Re: R. Berjon's Mod_perl site (was Re: Coldfusion vs. apache/mod_perl)

2000-07-07 Thread brian moseley
On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Robin Berjon wrote: No need to apologize, we've all got a lot to do. Is it just a matter of committing the cvs or is there more to be done ? I have a little bit of time between now and the middle of the month, I can help if need be. jim took a snapshot of a subset of the

Re: Coldfusion vs. apache/mod_perl

2000-07-06 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Bas wrote: Hi all, this is probably gonna be a longish one. It's about coldfusion vs. the combination of apache/mod_perl, I'm hoping to find some people on the list who have some experience with both, and who maybe faced a similar question. I've been searching the Net

Re: Coldfusion vs. apache/mod_perl

2000-07-06 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Paul Lindner wrote: I've been toying with using the Apache::ASP custom tag feature to support cold-fusion like applications. I don't think it will be too hard; reading the spec it appears you need to make a list of named queries and then use cfoutput tags with

Re: Coldfusion vs. apache/mod_perl

2000-07-06 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote: Take a look - hopefully you'll be impressed ;-) http://axkit.org/ BTW: I'll be giving a 2 hour talk on AxKit at ApacheCon Europe in October. Holy s..t! this is a well-laid out site!! Could you do the same for perl.apache.org? :)

Re: Coldfusion vs. apache/mod_perl

2000-07-06 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote: Take a look - hopefully you'll be impressed ;-) http://axkit.org/ BTW: I'll be giving a 2 hour talk on AxKit at ApacheCon Europe in October. Holy s..t! this is a well-laid out site!! Could you do the same for perl.apache.org? :) Well

R. Berjon's Mod_perl site (was Re: Coldfusion vs. apache/mod_perl)

2000-07-06 Thread Graham TerMarsch
Matt Sergeant wrote: Well of course AxKit gives me the consistent layout, and Robin Berjon gave me the design. He also did a perl.apache.org one, but people didn't like it - said it was too graphicy or something. Thats at http://www.knowscape.org/modperl/ Is too bad, I think this one looks

Re: R. Berjon's Mod_perl site (was Re: Coldfusion vs. apache/mod_perl)

2000-07-06 Thread Robin Berjon
At 09:15 07/07/2000 +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote: At 08:36 AM 7/6/00 -0700, Graham TerMarsch wrote: Matt Sergeant wrote: Well of course AxKit gives me the consistent layout, and Robin Berjon gave me the design. He also did a perl.apache.org one, but people didn't like it - said it was too

Re: R. Berjon's Mod_perl site (was Re: Coldfusion vs. apache/mod_perl)

2000-07-06 Thread Robin Berjon
At 21:12 06/07/2000 -0700, brian moseley wrote: On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Robin Berjon wrote: I think the new site was about to be committed but I don't know what happened with that. One recent my apologies. i've been meaning to do it, but real life has gotten in the way. i'll have it done by the

Coldfusion vs. apache/mod_perl

2000-07-05 Thread Bas
Hi all, this is probably gonna be a longish one. It's about coldfusion vs. the combination of apache/mod_perl, I'm hoping to find some people on the list who have some experience with both, and who maybe faced a similar question. I've been searching the Net for a few days now to find opinions,

RE: Coldfusion vs. apache/mod_perl

2000-07-05 Thread jbodnar
I just left a company that used either mod_perl or coldfusion for our intranet development. I never did any coldfusion development but I did have to deal with maintaing the coldfusion server and apps. coldfusion crashed several times in the three or four months I was involved with it. We never

Re: Coldfusion vs. apache/mod_perl

2000-07-05 Thread Paul Lindner
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 04:30:01PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just left a company that used either mod_perl or coldfusion for our intranet development. I never did any coldfusion development but I did have to deal with maintaing the coldfusion server and apps. coldfusion crashed

Re: Coldfusion vs. apache/mod_perl

2000-07-05 Thread Paul Lindner
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 04:09:06PM -0700, Joshua Chamas wrote: Paul Lindner wrote: IMHO, mod_perl applications easily out-performed our CF apps. One plus for coldfusion, there seems to be more CF developers out there (at least in Austin, TX) but that may be a sign that very few

Re: Coldfusion vs. apache/mod_perl

2000-07-05 Thread Chris Fry
Anyone looked at PHP??? Paul Lindner wrote: On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 04:09:06PM -0700, Joshua Chamas wrote: Paul Lindner wrote: IMHO, mod_perl applications easily out-performed our CF apps. One plus for coldfusion, there seems to be more CF developers out there (at least in

Re: Coldfusion vs. apache/mod_perl

2000-07-05 Thread Joshua Chamas
Paul Lindner wrote: Hey Paul, I think you will have a problem with cold fusion templating logic like if/else constructs. For these, I would recommend having something like a ColdFusionCompat config setting, and we could rip out some of these are parse time and convert them into the