subroutine redefined

2003-06-14 Thread Batara Kesuma
Hi, I tried using ModPerl::Registry with this piece of CGI code: #!/usr/bin/perl -w use CGI; use strict; my $cgi = CGI::-new; print $cgi-header; our $count = 0; for (1 .. 5) { increase_count(); } sub increase_count { our $count; $count++; print $count . br\n; } It gave me this

Re: UTF-8 support [was : (Re: [mp2] make test fails with 1.99_10-devsources on redhat)]

2003-06-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Perrin Harkins wrote: Mithun Bhattacharya wrote: If perl's UTF-8 support is broken in 5.8.0 doesnt that mean it will break any mod_perl application which is handling XML's or UTF-8 data ? I didn't say it was broken. I don't really know if it is. What I do know is that some documents,

Re: handler($$) unreliability

2003-06-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Frank Maas wrote: Are you using 'lookup_uri' or another form of subrequest somewhere in your handlers? Try tracing your request and see where it goes wrong. I had similar problems and it pointed out to be an error in a subrequest. Consult the mailinglist archive if you want. --Frank I have

Re: subroutine redefined

2003-06-14 Thread Batara Kesuma
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 16:40:15 +0900 Batara Kesuma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the problem? Ok, I just figured out that the error went away if I restarted the httpd server.

Re: How practical is that Practical mod_perl?

2003-06-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Slava, In my understanding you would better rewrite p.401-402 from the scratch for the next edition (which is not supposed to happen very soon, isn't it?). Otherwise, you will have to rewrite Apache::GzipChain appropriately. Whatever you decide, I would be more than happy to help you in that

Re: How practical is that Practical mod_perl?

2003-06-14 Thread Carl Brewer
Stas Bekman wrote: Slava, [chomp] I think it's a time to start a new thread on how to improve: http://perl.apache.org/docs/tutorials/client/compression/compression.html For starters, apache2/mp2 coverage. As I understand it, and my logs seem to indicate, mod_deflate compresses everything

Re: apache::request parse() doesn't capture abort error

2003-06-14 Thread Joe Schaefer
Hector Pizarro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] If the user closes the popup in the middle of an upload, Apache::Request parse() isn't throwing any error, and all the following code in my module savesthe file incomplete in the system, which of course is garbage data. Is this a bug, an

Re: How practical is that Practical mod_perl?

2003-06-14 Thread Slava Bizyayev
From: Ged Haywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 6:30 AM Subject: Re: How practical is that Practical mod_perl? It is unrealistic (and perhaps a little Oriental?) to refuse to accept that we make mistakes, and that we will continue to make them. It is far more constructive to

Need help again

2003-06-14 Thread Oskar
Hi, Thx for help, finally installing Apache 1.3 put mod_perl to work. I have another question. Now I have Apache configured to interpret in perl all files in particular directory. But Iwant perl to be accessible on whole site and just files with particular extensions should be interpreted

Re: How practical is that Practical mod_perl?

2003-06-14 Thread Slava Bizyayev
gzip problem in IE6 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q312496 is over since 1. M$ provides a free patch; 2. those lazy users (who usually don't care to apply patches) are not able to report problems anymore. Personally, I would recommend not to deal with deflate when

Re: How practical is that Practical mod_perl?

2003-06-14 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi Slava, On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Slava Bizyayev wrote: So, what it looks like? http://groups.yahoo.com/group/modperl/message/34174 Looks like a moment of truth. Yup. :) 73, Ged.

Re: problem building libapreq on Solaris

2003-06-14 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Xavier Noria wrote: Hello, I've just compiled Apache 1.3.27 with mod_perl 1.27 from their tarballs on Solaris. perl is 5.8.0 packaged for Solaris. The installation of libapreq with cpan(1) stops here: [snip] t/httpd -f `pwd`/t/httpd.conf /bin/sh: t/httpd:

Maintainers of Apache::*LDAP packages...?

2003-06-14 Thread Shannon Eric Peevey
Hi! I have just finished porting Apache::AuthNetLDAP to work with both modperl 1 and 2. I have been looking at some of the other packages that are lurking in this same arena, (ie Apache::AuthPerLDAP, Apache::AuthzLDAP, Apache::AuthzNetLDAP, Apache::AuthenLDAP, etc.), and was wondering what

Re: Need help again

2003-06-14 Thread Randy Kobes
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Oskar wrote: Hi, Thx for help, finally installing Apache 1.3 put mod_perl to work. I have another question. Now I have Apache configured to interpret in perl all files in particular directory. But I want perl to be accessible on whole site and just files with particular

Re: mod_perl slower than expected?

2003-06-14 Thread Marcin Kasperski
Is there anything I may be missing about the general configuration or environment of mod_perl which may be causing this strange situation? Try profiling... Some time ago I found my modperl app to be fairly slow because I turned on use Carp (and was carping errors and warnings). After

each considered harmful?

2003-06-14 Thread Marcin Kasperski
Hmm, probably well known but ... I have not met any direct warning of this problem so far. our %SOME_CONFIG = ( a = 1, b = 2, c = 3, ); ... while (my($k,$v) = each %SOME_CONFIG) { if( ... ) { return; # or last, or throw

Re: each considered harmful?

2003-06-14 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 11:33:17PM +0200, Marcin Kasperski wrote: Hmm, probably well known but ... I have not met any direct warning of this problem so far. our %SOME_CONFIG = ( a = 1, b = 2, c = 3, ); ... while (my($k,$v) = each

Re: How practical is that Practical mod_perl?

2003-06-14 Thread David Dick
or, as a bugfix for future versions of mod_perl compression modules, before compressing the page, the module should provide the option of adding 2048 bytes of spaces to the beginning of the page, which according to my quick calculations, gzips down to 46 bytes? only for ie6 of course. :)

Re: problem building libapreq on Solaris

2003-06-14 Thread Xavier Noria
On Saturday 14 June 2003 20:54, Ged Haywood wrote: Don't know if there's anyone who actually knows what's going on here but I thought you'd just like to hear from somebody. :) Sure, thank you :-). This is a wild stab in the dark. Guessing that the libapreq installation scripts are assuming