I'd second the original question, I've always embedded the SQL (what's the
S for?) in the code, isn't that the point of the wonderful DBD::*
packages? As far as modularizing database calls, there are a couple
reasons I've had problems with that. I found the methods being rewritten
to handle
I wasn't clear enough... My point was more six one way, half dozen the
other. For a public package, keeping dependancies down to a minimum is a
bonus, as well as keeping performance up by not having to pre-process html
looking for perl code. It can come down to a choice between
maintainability
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Kyle Dawkins wrote:
Mixing HTML with Perl with SQL is bad and evil on every single possible
level.
This bugged me... TMTOWTDI applies on so many levels.
The right way to do something is not always the technically best way
to do something. If you work in a large corporate
My apologies for beating this dead horse...
I am just unable to get my point across at all today.
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Kyle Dawkins wrote:
Tom et al.
This is, in my opinion, circular logic. Perhaps the reason that you
barely have enough time to go to the bathroom is that you're
writing
I've got a form that will (should) send various formats back to the client
depending on form values. They may want the results back in csv, pdf or
plain html. The form always submits to a .html, and the browser usually
expects an html.
I've tried setting $r-content_type and even $r-filename
Ken's right and yeah, I wanted to stay away from Javascript and keep it
simple, it's not the doing of javascript that's bad, it's the redoing.
One thing that appears to work is setting the Content-Disposition header
value to inline;filename=\search.csv\. (instead of attachment).
IE5 seems to do
Yeah, create a safe link jumping point. Something that you'd link to
instead of the external link, and pass in the external link, without a
session_id so that the HTTP_REFERER won't have the session ID.
Don't rely on IP address for more reasons then you mentioned...
It might not hurt to
there's always more then one way...
DocumentRoot /usr/local/apache_mp/htdocs
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond /usr/local/apache_mp/htdocs/%{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteRule /?S=([^/]+)/(.*) /$2 [E=SESSION_ID:$1]
This sets $ENV{SESSION_ID} to the session ID, but also catches it, if by
some bizarre
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, G.W. Haywood wrote:
Hi Allysson,
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Allysson Flavio wrote:
Is there a way to put in our client's server only compiled scripts
or like??? Or can we change Perl source code to decript our files??
I think you'd better read a book about C.
Hi
snip all other notes on it
I've seen a few folks say "my tuturial is at http://xxx", etc. But it
would be great if someone could put them all in a single place (take23?)
with a blurb about each.
I've been trying to keep the email with the links to the various
presentations and tutorials for
available certified folks"... that would
be a much better solution. See point #1 above.
Jay Jacobs
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
follow. Perhaps areas
to cover, standard tests, etc. Things that would lead a person to getting
really certified when/if such a thing exists.
Jay Jacobs
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
folks can take a step in those directions too.
I just think back to the time when I started putting smarts-to-web and
these were the first steps I took, and I looked for that kind of hand
holding as I figured out how to make it work.
Jay Jacobs
-
I was just going to post that url to the guide also... But another option
I've come up with not listed in the guide is to use the *nix "at" command.
If I need to run some processor intensive application that doesn't need
apache_anything, I'll do a system call to "at" to schedule it to run
can't quote a source for that one.
From my point of view, it never hurts to call finish()...
Jay Jacobs
rrency-new. But this seems a little silly. Anyone seen
this before?
Jay Jacobs
cy reference, and
call Math::Currency-new. But this seems a little silly. Anyone seen
this before?
Jay Jacobs
that is of the same name as the request, and
it's completely removable
This also doesn't change the $r-uri value, but I find that kind of a
blessing.
Jay Jacobs
LachNet Inc.
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Michael Nachbaur wrote:
Well, from what I'm reading, it looks like you don't want it to create sessions for
all
discussion about storing sessions (or
session_id) in a cookie and how reliable (or unreliable) that is.
Jay Jacobs
LachNet Inc.
On Fri, 12 May 2000, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
"Jeffrey W. Baker" wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Marc Slemko wrote:
In reality, IE's recently publicized hol
ll contain the session
stuff in it.
Jay Jacobs
LachNet Inc.
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
At 01:21 PM 5/10/00 -0500, Jay Jacobs wrote:
I embedded notes into this with a short book at the end...
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
There is a strong reason for co
issed some points, but it's all I can think of at this
time.
Jay Jacobs
LachNet Inc.
ir users. I don't see any way to gaurantee
that 100% of the people will be able to use a session-based site while
also allowing 0 session-jumping with high-security and privacy. And if I
can increase 91% serviced to 92% serviced while assuming the end-user just
figured out what "click here" means, I'll do it.
Jay Jacobs
LachNet Inc.
faced this same issue and had an ample solution...
Jay Jacobs
LachNet Inc.
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
Why is the session ID invalid just because they left for a week? Ask them
to authenticate again and take them right back to whatever they were
doing.
On some sites bookmarking the URL with the session ID embedded is the
optimal behavior.
24 matches
Mail list logo
