they exaggerate
> I do feel that compile time matters, but really with 60 seconds
> and high MaxRequestsPerChild, these systems are getting plenty
> of compiling caching.
The thing is, if mod_caucho takes 5 seconds the first time it hits each
template, but is the fastest afterwards, these numbers don't give a ve
In the recent Hello World 2000 benchmark posted by Joshua Chamas, mod_perl
handler was shown to be even faster than static HTML (at least for running
hello world), and twice as fast as using Apache::Registry to run a perl
script.
Does this mean that if there's a heavily used script on my system t
Perrin Harkins wrote:
>
> > mod_caucho
> > used to look a lot faster, but my testing methodology changed.
> > I used to take the results of the second benchmark run, and
> > publish those, but this time only ran the -test for minor
> > caching after starting resin ( & tomcat ). S
Good work as usual, Joshua.
> mod_caucho
> used to look a lot faster, but my testing methodology changed.
> I used to take the results of the second benchmark run, and
> publish those, but this time only ran the -test for minor
> caching after starting resin ( & tomcat ). So, I'
Good work as usual, Joshua.
> mod_caucho
> used to look a lot faster, but my testing methodology changed.
> I used to take the results of the second benchmark run, and
> publish those, but this time only ran the -test for minor
> caching after starting resin ( & tomcat ). So, I'
Philip Mak wrote:
>
> One thing caught my eye; how come "mod_perl handler" (808.4 hits per
> second) performed better than "HTML static" (768.2 hits per second)?
>
Here are my comments on this from the original post:
HTML static
for the first time, looks slower on my system than mod_perl.
One thing caught my eye; how come "mod_perl handler" (808.4 hits per
second) performed better than "HTML static" (768.2 hits per second)?
And sorry for my newbie-ish question, but what is the difference
between "mod_perl handler" and "Apache::Registry mod_perl"?
I agree with Vivek. With an URL in the format:
://:
The browser will use to connect to on . If you
don't specify , then the browser will pick the default for
, but if the server is not serving the specified on the
default , you won't get .
> From: Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organizat
Hey,
The latest Hello World benchmarks at available at:
http://www.chamas.com/bench/hello.tar.gz
To reproduce the BELOW results on your platform, for
whatever tests are available, run:
./bench.pl -test
./bench.pl -version -time=60
--Josh
DISCLAIMER: these benchmarks test only what they te
- Original Message -
From: Doug MacEachern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Christian Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: 'Modperl Mailing List (E-mail)' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:47 PM
Subject: RE: announce: mod_perl-1.25_01
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Christian Gilmore wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Issac Goldstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: detecting ssl
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Issac Goldstand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
Hey,
The latest release of Apache::ASP, v2.19, is out. You can
get it in your local CPAN or here:
http://www.perl.com/CPAN-local/modules/by-module/Apache/
The big development in the module is a standalone CGI mode that
works without mod_perl, at least on Linux where I tested it.
The rest ar
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Surat Singh Bhati wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not able to run the mod_perl scriptsd as with
> Apache::PerlRun, Apache::Registry is working fine.
>
> PerlRun says :
> "filename not found or unable to stat"
> and gives the 404 error.
>
> The file is exists there
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> Will I have to build a debugging-enabled libperl to get relevant
> information? Or is this enough to understand the problem?
libperld would help, all i can tell is that something in %SIG is being
caught, which normally shouldn't happen at sta
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 09:34:18PM -0500, Matt Glosson wrote:
> Hello. I've searched the internet and found many things relating to this,
> but I thought I would present my own specific problem. I'm trying to install
> mod_perl with IBM HTTP Server (which is really just apache 1.3.12) on AIX
> 4.3
Hi all. I am relatively new to mod_perl so try to bear with me. I am trying to use
the AuthAny.pm module to provide some basic authentication. First off.. Do I put it in
the same directory as Registry.pm? That is where I have it now. In my httpd.conf file
I put the following in:
> I need to save some status informations about each request (in my
> "filter" each request passes through 3 phases : PerlTransHandler,
> PerlAccessHandler and PerlHandler.
You want $r->pnotes.
- Perrin
Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Alberto Canzi wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi I need to use the ap_pool structure. In my Apache Module writing book
> > is explained how to use it in C but nothing is said about using it in
> > Perl.
> >
> > How does it work ? How may I use it in Perl?
>
> wh
--
mod_perl digest
July 1, 2001 - July 7, 2001
--
Recent happenings in the mod_perl world...
Features
o mo
On Wednesday, July 11, 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote the
following about "upgrading mod_perl/CGI.pm shows some weirdness"
DM> On 6 Jul 2001, Peter Rooney wrote:
>> machine 1:
>> CGI.pm version 2.46
>> machine 2 (the new machine):
>> CGI.pm version 3.02
DM> 3.02 is alpha, the README says:
DM
I'm trying to use image magick to manipulate images that are uploaded via http. To
handle the uploaded images I'm using libapreq's Apache::Upload.
I wrote the below simple example script to help explain my problem.
When an image is uploaded to it I get this error in the apache error log:
Imag
* On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 07:13:30PM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> > After "upgrading" my installation to Apache-1.3.20 and mod_perl-1.25 as
> > as a module I can't start apache anymore when httpd.conf contains:
> >
> > PerlRequire /etc/ap
29 matches
Mail list logo
